Second Ave. Sagas
  • About
  • Contact Me
  • 2nd Ave. Subway History
  • Search
  • About
  • Contact Me
  • 2nd Ave. Subway History
  • Search
Second Ave. Sagas

News and Views on New York City Transportation

Buses

Seeking a solution for the MTA’s bus woes

by Benjamin Kabak February 27, 2012
written by Benjamin Kabak on February 27, 2012

Bus ridership figures have declined dramatically over the past few years.

As the MTA touts the fact that subway ridership is on the up-and-up, its ever-shrinking bus network is telling a different story. Authority board members want to do something, anything, to reverse the downward trends, but a simple fix lies right beneath the authority’s nose. Will it be enough to save the bus system or are more dramatic changes in order?

First, the numbers. Subway ridership, we learned last night, is at levels not reached since 1947 before white flight, the true rise of the automobile and the general decline of New York City and its infrastructure. Bus figures though are going the wrong way. For 2011, bus ridership was 665.3 million — a hearty number, yes, but one that is 31.6 million trips fewer than the total from the year before. Bus ridership, in other words, declined 4.5 percent from 2010 to 2011.

These declines were not isolated to any time of the week either. Weekday rides were down 4.3 percent while weekend ridership shrunk by 6.4 percent. 2011 marked the first full year after the June 2010 service cuts that decimated the bus network, and it seems as though those cuts have driven a stake through the heart of the bus network.

Interestingly, the MTA doesn’t believe it’s losing transit riders, and the numbers bear them out. Average subway ridership increased by more than the number of bus rides lost between 2010 and 2011. Perhaps as the buses grow more inconvenient and less frequent, transit riders will opt for the subways instead. That’s the line Transit is pushing at least.

Yet, we shouldn’t be so accepting of that argument. A healthy and vibrant bus network is a component to any transit system. Although buses aren’t nearly as environmentally friendly as a subway, they serve to localize trips and offer more flexibility than a subway track. Buses can carry people over shorter distances and could offer interborough trips that are more direct than the round-about subway routing that invariably carries nearly everyone into and out of Manhattan.

So how to fix the buses and reverse this long-term trend? At the MTA Board committee meetings yesterday, some board members floated various ideas. “We have to start looking at the possibility of smaller buses in areas where there are not many people who need that service, and maybe a discounted fair for off peak hours, so as to encourage people back to using the buses,” Charles Moerdler said.

MTA officials, who described the declining bus ridership totals as “dire,” did not seem to embrace Moerdler’s idea. “Reducing off-peak fares is not something that we are considering at this time,” an authority spokesman said in a statement. Transit officials, meanwhile, are hoping that they will one day have the money to restore buses lost to the cuts but do not know when that time may be.

Even if we wait for money to materialize to restore these lost routes, the solution probably isn’t added service. Instead, it is to speed up the bus system. Buses in New York, as I’ve said many times before, are slow, plodding and unreliable. They’re at the whims of surface traffic and suffer through endless boarding delays. The secret of the faster and more popular Select Bus Service is the pre-board fare payment. That alone is responsible for the bulk of the service’s faster speeds. Enforced dedicated lanes and signal prioritization will help, but nothing gets buses moving faster in New York City than an end to the interminable wait for people to figure out how to dip their MetroCards.

Of course, instituting pre-board fare payment in its current form at every local bus stop in the city would be costly and inefficient. Many bus routes do not attract enough people for such a measure, and those are the ones that would benefit from more service. Transit then should try a balancing act: A faster roll-out of SBS-like services along popular routes coupled with more reliable service along others could make buses more attractive. Only then will New Yorkers return to the city’s surface transit network.

February 27, 2012 55 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Manhattan

What The Times missed about East 69th St.

by Benjamin Kabak February 27, 2012
written by Benjamin Kabak on February 27, 2012

A new subway entrance could tear asunder the entire fabric of an Upper East Side block, says its residents.

