New 59th St. station entrace to open after two years

By · Published on February 2, 2007 · Comments (2) ·

A new entrance at one of the busiest stations in the system is set to open this weekend. Just watch the ice. (Wikipedia.org)

Stories like this one are what make the MTA so damn entertaining. Two years ago, the MTA, with the blessing of Vornado Realty Trust, constructed a new entrance for the uber-busy stop at 59th Street-Lexington Avenue.

Serving the 4, 5, 6, N, R and W trains as well as a crowd of workers in midtown and shoppers at Bloomingdales, this stop on the East Side is one of the busiest in the system. So another entrance seemed reasonable.

But for two years, this entrance has sat shuttered with the turnstiles rarin’ to go. Why? Because Vornado Realty, the owners for the entrance’s building, refused to construct a canopy to protect customers from ice falling off the eaves of the 54-story building.

Well, the dispute has been resolved, and this two-year-old “new” entrance will open this weekend. Phew.

Categories : MTA Absurdity
Comments (2)

MTA’s bad week just gets worse

By · Published on February 1, 2007 · Comments (3) ·

The BMT’s Chambers Street is one of many stations badly in need of renovation. (Photo courtesy of NYCsubway.org)

With money tight and an aging system in disrepair, it has been a rough week for the Metropolitan Transit Authority.

The bad news started Wednesday with a report in The Times. Never known for its efficiency in repairs, the MTA is already $1.4 billion over budget on a five-year, $21 billion improvement plan, and they are not even halfway through the renovations yet. Here’s what the venerable paper had to say:

Among the projects in that program are renovations to subway and commuter train stations, maintenance of antiquated signal systems, and the purchase of hundreds of buses and subway cars, and many of the projects may be affected, officials indicated.

Much of the problem has been caused by a rapid increase in the cost of construction in New York City, as a result of rising prices for materials and the large number of new projects, which gives contractors the leverage to charge more. In many cases, fewer companies are bidding on projects and offers are coming in much higher than expected.

Another problem is the weak dollar, which appears likely to raise the cost of a contract for subway cars with French and Japanese companies.

While these problems extend beyond the buses and subways, we’ll ignore those pesky commuter rails for now. They’ll take the blame in a little while.

So what’s happening here? Well, most notable are the bids the MTA is receiving. If the MTA estimates a project to cost $200 million but the only bid is for $300 million, the Authority can either reject this bid and re-open the bidding or pay more than they expected. In many cases, the latter has happened.

In the article, Lee Sander, the MTA’s new CEO, has promised to “look at the issue” of rising construction costs, but I doubt he could do anything. But the juicy bit from Wednesday comes from Gene Russianoff, a lawyer with the influential Straphangers Campaign.

Mr. Russianoff said he was concerned that officials might push ahead with such high-profile undertakings while sacrificing some of the smaller projects needed to keep the transit system in good shape, like buying new subway and rail cars and making station repairs.

With the article laying the blame at the high costs of the Second Ave. Subway, the 7 Extension and the (as yet undiscussed here) plan to link the LIRR with Grand Central, Russianoff’s statement is full of contradictions. As the Straphangers have pushed for the additions as well as the necessary maintenance of the existing lines, the position seems irreconcilable.

But not so fast. Maybe Russianoff has a point as the Straphangers attempt to prioritize spending. They aren’t the only ones clamoring for proper funding. The City Comptroller William Thompson has joined the fray nothing that the MTA needs the funds for routine upgrades or riders could face massive service disruptions in the coming years.

He raised the specter of similar disruptions when he released an investigation of the ways MTA investment continues to ignore the antiquated subway system.

“NYC Transit is simply not getting its fair share of the Metropolitan Transportation Authority’s core capital funding,” he said, noting the city’s system carries nearly 94 percent of all MTA riders but receives just 75.5 percent of funds in the agency’s 2005-09 capital plan. And that “historical” shortchanging has worsened, he complained. Back in the 1992-’96 capital plan, NYC Transit got 77.5 percent.

Remember how I said we would come back to those pesky commuters? Well, um, yeah. It’s your fault our subway system is in disrepair just like it’s your fault that our subways fell into such disrepair as the suburbs became such an important part of the New York Metropolitan Area and the city became the neglected eye sore.

