Archive for December, 2007
View from Underground: Dreaming of an F Express
Posted by: | CommentsToday’s View from Underground comes to me from a reader Matt who saw the Culver Express sign on the F train earlier this week. An F Express train has long been a pet project of Second Ave. Sagas, and this sign represents what the future holds for riders along the Culver Line once the Gowanus Viaduct rehabilitation project is complete after 45 months of construction. It will be a welcome addition indeed.
Doctoroff: Let’s go halfsies on the 10th Ave. 7 line extension station
Posted by: | Comments
I bet tourists would be really confused by this sign if it were still there. (AP Photos)
When last we checked in on the 7 Line Extension at the project’s groundbreaking, Senator Chuck Schumer had just called upon the City of the New York and the MTA to resolve their differences concerning cost overruns for the $2.1-bilion one-stop extension to 34th and 11th Ave. As we know, the plan originally called for the city to fully fund a two-stop extension with one station at 41st St. and 10th Ave., but increasing costs led the city to say they would fund just a shell of a station. Six weeks before the groundbreaking ceremony, even higher-than-expected costs led the city scrap the plans for that station altogether.
Now, after a long stand-off between the City and the MTA, the City may be willing to negotiate a settlement of sorts concerning the station at 10th Ave. that should be built now; it will only get more expensive in the future. The first offer of a settlement is coming from none other than the man who first told the MTA they should cover cost overruns. Departing Deputy Mayor Dan Doctoroff said the City would be willing to pay for half of the second station if the MTA were willing to pick up the other half. Even just half of this project could cost the MTA up to $575 million. Patrick Arden of Metro has more:
The offer represented a change of heart for the Bloomberg administration, which had balked at spending more than the $2.1 billion it had budgeted for the project, a key part of its plan to develop the Far West Side. To cut costs, the 7 extension had become a one-stop line to 34th Street and Eleventh Avenue, because “commercial tenants will not move” to the Hudson Yards without the 7, Doctoroff explained at the project’s groundbreaking ceremony earlier this month…
MTA chief Elliot Sander told a state Assembly hearing Thursday he’d consider splitting the shell’s cost, but it depended on the MTA getting more money from Albany. “Under the current [capital] plan, we do not have the resources,” he said.
Now, this is something of a red herring from Doctoroff. When the City worked out a deal with the MTA to fund the 7 Line Extension, the City was originally on the hook for the entire cost of this project. It was, after all, part of Doctoroff’s ill-fated plan to draw the Olympics to New York and a new stadium for the Jets to the Hudson Yards area. The MTA stands to gain very little from this extension. Why should they pour their hard-to-come-by capital funds into this project anyway?
New York politicians, criticizing the MTA for its fare hike on Wednesday, rushed to the agency’s defense on Thursday. “It would be a grave error for the MTA to even consider it,” Assemblyman Richard Brodsky said.
Brodsky, along with Schumer, the City Comptroller and other state and federal officials sent a letter to the city yesterday urging the Bloomberg Administration to foot this bill. The letter noted, as had been previously reported, that the city could pay for the station if they ditched plans for a tree-lined promenade in the yet-unbuilt Hudson Yards development. Seriously, a subway stop at 10th Ave. and 41st St. far outweighs some hypothetical trees that a private developer could probably afford to plant.
While the Mayor’s office, in a wonderful show of politicking, called upon Schumer and the Washington pols to send money to the MTA for this project, the city just should pick up the tab. They’re trying to renege on a promise, and it will become more expensive to correct this mistake as time wears on. This sure isn’t the last we’re going to hear about the station at 41st and 10th Ave., and I still think that, when all is said and done, the 7 line be making two stops when the construction is complete.
Did the Mayor torpedo instant service upgrades?
Posted by: | Comments
When the MTA announced yesterday the service upgrades to go along with the fare hike, I applauded the agency for its fiscal restraint. The upgrades, you see, are being delayed until June or later so that the MTA can make sure its tenuous finances are in order.
But today, news emerged that shed some light on these delays, and word is that Mayor Bloomberg’s support for the fare hike was contingent upon the MTA’s delaying these service upgrades. His motives however may not be 100 percent pure. Is he really that concerned with the MTA’s financial health or does he have ulterior motives?
Metro’s Patrick Arden has more:
While the debate over the MTA’s finances has focused on wringing money from Albany, this push-back came from City Hall, when Mayor Michael Bloomberg decided to support the fare hike. In a statement, Bloomberg made clear he had asked “that next year’s service increase program will not be implemented until the first quarter’s tax and other revenues are reviewed.”
The mayor’s motivation may ultimately be political, as the MTA’s new $28 billion capital program gets submitted to the state Legislature just before it votes on congestion pricing. The mayor’s traffic fee would fund the MTA’s capital needs.
