For only the second time since 1978, New York faces a state-wide election without a Cuomo running for office. It’s an opportunity for the state to move past the tedium of the Andrew Cuomo years and the imperial governance of one man who would broker no dissent and often failed to encourage or allow hand-picked experts who may have known better to lead. While the current race between Kathy Hochul and Lee Zeldin may not represent the best the Empire State can offer, when it comes to transit, there is only choice in this race, and that choice is Kathy Hochul.
Hochul is an unlikely transit-focused candidate. She’s a Buffalo native, chosen to be Cuomo’s Lieutenant Governor as a sop to upstate voters, and she found herself thrust into the position when Cuomo resigned in 2021. On the transit front, she had to untangle an unstable mess left to her by her predecessor, and she’s succeeded in ways that make me believe she’ll be a stabilizing force for transit in the NYC region and a driver of growth as well.
As governor, Hochul has done what Cuomo failed to do: First, she brought stability to the upper echelons of MTA leadership. While Cuomo presided over a revolving door of agency CEOs and presidents, Hochul chose Janno Lieber, a dedicated, smart and competent official to lead the MTA without her interference. She has given him her support to lead the agency, make decisions regarding transit personnel and growth, and empowered him to change the conversation regarding transit funding, treating the system as a public service rather than a political piñata constantly facing budget cuts and fare hikes. On safety, upon the rest of Mayor Eric Adams, Hochul helped deploy extra MTA police officers to areas where the NYPD could not staff the transit division quickly enough, and the move paid dividends with the MTA itself touting recent declines in crime. In the past, New York Governors were loathe to work with city officials and often used the MTA as a political chit, holding transit riders hostage.
Outside of the day-to-day operations of the MTA, Hochul has shown a willingness to plan carefully and listen to people who know more than she does. She ditched Cuomo’s useless Backwards AirTrain, and instead of demanding experts bend to her whims, in championing the Interborough Express, she listened to planners who have meticulously crafted a case for a circumferential subway line, a true game-changer for disconnected parts of Brooklyn and Queens. On congestion pricing – a program that will unclog Manhattan streets while generating the revenue needed to launch the MTA’s $50 billion capital plan – she has taken political heat while continuing to support the traffic fee. Thanks to stonewalling at the federal level, congestion pricing may not be moving as fast as many New Yorkers had hoped, but Hochul has stood firm in the face of political calls to cut the fee.
Opposing Hochul is Lee Zeldin, a Long Island State Senator-turned-Congressional representative, who has no transit plan and has a documented history of hostility toward transit. While in the State Senate, he opposed the Payroll Mobility Tax, a measure that staved off the MTA’s fiscal collapse in 2010, and as a candidate, he has offered no vision for transit. He has spoken about stopping congestion pricing and claims, without basis in fact, that more fare enforcement can generate enough revenue for the MTA to plug all of its budget holes. Anyone with a passing familiarity with the issue can explain why fare enforcement alone, which itself costs significant money, cannot solve the MTA’s financial woes, and with the MTA facing a multi-billion-dollar fiscal cliff over the next few years, a governor with no plan to support transit is a governor inviting a crushing crisis for New York State and New York City. (Jose Martinez of The City further explored how a Zeldin administration could spell doom for the MTA.)
Even on crime, the issue on which Zeldin is trying to stake his campaign, he hasn’t offered a vision for improved safety. He talks about deposing a duly elected District Attorney and declaring a “state of emergency,” which is symbolic at best. But he has not provided concrete details how he will handle the mental health crisis driving much of the crime or how he will improve the shelter system so fewer New Yorkers are sleeping in the subways (itself not a crime, but a clear driver of the way many New Yorkers perceive public order). Hochul has ushered in new homelessness response teams and the rapid deployment of cops throughout the subways over the past few weeks has shown early success. The MTA recently announced a day with over 3.7 million riders and just four major felonies throughout the system, all robberies and all resulting in arrests.
With early voting behind us, this endorsement is arriving late in the game. I have a newborn at home and have been focusing on my daughter lately. But for many, the day to vote is Tuesday, and if you are thinking about the future of transit investment, transit expansion and transit’s economic health in New York State, the only candidate worth your vote is Kathy Hochul.

17 comments
Thoughtful endorsement based on facts not emotion. Thanks and I already early voted for Hochul.
I appreciate your insights, and I will be voting for Hochul tomorrow. It’s a crystal clear choice for anyone who ever rides mass transit.
