<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Against the use of capital funds to cover the gap</title>
	<atom:link href="http://secondavenuesagas.com/2009/12/17/against-the-use-of-capital-funds-to-cover-the-gap/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://secondavenuesagas.com/2009/12/17/against-the-use-of-capital-funds-to-cover-the-gap/</link>
	<description>A New York City Subway Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 04:42:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: APTA speaks out against the use of stimulus funds for operating deficits :: Second Ave. Sagas</title>
		<link>http://secondavenuesagas.com/2009/12/17/against-the-use-of-capital-funds-to-cover-the-gap/#comment-75073</link>
		<dc:creator>APTA speaks out against the use of stimulus funds for operating deficits :: Second Ave. Sagas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 20:08:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://secondavenuesagas.com/?p=4571#comment-75073</guid>
		<description>[...] to cover operating deficits while others — such as the Regional Plan Association and I — have come out against the use of capital funds as an operating band aid. In my view, it simply sets a bad precedent and allows state legislatures to further shirk [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to cover operating deficits while others — such as the Regional Plan Association and I — have come out against the use of capital funds as an operating band aid. In my view, it simply sets a bad precedent and allows state legislatures to further shirk [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fighting for and fighting against the MTA :: Second Ave. Sagas &#124; A New York City Subway Blog</title>
		<link>http://secondavenuesagas.com/2009/12/17/against-the-use-of-capital-funds-to-cover-the-gap/#comment-70761</link>
		<dc:creator>Fighting for and fighting against the MTA :: Second Ave. Sagas &#124; A New York City Subway Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 15:22:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://secondavenuesagas.com/?p=4571#comment-70761</guid>
		<description>[...] and one paragraph calling upon the MTA to shift stimulus funds to cover the operating deficit (a plan with which I disagree). At the same time as the group is fighting against the MTA, it is also trying to fight for the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and one paragraph calling upon the MTA to shift stimulus funds to cover the operating deficit (a plan with which I disagree). At the same time as the group is fighting against the MTA, it is also trying to fight for the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Using stimulus funds but from another source :: Second Ave. Sagas &#124; A New York City Subway Blog</title>
		<link>http://secondavenuesagas.com/2009/12/17/against-the-use-of-capital-funds-to-cover-the-gap/#comment-68590</link>
		<dc:creator>Using stimulus funds but from another source :: Second Ave. Sagas &#124; A New York City Subway Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 22:19:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://secondavenuesagas.com/?p=4571#comment-68590</guid>
		<description>[...] week, I explained why I was not in favor of Gene Russianoff&#8217;s plan to use stimulus funds to cover the MTA operating gap. It&#8217;s not sound policy to move money [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] week, I explained why I was not in favor of Gene Russianoff&#8217;s plan to use stimulus funds to cover the MTA operating gap. It&#8217;s not sound policy to move money [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Art Nudell</title>
		<link>http://secondavenuesagas.com/2009/12/17/against-the-use-of-capital-funds-to-cover-the-gap/#comment-68521</link>
		<dc:creator>Art Nudell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 04:11:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://secondavenuesagas.com/?p=4571#comment-68521</guid>
		<description>The federal government (FTA) assumes the cost of financing &quot;new Start&quot; Projects like SAS and the LIRRs East Side Access (ESA) will be 22.8% of the total budget, which adds to the current $2 billion finance costs out of $12 billion in the operating budget. These costs are generated by service to relatively few riders- a few hundred thousand riders in the cae of the SAS and the ESA-but paid by fare increases and service cuts to millions of the rest of us!
The SAS could be completed without a 96th street station (and augmented by street level bus rapid transit (BRT)with dedicated lanes at a fraction of the cost), saving $2 billion plus finance costs. (The 86th street station will have the heaviest usage); the ESA could be brought directly into Grand Central&#039;s lower level, rather than a $3 billion elaborate new terminal of dubious safety 17 stories below ground which could be turned into a 9/11 disaster by terrorists, a broken water main, or Con Edison!