Over the weekend, The Times’ Metropolitan Section took on the dispute over the MTA’s planned expansion of the 68th St. subway station. As we know, Transit is planning to make this busy station ADA-accessible and an overall easier place to exit the system by building new entrances and some elevators at 69th Street, and the residents along one part of 69th St. doth protest too much.

Cara Buckley penned The Times’ take on the dispute, and it’s a perfectly sterile piece. Those crazy one-percenters, it seems to say. Here’s how Buckley writes it:

There is talk that the proposed newcomer will bring riffraff to the block, or rats or outdoor urinators. That things will be noisier. Squishier. That property values will drop. Such are the fears running along 69th Street near Lexington Avenue, home to the Union Club, neo-Georgian homes and carriage houses. They are fears normally associated with the less-charming realities of urban life, like a homeless shelter or a late-night dive bar. But in this case, they are focused on something quite different: new entrances to a subway station.

Some New Yorkers can only dream of having a subway train ferry them straight to their front door, but residents of East 69th Street say the entrances have no place on what they believe to be one of the prettiest streets around. They have formed a block association and hired lawyers, and they plan to tap an engineering firm to conduct transportation and environmental assessments that will likely show that the entrances can and should go elsewhere, or perhaps are not needed at all. Residents are feeling, in the words of one, “hysterical,” all the while trying to defuse charges of Upper East Side snobbery.

“It’s not as though any of us are sitting there riding around in limos and saying other people should ride the subways, like Marie Antoinette,” said Charles Salfeld, who has lived at the Imperial House on East 69th Street since 1976. “What we object to is this access to and from the subway done at the expense of the residential and pristine quality of 69th Street.”

Actually, that’s exactly what those folks said at previous meetings, and now they’re trying to backtrack. What Buckley only tip-toed around when describing a block a few feet from Lexington Ave. and Hunter College were the clear racial undertones of the residents’ statements. During an October meeting, one resident said “people to the west don’t take the subway. Not to be elitist, but they don’t.” In January, another said the new station would “attract people looking to hang out.”

Now that these East 69th St. residents had time to compose themselves, their language — still ludicrous — has lost its edge. They speak of rolling a bowling ball down the block at night without hitting anything. They call the MTA’s new “absolutely preposterous” and worry about property values which will somehow go down with better subway access. They’ve lawyered up and toned it down.

This story runs deeper than just some neighborhood opposition to a new subway entrance. It’s about a group of people who think they’re better than everyone else and want to keep their quote-unquote pristine block of urban space shoved between Lexington and Park Avenues in Manhattan, the nation’s most densely populated area, to themselves. This isn’t a quaint dispute with some self-centered Upper East Siders. It’s elitism, classism and maybe even some racism at its worst, and that deserves attention.

February 27, 2012 41 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
AsidesMTA Politics

Link: On Lhota’s first 100 days

by Benjamin Kabak February 27, 2012
written by Benjamin Kabak on February 27, 2012

It’s hard to believe how quickly 100 days can go by, but that’s the time that’s passed since Joseph Lhota took over the reins at the MTA from Jay Walder. Despite a delayed confirmation hearing that didn’t see Lhota officially assuming the mantle of CEO and Chairman until January, the new head has been in place since mid-November when he served as the agency’s executive director. Today, Dana Rubinstein at Capital New York looks back on those first 100 days and walks away impressed.

“To sum up,” she writes, “Lhota was installed by a governor who doesn’t much care about transit to straighten out the finances and public image of an authority that is a political pinata, all while keeping the trains running on time. Perhaps surprisingly, under these circumstances, Joe Lhota’s first 100 days have been fairly calm. And perhaps more surprisingly, transit people seem to like the job he’s doing.”

