<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: R160s make their F line debut</title>
	<atom:link href="http://secondavenuesagas.com/2009/04/01/r160s-make-their-f-line-debut/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://secondavenuesagas.com/2009/04/01/r160s-make-their-f-line-debut/</link>
	<description>A New York City Subway Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 02:56:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Xie</title>
		<link>http://secondavenuesagas.com/2009/04/01/r160s-make-their-f-line-debut/#comment-63096</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Xie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 20:17:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://secondavenuesagas.com/?p=2622#comment-63096</guid>
		<description>I like The New F train. It was hard catching one. until i rode on one at 2 Avenue on the F/V lines.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like The New F train. It was hard catching one. until i rode on one at 2 Avenue on the F/V lines.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alon Levy</title>
		<link>http://secondavenuesagas.com/2009/04/01/r160s-make-their-f-line-debut/#comment-59845</link>
		<dc:creator>Alon Levy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 00:01:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://secondavenuesagas.com/?p=2622#comment-59845</guid>
		<description>They&#039;re already upgrading signaling to reduce headways. Headways on the F are constrained by the QB Express line, which is third in line to receive CBTC after the 7 and L.

The truth, though, is that reducing headways to less than 2 minutes is really hard. It&#039;s been done before, but usually there&#039;s a tradeoff between headways and train length. For instance, Tokyo&#039;s most frequent subway line, the Marunouchi Line, has headways of 1:50, but its trains have only 6 60-foot cars. As well, I believe New York ran trains at sub-2:00 headways in its early years, before platforms were lengthened.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They&#8217;re already upgrading signaling to reduce headways. Headways on the F are constrained by the QB Express line, which is third in line to receive CBTC after the 7 and L.</p>
<p>The truth, though, is that reducing headways to less than 2 minutes is really hard. It&#8217;s been done before, but usually there&#8217;s a tradeoff between headways and train length. For instance, Tokyo&#8217;s most frequent subway line, the Marunouchi Line, has headways of 1:50, but its trains have only 6 60-foot cars. As well, I believe New York ran trains at sub-2:00 headways in its early years, before platforms were lengthened.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary Reilly</title>
		<link>http://secondavenuesagas.com/2009/04/01/r160s-make-their-f-line-debut/#comment-59808</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Reilly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 19:38:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://secondavenuesagas.com/?p=2622#comment-59808</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve ridden a couple of times already, and these cars are far better than the old ones.  Much brighter, and it eliminates the old perpendicular seating arrangement that I have always hated.  Plus the clear signage on upcoming stops, and clearly audible announcements are a major plus.

Two thumbs up.

And the Daily News says they are testing 11 car configurations .  . . my sense is this is not the best option, but we&#039;ll see where it goes.  Better to upgrade signaling to reduce headways, than to do major platform expansions at multiple stations, I would imagine.

http://www.nydailynews.com/ny_local/2009/04/02/2009-04-02_nyc_transit_tests_11car_train_as_means_o.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve ridden a couple of times already, and these cars are far better than the old ones.  Much brighter, and it eliminates the old perpendicular seating arrangement that I have always hated.  Plus the clear signage on upcoming stops, and clearly audible announcements are a major plus.</p>
<p>Two thumbs up.</p>
<p>And the Daily News says they are testing 11 car configurations .  . . my sense is this is not the best option, but we&#8217;ll see where it goes.  Better to upgrade signaling to reduce headways, than to do major platform expansions at multiple stations, I would imagine.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/ny_local/2009/04/02/2009-04-02_nyc_transit_tests_11car_train_as_means_o.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.nydailynews.com/ny_.....ans_o.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://secondavenuesagas.com/2009/04/01/r160s-make-their-f-line-debut/#comment-59804</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 13:17:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://secondavenuesagas.com/?p=2622#comment-59804</guid>
		<description>I rode an R160 F train to work yesterday. Not all the announcements were working right and when we got to Bergen St, the display system suddenly claimed we were at W 8 St - NY Aquarium.

I&#039;m sure they&#039;ll get the kinks worked out in good order though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I rode an R160 F train to work yesterday. Not all the announcements were working right and when we got to Bergen St, the display system suddenly claimed we were at W 8 St &#8211; NY Aquarium.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure they&#8217;ll get the kinks worked out in good order though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anon</title>
		<link>http://secondavenuesagas.com/2009/04/01/r160s-make-their-f-line-debut/#comment-59800</link>
		<dc:creator>Anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 02:57:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://secondavenuesagas.com/?p=2622#comment-59800</guid>
		<description>http://www.mta.info/mta/ind-perform/annual/nyct-s-mdbf.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.mta.info/mta/ind-perform/annual/nyct-s-mdbf.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.mta.info/mta/ind-pe.....s-mdbf.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alon Levy</title>
		<link>http://secondavenuesagas.com/2009/04/01/r160s-make-their-f-line-debut/#comment-59798</link>
		<dc:creator>Alon Levy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 00:51:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://secondavenuesagas.com/?p=2622#comment-59798</guid>
		<description>Do you have a link? It&#039;s fascinating and I&#039;d like to see if there&#039;s a source that gives you these statistics for all train types and all months.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you have a link? It&#8217;s fascinating and I&#8217;d like to see if there&#8217;s a source that gives you these statistics for all train types and all months.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anon</title>
		<link>http://secondavenuesagas.com/2009/04/01/r160s-make-their-f-line-debut/#comment-59796</link>
		<dc:creator>Anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 22:46:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://secondavenuesagas.com/?p=2622#comment-59796</guid>
		<description>R160s also had a 1,000,000+ (1 Million!) MDBF for month of February.

This is *not* an April Fools.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>R160s also had a 1,000,000+ (1 Million!) MDBF for month of February.</p>
<p>This is *not* an April Fools.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

