Second Ave. Sagas
  • About
  • Contact Me
  • 2nd Ave. Subway History
  • Search
  • About
  • Contact Me
  • 2nd Ave. Subway History
  • Search
Second Ave. Sagas

News and Views on New York City Transportation

Buses

Abridged BRT coming to 34th St. in November

by Benjamin Kabak September 26, 2011
written by Benjamin Kabak on September 26, 2011

The latest plan for 34th Street will arrive in November.

It’s been over six months since 34th Street NIMBYs killed NYC DOT’s ambitious plan for a 34th Street transitway and equally as long since the agency announced modified plans for semi-dedicated bus lanes. Now those plans are coming to fruition, and DOT is eying a November roll-out for its so-called Select Bus Service along the 34th Street corridor.

As The Daily News reported today, instead of a dedicated transitway along 34th Street, we’ll get the M34A SBS, a BRT-lite route that will improve travel for all of one bus route in the city. The M34A will replace the M16, and it will be equipped with the same SBS features found along 1st and 2nd Aves. and Fordham Road: pre-board fare payment with proof-of-purhase; surveillance cameras to enforce bus-only lanes; three-door, low-floor buses; and eventually, signal prioritization.

These measures can’t replicate bus rapid transit. Rather, they are simply a start, but it’s tough to say if these efforts to speed up bus travel will go anywhere. Even after the city dumped the plans for a Transitway, residents are still complaining about curbside access and want DOT to carve out an exception to the bus-only lanes from 10 a.m. to 4 p.m. every weekday.

DOT has rightly refused. “Although we appreciate the concerns of the residents of the 34th Street block between Ninth and Tenth Avenues, the current curb configuration on 34th Street provides significant benefits to bus riders,” a spokesman said to DNAInfo. This is a battle over transit speed and street space that won’t end soon.

September 26, 2011 23 comments
2 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Second Avenue Subway

From Maloney, a B for the future T

by Benjamin Kabak September 26, 2011
written by Benjamin Kabak on September 26, 2011

Late last week, MTA honchos and various elected officials gathered underground at 63rd St. to celebrate the end of tunneling for Phase 1 of the Second Ave. Subway. Adi, the tunnel boring machine, broke through to the existing tube just east of Third Ave., and it seems as though there is, after seven decades of starts and stops, no turning back. There will be a part of the Second Ave. Subway sometime this decade.

Despite the accolades and photo ops, though, the subway is a long way off. The MTA has billions to spend and years of construction work ahead. It has to construct numerous auxiliary buildings and three stations, and although the MTA thinks construction will wrap in December 2016, the feds still say construction could last until 2018. That’s a long time for a two-mile extension of a preexisting subway tunnel with a $4.5 billion price tag.

The TBM then provided Carolyn Maloney, the House representative from the Upper East Side, with the perfect opportunity to unveil her third annual report card for the project. After giving the subway project a B- in 2009, she graded it a B last year. This year, it gets another B. Said Maloney:

“The MTA finished digging all the tunnels for the Second Avenue Subway this week – a huge breakthrough for the project and for our mass transit system. The MTA should be congratulated for achieving that milestone five months ahead of schedule. The project continues to score high marks on merit, given that it will serve 213,000 riders on its first day of operation; high marks on economic benefit, since it is providing 16,000 construction jobs at a time of economic hardship; and good marks on communication with the public and on construction management, as more than half the contracts for the subway have been awarded.

“However, the project continues to have a significant, negative impact on the community, with the emergence of new environmental concerns, and the MTA needs to improve its planning, adherence to budget, completion of entrances and ancillary facilities, and progress toward completion. But most of all, the MTA needs to stick to its current completion target of December 2016. Overall, we are awarding the MTA a ‘B,’ buoyed by the completion of the subway tunnels, the economic benefits of the project, and significant progress in awarding contracts.”

As it has been in past years, much of the 2011 report card is fairly obvious. Maloney still loves the project’s merit and potential long-term economic benefits. She also applauded the MTA’s completion of the tunnel boring earlier than anticipated.