While Rubinstein makes the mistake of crediting Lhota with FASTRACK — it was a Walder program that Lhota opted to push through — she highlights the good of his tenure so far: He’s reached out to the TWU, and he’s been a vocal critic of the current MTA funding structure. He recognizes that the MTA cannot survive without the revenue from the payroll tax and has called upon the state to find a more sustainable way to fund transit.

I believe Rubinstein’s take is the right one: Lhota has had a solid first 100 days. Amidst doubts concerning his credentials, he has established himself as a very credible MTA leader. Still, he has his work cut out for him. The TWU still has yet to agree to a contract, and the MTA must continue to push for future expansion plans while shoring up its internal bureaucracy and funding structure. Hopefully, though, Lhota is here to stay as some stability atop the MTA would be a welcome change from the revolving door through which we’ve lived over the past five years.

February 27, 2012 9 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
View from Underground

Device theft, subway ridership on the upswing

by Benjamin Kabak February 26, 2012
written by Benjamin Kabak on February 26, 2012

For the past few years, as smartphones, Kindles and iPads have become ubiquitous in society, they have invaded the subways. As I observe straphangers during my morning commutes, I’ve noticed how Kindles often outnumber books, and more people are reading the paper on their eReaders than in hard copy. It’s the wave of the future.

A few weeks ago, as I stood on my 3 train en route from Grand Army Plaza to Nevins St., I stood against the door reading The Times on my iPad as a cop stood next to me. In a friendly tone, he told me to guard my iPad because they are the number one item stolen on the subways. I politely thanked him and told him I knew the stats. I, along with many others on my car, went back to my digital newspaper.

Now, I and my fellow straphanger police officer are not the only ones who have noticed this increase in the number of eReaders underground. Thieves have as well, and over the past few years, we’ve heard multiple stories about how subway robbers are targeting smartphones and other electronic devices. One time-tested method involves the grab-and-dash. Thieves will pick a victim sitting close to a door who is seemingly paying more attention to their iPad than their surroundings. As the train pulls into a new station, the thief will grab the device and dash out of the train, leaving behind a electronics-less victim with little hope of catching the perpetrator.

This week, as the MTA Board committees gear up for their monthly meetings, the MTA has released a new set of data showcasing how these types of robberies are on the upswing. As the NYPD reports, reported grand larcenies for January 2012 were up by 42.2 percent over January 2011. Of course, with 155 reported larcenies, those numbers are still incredibly low. Average weekday ridership is over 5.4 million people so the chances of being a victim of such a grand larceny are slim.

Back in October of 2010, I noticed how New Yorkers these days ride obliviously. As a child of the 1980s, I remember when people were loath to ride the subways let alone flash their iPods, iPhones and Kindles. We take for granted the fact that the subways are safe, and even with grand larceny totals are rising, we shouldn’t lose sight of the fact that they are still essentially safe. Very few people are the victims of reported thefts, and the subways are safer. Even without station agents, rapes and murders are both at zero, and felony assaults are down too. With headlines talking about crime increases, we should ride carefully but not with a tinge of paranoia.

Subway ridership is on the upswing.

Meanwhile, subway ridership too is up significantly. According to the latest numbers from the MTA, total subway ridership last year hit 1.64 billion, and the authority says it’s the highest total since 1950. Average weekday ridership hit 5.3 million, the highest total since 1951, and combined Saturday and Sunday ridership was 5.4 million, the highest weekend total since 1947. As fares go up and service levels are cut, as cleaners vanish and station agents are cut back, people are riding the subways. Now if only someone in Albany would listen to the interests of the riders.

February 26, 2012 22 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Service Advisories

Weekend work impacting 12 lines, countdown clocks

by Benjamin Kabak February 24, 2012
written by Benjamin Kabak on February 24, 2012

The MTA has a full slate of weekend work planned for the next few days, but for the technologically-dependent among us, the worse news concerns the countdown clocks. For 12 full hours, from 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. on Saturday, the countdown clocks along the East and West Side IRT lines will be off. Transit says the temporary outage is due to “system maintenance on the Automatic Train Supervision system.” The clock themselves will not be touched, and they’ll go back on tomorrow evening.