Why does every one assume the MTA knows better??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The federal government (FTA) assumes the cost of financing &#8220;new Start&#8221; Projects like SAS and the LIRRs East Side Access (ESA) will be 22.8% of the total budget, which adds to the current $2 billion finance costs out of $12 billion in the operating budget. These costs are generated by service to relatively few riders- a few hundred thousand riders in the cae of the SAS and the ESA-but paid by fare increases and service cuts to millions of the rest of us!<br />
The SAS could be completed without a 96th street station (and augmented by street level bus rapid transit (BRT)with dedicated lanes at a fraction of the cost), saving $2 billion plus finance costs. (The 86th street station will have the heaviest usage); the ESA could be brought directly into Grand Central&#8217;s lower level, rather than a $3 billion elaborate new terminal of dubious safety 17 stories below ground which could be turned into a 9/11 disaster by terrorists, a broken water main, or Con Edison!<br />
Why does every one assume the MTA knows better??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Many answers, but no real soltuions, for MTA funding :: Second Ave. Sagas &#124; A New York City Subway Blog</title>
		<link>http://secondavenuesagas.com/2009/12/17/against-the-use-of-capital-funds-to-cover-the-gap/#comment-68470</link>
		<dc:creator>Many answers, but no real soltuions, for MTA funding :: Second Ave. Sagas &#124; A New York City Subway Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 06:48:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://secondavenuesagas.com/?p=4571#comment-68470</guid>
		<description>[...] We know that some advocates are pushing a move to cover the operating gap with capital funds — a misguided idea at best — but other officials are searching for ways to provide for a steadier stream of transit [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] We know that some advocates are pushing a move to cover the operating gap with capital funds — a misguided idea at best — but other officials are searching for ways to provide for a steadier stream of transit [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rhywun</title>
		<link>http://secondavenuesagas.com/2009/12/17/against-the-use-of-capital-funds-to-cover-the-gap/#comment-68465</link>
		<dc:creator>rhywun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 03:50:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://secondavenuesagas.com/?p=4571#comment-68465</guid>
		<description>The good news is that certain state politicians are making noise about how relying on capital funds to cover operations would put us back in the mess we had in the 70s. Which is very good news indeed, given the usual political game of relying on one-time gimmicks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The good news is that certain state politicians are making noise about how relying on capital funds to cover operations would put us back in the mess we had in the 70s. Which is very good news indeed, given the usual political game of relying on one-time gimmicks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alon Levy</title>
		<link>http://secondavenuesagas.com/2009/12/17/against-the-use-of-capital-funds-to-cover-the-gap/#comment-68439</link>
		<dc:creator>Alon Levy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 23:12:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://secondavenuesagas.com/?p=4571#comment-68439</guid>
		<description>Why would any private company in its right mind build a subway at $1.7 billion per km? In Tokyo they&#039;re balking at $500 million/km.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why would any private company in its right mind build a subway at $1.7 billion per km? In Tokyo they&#8217;re balking at $500 million/km.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alon Levy</title>
		<link>http://secondavenuesagas.com/2009/12/17/against-the-use-of-capital-funds-to-cover-the-gap/#comment-68438</link>
		<dc:creator>Alon Levy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 23:11:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://secondavenuesagas.com/?p=4571#comment-68438</guid>
		<description>This is true. Sheldon said that as long as the full project would be built, he didn&#039;t mind if the Upper East Side got to be Phase I.

In a way, he was rational - at the per-km cost of Paris or Tokyo, the full line would cost $5.5 billion, little more than the current budgeted cost of Phase I.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is true. Sheldon said that as long as the full project would be built, he didn&#8217;t mind if the Upper East Side got to be Phase I.</p>
<p>In a way, he was rational &#8211; at the per-km cost of Paris or Tokyo, the full line would cost $5.5 billion, little more than the current budgeted cost of Phase I.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott E</title>
		<link>http://secondavenuesagas.com/2009/12/17/against-the-use-of-capital-funds-to-cover-the-gap/#comment-68426</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott E</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 21:26:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://secondavenuesagas.com/?p=4571#comment-68426</guid>
		<description>Dear Senator:  If you don&#039;t approve bridge tolls, your families will each need to pay about $700 per year, per child, to educate the youth.  (might that work?  Hate to use the kids as a negotiating pawn, but fair is fair)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Senator:  If you don&#8217;t approve bridge tolls, your families will each need to pay about $700 per year, per child, to educate the youth.  (might that work?  Hate to use the kids as a negotiating pawn, but fair is fair)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron</title>
		<link>http://secondavenuesagas.com/2009/12/17/against-the-use-of-capital-funds-to-cover-the-gap/#comment-68419</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 19:40:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://secondavenuesagas.com/?p=4571#comment-68419</guid>
		<description>Because it&#039;s interlined with the Q, and because the Q has a bunch of same platform transfers at places, you would need to install fare gates at all 480+ stations capable of collecting an exit fare a la Washington.  The investment is not worth the price, particularly when nobody at the MTA wants to go with an exit fare and cities like Boston are phasing theirs out due to the nuisance factor in collecting them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because it&#8217;s interlined with the Q, and because the Q has a bunch of same platform transfers at places, you would need to install fare gates at all 480+ stations capable of collecting an exit fare a la Washington.  The investment is not worth the price, particularly when nobody at the MTA wants to go with an exit fare and cities like Boston are phasing theirs out due to the nuisance factor in collecting them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

