<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Transit breaks up the B61</title>
	<atom:link href="http://secondavenuesagas.com/2009/12/30/transit-breaks-up-the-b61/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://secondavenuesagas.com/2009/12/30/transit-breaks-up-the-b61/</link>
	<description>A New York City Subway Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 23:51:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: rhywun</title>
		<link>http://secondavenuesagas.com/2009/12/30/transit-breaks-up-the-b61/#comment-69112</link>
		<dc:creator>rhywun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 07:24:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://secondavenuesagas.com/?p=4662#comment-69112</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s hard to comment on this without tons more data to examine, or personal experience... but I find the topic interesting anyway :)

I noticed in Wikipedia that the 70s saw a large number of route consolidations (e.g. the B34 was absorbed by the B1). I wonder if that was done for budget or reliability reasons. I suspect the former, given that it was, well, the 70s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s hard to comment on this without tons more data to examine, or personal experience&#8230; but I find the topic interesting anyway <img src='http://secondavenuesagas.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I noticed in Wikipedia that the 70s saw a large number of route consolidations (e.g. the B34 was absorbed by the B1). I wonder if that was done for budget or reliability reasons. I suspect the former, given that it was, well, the 70s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AlexB</title>
		<link>http://secondavenuesagas.com/2009/12/30/transit-breaks-up-the-b61/#comment-69109</link>
		<dc:creator>AlexB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 05:43:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://secondavenuesagas.com/?p=4662#comment-69109</guid>
		<description>It would be nice if both routes turned onto Fulton St and terminated at Flatbush so it would be easier to catch the BMQR trains</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be nice if both routes turned onto Fulton St and terminated at Flatbush so it would be easier to catch the BMQR trains</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AlexB</title>
		<link>http://secondavenuesagas.com/2009/12/30/transit-breaks-up-the-b61/#comment-69108</link>
		<dc:creator>AlexB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 05:42:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://secondavenuesagas.com/?p=4662#comment-69108</guid>
		<description>The overlap you propose would be over the part of the route with the least ridership.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The overlap you propose would be over the part of the route with the least ridership.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anonymouse</title>
		<link>http://secondavenuesagas.com/2009/12/30/transit-breaks-up-the-b61/#comment-69039</link>
		<dc:creator>anonymouse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 06:19:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://secondavenuesagas.com/?p=4662#comment-69039</guid>
		<description>I wish they&#039;d run it a bit further through Downtown Brooklyn. As it is, it doesn&#039;t even really make it to the Jay Street station, which is where I&#039;d transfer from the subway to the bus when I took the B61 regularly. But at least the Red Hook section should be fairly reliable now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wish they&#8217;d run it a bit further through Downtown Brooklyn. As it is, it doesn&#8217;t even really make it to the Jay Street station, which is where I&#8217;d transfer from the subway to the bus when I took the B61 regularly. But at least the Red Hook section should be fairly reliable now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://secondavenuesagas.com/2009/12/30/transit-breaks-up-the-b61/#comment-69031</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 03:15:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://secondavenuesagas.com/?p=4662#comment-69031</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s wishful thinking in an era of service cuts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s wishful thinking in an era of service cuts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cap'n Transit</title>
		<link>http://secondavenuesagas.com/2009/12/30/transit-breaks-up-the-b61/#comment-69017</link>
		<dc:creator>Cap'n Transit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 20:36:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://secondavenuesagas.com/?p=4662#comment-69017</guid>
		<description>I still think they should have had more overlap, with the B61 going all the way from Red Hook to Williamsburg.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still think they should have had more overlap, with the B61 going all the way from Red Hook to Williamsburg.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