This temporary move makes me laugh a bit. I’ve become so accustomed to riding on lines with the countdown clocks that I find myself far more impatient during waits on B Division platforms. Tomorrow, we go back to staring into dark tunnels awaiting the next train.

Meanwhile, it’s Friday, and you know what that means. Subway Weekender has the map.


From 12:01 a.m. to 6:30 a.m., Sunday, February 26 and from 12:01 a.m. to 5 a.m. Monday, February 27, uptown 4 trains run express from Brooklyn Bridge to 14th Street-Union Square due to work on the Broadway/Lafayette-to-Bleecker Street transfer connection and station painting at Astor Place and Spring Street.


From 12:01 a.m. Sunday, February 26 to 5 a.m. Monday, February 27, downtown 4 trains run local from 125th to Grand Central-42nd Street due to station time signal enhancements.


From 8 a.m. to 10 p.m., Sunday, February 26, downtown 5 trains run local from 125th Street to Grand Central-42nd Street due to station time signal enhancements.


From 12:01 a.m. Sunday, February 26 to 5 a.m. Monday, February 27, uptown 6 trains run express from Brooklyn Bridge to 14th Street-Union Square due to work on the Broadway/Lafayette-to-Bleecker Street transfer connection and station painting at Astor Place and Spring Street.


From 12:01 a.m. Saturday, February 25 to 5 a.m. Monday, February 27, there are no 7 trains between Times Square-42nd Street and Queensboro Plaza due to track panel installation and CBTC work south of Queensboro Plaza, ADA work at Court Square and station renewal at Hunters Point Avenue. Customers should take the N, R, E or F between Manhattan and Queens. Free shuttle buses operate between Vernon Blvd-Jackson Avenue and Queensboro Plaza. In Manhattan, the 42nd Street shuttle (S) operates overnight. (Repeats next five weekends through March 31-Apr 2.)


From 12:01 a.m. Saturday, February 25 to 5 a.m. Monday, February 27, A trains run local in both directions between 145th Street and 168th Street and from 6:30 a.m. to 11 p.m., Saturday, February 25, and Sunday, February 26, there is no C train service between 145th Street and 168th Street due to track maintenance. Customers should take the A instead.


From 12:01 a.m. Saturday, February 25 to 5 a.m. Monday, February 27, Brooklyn-bound D trains run via the N line from 36th Street to Coney Island-Stillwell Avenue due to station and line structure rehabilitation near 9th Avenue. Note: Free transfers are available at New Utrecht Avenue-62nd Street with MetroCards. This out-of-system transfer at street level via New Utrecht Avenue is available until May 2012. Look for instructions on station signs.


From 12:01 a.m. Saturday, February 25 to 5 a.m. Monday, February 27, there is no L train service between Broadway Junction and 8th Avenue due to signal removal. The M train, M14 bus and free shuttle buses provide alternate service.

  • M service is extended to the 57th Street F station.
  • Customers may take to M14 bus between 1st Avenue and 8th Avenue.
  • Free shuttle bus operates in three sections:
    1. Between Broadway Junction and Myrtle-Wyckoff Avs.
    2. Between Myrtle-Wyckoff Avs and Lorimer Street-Metropolitan Avenue (G)
    3. Between Lorimer Street-Metropolitan Ave (G) and Marcy Ave (J, M)

Note: Manhattan-bound customers may transfer to the A, C or J train at Broadway Junction or the M at Myrtle-Wyckoff Avs or Marcy Ave.


From 6 a.m. to 12 midnight, Saturday, February 25 and from 8 a.m. to 11 p.m., Sunday, February 26, M service is extended to the 57th Street (F) station due to L suspension.


