Archive for March, 2010
Empire State Development Corp. gives Moynihan the OK
Posted by: | CommentsSix weeks after the Moynihan Station projected earned an $83 million TIGER grant that will enable the city to build Phase I of the ambitious Penn Station expansion plan, New York’s Empire State Development Corporation has approved the amended General Project Plan. (View the amended Project Plan here.) The ESDC vote kicked off the public approval process, and the next major milestone will be a public hearing on Wednesday April 28 at the Farley Post Office, the future site of the project.
“Too many have waited too long for relief at Penn Station,” Robin Stout, Moynihan Station Development Corporation president said in a statement after the vote. “As we move through the public approval process, we will also be concluding our design and documentation so that Phase 1 construction can begin as soon as possible.”
As the Moynihan Station plan moves forward — with Skidmore, Owings & Merrill as the lead architects — the costs remain an issue. Phase I is a $267 million project that simply improves access to the current Penn Station by constructing more entrances and widening a few platforms. Phase II, which will turn the Farley Building into a rail hall, will cost between $1-$1.5 billion and has not yet received any funding commitments. Baby steps are better than no progress at all, but I’m not too optimistic that the Moynihan Station plan as it currently exists will see the light of day anytime soon.
MTA rejects WFP service alert parody ads
Posted by: | Comments
A few weeks ago, the Working Families Party sent out an email about a planned ad campaign aimed at Mayor Michael Bloomberg. Using parodies of the MTA’s ubiquitous service advisory signs, the WFP wanted to bring attention to the fact that Bloomberg had made some lofty campaign promises concerning transit in New York City but had failed to live up to those promises so far. Using the subway bullets to take jabs at the Mayor, the WFP proclaimed “OMFG” and “WTF?”
When these ads hit my inbox, I had a feeling the MTA would reject them. They resembled the service advisories, and the MTA would allege that the signs would confuse riders into thinking the authority itself endorsed the views expressed by the WFP. It is unsurprising, then, to read today that the MTA has rejected these ads on exactly those grounds. The agency will forego between $25-$50,000 and may incur a First Amendment challenge. But the ads, they say, are obscene.
The Daily News’ Pete Donohue has more:
Transit officials rejected the spots because the acronyms imply obscene language that many riders may find “offensive, improper or in bad taste,” MTA spokesman Kevin Ortiz said. The ads also look too much like the real thing, using subway-line logos to form the suggestive acronyms, according to the MTA. Some riders might believe they are real authority bulletins, officials said – or that the authority agrees with the political message.
The Working Families Party was looking to spend $25,000 to $50,000 for a four-week run in the transit system, party spokesman Bryan Collinsworth said. “We were really hoping to put some pressure on the mayor,” Collinsworth said. “We think he controls a central piece of the puzzle.”
…Bloomberg spokesman Marc LaVorgna said the campaign was simply off track, in part because the mayor speaks out daily about the need for more transit funding. “Their anger on this issue is misdirected,” LaVorgna said. “They should be directing their anger to the state, which has yet to come up with a successful funding source for the MTA. They should be talking to the entity that controls the MTA, which is the state and the state Legislature.”
Although LaVorgna is right in telling people to direct their ire toward state officials, Mayor Bloomberg has not tried to deliver on his lofty campaign promises and has not fought hard for transit either at the state or local level. The city hasn’t volunteered to up its contributions to the Student MetroCard program and isn’t searching for alternative city-based funding schemes. The ads indeed had the right message.
But for the MTA, it made sense to reject these ads, and it will make sense for the WFP to explore a lawsuit. Commercial speech isn’t as protected under the Supreme Court’s First Amendment jurisprudence, but as the MTA is a government actor, the WFP may be able to sustain a challenge to this decision. The resources, though, would be better spent fighting for transit funding instead of against the MTA.
How the Unlimited MetroCard revolutionized transit
Posted by: | Comments
When Tuesday dawned another cold, windy and rainy day, I pondered how New Yorkers ride the subway in those ugly conditions. On rainy days, the trains are damp and more crowded than usual. People who would otherwise walk or bike to their myriad destinations head underground for a ride free from rain.
Meanwhile, throughout the city, people running errands opt to duck underground as well. Instead of walking from, say, 50th St. to 40th St., the one-stop ride along the Sixth Ave. IND often calls out, and while 15 years ago, that ride would have cost $1.25, today, the Unlimited MetroCard urges you to take that one- or two-stop ride. Straphangers, in fact, get better deals on their weekly or monthly cards if they ride more frequently, and the MTA earns less per ride. In a way, it is a perverse incentive.
Today, the Unlimited MetroCard is a way of life. In January, over 50 percent of all non-student trips came from one of the four unlimited ride offerings. Yet, 12 years ago, few were aware of the looming debut of these cards that have changed the way we ride.
