In the not-too-distant future, the MTA and NYC DOT will begin to install Select Bus Service routes along First and Second Avenues. As their plan to speed up bus service goes into effect, a small but vocal minority will complain about how the new bus lanes will impact businesses because parking spots will be lost. As I’ve said on more than one occasion, that’s a spurious argument that doesn’t reflect the reality of the demographics of the East Side.

Today, we have some proof from an NYU study that East Siders view themselves as benefiting from increased transit options and are eagerly awaiting the better bus service. Businesses, too, view these bus lanes as a boon. Kurt Cavanaugh in The Villager has more:

A big question mark thus far has been what the plan will mean to the thousands of business owners along First and Second Aves. These are, after all, very tough times and many businesses are struggling just to break even. Change can be unwelcome in the best of times, and in a deep recession, there is a very reasonable fear that things could get worse.

New York University researchers have recently interviewed hundreds of shoppers along the East Village segment of the Select Bus Service corridor. They have focused on: preferred modes of transportation; pedestrian compared to automobile driver spending; and how shopping habits might change if parking were reduced and/or bus access improved.

The results are striking. Among the 500 customers surveyed, 7 percent came to the area by car, 45 percent arrived by public transportation and 43 percent arrived by biking or walking. Spending habits were even more lopsided. Automobile drivers constituted less than 4 percent of the total weekly spending. Those using sustainable modes of transportation — biking, walking and public transit — represented 96 percent of weekly spending.

When asked how they would respond to proposed street changes, 36 percent of customers said they would come to the area more often if bus service were improved, while only 10 percent would come less often if there were less on-street parking. An even higher proportion, 12 percent, said they would come more often if there were less parking.

People who live, walk and shop along the East Side’s main thoroughfares understand that streets, especially in New York City, are mostly for pedestrians. Local businesses cater to pedestrians, cyclists and bus riders while cars zoom by, taking up precious space with few people and providing no opportunities for window shopping or casual browsing. The voices will raise as the SBS debut this fall nears, but as the numbers show, car drivers are in the small minority. These bus improvements are sure to benefit the East Side.

Categories : Buses
Comments (27)
  • LaHood not yet on board with Senate transit measure · As a group of U.S. Senators prepare to fight for a $2-billion transit rescue package that could help the MTA avert sweeping service cuts next month, one potential ally hasn’t yet embraced the bill. As Andrea Bernstein at Transportation Nation reports, Ray LaHood, President Obama’s Transportation Secretary, has not yet endorsed the bill. While speaking with WNYC’s Brian Lehrer yesterday, LaHood expressed concerns over finding the $2 billion without pushing the country further into the red.

    “We haven’t endorsed it,” he said, “because we really need to look at how we pay for that or how the Congress is going to pay for it. But we’re in discussion with Congress on a regular basis about these kinds of transit problems — lower ridership and lower resources. It’s an issue. We’ve talked to Congress a lot about it, these things have to be paid for too, it’s one thing to say you’re going to appropriate x amount of dollars but we’ll continue to keep a watchful eye on it.”

    LaHood’s press secretary later explained that the secretary’s use of present tense simply means that, as of now, the administration is not endorsing the bill. Implicit in that statement is a belief that the administration would consider supporting the transit operations rescue package if an appropriate source of funding could be found. As it is, New York, for example, would still have to face the reality of an inadequate funding scheme for transit, but if federal money can close the gap until the end of 2011, perhaps by then, real estate taxes will increase enough to cover the MTA’s budget gap. · (1)

I have a secret love affair with New York City subway maps. I currently have an extensive collection of historical maps that date back to the mid-1940s and possess more than my fair share of the rare Vignelli maps. Throughout the decades, as I’ve written in the past, the New York City Transit Authority and later the MTA have struggled to balance the purpose and design of the subway map with geography first taking a back seat to design and, more recently, design falling behind geography as the driving force behind The Map.