From 7 a.m. to 9 p.m., Saturday, February 25, and from 9:30 a.m. to 7 p.m., Sunday, February 26, some N trains operate between Ditmars Blvd and 34fh Street-Herald Square due to track panel installation and CBTC work south of Queensboro Plaza, ADA work at Court Square and station renewal at Hunters Point Avenue.


From 12:01 a.m. Saturday, February 25 to 5 a.m. Monday, February 27, N trains stop at DeKalb Avenue in both directions all weekend in order to provide a transfer to and from Q trains.


From 12:01 a.m. Saturday, February 25 to 5 a.m. Monday, February 27, there is no Q train service between 57th Street-7th Avenue and DeKalb Avenue. Q trains will operate to and from Whitehall Street on the R line. Customers may take the N between 57th Street-7th Avenue and DeKalb Avenue or the R between 57th Street-7th Avenue and Whitehall Street.

(42nd Street Shuttle)
From 12:01 a.m. to 6 a.m., Saturday, February 25, Sunday, February 26 and Monday, February 27, 42nd Street operates overnight due to the 7 line suspension between Queens and Manhattan.

February 24, 2012 10 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Subway History

Was the L train considered for elimination?

by Benjamin Kabak February 24, 2012
written by Benjamin Kabak on February 24, 2012

The New York Post had one of the more infuriatingly tantalizing two-paragraph articles you’ll ever see about the subway today. The story is here, and this is the entire thing:

Every hipster’s favorite subway line — the perennially packed L train — was almost completely shuttered 25 years ago because barely anyone was using it, MTA Chairman Joseph Lhota revealed yesterday.

Now that line — serving once- desolate but now trendy Williamsburg — is one of the fastest-growing in the system.

With a nary a hint of history, The Post drops a bombshell. The MTA may have considered eliminating the L during its nadir. Could it be true? Would the authority sever a cross-borough connection that now is packed morning, noon and night, seven days a week? Some brief Google searches didn’t turn up any history, and this story piqued my interest.

I initially reached out to the MTA for initial comment, and while they’re working on it, they didn’t seem optimistic that too much would turn up. I queried SubChat as well, and those responses were equally as vague. One SubChatter noted a rumor that the TA may have considered shutting down the G, and another noted that a proposal to shutter the L could have been a part of the so-called “planned shrinkage” movement from the late 1970s when the city was literally burning down.

But what of The Post’s claims themselves? One SubChatter disputed the notion that the L was “barely used” and recalled the era of the 1980s when the train was full during rush hour commutes. Perhaps the J/M trains were to be axed instead? Another though remembered a time in the 1960s when the BMT Canarsie line was not a popular route.

There is, it seems, some truth to the fact that the L was not a popular line for a while. Mike Frumin, who used historic ridership data to chart station popularity, noted in 2009 how L train traffic tanked for decades and only recently has enjoyed a relatively strong upswing. At its low point in the late 1970s, only 1.2 million annually — or around 3000 per day — used the Bedford Ave. stop. That figure spiked to nearly 7 million in 2010 with average weekday ridership up to 21,000.

All told, considering the financial and ridership problems that plagued the MTA as well as the social and political situations in New York City at the time, it makes sense that the authority could have considered shutting subway lines. That was, after all, the time of the infamous Ford to City: Drop Dead Daily News cover. Still, without the L train or the J/M/Z or even the G train, areas in Queens and Northern Brooklyn that are enjoying growth today would be entirely lost. Shutting full subway arteries isn’t something that should be considered as an option, no matter how bad a temporary financial situation lasts.

February 24, 2012 29 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
AsidesView from Underground

Subway-related deaths account for 7% of NYC suicides

by Benjamin Kabak February 24, 2012
written by Benjamin Kabak on February 24, 2012

While New York City’s suicide rate is nearly half the national average, seven percent of New York suicides come via subway-related deaths, according to a report from the City’s Department of Health and Mental Hygiene. The report notes that around 475 New York City residents take their own lives annually, and based on numbers from 2006-2007, around 33 of those deaths come via subway accidents. TWU officials tell me that in 2011, 54 New Yorkers committed suicide in the subway with another 36 people suffering serious injuries. Men are far more likely to attempt suicide via subway than women.