Thompson was a bit upset tonight. He noted that necessary upgrades have been delayed for 15 years and many won’t be completed until 2028. He focused on problems of security and, more simply, on-time train functions. One of the biggest areas of concern is the subway’s antiquated signal system. A fire in 2005 shed some light onto this problem, but as Thompson pointed out, the majority of signals are over 70 years old. The system is antique, and the technology is long outdated. And let’s not even start on the public address system.

So it’s been a rough week for the MTA. But the truth is that it’s been a rough existence for the MTA. These funding problems are nothing new, and next week, I’ll explore an issue that I believe to be at the root for these problems: The history of the 5¢ fare. For too long though New Yorkers have dealt with poor finances in the subway. We need the upgrades Thompson pushes and we need that Second Avenue Subway and 7 Extension. This ride will get interesting this year no matter what.

Categories : MTA Economics
Comments (3)

Breaking down the NYC Blogger Summit

By · Published on February 1, 2007 · Comments (2) ·

With the promise of free food, WNBC last night lured over 100 New York City bloggers into Studios 6A and 6B at 30 Rock to discuss the future of blogging and television journalist. Set up by Erin Monteiro, the NYC Blogger Summit made for an interesting evening of MSM/Blogosphere mingling. (How much more cliched could I get?)

Sree Sreenivasan, tech reporter and Columbia Journalism School dean, led the discussion as many executives and staffers from WNBC spoke about their ideas to integrate blogging into their coverage and fielded questions from bloggers. For much of the evening, the discussion was all over the map. WNBC, as with many local TV outlets, isn’t quite sure what it wants to do with blogs.

What is clear from WNBC’s perspective is that they want to form relationships with blogs that give them stories. In turn, WNBC will give these bloggers credit and, in the eyes of some of the bloggers at least, legitimize their writing and reporting efforts. Where the talks broke down last night were over the details.

Some of the WNBC execs, it seems, wanted bloggers to give them exclusives. Others, Sree included, stressed that WNBC simply wants to be on the blogger distribution list each writer has for self-promotion purposes. We would become, in other words, the eyes on the street for WNBC.

Meanwhile, WNBC is struggling with integrating blogs into its own site. How does a TV news organization so used to producing something at 6 p.m. and 11 p.m. change its focus to present constantly breaking news without upstaging its own product? Print journalists have adapted to the Internet because they had to. The medium of print was too easily co-opted by bloggers who had an audience clamoring for on-demand breaking news. Only recently have video presentations made enough strides to challenge TV news, and most bloggers don’t watch their local newscasts, I learned last night.

The problem I have with the local newscast, as I discussed at the Channel 4 bar afterwards with Brian Basset of The Jets Blog, is that it’s not relevant. Watching a 30-second story about a fire somewhere that affects 20 people and then another 30-second story about a car accident from seven hours ago has no bearing on my life. Another murder, another crime, it’s all part of any urban life, and to me, that’s not news.

What local TV news should cover and what the blogs can cover are the important stories. Tell me in detail what construction cost overruns on the subway mean to me. Show me the weather; show me politics; show me sports. If a local TV news story wants to cover crime, give it to me in context. Was that murder in a neighborhood typically free from murders? Are murder rates rising? Put some time into it.

Just don’t become a media whore like our Fox 5 newscast.

For another look at the evening, The Wonkers from Gotham Gazette was there and wrote up a summary too.

Other than the summit, the networking aspect of the event was enlightening. We sit here all day typing away at our blogs, but hey, real people are behind those posts. In addition to the folks above, I got to meet Chris from East Village Idiot (a daily favorite), Heather from Gawker, Julie from Trailer Spy, Matt from NYC Convergence and a whole slew of other folk. Good crowd; good times; interesting discussion.

But I think there’s still a long way to go before WNBC and other local TV affiliates determine just how we as bloggers fit in with their news coverage.

Comments (2)

The $140-million question: ‘Can you hear me now?’

By · Published on January 31, 2007 · Comments (3) ·

That’s The Times’ fancy way of showing us why radio reception isn’t too good underground.

The news out of the subways last week featured yet another setback for adequate underground communications. According to news reports, a $140-million communication system for the New York City police that is supposed to work underground does not. This comes as no surprise to anyone who has ever tried to use a cell phone in the subway.

The Times reported on the problem last week:

Last October, after spending $140 million, the authority completed the installation of the system citywide.

But it has not been turned on.