Now, I’m not quite sure where Arden is going with this line of thinking. On the one hand, it would behoove Bloomberg politically to support service upgrades. Every New York City politician supports more frequent subway service because, hey, that’s what voters like. And Bloomberg does seem genuinely concerned about the MTA’s finances.
But on the other hand — well, on the other hand, I’m drawing a blank. Arden notes that this could be a political gambit to pressure the state into approving the congestion pricing plan. But how? The congestion pricing money would go toward capital programs for the MTA and not the added train and bus service.
I could picture Bloomberg telling the legislature that, unless they approve more money for the MTA and the congestion pricing plan, the MTA will have to cut service and won’t be able to institute these service additions. Such an outcome would not endear state representatives to their constituents. But based upon the news reports about these service upgrades, it sounds like they aren’t related to the congestion pricing income as much as they are to the health of the MTA between now and May.
Bloomberg could be playing out a dangerous political gambit here, and I would hate to see these much-needed additions to subway service disappear if our mayor were to end up on the losing side of the gamble.
Fulton hub beset with cost overruns
Posted by: | CommentsThe MTA is running into more problems with the proposed Fulton Street hub. The station — a massive underground catacomb designed to connect the 2, 3, 4, 5, A, C, E, R, W, J and Z trains — was meant to be an anchor in the Lower Manhattan revival. But the project is running into cost overruns. Yesterday, MTA Board Member Nancy Shevell said it would require some “soul-searching” to keep the project at or near its $888 million cap. Considering that the project is already $41 million over cap and construction is very far along, I’m not quite sure how the MTA is going to pull this one off. [Metro]
MTA, Siemens at odds over technology projects
Posted by: | Comments
This sign may or may be accurate. That’s the problem. (Photo by Benjamin Kabak)
For years, New Yorkers have bemoaned the state of the MTA’s technology. While London has advanced tracking systems that show how far away, in minutes, the next Tube trains are and GPS systems that display the same information in bus stations, New Yorkers have, for time immemorial, had to relay on the old peer-and-hope method of waiting for that next train or bus.
In an effort to address these deficiencies, the MTA long ago contracted with Siemens to retrofit the 100-year-old subway system with 21st Century — or is that late 20th Century? — technology. Using the BMT Canarsie line as a staging ground for subway monitors and a few bus routes for surface monitoring, Siemens was supposed to deliver technology that would allow riders to know when the next buses and trains are coming. While some of the L line stations have the monitors, the technology has been far from perfect.
Finally, after making some noise about Siemens’ inability to deliver on their contracts in 2006, the MTA is getting more than a little fed up. According to a report this week by NY1’s Bobby Cuza, the MTA may be gearing up to find Siemens in default. Cuza reports:
It was hailed as a revolution in bus service: a high-tech satellite tracking system that would let dispatchers – and, eventually, the public – see the exact location of buses, information that would also be available via the MTA website and electronic displays. But the project has been riddled with problems. It’s now at least 16 months behind schedule, and transit officials are threatening to find the contractor in default…
That contractor is Siemens. Subsidiaries of the German technology company are involved in five high-tech transit projects, including plans to run computer-driven trains on the L line, a project several years behind schedule and about $70 million over budget. Then there’s those message boards telling you how long until the next train arrives – now operational on the L train, the signs were supposed to be up and running at 156 stations on 1/2/3 and 4/5/6 lines almost a year ago. Now completion is slated for 2009 at the earliest.
As with any subcontractor job, everyone wants to blame someone else. “What we found with all five projects is, in our opinion, one systemic issue, and that is the schedule and the ability to deliver the work on-time,” MTA Consultant Jerome Gold said to Cuza. If that’s not an understatement, I don’t know what is.
After months of burning its own money employing workers for these technological upgrades, the MTA is chomping at the bit to go after Siemens. “I’m for doing the most damage we can do to a company that has caused us an enormous amount of difficulty and an enormous amount of problems,” MTA Board Member Barry Feinstein threatened.
Siemens, on the other hand, says that the 100-year-old system, run 24 hours a day every day of the year, cannot easily accept technology undreamt of in 1904 — or 1924 when the Canarsie Line opened. A few Subchat folks were willing to accept Siemens’ excuses, but the reality is that if Siemens signed a contract with an expected due date for this technology and failed to meet that delivery date, it’s time for the MTA to wield what Board Chairman Dale Hemmerdinger called its hammer.
If the MTA is serious about entering an age of fiscal responsibility, it’s time to stop wasting $10-$20 million a year on cost overruns that should be borne by the contractor. We need this technology to keep our subways a state-of-the-art public transit system, and the MTA needs to see its contracts honored. No more excuses.
MTA Board approves fare hike
Posted by: | CommentsStock up on those $76 MetroCards while you still can.
