Home Transit LaborTWU Is there a Transit healthcare problem?

Is there a Transit healthcare problem?

by Benjamin Kabak

We spent much of last week concerned about the most recent round of Second Ave. Subway delays, and in doing so, a potentially explosive story concerning New York City Transit slipped through the tracks. According to a report in the Daily News last week, Transit took a $1 million hit and jeopardized a strong position vis-a-vis its labor relations when it allowed potential worker health care contributions to lapse.

Pete Donohue broke the story last week:

The transit workers contract reached after the December 2005 bus and subway strike allowed management for the first time to make paycheck deductions to help defray soaring expenses. The rate – 1.5% of earnings – went into effect retroactively for 2006. It could be increased annually and was bumped up to 1.53% for 2007.

While health care expenses continued to escalate for the agency, NYC Transit managers opted not to hike the contribution rate for 2008. Instead, transit brass agreed with Transport Workers Union Local 100’s interpretation of the contract on how to determine if contributions should be increased or kept flat.

The decision has raised eyebrows inside and outside the Metropolitan Transportation Authority. Interim MTA Chief Executive Officer Helena Williams was concerned last month after learning NYC Transit, the main subway and bus division, didn’t increase the contribution rate, a statement released by MTA spokesman Jeremy Soffin said. Williams asked the MTA auditor to do a “full review.”

“Ballooning health care costs are putting enormous pressure on the MTA’s budget, and escalating employee contributions are critical to defraying these costs,” Williams said.

According to union leaders, Transit officials were concerned that they would lose on the issue in arbitration. With relations between the union and the MTA so tenuous as late, Transit reportedly did not want to risk pushing the issue.

The next day, former MTA Chair Peter Kalikow expressed his outrage over the news. “What did we go through a strike for?” he said to Donohue. “So we could give it back to them? It’s outrageous.”

On Friday, the Daily News editorial board called Transit President Howard Roberts a subway sellout. “He must be held accountable,” they wrote while Kalikow chimed in with his own op-ed. He called it a “shady deal” and claimed that the union “has wormed its way out of paying anything for health care.”

I’m not so sure I can get that worked up about this announcement. Roberts’ decision will probably cost the MTA around $1 million and may cost them up to $4 million, if everything goes wrong. Meanwhile, any improvement in labor relations could save the MTA far more than that.

As I’ve written about this year, the MTA has some serious labor problems. They are beholden to a very generous pension plan with escalating costs threatening to get out of hand. This health care story is hardly worth the trouble. Maybe another contractual interpretation would have bolstered the MTA’s position, but maybe it wouldn’t have. Perhaps I don’t see why ex-MTA officials are so up in arms, and as interim MTA head Helena Williams looks into this issue, I doubt she’ll find much.

You may also like

5 comments

Working Class July 27, 2009 - 6:57 am

The TWU represented blue collar employees of the MTA are the only ones in the MTA family that pay anything for health care. And the amount is calculated off of the gross so you make more they take more. Higher paid employees pay alot more for the same coverage as lower paid employees. That thief Kalikow should mind his own business or talk about the many many MTA unions that don’t pay anything towards healthcare.

Reply
cynthia may July 27, 2009 - 10:54 am

Today marks two years that a great labor union leader who worked at ground zero passed. I hope, as her life partner, that Renee English is always remembered for her dedication, service, love and commitment to TWU Local 100. And may all the brave and proud transit workers get every bit of health care they deserve for the heroism they show everyday in running new york city, and especially the 2,300 who served rescue & recovery at ground zero from 9/11.
May she rest in peace, cynthia may

Reply
Mike July 27, 2009 - 11:33 am

Transit workers were never recognized for working @ ground zero even though they were the second most represented agency involved on the recovery efforts.

Reply
Josh Karpoff July 27, 2009 - 1:36 pm

The cost of a for-profit healthcare system is strangling every aspect of our society: manufacturing, retail, small business, construction and civil service.

TWU Local 100 and the MTA should both come out in support of HR 676, the universal healthcare bill. It would save the MTA a small fortune in overhead AND it would relieve the TWU members of the hassle of dealing with HMOs.

Reply
Anon July 27, 2009 - 5:31 pm

Why is the former owner of the NY Post having a tirade in the Daily News?

Why is NYCT reneging (breaching?) the City’s Contract with DC37?
http://www.dc37.net/dc37contracts/economic.html

and what does this have to do with TWU?

Reply

Leave a Comment