<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Culver Viaduct work begins with G extension</title>
	<atom:link href="http://secondavenuesagas.com/2009/05/19/culver-viaduct-work-begins-with-g-extension/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://secondavenuesagas.com/2009/05/19/culver-viaduct-work-begins-with-g-extension/</link>
	<description>A New York City Subway Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 00:19:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Having a station renovation cake and eating it too :: Second Ave. Sagas &#124; A New York City Subway Blog</title>
		<link>http://secondavenuesagas.com/2009/05/19/culver-viaduct-work-begins-with-g-extension/#comment-72043</link>
		<dc:creator>Having a station renovation cake and eating it too :: Second Ave. Sagas &#124; A New York City Subway Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 19:48:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://secondavenuesagas.com/?p=2932#comment-72043</guid>
		<description>[...] more on the Culver Viaduct project, check out my old posts here, here and here. After the jump, a video from the MTA about the rehabilitation [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] more on the Culver Viaduct project, check out my old posts here, here and here. After the jump, a video from the MTA about the rehabilitation [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://secondavenuesagas.com/2009/05/19/culver-viaduct-work-begins-with-g-extension/#comment-63792</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2009 06:57:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://secondavenuesagas.com/?p=2932#comment-63792</guid>
		<description>This is necessary because the G trains relay on the viaduct, and since that is out the next closest interlocking where the G trains can be relayed is church avenue.

(MTA NYCT Tower Operator)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is necessary because the G trains relay on the viaduct, and since that is out the next closest interlocking where the G trains can be relayed is church avenue.</p>
<p>(MTA NYCT Tower Operator)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy B.</title>
		<link>http://secondavenuesagas.com/2009/05/19/culver-viaduct-work-begins-with-g-extension/#comment-63253</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 20:20:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://secondavenuesagas.com/?p=2932#comment-63253</guid>
		<description>Aha! Figured it out. As noted in the Post article linked above, the G has to run further because the crossover tracks will be under construction, and the trains physically won&#039;t be able to turn around at Smith-9th.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aha! Figured it out. As noted in the Post article linked above, the G has to run further because the crossover tracks will be under construction, and the trains physically won&#8217;t be able to turn around at Smith-9th.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rhywun</title>
		<link>http://secondavenuesagas.com/2009/05/19/culver-viaduct-work-begins-with-g-extension/#comment-61089</link>
		<dc:creator>rhywun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 12:37:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://secondavenuesagas.com/?p=2932#comment-61089</guid>
		<description>Cool, another train I can actually transfer to from the R! Hm, this might actually help me visit friends in Fort Greene.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool, another train I can actually transfer to from the R! Hm, this might actually help me visit friends in Fort Greene.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed</title>
		<link>http://secondavenuesagas.com/2009/05/19/culver-viaduct-work-begins-with-g-extension/#comment-61084</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 03:27:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://secondavenuesagas.com/?p=2932#comment-61084</guid>
		<description>The &quot;G&quot; is sort of the Staten Island subway line of Brooklyn.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8220;G&#8221; is sort of the Staten Island subway line of Brooklyn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alon Levy</title>
		<link>http://secondavenuesagas.com/2009/05/19/culver-viaduct-work-begins-with-g-extension/#comment-61083</link>
		<dc:creator>Alon Levy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 02:16:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://secondavenuesagas.com/?p=2932#comment-61083</guid>
		<description>If only people whined about the G back when the IND was proposed in the 1920s, the city might have redesigned it to maximize rather than minimize connections.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If only people whined about the G back when the IND was proposed in the 1920s, the city might have redesigned it to maximize rather than minimize connections.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: StreetsPariah</title>
		<link>http://secondavenuesagas.com/2009/05/19/culver-viaduct-work-begins-with-g-extension/#comment-61080</link>
		<dc:creator>StreetsPariah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 00:39:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://secondavenuesagas.com/?p=2932#comment-61080</guid>
		<description>Poor backwards G train.  Only on this beleaguered line can construction cause the line to be extended!

Now about that de facto elimination of the line between Court Sq and Forest Hills (&quot;until further notice&quot; my foot)...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Poor backwards G train.  Only on this beleaguered line can construction cause the line to be extended!</p>
<p>Now about that de facto elimination of the line between Court Sq and Forest Hills (&#8220;until further notice&#8221; my foot)&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian W.</title>
		<link>http://secondavenuesagas.com/2009/05/19/culver-viaduct-work-begins-with-g-extension/#comment-61073</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian W.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 19:58:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://secondavenuesagas.com/?p=2932#comment-61073</guid>
		<description>It doesn&#039;t seem like they&#039;ll have to do very much to maintain headways.  As it is, many G trains already go all the way to Church Avenue, i.e. between shifts or when the F is running express due to Jay Street reconstruction.  Even when they turn around at 4th Ave they tend to sit there for a while.  But I&#039;m guessing the $2.5 million accounts for the need for what is probably one or two extra trips per day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It doesn&#8217;t seem like they&#8217;ll have to do very much to maintain headways.  As it is, many G trains already go all the way to Church Avenue, i.e. between shifts or when the F is running express due to Jay Street reconstruction.  Even when they turn around at 4th Ave they tend to sit there for a while.  But I&#8217;m guessing the $2.5 million accounts for the need for what is probably one or two extra trips per day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://secondavenuesagas.com/2009/05/19/culver-viaduct-work-begins-with-g-extension/#comment-61072</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 19:34:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://secondavenuesagas.com/?p=2932#comment-61072</guid>
		<description>Big question: will they be adding more frequent service to accompany the extension, or will headways increase even more than the excruciating ones the G train already has?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Big question: will they be adding more frequent service to accompany the extension, or will headways increase even more than the excruciating ones the G train already has?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