The MTA Board has voted to approve the proposed fare hike. Beginning March 2, 2008, fares for New York City buses and subways will increase. CityRoom has the story:
The majority of riders — who use unlimited-ride MetroCards or get a discount for buying multiple rides at once — will have to pay more, starting on March 2. The costs of unlimited-ride cards will rise to $81 from $76 for the 30-day card and to $25 from $24 for the 7-day card; a new 14-day card will be sold for $47.
The bonus for regular pay-per-ride cards will be reduced to 15 percent from 20 percent, but the threshold for receiving the bonus will also be reduced, to $7 from $10. With the bonuses in place, the average cost of a bonus ride will rise to $1.74 from $1.67. The express bus fare ($5) and the cost of a 7-day express bus pass ($41) remain unchanged.
As anyone who follows New York politics knows, the fare hike debate has been raging for much of the last two months. The MTA wanted a higher increase and a base-fare hike as well, but Gov. Spitzer, ever mindful of those tourists in New York, decided he would rather screw over the regular commuters with a token gesture that keeps the base fare at $2 and didn’t really help his sagging approval ratings anyway.
While the MTA has long pushed this fare hike an important step on the road to fiscal responsibility, opponents of the hike have urged the agency to wait a few months for Albany to kick back some money. “I think there’s no harm in waiting until July 1, to keep the pressure on Albany and to ensure they come through for the M.T.A.,” MTA Board Member and fare hike dissenter Andrew Saul said. “By taking the pressure off Albany at this point, it’s a bad mistake for us.”
But other members on the MTA Board recognized the Authority’s tenuous financial situation. Barry Feinstein, an appointee of the governor, noted that the MTA faces a “dog fight” for state funding, and Susan Metzger appreciated the efforts by the MTA to ween itself off of tax windfalls. “This is a very hard decision for all of us too make, and it’s an unpopular one but it’s a first step toward fiscal responsibility,” she said. The MTA, she noted, can no longer turn “a blind eye to our responsiblity to put the MTA on a firm future monetary structure.”
Hikes will go into effect on March 1 for MetroNorth and LIRR riders and March 16 for Bridge and Tunnel users.
Subway crime reaches record low
Posted by: | CommentsDon’t feel safe on the subway? Well, then, what’s wrong with you? Subway crime has hit a new low with an average of just six reported crimes per day. Once upon a time, back in the good old days of 1990, subway crime numbers sat at 48 per day. Maybe all of the people who claimed they don’t feel safe in the subways are simply buying into the Hollywood image of the New York City subways. It’s never been safer to ride underground in New York. [Metro]
A subway Bill of ‘Yeah, Rights’
Posted by: | Comments
Welcome to the day of fare hike reckoning. Some time after 9:30 a.m., the MTA Board will vote to approve the fare hike. By all accounts, the rate increase is a foregone conclusion.
While straphangers may enjoy some service upgrades with the fare hike, two city councilmen and a whole slew of rider advocates want the City Council to adopt a Subway Rider Bill of Rights. Modeled after the Taxicab Rider Bill of Rights, the subway equivalent calls for better and more reliable service, among other benefits. Take a look at the ten rights — or “yeah, rights,” as I like to call them — the council members Bill de Blasio and John Liu want the MTA to endorse. (Click the photo for a larger view as well.)
- Fares that are affordable and attract riders to use mass transit.
- Regular, on-time subway service.
- Immediate and real-time notification of service changes and advisories available to passengers on platforms, in train cars, and via internet and ext message with accurate information.
- Accurate and user-friendly assistance for riders to find alternative means of transportation in situations where service is interrupted.
- Trains and platforms that are kept clean.
- A working and understandable public address system on all platforms and in all trains, with in-car announcements alerting passengers to upcoming train stops and platform notifications informing riders of the arrival of the next train.
- Well-trained, helpful station and train personnel to provide information and directions, as well as establish a human presence in the subways.
- Working payphones in all stations and access to cellular phone service while on platforms.
- An MTA website that is user-friendly and can support heavy traffic such as that which may be experienced during an emergency.
- An environment as safe and secure as possible from crime and terrorism, with such features as an increased presence of uniformed police officers and bright lighting.
It’s hard to argue with these rights really. We all want fair fares and reliable service as well as a certain level of customer service, but with the MTA’s history, do you understand now why I call them “Yeah, rights”? The public address systems both on trains and in stations are nightmares; the cell phone idea is hundreds of dollars away from a reality; and don’t get me started on those helpful station personnel.
The council members speaking out for the plan were vague about what they expect from the MTA, but they do want a more concrete devotion to customer satisfaction. “It is unacceptable to the New Yorkers who ride our subways every day that these basic levels of service are not already provided,” de Blasio said. “If the MTA sees fit to stuff riders’ stockings with higher fares this holiday season, they should also agree to give those riders the gift that is actually on everyone’s wish list: decent mass transit service.”