With the MTA set to eliminate the V and W and change the M’s Manhattan trunk line from the BMT Nassau route to the IND Sixth Ave. line, the authority has decided that now is as good a time as any to redesign its familiar map. While the authority hasn’t gone so far as to adopt Eddie Jabbour’s Kick Map or re-embrace Massimo Vingelli’s masterpiece, the MTA has refreshed the map. It now features more Manhattan, less Staten Island and the return of City Island.

The new map, according to Michael Grynbaum of The Times, is supposed to help unclutter something that has become overgrown with unnecessary information. The confusing spreadsheet of service times will be removed from the bottom of the map, potentially creating confusion as subway routes shift with the hours and days of the route. The call-out boxes that provide mostly useless bus connection information will be drastically reduced. Instead, map-readers will be urged to check out the MTA’s website for up-to-date service information. Considering that cell service underground is nearly non-existent, the map’s goals and its instructions seem to be at odds with each other.

Grynbaum has more on the MTA’s in-car efforts to improve the map:

A separate, stripped-down map will also be produced, to be displayed only inside subway cars. Neighborhood names, parks, ferries and bus connections will not appear on this version, making for a less cluttered composition that may be easier to read over a fellow rider’s shoulders. The authority says its goal is improved clarity — but the redesigned map also marks the latest salvo in a long debate over how to best represent a complex system that can bedevil tourists and natives alike…

[In 1979], the authority wanted geographical accuracy so that passengers would not be confused upon ascending back to the street. Hence, subway lines that wiggle and curve, reflecting the exact route of the train, and a simple street grid that highlights popular attractions and neighborhoods. Over time, however, the map acquired new elements like ferry routes and obtrusive balloons showing bus connections.

The authority now concedes that the map became overcrowded. “In its desire to be complete and provide a great deal of information, it took away from some of the clarity you would have with a simpler map,” said Jay H. Walder, the authority’s chairman, who encouraged his marketing staff to make changes.

For the latest iteration, Mr. Walder decided that the service guide, which purports to show a weekend schedule, was theoretical at best. The guide was removed, along with a growing list of handicapped-accessible stations that had begun to dominate the bottom right corner. Small wheelchair symbols will continue to denote those stops.

In addition to these changes in the way the map will be used, the authority opted to refresh the design as well. The subway lines themselves now have a grey shadow to highlight the routes. The water’s blue is a darker shade while parks are denoted in an olive green. Various other geographical features that have appeared and disappeared from the maps — smaller parks, islands unreachable by the subway — will show up as well.

But enough about words. What good is a subway map post without images? The Times has put together a great comparative graphic of the new map as it stacks up against the pre-Vignelli, Vignelli, 1979 Hertz version and the latest iteration of The Map. A few comparative shots are below.

Queens

In the old map, the Queens routes are a bit convoluted. The G train’s supposed trek to Forest Hills is demarcated by a dotted green line. The bus routes to LaGuardia make the area tough to decipher, but those dotted blue lines aren’t going away in the new version.

Now, we see the G terminate in Long Island City, and Rikers Island makes an appearance just to the northwest of LaGuardia Airport. The M has turned orange.

Brooklyn

Gone is the M from 4th Ave.

Manhattan

Although the Chrystie St. Cut connects Essex St. to Broadway/Lafayette via the local tracks, the map shows the M meeting up with the B/D just north of Grand St. It is a subtle way of showing a new service pattern. The W is gone from this map, and NoHo makes its first appearance as the MTA-sanctioned neighborhood name. Additionally, the new iteration of the subway map features a Manhattan far wider than it actually is. The island has grown 31 percent and is now 83 percent wider than it is in real life.

Categories : Subway Maps
Comments (59)

A bus stop no longer Unless the U.S. Senate can deliver operating aid to the MTA before late June, the city will suddenly find itself with hundreds of empty bus stops and vacant curbside space. While the MTA oversees the buses and their drivers, New York City’s Department of Transportation is in charge of the street space and the bus shelters. What will they do with the 570 unused stops?