The reaction to those who attempt a subway suicide has always been mixed amongst straphangers. Any suicide is disruptive to many people’s lives and often a cry for help. But a subway suicide multiplies that impact. The person driving a train that causes another’s death has to live with the accident, and subway riders who are trying to get to their destinations can be delayed for hours. It is, some say, the most selfish way for someone to take his or her own life.

To help prevent suicides and otherwise address crisis intervention, the city runs a hotline at 1-800-LIFENET and has more information available on its website.

February 24, 2012 3 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
MTA Construction

Eying the next generation of MTA megaprojects

by Benjamin Kabak February 24, 2012
written by Benjamin Kabak on February 24, 2012

As hard as it is to believe, the current slate of MTA megaprojects are, by and large, operating at something akin to autopilot. While the authority still has to worry about construction timelines, budget caps and placating neighbors, the various expansion projects are generally well on their ways toward completion. Thus, it is never too early to talk about the far-off future.

Over the past few months, it’s become clear that, despite some concerns about timeframes and budget figures, the MTA has its projects under control. The 7 line is on pace to open in late 2013, and the Fulton Street Transit Center, after years of delays and a lack of leadership, is set for a 2014 debut. The authority is making progress underneath Second Ave. and continues to stress a 2016 revenue service date. The East Side Access Project’s timeline remains in limbo, but Capital Construction should be coming back with an update within the next few weeks.

So what’s next? We don’t know where the money will come from, but the MTA can’t stop expanding its system. There are too many worthwhile projects that have been years or decades in the making. As the MTA is no longer planning its current slate of projects, the authority could begin to look toward its next round of so-called megaprojects. As I see it, the authority could have four projects ready to go pretty quickly.

1. Second Ave. Subway Phase 2: As far as I’m concerned, this is a no-brainer. While Phase 1 of SAS is supposed to carry 200,000 passengers daily, for the line to be worthwhile, it must fulfill its full potential. Phases 3 and 4, through midtown, will be costly and tricky; after all, Michael Horodniceanu recently guessed the total price tag on the remaining sections to be over $23 billion. But Phase 2 should be the easiest. Much of the tunneling has been completed, and this Phase offers the promise of a connection to the Lexington Ave. IRT at 125th St. Furthermore, it allows the MTA the option to build north or west at a future date.

2. Reactivation of the Staten Island North Shore Rail: Restoring rail to Staten Island’s North Shore has been in the works for some time. At the behest of local politicians, the MTA has been hosted planning open houses for a few years, and they have developed a fairly extensive North Shore Alternatives Analysis website. The city’s Economic Development Corporation appears to be on board, and the authority issued a study last year focusing on the various transit possibilities.

3. Metro-North Access to Penn Station: Again, this is another project that has been percolating within the MTA for some time now, and it is largely dependent upon the East Side Access Project. Once ESA is completed, the MTA could bring some Metro-North trains into Penn Station to provide better access to both sides of Manhattan for residents from Westchester. In fact, this plan first popped up in the early 2000s, and the MTA revived discussions this past fall. The authority plans to release an environmental assessment in 2013 and has up a project website. For some reason, Long Island politicians and residents aren’t yet on board though.

4. Third-Tracking the LIRR Mainline: In 2005, the MTA to began to discuss plans to improve service along the LIRR Mainline, and those plans included a highly controversial third track. Long Island politicians and transit advocates feel that this is an entirely project that will help the LIRR adapt to a planned jump in ridership that a completed ESA will bring. Yet, NIMBYs along the route have long spoken out against it. Four years ago, some LI representatives stressed how this project would happen, but it’ll take a battle to see this one through.

