<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New York City Transit testing innovations on the tracks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://secondavenuesagas.com/2008/10/15/new-york-city-transit-testing-innovations-on-the-tracks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://secondavenuesagas.com/2008/10/15/new-york-city-transit-testing-innovations-on-the-tracks/</link>
	<description>A New York City Subway Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 21:41:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: theloosh</title>
		<link>http://secondavenuesagas.com/2008/10/15/new-york-city-transit-testing-innovations-on-the-tracks/#comment-55723</link>
		<dc:creator>theloosh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 14:08:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://secondavenuesagas.com/?p=1502#comment-55723</guid>
		<description>Chicago just added seatless cars because the train system is at capacity, and they were a big hit despite a lot of negative press before hand. Only thing is, during the engineering to take out the seats, they found that the chassis of the old cars couldn&#039;t handle the weight of 40 more passengers, so they only ended up taking out half the seats in each car. However, if NYCT is buying whole new seatless cars, then I guess that wouldn&#039;t be a problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chicago just added seatless cars because the train system is at capacity, and they were a big hit despite a lot of negative press before hand. Only thing is, during the engineering to take out the seats, they found that the chassis of the old cars couldn&#8217;t handle the weight of 40 more passengers, so they only ended up taking out half the seats in each car. However, if NYCT is buying whole new seatless cars, then I guess that wouldn&#8217;t be a problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott E</title>
		<link>http://secondavenuesagas.com/2008/10/15/new-york-city-transit-testing-innovations-on-the-tracks/#comment-55224</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott E</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 12:55:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://secondavenuesagas.com/?p=1502#comment-55224</guid>
		<description>Question is -- how many of these are &quot;pilot&quot; projects and how many are &quot;pet projects&quot;?  We rarely get a measure of the success of them, nor do we see pilots rolled out.

On the number 7 line, we had those neon &quot;EXP&quot; and &quot;LCL indicators.  Then we had the electronic circle and diamond to indicate express or local.  I don&#039;t know if they will be installed on the entire fleet, but seeing that R142s will make their way to the line shortly (as I understand), it&#039;s kind of a pointless project.

We had the #9 line.  Then we didn&#039;t.  Then we did.  Then we didn&#039;t.  Many people think we still do.  Sometimes the #2 trains announce transfers to the 9.  Is the line running better with or without it?

Were the subway rider report cards really such a success?  How about the bus ones?  I doubt the next round of them will produce much difference in results, only this time we&#039;ll get less feedback, and we&#039;ll all know there is no money to fund improvements.

How about the &quot;paypass&quot; system that&#039;s been a pilot on the Lexington Ave line for the last few years?  Does it work?  Will it be expanded?

I&#039;m all for implementing pilot programs and trials, but they seem to be experiments that never get evaluated, or followed through, at the end.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Question is &#8212; how many of these are &#8220;pilot&#8221; projects and how many are &#8220;pet projects&#8221;?  We rarely get a measure of the success of them, nor do we see pilots rolled out.</p>
<p>On the number 7 line, we had those neon &#8220;EXP&#8221; and &#8220;LCL indicators.  Then we had the electronic circle and diamond to indicate express or local.  I don&#8217;t know if they will be installed on the entire fleet, but seeing that R142s will make their way to the line shortly (as I understand), it&#8217;s kind of a pointless project.</p>
<p>We had the #9 line.  Then we didn&#8217;t.  Then we did.  Then we didn&#8217;t.  Many people think we still do.  Sometimes the #2 trains announce transfers to the 9.  Is the line running better with or without it?</p>
<p>Were the subway rider report cards really such a success?  How about the bus ones?  I doubt the next round of them will produce much difference in results, only this time we&#8217;ll get less feedback, and we&#8217;ll all know there is no money to fund improvements.</p>
<p>How about the &#8220;paypass&#8221; system that&#8217;s been a pilot on the Lexington Ave line for the last few years?  Does it work?  Will it be expanded?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m all for implementing pilot programs and trials, but they seem to be experiments that never get evaluated, or followed through, at the end.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