That is because the Police Department refuses to use it, saying the new system is hobbled by widespread interference that garbles communication and creates areas where radios cannot receive properly. “What you get is distorted audio,” said Joseph Yurman, a communications engineer for New York City Transit. “You can hear it, but it sounds as if you’re talking through a glass of water.”

Fixing the problem may require replacing new equipment with more advanced components at a cost of up to $20 million more. If all goes well and disputes over which agency will pay for the changes can be resolved, the police say the full system could be turned on next year, some four years behind schedule.

According to engineers offering up an explanation for this interference, the problem basically arises from all of the metal found in our city streets. From ventilation grates to pipes and entrances, metal shields much of the subway, and the radio waves pick up interference as they pass underground. Furthermore, nearly 75 miles worth of cables installed for this project have eroded beyond use.

So once again another technological upgrade by the MTA faces cost overruns and and a delayed timeline. And the NYPD and Fire Department can’t agree on the safety of subways. It’s politics as usual for our underground transportation network.

Categories : MTA Absurdity
Comments (3)

Breaking News: The 2nd Ave. subway is so ‘boring’

By · Published on January 25, 2007 · Comments (2) ·

The current remains of earlier work in the 2nd Ave. subway tunnel. (NYTimes.com)

My dad, 57, has spent his entire life in New York. He is one of millions of people skeptical that a Second Ave. subway line would be operational in their lifetimes. Can you blame them?

This subway line has transcended history. Originally proposed in 1929, the line has become a symbol of the rise and fall of American urban society in the Twentieth Century. It was the victim of short-sighted policies and poor financial planning by the ancestors of today’s MTA, the government of New York City and the old IRT and BMT corporations. When automobiles and Robert Moses took over New York City, the Second Ave. subway died for the second time in the 1940s.

It was revived in the 1970s, only to mee its end at a broke city. We had no money; we had no presidential support (“Ford to City: Drop Dead”). But we do still have a remnant from that area: some completed parts of that infamous Second Ave. line. Don’t believe me? Just look at the top of this post.

Now, if the news is to be believed, the Second Ave. subway will soon exist. The City, as NY1 reported today, is one month away from construction on this ill-faited and much-needed subway expansion. Allow me to quote, at length:

MTA officials say that in a few weeks, they will award a $333 million contract to build what they call Phase One. “This is real now, and it is happening,” said Mysore Nagaraja of the MTA Capital Construction Corporation. “And we are excited about it.” …

A consortium of three American companies submitted the winning bid for construction work: Skanska USA Civil, Schiavone Construction, and J.F. Shea Construction. They will be formally awarded the contract after a two-to-four-week vetting process.

Then construction work will begin between 96th and 92nd Streets, where a tunnel boring machine will begin drilling the new tunnels.

So this is actually happening. In a few years, the Q will go beyond 57th Street up into areas of the Upper East Side that desperate need subway service. Then, we’ll get the turquoise T. But what does this mean for the folks living along that Second Ave. corridor?

Well, at first, there will be disruptions. But the MTA isn’t exactly using the cut-and-cover method to construct this subway line. Here’s how Nagaraja explained it to NY1. “We are going to be taking two to three lanes for construction,” he said. “And we have to relocate all the utilities there first. And once the utilities are relocated, then we have to make this hole, which is about 60 – 70 feet deep. That is when the machine can be dropped in there and [we can] start assembling the machine.”

Construction trailers and heavy machinery will soon dot the landscape of Second Ave. But then the boring machine will be dropped far underground and the real work will begin as the city finally starts to connect the tunnel sections. We’ll have a new subway line soon enough. My dad won’t believe it until he sets foot in one of the new stations, and I’m sure millions of New Yorkers share his skepticism. But sooner, rather than later, we’ll have to find another ill-fated project to hope for aimlessly. How about a new river crossing?

Comments (2)

Screwing over a neighborhood, one project at a time

By · Published on January 22, 2007 · Comments (3) ·

When last we checked in on the 7 line extension plans, amNY had just announced, to little fanfare, the MTA’s seemingly under-the-table plan to construt one of the two planned stops. While I was, at first, skeptical of the reality of these cuts, it seems that I was wrong.

Ten days ago, The Daily News noted some rumblings and grumblings about the plan. But the story came to a head today when amNY reported on the planned efforts of transit advocates to bring attention to these plans.

[Nonvoting rider MTA board representative Andrew] Albert and the New York City Transit Riders Council are scheduled to hold a news conference Monday morning along with elected officials to demand the creation of the 41st Street station.