These aren’t particularly out-of-the-box ideas for the MTA’s next big expansion push, but reading the tea leaves here is not challenging. The authority appears to have its sites set on these projects, and I wouldn’t be surprised to see them become the focus of MTA Capital Construction as its current works wind down over the next few years. The key to all of them however will be the costs. The authority must figure out a way to get construction costs down to reasonable levels or else these projects won’t move from beyond the drawing board.

February 24, 2012 104 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Service Advisories

Transit readies 6th Ave. for a FASTRACK treatment

by Benjamin Kabak February 23, 2012
written by Benjamin Kabak on February 23, 2012

The FASTRACK express heads to 6th Ave. on Monday night, and Transit has laid out the week’s service closures. From 10 p.m.-5 a.m. each night beginning on the evening of Monday, February 27 and ending in the morning on Friday, March 2, there will be no service along 6th Ave. between 57th St. and West 4th St. in both directions. Here’s how service will operate instead:

  • D trains are rerouted and operate in two sections:
    • D trains will operate between 205th Street and 59th Street-Columbus Circle, then via the C line between 59th Street-Columbus Circle and West 4th Street, then via the F line between West 4th Street and 2nd Avenue, the last stop.
    • D trains will operate between Coney Island-Stillwell Avenue and 36th Street in Brooklyn, then via the R line between 36th Street and Whitehall Street in Lower Manhattan, the last stop.
  • F trains operate via the E line between Roosevelt Avenue and West 4th Street in both directions. For service to Lexington Avenue/63rd Street, Roosevelt Island and 21st Street-Queensbridge, customers should take the Q. Q service will be extended to 21st Street-Queensbridge via the F line after 57th Street-7th Avenue.
  • Manhattan-bound B and M service in Brooklyn and Queens ends at 9:30 p.m. Service in Manhattan is available until 10 p.m.
  • Free Shuttle buses provide connecting service between the Grand Street D station and both the Canal Street N/Q/R/6 and Broadway-Lafayette D/F stations.

With the various routes along 6th Ave. branching off to numerous locales both north and south of Manhattan’s so-called Central Business District, this is a tricky FASTRACK to run, but things seem to make sense. F trains will run via the E until West 4th St. before heading into Brooklyn, but any D trips from Manhattan to Brooklyn require a pair of transfers. I’d say anyone needing a D train late at night next week is better off finding a different route if possible.

February 23, 2012 16 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Brooklyn

Closed for decades, Brooklyn’s 4th Ave. station entrances reopen

by Benjamin Kabak February 23, 2012
written by Benjamin Kabak on February 23, 2012

In an effort to enliven a dead spot on the avenue, the east subway entrance at 4th Avenue between 9th and 10th Streets in Brooklyn, seen here last year, have been reopened. (Photo by Benjamin Kabak)

As part of the extensive Culver Viaduct rehabilitation project, the MTA has reopened a subway entrance that had been closed for more than four decades. Transit announced today that the long-shuttered entrance underneath the viaduct on the east side of 4th Ave. between 9th and 10th Streets has been reopened, pleasing neighbors who had viewed the conditions under the viaduct as unsafe blight. Pedestrian advocates too are happy with the reopening as straphangers will now no longer have to cross a busy and dangerous 4th Ave.

“During the initial phases of this project, we decided it was the perfect opportunity to reopen the east side station house on 4th Avenue,” NYC Transit President Thomas F. Prendergast said in a statement. “We are grateful to the elected officials whose contributions allowed us to do even more than we had planned at this historic station.”

The project, as I reported last year, was funded through an $800,000 grant from Assembly Representative Joan Millman’s office and $2 million from Brooklyn Borough President Marty Markowitz as well. Both politicians praised the authority for its work. “The opening of the east side entrance to the 4th Avenue-9th Street station is a big win for the community and the first stage of what will be the eventual transformation of Fourth Avenue into a grand ‘Brooklyn Boulevard,’” Markowitz said. “Soon, the area adjacent to this entrance will be filled with retail, and the exterior archways and windows will be opened and restored to their original glory.”