Gov. George Pataki first announced unlimited ride cards in early December 1997. Original plans called for a $63 30-day card, a $17 seven-day card and a $4 one-day fun pass. In a twist of history, the MTA could afford to offer these discount cards because of a surplus of tax revenue in 1997. The agency was expected to lose over $230 million on the per-ride discounts, and as riders today pay an inflation-adjusted fare that is 36 cents lower than the average fare was in 1996, this loss is still haunting the MTA today.
While the 30-day cards then — and still do today — require someone to ride at least 47 times to be a better deal than the pay-per-ride discounts, the new passes were designed to encourage use. Original MTA estimates projected 100 million more riders per year, an increase of six percent. ”The goal here,” Pataki said said to The Times, ”was very simply to empower the rider. Empower the person who takes the subway and the person who takes the bus by giving them the broadest possible range of options as to how they want to choose to use the mass transit system.”
When the unlimited cards debuted on July 4, 1998, they were an immediate hit. Even though plans for the one-day card were delayed, lines at the token booths snaked through stations, and New Yorkers were eager to take advantage of the potential savings. ”Maybe it would stop me from taking so many cabs,” one rider said at the time. ”It has to do with commitment. Once I’ve made that $17 investment up front, I see it as a free situation, rather than a $5 cab ride minus the dollar-and-a-half public transportation.”
The only down side riders could find was the original 18-minute use restriction. The unlimited ride cards could be used once system-wide every 18 minutes, and many straphangers taking short trips found themselves waiting for time to expire. Eventually, Transit agreed to reduce the limitations to their current form. Today, riders can swipe in at the same station only once every 18 minutes but can enter the system at other points before the time limit is up.
Immediately, the savings were apparent. As The Daily News noted, messenger services and frequent train riders were going to realize savings of hundreds of dollars annually. First day sales were very brisk and have continued to be for the past 12 years.
Today, the unlimited ride cards are still a great deal. As a student and frequent subway rider, my pay-per-ride cost off of the $89 monthly card is only just around $1.10 per ride. I can hop on and hop off the trains and buses as I please, and I don’t have to think twice about taking a trip we used to view as unnecessary 15 or 20 years ago. The Unlimited MetroCards changed the way we ride and interact with the system, and that was true transit innovation for New York City.
The IRT on LSD
Posted by: | CommentsIn the musical Hair, the Tribe sing a song called “Initials” in which LBJ takes the IRT to find a bunch of kids on LSD. It turns out that perhaps the kids weren’t the only ones on LSD. In an intriguing report published while I was on vacation for a few days earlier this month, The Post notes a new book book on the CIA that alleges LSD experiments in the subway. On two occasions in the early 1950s, FBI documents purport to say, the CIA planned to test the hallucinogen in the New York City subway. Supposed, the tests were carried out in November of 1950, but no one has ever confirmed the line or station that served as the intelligence agency’s guinea pig.
Did a union protest slow down Friday bus service?
Posted by: | Comments
When the MTA Board voted to cut hundreds of unionized station agents, TWU President John Samuelsen vowed to fight the cuts. On Friday, according to one report, he and other TWU members may have begun that fight with a procedural move that slowed down bus service in Queens during the morning commute.
According to Pete Donohue of The Daily News, a series of spot inspections at the College Point bus depot led to 16 route cancellations and 64 delays of over an hour as Queens commuters waiting for the bus. Some union leaders claimed this move was simply for the security and safety of drivers and passengers while others said it was a strike at the MTA. Writes Donohue:
Before dawn at the College Point bus depot, union officers conducted spot inspections on buses heading to the only exit. Citing equipment defects, union officers and staff delayed 64 buses by more than an hour, the Metropolitan Transportation Authority confirmed. The scheduled runs of an additional 16 buses were canceled by managers because of the logjam, the MTA said. All told, about one-third of the depot’s available fleet was affected by what sources said was the biggest action of its kind in years….
[Samuelsen] maintained the equipment inspections were not connected to MTA plans to let go up to 500 token booth clerks and bus drivers later this year. “The union has an obligation to provide a safe workplace for our members and a safe bus for the riders, and by doing these inspections, we’re living up to our obligation,” Samuelsen said.
The union inspections Friday did reveal numerous defects in turn signals, wheelchair lifts and headlights, Samuelsen claimed. But a source familiar with the inspections acknowledged, “This is the union’s way of flexing its muscles.” Since January, the union has conducted several bus checks at other depots, according to the union. While it’s illegal for a union to intentionally slow service as a show of force, it can be difficult to prove.