“Thousands of people live in the area. They deserve a station,” Albert said. “Its an insult to watch the trains whiz by your neighborhood.”

Even worse Albert said, the MTA’s own bean counters estimate, that if they build the 41st Street station now it would cost $200 million, but to wait several years to build it the cost could easily top $400 million.

As details have emerged about the scaled-back plan, we can put together a clearer picture of the planned extension. The MTA will construct a new tunnel that follows 41st St. to 11th Ave. and then heads south down 11th Ave. to a turnaround point at 23rd St. and 11th Ave. Original plans called for a station at 41st and 10th and a terminal at 34th and 11th.

But now, to keep the project under budget, the city will build a shell station at 41st and 10th and only one operating station at 34th and 11th. This so-called shell station could then be converted into an operating station at “some point in the future.”

As rider advocates work to deliver a true extension that could serve Hell’s Kitchen – a vibrant residential area in need of a subway stop – Lee Sander, the proactive new CEO of the MTA, said he would take a look at building the station at 41st and 10th now rather than later.

For more on the 7 line extension, check out all of the technical documents at the MTA’s Capital Construction Web site. This track image comes from the Scoping Document.

Categories : 7 Line Extension
Comments (3)

New transit chief saying all the right things on service, security

By · Published on January 17, 2007 · Comments (0) ·

Almost two weeks ago, we first met Elliot “Lee” Sander, the new MTA chief. Sander has stayed in the news since taking over the reins of the MTA, and this week, he is saying all the right things. Labor relations, service improvements and aesthetic changes are all high on his to-do list.

New York 1 caught up Sander to discuss his plans:

[Sander] says he’ll tackle overcrowding on certain transit lines, and he’ll make it a priority to change inaudible announcements into something more understandable on the subway PA systems.

He also says he’s put together a panel to examine labor relations and plans to bring in new management.

Already, Sander has been quick to act on one of his goals. He had lunch with Roger Toussaint at the Old Homestead this week. Toussaint, the somewhat embattled head of the transit workers union, came away pleased from this lunch, The Times reported.

“We discussed the relations between the T.W.U. and the M.T.A. and how to move the relationship to a better place. It was a very constructive conversation,” Toussaint said to reporter William Neuman.

In terms of his second goal, I would suggest that Sander find a way to free up some money for more trains. Nothing solves overcrowding that frequent service along perennial crowded lines, such as the L.

Meanwhile, a Representative Anthony Weiner issued a call for bomb-proof trash cans similar to the ones in the D.C. Metro to be installed in the subways, Sander also pledged to examine security in the subways. As the MTA examines the trash cans to make sure they work in the smaller enclosed spaces of the New York subways (as opposed to the cavernous D.C. stations), Sander noted that the MTA will work with the TWU to train subway workers as first responders in case of emergency or terrorist attack.

All in all, it’s a good start for someone who will play a big role in setting subway policy over the next few years.

Categories : MTA Politics
Comments (0)

Subway signs enterting the 1990s

By · Published on January 16, 2007 · Comments (3) ·

It was a big weekend for the New York City subway as the MTA finally figured out that the 1990s started seventeen years ago. No longer will passengers be forced to stand at the platform’s edge peering into dark tunnels searching in vain for the faint glimmer of the headlines of an approaching train.

Instead, New York has finally caught up to London, Washington, D.C, and the vast majority of the world’s subway lines as they unveiled the first of what promises to be many boards notifying passengers just how far away that next train is.

As The Post noted over the weekend, these signs, pictured above, debuted on the L train a few days ago and should be “fully operational” in February. Considering that these other subway systems had long featured train notification, we should be more skeptical of the MTA and less celebratory.

But maybe the celebrations have been met with the appropriate levels of New York cynicism. As with all things MTA, the debut of these signs has been far from smooth. First, these signs were supposed to be unveiled last July, but as another who lived through the reconstruction of the 41st St. Times Square tunnel recontruction, MTA timetables are notoriously terrible.

More notable, however, was The Sun’s examination of the new signs after a few days of use.

The screens, which display departure times for two scheduled trains in each direction, regularly overestimated the time until a train’s arrival or else announced only a “Delay.” At some stations, the screens were not working at all, and displayed just one generic message: “This is a test. May not be accurate.”