Liu chimed in with an apt appraisal of the current leadership situation at the MTA. “With the new MTA leadership, much of the spirit and letter of this Bill of Rights is already embodied in many ways,” he said. “Recognizing this document would serve to formalize the already existing intent and commitment on the part of the new MTA leadership to truly provide customers with utmost service.”
While I’m all in support of a better commitment to customer service, I have to wonder if a largely symbolic Bill of Rights is the best way to achieve those ends. The MTA, to lay it on the line, needs money to accomplish those goals, and ironically, one of the supporters of the Bill of Rights wasn’t too keen on the MTA’s getting more money. If we want to see better PA systems, the MTA needs the funds to install one. If we went the MTA to wire stations to ensure a means of delivery for real-time service updates, show them the money. A Bill of Rights can only go so far.
For its part, the MTA was quick to note recent customer service initiatives. In a press release issued yesterday, the MTA discussed its recent $70-million improvement efforts. “Responding to the needs of subway and bus riders throughout the city, MTA New York City Transit has budgeted nearly $70 million for enhancements in the areas of quality, safety and security,” the release said. “Additionally, NYC Transit has received approval to begin working towards implementation next year of 32 separate proposals for new and increased services, with an annual value of $46 million. We hope that city and state legislators will help secure additional funding so that we can make further improvements to the system.”
Clearly, the answer lies not in a Bill of Rights but in more funds for the MTA. Gary Reilly, Brooklyn transit advocate and fellow supporter of the F Express Plan, beat this drum yesterday during the announcement in support of the Bill. “If we’re to preserve our status as one of the greenest cities in America, we need Governor Spitzer to commit to state funding for mass transit that will reverse the tragic legacy of neglect left us by the Pataki administration,” he said. Hear. Hear.
Pork for Second Ave.
Posted by: | CommentsOn the same day that the Second Ave. deli reopened, the Second Ave. Subway got a little pork of its own. New York City House Representatives Carolyn Maloney and Jose Serrano announced yesterday that the federal government will be sending an additional $160 million New York’s way for the Second Ave. Subway. The money comes from an appropriations bill expected to pass the House and Senate this week. [New York 1]
Added service could come with higher fares
Posted by: | Comments
Abandon hope, all ye who hate fare hikes. Today, the MTA board’s finance committee voted to approve the fare hike plans. While the full MTA board still has to decide on the hike tomorrow, that vote is all but a formality at this point.
“There is little question that this will be approved, if not unanimously, then virtually unanimously,” MTA Board member Barry Feinstein said to NY1’s transportation guru Bobby Cuza. So start stocking up on Unlimited Ride 30-Day MetroCards. The new fares will most likely go into effect on March 2.
But all is not last in the war for a better subway system. Along with the new fares — and a financial caveat — will come increased bus and subway service during the second half of 2008. William Neuman reports:
Riders would see the first service improvements in June, according to material released on Monday. Some of the changes are relatively small, like shaving one or two minutes from waiting times for evening service on the Nos. 1, 4 and 6 lines. Others add hours of operation to some lines. Operation of the B and W lines on weekdays would be extended to 11 p.m. from 9:30 p.m. Some changes, like an increase in service on the G train, would not begin until next December.
The changes would also create a new bus line, the M13, from the Lower East Side to East Midtown, and would extend the B71 and B77 buses from Brooklyn via the Brooklyn-Battery Tunnel into Manhattan, where they would go to South Ferry.
Cuza also notes that the 3 will always run to 148th St., that the R will go to Forest Hills-71st Ave. at all times, and that the 7 will see more weekend service.
According to the MTA, these much-needed service additions will cost at least $16 million in 2008 and $46 million the year after. No matter the price tage, riders along those lines targeted for service should rejoice, and those relying on the B (like me!) should be particularly thrilled by that news.
Of course, there’s one giant IF though. The MTA will implement this increased service plan only if their finances hold through the first three months of 2008. If the debt-laden agency’s economic situation worsens between now and March, riders will be saddled with a higher fare and none of the promised service upgrades. “If those are not now going to go through, you know, I feel a little bit betrayed about the whole thing, and so should the customers,” NYCT Riders Council representative and MTA board Andrew Albert said.
For all the negativity surrounding the fare hike, these service upgrades should soften the blow of the fare hikes. Unsurprisingly, the MTA hasn’t done a great job pushing these service upgrades as a trade-off for the fare hikes. Had they done so, I believe the public would have been more accepting of the hikes.
Photo of the old tokens and a Metrocard by flickr user MacRonin47.