These allegations remind me of my bus experiences on Saturday night. I rode the B71 — a route soon to be eliminated — from Park Slope to Carroll Gardens, and as my girlfriend and I prepared to exit the bus, we started chatting with the driver about the impending extinction of his bus. He started bemoaning the high salaries earned by those at the top of the MTA management chain and said that those people should take paycuts first. I didn’t want to start a debate by telling him that those managers are taking cuts and losing jobs while any remaining TWU employees will get to enjoy their raises this year. We had to get off the bus, and it wasn’t worth the fight.
Still, as the union may or may not be hitting back at the MTA, the truth remains that, until Albany finds a way to fund public transportation in New York City, everyone will feel the pain. Management will be reduced; union members will lose their jobs; passengers will see bus and subway service cut. Sometimes, we fall into a “union-vs.-management” framework, but as long as the MTA remains on the edge of financial ruin, everyone loses.
Could a station agent have prevented the 2 train stabbings?
Posted by: | CommentsUnfortunately for the MTA, this Sunday’s 2 train stabbings led to a renewed focus on the authority’s plan to eliminate station agents. Although the actual murder took place aboard the 2 train in between 14th and Christopher Sts., some of the perps escaped via the southbound platform at Christopher St. while the others left at Houston, and both of those platforms are currently without station agents. Today, in the Daily News, Pete Donohue and Barry Paddock ask if station agents could have helped the solve the crime.
The answer to that question is both yes and no. As with the cameras I explored this morning, a station agent who happened to see the allegedly killers exit the station would have been able to provide a description to the police. Yet, we shouldn’t think that the station agent would have stopped this crime. The stabbings occurred on a train well out of sight from any MTA employee, and this seemingly heat-of-passion killing seems to have been nearly unavoidable. When we consider as well that station agents are not allowed to leave their booths, the best we could hope for is a more accurate description of the still-at-large killers. How to balance those surveillance needs with the MTA’s budgetary woes is a problem facing the authority right now.
The benefits and limitations of subway security cameras
Posted by: | Comments
Over the last few months, we’ve heard a lot about the MTA’s efforts at securing its system. A ongoing lawsuit against Lockheed Martin has left the current state of subway security in disarray, and approximately half of the system’s 4300 cameras do not work properly. Had everything gone according to plan, by now, the entire subway system would have been outfitted with closed-circuit security cameras.
Generally, this halting attempt at installing cameras doesn’t impact the public. We’ll ride the trains no matter what and hope for the best. But this weekend, two stories highlight both the benefits and limitations of subway security cameras. The first happened right here in New York when a stabbing on Sunday morning left two riders dead and the cops on the hunt for a killer. The NYPD’s efforts have been slowed by the lack of adequate security measures underground.
As Ray Rivera and Michael Grynbaum write in The Times today, Christopher St. — the station through which the alleged perp escaped — has no cameras, and overall, the system’s video surveillance system “remains a patchwork of lifeless cameras, unequipped stations and problem-plagued wiring.”
MTA and New York City officials are aware of the system’s shortcomings. “This definitely should have been recorded on surveillance camera,” Norman Seabrook, head of the MTA’s security committee, said to The Times “Post-9/11, the terrorist bombings that just occurred in Moscow, the two murders that just occurred plus other incidents that continue to occur in the subway system, we cannot wait any longer to ensure the safety of the public.”
Yet, the Moscow bombings, despite Seabrook’s concern, highlight just how useless security cameras can be. During the Monday morning rush hour, two suicide bombers detonated explosives in the Moscow Metro. The bombers are suspected to be a part of some Northern Caucasus separatist groups, and the blasts raised fears through Russia and the rest of the world.
In New York, the NYPD rushed to “activate” a security plan, Reuters reported on Monday. Police details flooded the subway system, and squads were dispatched to major transit hubs around the city. Although there was no suspected link between America’s enemies and the Russian attackers, the city wanted to maintain a strong security footing. It was, MTA spokesman Jeremy Soffin said to amNew York, a “precaution.”
Yet, I wonder if this response is more an example of wishful thinking and the limitations we run up against in defending an open and porous subway system than it is of precaution. By dispatching police after the fact, it is as though security officials are trying to close the barn door after the horse escaped. As former NYPD commissioner Howard Safir said to Heather Haddon, “There are so many entrances, so many stations, so many people. It’s virtually impossible to guarantee that it won’t be vulnerable.”
So where then does that leave New Yorkers on a daily basis? On the one hand, a killer is still at large because he was able to slip out of an unsecured subway system after stabbing two or three men on a subway train car that is surveillance-free. On the other, we are aware of the security risks we face as we ride the trains and now that, while exceedingly rare, a terrorist attack underground can be a devastating and tragic event. As station agents vanish and security dollars languish, the MTA must do what it can to guard against both kinds of subway attacks.
