Home Asides Bloomberg: It’s like taking candy from a baby

Bloomberg: It’s like taking candy from a baby

by Benjamin Kabak

During a Q-and-A with reporters yesterday, Michael Bloomberg, who has overseen reductions in city contributions to the MTA during his eight years as mayor, got to talking about the latest MTA financial crisis. His comments showed that he understands the source of the MTA’s pain but doesn’t know what to do about it. “I don’t know why anybody is surprised at what is happening to the MTA,” he said. “It’s a piggy bank that keeps getting raided.”

Bloomberg also understands the overall economic effect the transportation network has on our a region, a topic I explored yesterday. “It’s going to make it very difficult for people who rely on mass transit,” the mayor said. “That hurts our overall economy.” So what, Mr. Mayor, will you do about it? Will you lobby Albany for some accountability? Will you find some way to deliver on congestion pricing? Will you renew a push for East River Bridge tolls? Right now, Bloomberg is all talk and no action.

In the end, the agency is moving ahead with its budget preparations, an authority spokesman said that the MTA will not raid its capital budget. It could try to shift some capital funds to its operating costs or use up to 10 percent of the federal stimulus funds for the same purpose. Maintenance and construction, though, are too integral to the future of the city to be neglected. “We are not using rebuilding funds,” MTA spokesman Jeremy Soffin said to the Daily News. “We can’t afford to compromise our maintenance and rebuilding program.”

You may also like

2 comments

Mourning the Loss of Bike Lanes - City Room Blog - NYTimes.com December 10, 2009 - 2:17 pm

[…] “A piggy bank that keeps getting raided”: parsing the mayor’s assessment of the M.T.A. [Second Avenue Sagas] […]

Reply
Larry Littlefield December 10, 2009 - 2:38 pm

“We are not using rebuilding funds,” MTA spokesman Jeremy Soffin said to the Daily News. “We can’t afford to compromise our maintenance and rebuilding program.”

I’ll bet in the end they do it, and unless a whistleblower tells us, we’ll never know until years later when consequences emerge.

As far as I’m concerned, using borrowed money for ongoing normal replacement is the same as borrowing for day to day expenses. Because ongoing normal replacement is an ongoing need. Most of the debt incurred for the past 17 years or so should not have been. It was a generational theft.

Reply

Leave a Comment