The Sun also notes that these signs will only go up on the old IRT lines. So while the numbered subway lines, the city’s most popular routes, will get technology of, well, the past, the lettered subways of the city’s old BMT and IND lines still won’t run too frequently and passengers still won’t know when the next train is due in at their station.

Image courtesy of thelexiphane at Flickr.

Categories : MTA Technology
Comments (3)

MetroCard payments getting EZ-er

By · Published on January 10, 2007 · Comments (4) ·

While not the most exciting of news especially after Monday’s fun with condoms, now, subway riders won’t end up harming their naughty bits with the EasyPay XPress MetroCard, a balance replenishing system that works much like the EZ-Pass program.

Using super-advanced technology – no wait, basic computer technology – the MTA has finally figured out a way to tie your MetroCard into your bank account, reports The Daily News. So says the newspaper:

The EasyPay XPress MetroCard, which is good for two years, works like the popular EZPass system. When the card’s balance dips to $25, it’s replenished with a $50 infusion.

Although EasyPay XPress MetroCards were designed with express bus riders in mind, subway and local bus riders can also use them, officials said.

“Initiatives like EasyPay XPress are designed to make it as easy and convenient as possible for our customers to access MTA services,” Metropolitan Transportation Authority Executive Director and CEO Elliot Sander said.

Except for those of us who have done the economics and prefer the unlimited options, never again will unsuspecting straphangers bang into the turnstile bar without noticing the Insufficient Fare sign light up. Instead, the MTA will just suck the money out of your bank account, $2 at a time.

Edit: One commenter asked if the pay-per-ride discount applies. It does. If you buy $20 worth of rides, you get a $24 MetroCard. Likewise, when the MTA charges your bank account $50, you get $60 on your MetroCard.

Old-school blue MetroCard picture courtesy of AMNY.com.

Categories : MetroCard
Comments (4)

Condoms a la NYC Subways

By · Published on January 8, 2007 · Comments (28) ·

With the Disney-fication of Times Square, the closing of the city’s numerous sex shops and the lower presence of prostitution, it was only a matter of time before safe sex became the agenda du jour of City Hall. While the rest of the country struggles with the idiocy of abstinence-only education, Mayor Bloomberg will soon unveil New York City condoms wrapped in the colors of the New York City subway lines, says The Post.

The condoms, produced by LifeStyles, will be wrapped in colored foil corresponding to one of the MTA’s distinct subway lines. “The condom packets will be modeled after the New York City subway system. Every foil will have a color,” said Carol Carozza, spokeswoman for Ansell, LifeStyle’s parent company, told The Post.

Now, while promoting safe sex is a noble venture, especially in the city that leads the nation in AIDS cases, I have to wonder just how closely tied in to the subway lines this promotion will be. And so I bring to you condom styles based on the subway lines.

The G Condom Condoms wrapped in the familiar lime green of the ever-unreliable G train are for the man in your life who takes a while. Generally, you have to wait a long time for the train to come, and when it does, it’s usually a short one.
The 6 Condom As the 6 was once again rated the best subway line in the city, by the Straphangers Campaign, the 6 condoms, wrapped in vibrant green, are for great sex. Ribbed for her pleasure, perhaps?
The 7 Condom Ah, the 7 train. In the immortal words of John Rocker, it’s home to “some kid with purple hair next to some queer with AIDS right next to some dude who just got out of jail for the fourth time right next to some 20-year-old mom with four kids.” But it’s also the dirtiest train in the city with just 55 percent of the cars passing the Straphangers’ cleanliness test. But 89 percent of the time, the 7 is on time. So I guess this one’s quick and dirty.
The Shuttle This one just goes back and forth. Back and forth. Back and forth.
The M Condom A lovely shade of brown, the M train condoms will mirror the Nassau Street Local. It doesn’t come to frequently; it’s pretty empty; and it breaks down a lot. Maybe it needs some Viagra?
The 1 Condom And last but not least, we get the 7th Ave. Local. It keeps itself clean with frequent, on-time service, but it’s tough to find a seat. It also stops everywhere. So this is the condom for the man with less-than-discriminating taste and an unsatiated appetite for sex.

Yes, the K train was a real subway line in New York. It ran on various routes in the city, most recently as the 8th Ave. Local. The last K train rode off into the sunset on December 10, 1988. Read more at Wikipedia.

Categories : MTA Absurdity
Comments (28)