Chipped and peeling paint jobs are a routine sight in the subways. (Courtesy of flickr user tash in ny)
Sometimes, the ridiculous stories just write themselves. This is one of those times because the MTA can’t get it together to use extra cash they have floating around to paint stations that need to be painted. Yes, you read that right.
So the MTA, when the sale of Stuyvesant Town went through, earned a whopping $52 million off of the sale’s mortgage. With this money in tow, the Authority developed a five-year program during which they would paint 200 stations in need of painting. That was seven months ago.
Today, the Daily News reported that the MTA just can’t figure out how to get this program off the ground. Pete Donohue had more:
The MTA last year adopted a budget and multiyear fiscal plan calling for dozens of stations to be painted each year for a decade until every hub is refurbished with a fresh coat. Seven months later, NYC Transit hasn’t decided how to proceed with the station painting program. It’s unclear who will do the work, which stations will be among the first to get a paint job and which would be among the last to be brushed, NYC Transit spokesman Paul Fleuranges said.
“It will go forward, but I don’t know when or what the plan is,” Fleuranges said.
That’s right. It’s taken the MTA seven months (and counting) just to figure out how to proceed with the simplest of plans. MTA board member Andrew Albert summed up my feelings pretty nicely. “They haven’t started?” he asked incredulously. “It shouldn’t take a year to decide what stations to do. There’s little doubt you can find 35 stations a year that badly need a paint job.”
Among the options I came up with were flipping a coin, pulling station names out of a hat or playing that whole “tell me where to stop” game with someone’s finger and the subway map. Someone — anyone — pick a station and start there.
The 149th St.-Grand Concourse station could really use a paint job and so could some of the Bay Ridge stations on the R line. I could name 10 stations without thinking that would benefit from a fresh coat of paint. So come on, MTA. It can’t be that hard, right?
11 comments
so could the 86th and Lex station!!!!
I was at 125th Street and Lenox Avenue today (2 and 3 trains) and I walked by a garbage pail with a WET PAINT sign on it so I guess the MTA started there.
I can think of 468 stations that could use at least a bit of paint.
I’ve been thinking about this post all weekend. The anger level keeps rising… I hate the MTA so much.
As for the “Wet Paint” signs, I always see them on garbage cans. The signs on the vertical I-Beams look like they’ve been there for years.
[…] toll surplus would give the MTA the extra money they need to wait. He also drops in the fact that $50 million was supposed to use on paint jobs could be added to this pot as […]
[…] Remember the paint jobs? Remember back in July when word leaked out that the MTA couldn’t use $50 million they had set aside to paint stations because they couldn’t figure out how to pick which stations should go first? […]
[…] us in as to why MTA paint jobs at stations seem to move at glacially slow paces. (Related SAS posts here and […]
[…] love it when the MTA’s efforts at painting make the news. Last July, we saw the MTA paralyzed by indecision because they couldn’t figure out which stations to paint. Seven months later, in February, […]
[…] efforts haven’t gotten much positive press over the last few years. First, the agency couldn’t figure out how to spend $50 million on painting their decaying stations. Then, they announced that the paintings would proceed at a […]
[…] MTA couldn’t get a $50-million station painting plan off the ground because authority heads could not figure out which stations to paint first. In 2008, Transit announced that, instead of painting 46 a year and […]
[…] the years, I’ve tackled the MTA’s paint job problems. In 2007, the MTA had plans to paint 200 stations in five years, but that plan was delayed because the authority couldn’t figure out how to decide which […]