Agree that the choice is obvious. Thanks for your thoughts; I hadn’t realized how she had worked constructively with the city on policing. I hope it’s more than throwing cops at our structural social problems.
Didn’t Hochul sideline the LaGuardia AirTran, leaving us to start all over again with the various hearings and permitting processes, that potentially take many years and dollars to accomplish. Also her plan for Penn Station South, a multi billion dollar plan, would demolish a whole city block, to create numerous office buildings, which in this work at home environment we have now, would do nothing more than add to the oversupply of such buildings. Also if I’m not mistaken, Penn Station South, would also result in a dead end terminal for trains traveling in the new Gateway tunnels. Through running east- west running of train traffic would be a better outcome. Imagine the funds that would be required to acquire all that real estate, demolish it and then construct new buildings, being allocated to improving transit. Perhaps something like linking Penn Station to Grand Central, again with through running of trains
Given that tail tracks for East Side Access (oops, Grand Central Madison) terminate under Park Avenue and 38th Street, creating a new link between Grand Central and Penn Station via an extension of those tunnels may not be entirely unfeasible from an engineering standpoint. Politically, it might be a much harder sell.
How so?
ben come back to us in 2024 boddy.
2nd ave phase two is afoot!
Congestion price cancelled at the last minute leaving transit expansion funding in limbo. Still think Hochul’s the one?
Well argued. After decades of watching Albany treat the MTA as an afterthought, having a governor willing to spend capital on congestion pricing and expansion is a real shift. I run CADCraft, a small open-source CAD project, and I only wish transit planning everywhere got this kind of informed attention. Riders should follow this race closely.
I appreciate this detailed breakdown of Hochul’s transit record. The point about her letting Lieber actually run the MTA without constant interference really stands out, especially after the Cuomo years. Zeldin’s lack of any real plan for the fiscal cliff is genuinely alarming. It’s rare to see an endorsement that focuses on competence over charisma. For anyone who cares about the subway system, this makes the choice pretty clear. I just hope the next governor keeps pushing congestion pricing forward despite the political heat. Related resource: Stampmaker Lab
This piece makes a strong case that Hochul is the only real transit choice in this race. I appreciate the point about her letting Janno Lieber actually run the MTA instead of micromanaging like Cuomo did. The contrast with Zeldin, who has no plan and opposed the Payroll Mobility Tax, is stark. With the fiscal cliff looming, that difference matters a lot for riders. Related resource: Web Dashers Levels
I appreciate this endorsement because it focuses on the actual record rather than campaign slogans. The point about Hochul letting Janno Lieber run the MTA without constant political interference is the one that matters most to me. Cuomo’s revolving door of leadership did real damage, and stability alone is worth a lot. Zeldin’s fare enforcement fantasy would be laughable if the fiscal cliff weren’t so serious. I just hope Hochul keeps pushing congestion pricing even when it gets uncomfortable. For anyone tracking how leadership changes ripple through agencies, there’s interesting context at . Related resource: Noomicheemsat
This piece makes a strong case that Hochul is the only real choice for transit riders. I appreciate the focus on her support for congestion pricing and the Interborough Express, which could genuinely help outer boroughs. Zeldin’s lack of a transit plan is alarming, especially with the MTA’s fiscal cliff looming. It’s refreshing to see a governor who listens to experts instead of ruling by whim. For anyone tracking how policy details get communicated, . Related resource: Cursive Generatorner
This is a thoughtful breakdown of how transit priorities and steady leadership can shape New York’s future. The point about listening to people who understand the system is especially important. I have been exploring AI UGC Video Generator for testing product-focused ad ideas, and the same emphasis on clear planning applies there too.
The point about separating transit policy from campaign noise was especially clear, and the discussion of the Interborough Express made the stakes concrete. I also appreciate projects that let people explore choices and consequences at their own pace; Project Moon Life is an unofficial life simulator set in The City, where story events and decisions can lead to different endings. Thanks for the thoughtful analysis!
The continuity point really lands. Transit projects live or die on leaders who stay committed past one news cycle, and compounding is exactly what makes long-term bets work, the same logic behind Project Moon Life Sim, a browser life simulator where small early choices quietly reshape the whole city decades later. Cleaning up the ride-hailing free-for-all alone would justify the endorsement. Great write-up as always.
This article shows how long-term planning depends on clear priorities and informed decisions. RTFANS applies the same facility-based approach to industrial airflow, HVLS fan coverage, and evaporative cooling. RTFANS