Home Taxis Taxi drivers bemoan hybrid demands

Taxi drivers bemoan hybrid demands

by Benjamin Kabak

Pardon me while I leave the underground world of transportation and visit the devoted straphanger’s sometimes-nemesis, sometimes-friend: the taxi cab.

I’ve long been fascinated with New York City taxis in a more academic way than I am with the city’s subways. More specifically, I’ve watched with interest as the city has pioneered a radical plan to convert its entire taxi fleet from fuel-guzzling Ford Crown Vics to green hybrids of all shapes and sizes.

The root of my interest began in the spring of 2004 as hybrids were slowly becoming a popular item. I was enrolled in a class on the political economy of the automobile, and for one of my term papers, I proposed that the City of New York should convert its entire fleet into hybrids. Little did I know how prescient I would be.

The gist of the paper — which you can find here as a Word document — was that cab drivers would see significant fuel savings by switching to hybrids designed for optimal use in the stop-and-go traffic environment of New York City. Hybrids, in most cases, get fuel mileage in city traffic two to three times greater than the old Crown Victoria taxis do. While some passengers would be inconvenienced by the smaller trunk space and decreased leg room in the hybrids, the social benefits, ranging from a cleaner air to the city’s place as a model taxi fleet, would far outweigh the downsides.

While that is a fairly simple argument, I think it’s held up over time. Since I wrote that paper, the city has indeed embarked on a landmark program to convert its entire fleet to hybrids, and beginning this year, only hybrid cars may be registered as taxis. Considering that the entire taxi fleet turns over every three-to-five years, the clock is ticking for the 15 city miles-per-gallon Crown Victorias, a relic of the day when we worried too little about gas prices and paid too little at the pump for our gas-guzzling ways.

But of course, cab owners aren’t too happy about the switch, and they’re voicing their displeasures. Via Sally Goldenberg in the Post:

Owners cite a shortage of hybrids and argue that they’re also not as safe as the standard, heavy Crown Victorias. Ronald Sherman, a fleet owner and president of the Metropolitan Taxicab Board of Trade, said major hybrid providers Ford and Toyota can sell only a fifth of the number required to meet the directive. “Clearly, there will not be enough to sustain this mandate,” Sherman said. “The numbers simply don’t add up.”

In a letter to Matthew Daus, chairman of the city Taxi and Limousine Commission, he asked that the city push back the deadline due to a “nationwide hybrid car and parts availability crisis.”

“Crown Victorias are 5-star, across-the-board crash-rated vehicles that withstand severe accidents,” he wrote.

The Post also mentions that Sherman has long been a critic of hybrid taxis and testified against the Ford Escape hybrid earlier this year. That car has since been cleared by auto safety experts.

I can’t really explain Mr. Sherman’s opposition to the hybrids. While he is concerned about black-market cabs with more trunk space stealing the yellow cab businesses when the smaller trunks are prevalent, anyone who’s ever hailed a cab in New York will be quick to dispute this point with Sherman. The vast majority of people aren’t taking taxis with suitcases, and those who do will find a way to fit their suitcases into the back of a taxicab.

In the end, it’s all about an auto industry voice resisting change for the better. While not as egregious as various promotions celebrating subsidized gas for two years, Sherman’s voice is yet another trying to stem a tide that will help out the city environmentally and cab drivers financially. Trade reps should be encouraging these developments; they should work with the Bloomberg Administration to ensure a smooth transition. In 2008, with gas prices high and global climate change an accepted reality, Sherman’s words seem remarkably out of touch with the times.

You may also like

9 comments

Stationstops.com July 1, 2008 - 1:37 am

What annoys me the most about NYC taxi cabs is that despite how large the fleet is, no one ever bothered to design an actual cab – they just picked a sedan.

Anyone who has ridden a cab in London knows exactly what I mean. London cabs are specifically designed to be CABS, are extremely easy to enter and exit, and you can walk right into the back of one with your luggage and have legroom galore – plus, they are designed to be easier to keep clean, and they are indeed cleaner. Oh and the drivers can actually get to hotels and landmarks by name without an intersection.

