<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Money for congestion fee may not go to transit</title>
	<atom:link href="http://secondavenuesagas.com/2008/01/15/money-for-congestion-fee-may-not-go-to-transit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://secondavenuesagas.com/2008/01/15/money-for-congestion-fee-may-not-go-to-transit/</link>
	<description>A New York City Subway Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 12:50:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Second Ave. Sagas &#124; Blogging the NYC Subways &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Sander calls for a congestion fee</title>
		<link>http://secondavenuesagas.com/2008/01/15/money-for-congestion-fee-may-not-go-to-transit/#comment-17823</link>
		<dc:creator>Second Ave. Sagas &#124; Blogging the NYC Subways &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Sander calls for a congestion fee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 05:06:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://secondavenuesagas.com/2008/01/15/money-for-congestion-fee-may-not-go-to-transit/#comment-17823</guid>
		<description>[...] into view. But for the subways, this issue of funding should transcend congestion fee revenue. As I noted yesterday, the city and state should guarantee dedicated funding for the MTA outside of any money the MTA may [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] into view. But for the subways, this issue of funding should transcend congestion fee revenue. As I noted yesterday, the city and state should guarantee dedicated funding for the MTA outside of any money the MTA may [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary</title>
		<link>http://secondavenuesagas.com/2008/01/15/money-for-congestion-fee-may-not-go-to-transit/#comment-17547</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 15:26:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://secondavenuesagas.com/2008/01/15/money-for-congestion-fee-may-not-go-to-transit/#comment-17547</guid>
		<description>The Cap&#039;n is right!  I emailed Lisberg on saturday because of an earlier article he wrote, which characterized John Liu as a supporter of congestion pricing.  Baloney!

Liu and Weprin, two of the loudest voices AGANST congestion pricing, are now trying to reinvent themselves, and the press is falling for it hook, line and sinker.  This is all about instilling FUD (fear, uncertainty and doubt).  Liu and Weprin should both be ashamed of themselves for dishonesty I expect from the GOP, not Democrats.

And the newsmen should be ashamed for falling for it.  I had to expalin to some people from my neighborhood that this was all a sham just two days ago.  It&#039;s frustrating how easily they&#039;ve been able to sell this narrative.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Cap&#8217;n is right!  I emailed Lisberg on saturday because of an earlier article he wrote, which characterized John Liu as a supporter of congestion pricing.  Baloney!</p>
<p>Liu and Weprin, two of the loudest voices AGANST congestion pricing, are now trying to reinvent themselves, and the press is falling for it hook, line and sinker.  This is all about instilling FUD (fear, uncertainty and doubt).  Liu and Weprin should both be ashamed of themselves for dishonesty I expect from the GOP, not Democrats.</p>
<p>And the newsmen should be ashamed for falling for it.  I had to expalin to some people from my neighborhood that this was all a sham just two days ago.  It&#8217;s frustrating how easily they&#8217;ve been able to sell this narrative.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cap'n Transit</title>
		<link>http://secondavenuesagas.com/2008/01/15/money-for-congestion-fee-may-not-go-to-transit/#comment-17540</link>
		<dc:creator>Cap'n Transit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 14:57:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://secondavenuesagas.com/2008/01/15/money-for-congestion-fee-may-not-go-to-transit/#comment-17540</guid>
		<description>David Weprin has been opposed to congestion pricing since before the Mayor announced it, and has been making this statement from day one.  This is nothing new.

The problem with his reasoning is that the state and city have been underfunding the MTA for years, and they could reduce their contribution whether congestion pricing passes or not.  So his statement boils down to, &quot;don&#039;t trust the government.&quot;  Yeah, we knew that, but how are we supposed to get anything done without trusting it to some degree?

In any case, this doesn&#039;t change the fact that since 1912 non-motorists have been paying city taxes to maintain bridges that they don&#039;t use.  When you&#039;re asking motorists to pay a fairer share, it doesn&#039;t matter whether the money goes to transit or not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David Weprin has been opposed to congestion pricing since before the Mayor announced it, and has been making this statement from day one.  This is nothing new.</p>
<p>The problem with his reasoning is that the state and city have been underfunding the MTA for years, and they could reduce their contribution whether congestion pricing passes or not.  So his statement boils down to, &#8220;don&#8217;t trust the government.&#8221;  Yeah, we knew that, but how are we supposed to get anything done without trusting it to some degree?</p>
<p>In any case, this doesn&#8217;t change the fact that since 1912 non-motorists have been paying city taxes to maintain bridges that they don&#8217;t use.  When you&#8217;re asking motorists to pay a fairer share, it doesn&#8217;t matter whether the money goes to transit or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kid Twist</title>
		<link>http://secondavenuesagas.com/2008/01/15/money-for-congestion-fee-may-not-go-to-transit/#comment-17539</link>
		<dc:creator>Kid Twist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 14:45:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://secondavenuesagas.com/2008/01/15/money-for-congestion-fee-may-not-go-to-transit/#comment-17539</guid>
		<description>This surprises you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This surprises you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