Streetsblog’s Noah Kazis tackled just this question yesterday. He notes first that “any plan to re-purpose bus stops will be provisional, since the cuts might be averted or service could be restored at a later date” and urges New York City to look west to San Francisco for ways to “promote sustainable transportation and improve the quality of public space.”

The obvious use for these bus stop spaces would include bike parking both underneath the shelters and perhaps in the streets. San Francisco has used the curbside space at former bus stops for either on-street bike parking or mini plazas. Considering how many bus stops are in business-rich and pedestrian-friendly neighborhoods that rely on foot traffic and will soon be suffering with public transit, the bike spaces could go a long way toward maintaining a vibrant street life in the absence of buses.

Yet, reports Kazis, NYC DOT isn’t thinking that far outside of the box. He says:

Here in New York City, it looks like DOT’s contingency plan does not include re-purposing street space for pedestrian or bike improvements.

At most closed-down bus stops, said an agency spokesperson, the curbside area will simply take on the regulations of the adjoining area. If the street has parking along the curb, for example, the bus stop will become parking. In a few cases, the bus stop might be used for something like a truck loading zone instead.

Advocates are calling for DOT to think creatively about this new space, if the need arises. “Every neighborhood is different and there’s definitely no cookie-cutter solution for all of these bus stops,” said Transportation Alternatives’ Wiley Norvell, but in many neighborhoods, the curbside area could be used “to create green space or open space for leisure and recreation.” While TA’s goal is to ultimately see bus service restored, said Norvell, “we really hope that the city is using the biggest possible toolbox when reprogramming the space.”

Other transit advocates believe DOT could be missing a golden opportunity to do anything with the new parking spaces and public areas. A writer who goes by the pseudonym Chicken Underwear and lives near the intersection across the street from my apartment which will soon lose two bus stops along the B71 route believes the city should charge higher rates for the premium spaces that were once bus stops. He wants to see the city charge $5 during the day and maybe $2 at night for these spaces, thus maintaining high turnover and ensuring that people who want to shop in the area and insist on driving can park.

Higher parking rates would have an added benefit as well. As I wrote last year, the MTA could draw in a lot of money if New York City were to charge market rates for its parking spots. This money could offset some of the service cuts or help the MTA alleviate the remainder of its debt, and in time, it could be used to restore service along corridors that need it.

For now, we have to hope that the cuts are temporary. We have to hope someone somewhere with political sway can find the will and the dollars to avoid a transit reduction that will harm the city’s economy. But if the cuts come to pass in a little over a month, DOT shouldn’t waste a valuable opportunity to repurpose some empty spaces.

Categories : Buses
Comments (7)
  • CB 8 rejects Second Ave. advertising proposal · For the past three years, businesses along Second Ave. have struggled to draw in customers as the MTA digs out its new subway line. Many shops and restaurants have closed while others are barely hanging on. Meanwhile, the state rejected monetary grants for businesses, and a Shop 2nd Ave. initiative hasn’t been as successful as many would hope.

    In an effort to attract more customers, earlier this week, a group of business owners and Co-Op residents proposed a modification of the neighborhood’s billboard restrictions. The proposal would have allowed store owners to hang billboards on buildings that are up to 100 feet away from the business entrances. Thus, proprietors could advertise above the construction site.

    Community Board 8, however, rejected the measure. “We’ll look like 42nd Street,” Kathy Watts-Grossman, an Upper East Sider, said. “If you cheapen the neighborhood by putting up signage, you can’t take it back.” With few Community Board members willing to trade off some temporary advertising space in an effort to keep businesses alive, Second Ave. store owners will have to keep struggling along. As Richard Bass, a consultant who helped put forward this proposal said, “It’s a trade-off of evils. No one likes to advertise in a residential neighborhood, but no one likes shutting down businesses.” · (2)

Since taking over the reins of the MTA last fall, current CEO and Chair Jay Walder has pushed the authority to adopt newer technologies quicker than the MTA had in the past. Coming from London, Walder was intimately familiar with the contact-less Oyster Card program, and over the last few months, he has repeatedly highlighted how improving the efficiency of the agency’s fare-collection efforts can result in increased revenue by well over $30-40 million annually.

