Aug
05

The Future of the MetroCard Part 3

By

Today I offer part three of a series on the Future of the Metro Card and smart card technologies.  In case you missed them: Part 1 and Part 2.   In order to incorporate a lot of the comments we have received, I have decided to split part three into two parts. Expect an additional Part 4 tomorrow — a proposed Smart Card for NYC.

Part 3 – Smart Card Progress in NYC

As we reported on Monday, Elliot Sander has passed the baton to Jay Walder, Head Wizard of the OysterCard, to lead the MTA into smart-card future.  Walder may not be alone — just this morning, Bloomberg called for an MTA technology czar, to keep NYC on the cutting edge in transit technology (which it most certainly is not).  Based on the record of his 2001 promises, we should be skeptical this time around — still it’s exciting to see Bloomberg linking his own political success to the future of transit. And in my opinion, a  dedicated technology czar could be great news for incredibly delayed projects like Computer-Based Train Control, GPS for buses,  and under-ground cellphone service.

As many of you commented on Monday and Tuesday, both the MTA and the Port Authority are no strangers to smart cards.  The developments in smart card technology among all agencies, however,  have been fragmented, slow, and confusing. Below, I attempt to summarize what each agency has done and synthesize where I believe they are actually headed.

Past Progress

The MTA first launched a contact-less payment system in a pilot on the Lexington Avenue Line in 2006. The project was in partnership with MasterCard, utilizing their PayPass technology — a fancy credit card version of an RFID-enabled smart card, usually in the form of a fob. Early reports were successful, leading to an extension in 2007. Participating credit cards even allowed pay-pass users to use their cellphone as the pass. Although the pilot remains active, the MTA has been fairly mum about the project.

The PortAuthority launched their own smart card, the SmartLink, in 2006. Although riders initally preferred the MetroCard, according to recent reports the SmartLink is now the most popular way to pay on PATH. The SmartLink has many of the benefits of a modern smart card. It is a contact-less system, ensuring speed, and its money value can be controlled online. Its usefulness is limited, of course, by its scope — it has no interoperability with any other system, not even the PA’s own AirTrain systems.

Recent Progress

Perhaps because the PortAuthority recognized the  SmartLink’s un-tapped potential (yes, that’s a pun), leaders decided in 2008 to pilot (what I think is) a SmartLink expansion. In February 2008, the Port Authority announced a pilot with NJT “to develop and test a ‘tap’ payment card  at all 13 PATH train stations and on two connecting NJ TRANSIT bus routes”.  Like the MTA, NJ Transit and the Port Authority chose MasterCard to design and build the system. Although the pilot was expected to “lauch in early 2009“, I have heard nothing about it, and  its relationship to the existing SmartLink program remains unclear.  Unless one of you can share new information, I can only presume that this pilot is being held up in some long-term development process (aka transit purgatory).

Miraculously, however, the MTA may be able to shed some light. As recently as July 2009, Steve Frazzini, chief fare-payment officer at New York City Transit, told the Philadelphia Daily News (thanks to reader, Scott E for the the correction) that the MTA “will demonstrate a second phase [of the Lexigton Avenue pilot] at year’s end .” According to the same Philly article, Frazzine said that the expanded MTA pilot “will include 275 buses and will link to a pilot with the Port Authority of NY/NJ, PATH and New Jersey Transit.” In other words, the MTA is in fact working with the Port Authority and NJT on a smart card pilot.

Conclusion
The respective agencies are lacking transparency and the media has failed to properly investigate their plans. There has been no press release. There has been no coverage by a NYC-based media outlet. Yet right under our noses, the MTA, NJT, and the Port Authority are (supposedly) in the process of piloting a multi-agency smart card. (Finding out about it in the Philadelphia Daily News is but salt in the wound.)

But since this blog was inspired by the Second Avenue Subway, let’s just say, “I’ll believe it when I see it.”

Stay tuned tomorrow for Part 4 – Smart Card Proposal for NYC. If anyone has any additional sources of information about anything above, please pass it along. Once again, thank you for all of your excellent comments!



Categories : MetroCard

7 Responses to “The Future of the MetroCard Part 3”

  1. SEAN says:

    How did a non New York newspaper get this story before the Times, post or the NY Daily News. Strange. Unless the whole thing is a joke.

  2. Scott E says:

    Oh, and as a minor correction — according to the byline in the link, the article appeared in the Philadelphia Daily News, not the Inquirer. True, both papers have common ownership and share a website, but I thought I’d point out the distinction.

  3. Jim says:

    Saw a post yesterday about the lack of extended PATH service out to Newark Liberty…Having been around the PA, Newark City Officials, and NJT I too have posed this question. As you would expect, it’s not a new concept. The reason I was given for it not being extended was that the increase in service provided by PATH would inundate Newark Liberty with flights (thus delaying flights even more than they already are). This extension would make Newark the most ideal (and fastest) connection from a flight into both downtown and midtown Manhattan, and also take business away from LGA and JFK. Plans to expand the NWK to the “port-side” of the Turnpike (By the Ikea) were actually investigated at one point…but dismissed as unfeasible.

  4. Gil says:

    Just wanted to point out the real reasoning for the Smartlink being the most used type of card on the path: cost.

    Although the PATH is $1.75 fare, when you buy a ten trip Smartlink, you actually pay only $1.30 a ride.
    Buying about $1.52 in Metrocard will give you a path ride (using 15% bonus). It would save you over $114 a year if you ride twice each weekday.

    The Smartlink is also the only way you can get an unlimited path card…

    I’m sure many commuters would have rather kept one metrocard for both systems. Aside from the cost, an unlimited Metrocard doesn’t work on the Path, so you’d end up having to carry two Metrocards anyway. And I think every new yorker has, at one point or another “swiped the wrong metrocard”.

  5. Hello! I know this is kind of off-topic but I needed to ask.
    Does building a well-established website such as yours require a
    lot of work? I am completely new to running a
    blog however I do write in my diary daily. I’d like to start
    a blog so I can easily share my experience and thoughts online.
    Please let me know if you have any suggestions or tips for
    brand new aspiring bloggers. Appreciate it!

    My weblog :: what are the best diet pills

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>