This would be a great time to encourage automakers to design a real American cab with todays needs – including fuel economy based on the driving habits of cab drivers.

While they are at it, they should design a police car too.

Reply
Doc Barnett July 1, 2008 - 8:06 am

The fleet owners’ harping on (occupant!!!) safety is a huge turnoff and undermines their complaint that acquiring and maintaining hybrids when they are in such high demand is expensive. All taxi customers are also pedestrians; occupant safety achieved primarily by mass is more than negated by increased danger to outside people and even structures when cabs crash. It’s a backward view of safety that prizes the Crown Vic on NYC streets, and I doubt it resonates even the most devoted (lazy) taxi rider. We all spend more time outside cabs than inside them.

Reply
Michael Gruen July 1, 2008 - 8:59 am

It’s simple, really:

American Hybrid Options: 1-ish.
Foreign Hybrid Options: Numerous.

Ford et al know how to lobby.

Reply
StationStops.com July 1, 2008 - 12:27 pm

True but I would much rather see pressure put on American carmakers than make the NYC cab fleet foreign – that’s not the right direction.

Reply
Boris July 1, 2008 - 10:11 am

Like Doc said, Crown Vics are a danger to pedestrians and smaller cars- not to mention how cabbies take advantage of their tank-like status to muscle their way out of traffic. I can almost feel Sherman is afraid of losing this street superiority status with the nimbler, lighter hybrid taxis.

Now if only our streets and highways were redone to fix the numerous bottlenecks, substandard highway ramps, and dangerous intersections, cabbies will seize to be a traffic hazard altogether.

Reply
Mike July 1, 2008 - 11:41 am

It’s really about the money. Hybrid cars cost more than Crown Victorias. The fleet owners, since they rent out the cabbies to the drivers each day, don’t see the cost savings in fuel. The drivers will save plenty every day they drive on fuel costs ($40 or more on a typical day).

Instead, what the fleet owners do is charge more to rent the hybrid out to the driver. In this way, they can also cash in on the savings.

But they still have to lay out more (and we’re talking about 2-3X the amount) to buy the new vehicle. That’s not an easy thing for them to do.

But it will be worth it in the long run. In a recent Calgary study, cab drivers reported it only took them 14-18 months to make up the difference in the cost to buy the hybrid taxi.

Reply
twakum July 1, 2008 - 3:46 pm

Hi, guy who used to do Taxi insurance here! the vast majority of taxi accidents are low speed, how often do they get to go 55+? A lot less than limos or your car. While frequency is high, severity is lower than comparable public transportation classes.

What they really hate is its easy to fix a 25+ year old design Crown Vic, as oppsed to buying all new quaterpanels and the like with non CV’s.

Most taxi fleet owners are total douchebags anyway.

Reply
Jessica July 1, 2008 - 9:48 pm

Frankly, Commission mandates don’t work out well for anyone.

I love StationStops’ comment re the importance of design. Rethinking this thing from the beginning would be the ideal solution, and if this were a private system, it wouldn’t be overrun with hasty political decisions like this one.

Instead, we’re looking at retrofitting an entire system. And it’s especially interesting that this hybrid push “to replace the entire fleet” comes after the recent, expensive, and [largely loathed] gps/ tracking/ news systems have been installed to no one’s benefit.

Reply
A. Louis June 1, 2010 - 1:34 pm

http://matthewdausisahorsespatootie.blogspot.com/
You say:
“The vast majority of people aren’t taking taxis with suitcases, and those who do will find a way to fit their suitcases into the back of a taxicab.”

This is a very cavalier attitude. Cabbies need not “the vast majority” of passengers, they need all of the passengers. As it is lax enforcement against gypasie cabs leaves most people thinking that there are two kinds of taxis, yellow with the meters and black without meters. “The vast majority” get into whichever stops first. As it is legal cabs pay taxes including the fifty cent transit tax per ride which the geniuses at the TLC show on the meter as an “extra” which for “The vast majority” means it’s part of the cabbies tip. The TLC is oblivious and has never had one ex cabbie on its panel.

Reply

Leave a Comment