To that end, the MetroCard — a technology obsolete the day it was introduced — has been on borrowed time since Walder pledged a contact-less fare-payment system by 2014. Next week, this goal will take a big step forward as MasterCard, the MTA, PATH and New Jersey Transit will unveil a six-month pilot program that the MTA hopes will extend to the entire system in short order. Heather Haddon of amNew York has some details:

The “smartcard” system allows straphangers to pass a specially equipped key chain, credit card or phone across a reader on a turnstile or bus fare box to pay, with participants registering to have the money drawn from their bank account, much like the E-Z pass for drivers. The system means less time at MetroCard machines and allows buses to get going faster, transit advocates say. “It’s amazingly quick,” said William Henderson, executive director of the Permanent Citizens Advisory Committee to the MTA.

The new program will be available along the Lexington Avenue subway line, along with the M14, M23, M79, M86, M101, M102, M103 and BxM7 bus lines, according to transit documents. The MTA estimates that more than 1 million riders could potentially benefit from it, including NJ Transit users. Still, participants at this stage in the game will have to buy a regular MetroCard to continue riding on other train or bus lines.

Currently, the website established for this pilot program is fairly bare bones, but through some Google sleuthing, I’ve uncovered a few other details and some screenshots of the website. Click the images to enlarge.

The New York City Transit trial will include a variety of fare-payment options. Those MasterCard users whose cards come equipped with a smart chip can either enroll in a plan or pay as they go. The pay-as-you-go option remains foolish because the charge will be a full $2.25 while the pre-paid pay-per-ride plans include the 15 percent fare bonus with an automatic renewal when account balances dip. Customers used to timed passes can opt to buy the equivalent a one-, seven-, 14- or 30-day unlimited MetroCard with an optional auto-renew at the end of the time period. In a sense, the pay pass is a glorified MetroCard EasyPayXpress plan that allows the MTA to improve its fare-collection efforts.

For now, reports Haddon, MasterCard is paying for the pilot, and the MTA will try to include more credit card companies and routes in the upcoming months. To make this work, the rollout will have to be comprehensive, and there will be an element of trial-and-error involved. Unless the MTA is limiting entrances at certain stations to only those using the PayPass, the need for a MetroCard to get anywhere else will trump those who use their MasterCards to swipe in a second or two faster than they otherwise would.

Still, while the MetroCard is on borrowed time, the authority must still address multiple issues. How will a program that requires online registration scale across a system of that averages five million riders a day? What will happen to riders who don’t have credit cards or don’t want to supply the MTA with their credit card info? And more importantly, will a credit card touch-and-go system be the final solution for a MetroCard replacement? The June 1 pilot will mark the next step forward, but miles remain until the MetroCard is phased out entirely.

Categories : MetroCard
Comments (28)

How long will it take for Related to fully develop its Hudson Yards area?

Nearly two years ago to the day, Related Companies agreed to pay the MTA $1 billion for the rights to the Hudson Yards land. As the real estate market collapsed, though, the two sides delayed signing the deal as various benchmarks for payments were negotiated.

Today, the MTA and Related finally announced a contract for the rights. The deal calls for the MTA to lease the land to Related for 99 years with various purchase options, and in return, the MTA will earn $1 billion for capital programs. Related plans to build 12 million square feet of commercial and residential development.

“This is a tremendously exciting development project that together with the extension of the 7 line will turn this area into a vibrant residential and commercial neighborhood,” MTA Chairman and CEO Jay H. Walder said in a statement. “We were also able to maximize value for the MTA and provide a new revenue stream to support many of our vital capital projects.”