Despite today’s reopening, Transit says it still has to put the finishing touches on the revived entrance and has a ways to go as it completes the station renovation. The doors that open onto 4th Ave. are temporary, and those that open onto 10th St. will remain closed until later this year. The historic arch, covered by billboards on both sides, will be unveiled by the end of the year as well as Transit works to give the station a “lighter, more open look.”

Other improvements to the 4th Ave. area include a fresh coat of paint for the underside of the viaduct, improved lighting above the sidewalks and new retail storefronts for the both the east and west side of the streets. Transit plans to award contracts for those stores in 2013. All told, it’s a welcome improvement to what is an ugly but well-trod block along 4th Ave.

February 23, 2012 19 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Load More Posts

About The Author

Name: Benjamin Kabak
E-mail: Contact Me

Become a Patron!
Follow @2AvSagas

Upcoming Events
TBD

RSS? Yes, Please: SAS' RSS Feed
SAS In Your Inbox: Subscribe to SAS by E-mail

Instagram



Disclaimer: Subway Map © Metropolitan Transportation Authority. Used with permission. MTA is not associated with nor does it endorse this website or its content.

Categories

  • 14th Street Busway (1)
  • 7 Line Extension (118)
  • Abandoned Stations (31)
  • ARC Tunnel (52)
  • Arts for Transit (19)
  • Asides (1,244)
  • Bronx (13)
  • Brooklyn (126)
  • Brooklyn-Queens Connector (13)
  • Buses (291)
  • Capital Program 2010-2014 (27)
  • Capital Program 2015-2019 (56)
  • Capital Program 2020-2024 (3)
  • Congestion Fee (71)
  • East Side Access Project (37)
  • F Express Plan (22)
  • Fare Hikes (173)
  • Fulton Street (57)
  • Gateway Tunnel (29)
  • High-Speed Rail (9)
  • Hudson Yards (18)
  • Interborough Express (1)
  • International Subways (26)
  • L Train Shutdown (20)
  • LIRR (65)
  • Manhattan (73)
  • Metro-North (99)
  • MetroCard (124)
  • Moynihan Station (16)
  • MTA (98)
  • MTA Absurdity (233)
  • MTA Bridges and Tunnels (27)
  • MTA Construction (128)
  • MTA Economics (522)
    • Doomsday Budget (74)
    • Ravitch Commission (23)
  • MTA Politics (330)
  • MTA Technology (195)
  • New Jersey Transit (53)
  • New York City Transit (220)
  • OMNY (3)
  • PANYNJ (113)
  • Paratransit (10)
  • Penn Station (18)
  • Penn Station Access (10)
  • Podcast (30)
  • Public Transit Policy (164)
  • Queens (129)
  • Rider Report Cards (31)
  • Rolling Stock (40)
  • Second Avenue Subway (262)
  • Self Promotion (77)
  • Service Advisories (612)
  • Service Cuts (118)
  • Sponsored Post (1)
  • Staten Island (52)
  • Straphangers Campaign (40)
  • Subway Advertising (45)
  • Subway Cell Service (34)
  • Subway History (81)
  • Subway Maps (83)
  • Subway Movies (14)
  • Subway Romance (13)
  • Subway Security (104)
  • Superstorm Sandy (35)
  • Taxis (43)
  • Transit Labor (151)
    • ATU (4)
    • TWU (100)
    • UTU (8)
  • Triboro RX (4)
  • U.S. Transit Systems (53)
    • BART (1)
    • Capital Metro (1)
    • CTA (7)
    • MBTA (11)
    • SEPTA (5)
    • WMATA (28)
  • View from Underground (447)

Archives

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram

@2019 - All Right Reserved.


Back To Top