A train Has Been a Big Question it has 3 last stop in Queeen is 31 miles long. They where testing the R 160 on the A but never was completed for uknown reasons.

C train should run at nite cause the A makes about 60 stops to far Rockaway from 207 st which is abuse to riders cause of the long ride

4 train is always crowded and always jam pack but northbound gets easier after 42 st. And most of the time during rush hour does not run 4 minutes usaully more.

5 train never goes to 238 st Neried ave on rush hours any more. Which why Mya has never mention we dont know. They seem to be very secert. It Runs approxmatley 8 minutes during Rush Hours.

D train is horriable it makes the Ntrain goes slow also between The connection from after the Bridge. always Delay cause of the D and they Put the D and N train to close of arrival time at pacfic and 36 st to allow some space so they can got a desecnt speed. Also allow for the N goes first from 36 st to 59 st there no turn which require to go 10 miles like the d goes to go to the elavated track to 9 ave via the west end line.

M train is always being delay due to the J. North Bound Always allowing the J to go first before it enters broad st allow the M goes first Makes more sense cause it makes no turn Until myrtle. But the J goes first from Marcy to go express which cause the M to be delayed. But the R 160 train Helps on the M which runs smoother and faster. J train should run express in manhattan from delancey to chamber st since they are for tracks and two are not use which also is another resoultion for M train delays North bound

I hope some this information Help on some reason why trains are delayed

It takes, unless a person or 2 holds the doors or there is track trouble, 35 minutes from end to end. With a 4 minute waiting time that mean in 40 minutes you are in Canarsie or at 8th Ave. The cars are cool, the announcements are hearable… it is really a good line.

The 6 is pretty nice too, and the 1… not too sure about that one.

All-in-all, it’d be glad to take out of town friends on it.

Despite its methodological flaws, this study is more than just a publicity stunt. The Straphangers Campaign takes the subway seriously. They issue the study every year, so you can make comparisons over time. I agree that any method that would take account of overlapping services would be a lot more complicated, and probably not worth it. By the way, the MTA’s rider report cards did the same thing.

Not accounting for lines that overlap seems like a major drawback to this method. I mean, poor bottom-ranked W train. True, if you absolutely have to take the W and only the W, you might want to have a book with you on the platform. But unless you’re going specifically from Astoria to Wall Street and aren’t willing to switch trains, an N or R (or several) will probably pass by in the meantime. Now it’s expected to compete with the 7?

Then again, this is a publicity exercise, not a scientific study, and trying to measure all the overlapping lines (separate ratings for “Bronx 4,” “Bronx 2/5″, “Manhattan 4/5″?) would probably turn it into a complicated mess.