Although Related will now put $21.75 million down as a deposit with two more payments of around $11 million due in November and next May, the deal won’t close until the economy hits various benchmarks. Related will now begin searching for tenants willing to commit to office space that won’t be ready for years, and the company will have to build a deck over the LIRR rail yards without disrupting service.

In related Related news, the real estate company also unveiled a new funding partner. After dropping Goldman Sachs earlier this year, Related will team up with the Ontario Municipal Employees Retirement System, a Canadian pension fund. The fund will provide Related with, according to The Wall Street Journal, “up to $475 million in equity.” With this infusion of capital, Related now believes work on the Hudson Yards “will be under way before the triggers are hit.” The 7 line extension, which will open well before the development takes off, will help spur this development. Now, let’s see the MTA and New York City find the money for the stop at 41st St. and 10th Ave.

Categories : Hudson Yards
Comments (6)
  • A closer look at the spit attack leave time numbers · While the corner of the Internet devoted to New York news was all abuzz earlier this week over the spit attack time off numbers that showed some drivers taking six months’ paid leave time following assaults by saliva, Jim Dwyer took a closer look. The Times columnist did some sleuthing and determined that the numbers reported earlier this week were erroneous. Rather, union officials told him — and MTA officials supported the claim — that “of 69 spitting cases in 2009, 34 drivers came back to work for their next shift, and nine took less than ten days off.” The rest, he said, were held back by the recommendation of two doctors.

    According to Dwyer, the discrepancies “hardly matter,” and even though Gene Russianoff aptly termed the MTA mess “government by anecdote,” Dwyer raises a few good points in his column. He faults the state for not allowing the MTA to escape crushing pension debt and faults the MTA for taking on too much bond-based debt while recently hiring the financial guru who got them into this mess as the new CFO. It is a giant mess.

    Still, Dwyer ends his piece on an optimistic note. Although MTA CEO and Chair Jay Walder and TWU Local 100 President John Samuelsen have battled it out in the press recently, the two sides are slowly learning that private conversations are a better route to fiscal reform than a P.R. war. “Jay has had conversations with Mr. Samuelsen,” MTA spokesman Jeremy Soffin said to Dwyer. “They’re both on the same page, that the best chance of getting things done is talking quietly and less talking in the press.” Sounds reasonable to me. · (8)

A bus stop no longer With June 28, the day on which New York City Transit will eliminate bus and subway service in order to save $93 million, coming ever closer, time for any rescue packages is running out. Yet, the United States Senate might just come through with the dollars the MTA — and other transit authorities across the nation — needs to avoid crippling service cuts or fare hikes.

With support from the Amalgamated Transit Union and the Transport Workers Union, Senators Chuck Schumer, Kirsten Gillibrand and six other Democrats announced a federal bill that would provide $2 billion in operations aid for transit authorities that are currently exploring service cuts or fare hikes to close budget gaps. The MTA would be eligible for $275 million in assistance that would be good through September 2011.

“Commuters in New York are outraged by the fare hikes and service cuts that are being considered right now,” Gillibrand said. “This emergency funding is badly needed to maintain strong and affordable transit systems that get workers to work, students to school, and keep our economy moving.”

Streetsblog, its DC counterpart and the Tri-State Transportation Campaign all hailed the introduction of the bill as a major step toward a transit rescue. Yet, time remains as short. Writes Ben Fried at Streetsblog:

Before the MTA can decide how to allocate the funding, the bill has to pass Congress. The legislation could be attached as a rider to a war spending bill the Senate is expected to pass this week, said Liu. Or it could be attached to a small business tax credit bill the week of June 8. (The transit aid measures would also have to clear negotiations in conference committee.) Either option would presumably allow the MTA to avoid enacting service cuts scheduled to take effect at the end of June.