A Sunday morning stabbing on the 2 train
Posted by: | Comments
As Saturday night turned into Sunday morning, two men were fatally stabbed on a Brooklyn-bound 2 train. What happened on the train remains something of a mystery, but as more information comes to light, the tale is a particularly grisly one.
I first saw the news in The Times on Sunday morning when it was nothing more than a short report from the Associated Press. By the evening, their reporting had turned into a longer story with some details. Two groups of young men boarded the Brooklyn-bound 2 train making local stops. The first got on at 42nd St; the second got off later.
Somewhere in between 14th St. and Christopher St., Darnell Morel and Ricardo Williams were stabbed multiple times, and police stopped the train at Houston St. The assailants fled, and the two victims were both pronounced dead on arrival at St. Vincent. A third stabbing victim, says the report, remains in stable condition at the hospital.
The Daily News and The Post provided different takes on the story with the help of the victims’ friends. Apparently, ten friends were on the way back from a night out at the Cellar Bar in the Bryant Park Hotel. At 14th St., one of the group threw a bag of garbage out of the train car and hit another passenger on the platform. He and his three friends got agitated and pulled a knife. As the group tried to calm down the potential assailant, Morel and Williams were stabbed. “When we left, he stood banging on the glass with the knife in his hand,” Bryan Woods, a friend of the two victims, said to The Daily News. “[He was] laughing like he knew he got one of us.”
Cops are still looking for alleged attackers and are trying to piece together a more complete story. Both Morel and Williams, reported The Times, had arrest records. For the papers, this is a story of the city’s increased homicide rate. The subways, relatively crime-free for years, haven’t seen a spike in petty crime, but across the city, the murder rate has been climbing. Is it, as some bemoan, a return to the 1980s? “I feel like the city is losing its grip,” Liz McCarvill, a West Village resident, said to The Post. “I have to take the subway at 4:30 in the morning to get to the airport. It’ll be me and the people who kill each other.”
That is, I think, an overstatement borne out of fear when someone is attacked and murdered on your train. I ride the 2 train regularly, and I knkow McCarvill’s concerns. Still, what happened yesterday morning is similar to the murder that took place on the D train in November. There, one rider refused to remove his bags from a seat for another rider, and that other rider killed his co-straphanger over a seat. The lessons I offered up in November served as a reminder to be wary of those around you on the train. Most New Yorkers are calm and collected; they won’t snap at an obvious mistake. But the one guy out of 100 who does can mean harm.
I want to know more about this garbage bag that was tossed from a train and the reaction of the alleged killers to that bag. The subways and streets of new york City are safe, but sometimes safety can lead to complacency. A tragedy on the 2 train yesterday didn’t need to happen.
Ravitch: MTA is in ‘serious trouble’
Posted by: | CommentsFor those regular readers of SAS, the latest from Richard Ravitch isn’t shocking, but it’s a warning sign nonetheless. In an interview with The Post last week, the current Lieutenant Governor and one-time MTA head expressed fears over the financial future of the MTA. “I don’t see much basis for hope. I’m very concerned,” he told Tom Namako and Carl Campanile. With real estate tax revenues for 2010 already $18 million under projection, the authority is going to have to scramble throughout the year to stay afloat, and Ravitch, the architect of last year’s funding plan, doesn’t see anyone in Albany stepping up to bat for the authority any time soon.
So what is the MTA to do? It can’t declare bankruptcy; it can’t absolve itself of old capital debts or current employment agreements. It can continue to cut services, but cutting our bus and subway options would risk incurring the wrath of commuters. It can also look to raise fares, a certainty for 2011 but an idea that hasn’t gained much traction this year. No matter the path, though, 2010 will be a struggle for the MTA at a time when New York City most needs its transit options.
Hudson Yards closing delayed again
Posted by: | CommentsAnother Hudson Yards deadline is fast approaching that the MTA and Related will miss. After postponing the planned 2009 closing to Jan. 31, 2010 and then pushing it back again to March 31, the two sides have again agreed to delay the signing of the contract, The Observer reports. According to Eliot Brown, the two sides are now targeting an April 30 date as “the process of readying the legal documents has dragged on.”
While officials know it will take decades for Related to develop the area, for the MTA, the concerns here are in the dollars. Initially, Related was to start making installments of the $1 billion it will owe the MTA over the next century last year, but as Brown reports, “now the firm will not have to close on the deal until the economy hits certain specific benchmarks, showing improvements in such areas as vacancy rates.” At some point soon, Related will pay the MTA $43.5 million as an initial payment, and the real estate company has invested heavily in the site already. But the longer these negotiations drag on, the more the value of missed payments to MTA just grows and grows.