“It comes down to our region’s senators being the champions for this on the Senate floor,” said [TSTC's Ya-Ting[ Liu, who praised [Connecticut Senator Christopher] Dodd and the Senate delegations from New York and New Jersey for sponsoring the bill. “We just know we have to keep up the public pressure.”

In New York City, this bill could not come soon enough, and I worry that its Eleventh Hour introduction may in fact be too late. The MTA has already implemented new schedules for its commuter rail lines and has phased out G train service to Forest Hills. Construction crews are working now to ready the Chrystie St. Cut for revenue service as the M will replace the V train along Sixth Ave., and signs mark bus stops across the city announcing service changes or outright suspensions. If the MTA is to reverse these cuts, the money must start flowing soon.

Of course, the other element of this rescue package we must consider is the way it absolves New York State of its responsibilities toward transit. If this important piece of legislation can pass the Senate quickly, it will be good only for the next 16 months. It isn’t designed to replace state funding schemes, and states shouldn’t begin to rely on the feds to bail out transit agencies every time a funding crisis arises. Perhaps the economy will rebound enough to provide the MTA with increased real estate taxes to avoid future armageddons, but a toll or congestion pricing scheme will have to be put in place sooner or later to help shore up the authority’s revenue streams.

Realistically, the MTA is planning to move forward with its cuts until the bill is ultimately approved. The authority, never one to waste words as it seemingly does with dollars, had only a brief statement to issue. “We support the bill,” spokesman Kevin Ortiz said, “and we hope it passes.”

Comments (29)

Once upon a time, Robert Moses wanted a bridge, and generally, whatever Moses wanted, Moses got. This bridge was to span the New York Harbor from the battery to Brooklyn. It would have drastically changed the way the waterfront looked and would have done away with Battery Park and Castle Clinton.

In New York City, few outside of the man with the power wanted a bridge. Park protestors agitated for a tunnel, and those who wanted to save the historic Castle Clinton called for one as well. Moses did not listen, and it took an act of the president to turn the bridge into the tunnel. When First Lady Eleanor Roosevelt objected to the way the tunnel would ruin the view of the harbor, her husband spuriously, that the Brooklyn-Battery Bridge would interfere with national safety because the Brooklyn Navy Yard was upstream from the tunnel.

Even though both the Manhattan and Brooklyn Bridges were seaward from the navy yard as well, the executive order won the day, and today, we commemorate the 60th anniversary of the opening of the Brooklyn-Battery Tunnel. Today, approximately 44,000 vehicles pass through the 1.7-mile long tunnel on a daily basis. Yet, the origins of the tunnel were arduous.

The NYC Tunnel Authority started construction in October 1940, but the same government that quelled the threat of a bridge ordered a halt to the project in 1942 when the war effort required steel, iron and construction materials. In 1945, Moses’ Triborough Bridge Authority took control of the project, and Moses replaced Ole Signstad with Ralph Smillie as the engineer in charge. Today, the tunnel with its three ventilation plants sees its air recycled every 90 seconds, and what was once a 35-cent toll one way is now $5.50 for those without an E-ZPass.

The tunnel, once featured in Men in Black as the home to the organization tasked with tracking and policing aliens on Earth, isn’t getting a grand celebration for its 60th birthday. The MTA has, however, posted an album of old pictures to commemorate the event. Take a peek:

Cars heading to Manhattan enter the Brooklyn-Battery Tunnel in the 1950s. (Courtesy of MTA
Bridges and Tunnels Special Archive.)

Comments (20)
Page 143 of 360« First...141142143144145...Last »
  • Extended Stay

    Featuring a wide range of sophisticated furnished apartments throughout the city and surrounding areas, ExecuStay can help you enjoy a New York extended stay that's both productive and relaxing.

  • Corporate Apartments

    As a resident of ExecuStay New York corporate apartments, you'll find that getting around is a snap, thanks to the many MTA subway lines, buses and yellow cabs.