Yet, other concerns remain. In grading construction management a B-, she said, “Failure to do due diligence on a contractor at 72nd street has delayed demolition of the Falk buildings; problems with environmental mitigation have sent dust clouds onto the streets near 72nd Street; and problems with engineering of an entrance at 69th Street has residents concerned about possibly experiencing damage to their heating system and other utilities.”

Furthermore, she has called upon the MTA to improve planning (B-) and mitigation of construction impact (C-). Staying on budget gets a C+ when, in reality, it should probably be graded an F. After all, the MTA once thought Phase 1 would cost around $3.8 billion. But ultimately she seems to like the project and wants the MTA to devote enough resources toward its completion:

“The MTA has an ambitious construction schedule, and it needs to put its full attention to making sure that this project is moving forward with all deliberate speed. However, without a new Chair who is committed to complete the subway and without assurance that state funding will be forthcoming, this project may never be finished. The completion date for the project has been extended significantly over the years, but there were no further delays in 2011 or 2010 – a welcome development. Future delays would make this project more difficult and costly to complete. The MTA must take all steps necessary to ensure that it does not exceed its current project completion date.

Completion of the tunnels brings great hope that early problems are being resolved and that this project will stay within its current timetable and budget. There is a lot more work to be done, but there is also a growing sense that a Second Avenue Subway may soon be a reality.

One day, someone with study the MTA’s planning process for the Second Ave. Subway. We’ll find out why it costs so much and why it’s taking so long to complete. That isn’t Maloney’s report though. Hers is an effort to get the MTA to fix its process and its relationship with the neighborhood. It’s a admirable goal but one that only gets us halfway there.

September 26, 2011 28 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Service Advisories

Weekend changes impacting 13 subway lines

by Benjamin Kabak September 23, 2011
written by Benjamin Kabak on September 23, 2011

For your weekend viewing pleasure, here’s another video of the Second Ave. TBM breaking through the wall at 63rd St. It’s subway destructo-porn at its best. Anyway, it’s the weekend. You know the drill. Have fun. Stay dry.


From 12:01 a.m. Saturday, September 24 to 5 a.m. Monday, September 26, there is no 1 train service between 242nd Street and 168th Street due to Dyckman Street station and structural rehabilitation, platform edge and canopy work at stations between 215th and 242nd Sts. and switch renewal north of 238th Street.

  • For 181st and 191st Sts., take the 1 to 168th Street and transfer to the M3 or free shuttle bus on St. Nicholas Avenue.
  • For Dyckman and 207th Sts., take the 1 to 168th Street and transfer to the A.
  • For stations between 215th and 242nd Sts., take the 1 to 168th Street, transfer to the uptown A to 207th Street and take the free shuttle bus operating along Broadway.


From 1 a.m. Saturday, September 24 to 5 a.m. Monday, September 26, 4 trains skip Fulton Street in both directions due to work on the Fulton Street Transit Center. For alternate service, take the 2, 3, A, C or J instead. Note: J shuttle train operates between Fulton Street and Chambers Street-Brooklyn Bridge.


From 6 a.m. to 11:30 p.m., Saturday, September 24 and from 8 a.m. to 11:30 p.m., Sunday, September 25, 5 trains skip Fulton Street in both directions due to work on the Fulton Street Transit Center. For alternate service, take the 2, 3, A, C or J instead. Note: J shuttle train operates between Fulton Street and Chambers Street-Brooklyn Bridge.


From 6 a.m. to 6 p.m., Saturday, September 24 and Sunday, September 25, downtown 6 trains run express from Pelham Bay Park to Parkchester due to rail and switch work south of Pelham Bay Park.


From 12:01 a.m. Saturday, September 24 to 5 a.m. Monday, September 26, Manhattan-bound D trains run on the N line from Coney Island-Stillwell Avenue to 36th Street due to structural repair and station rehabilitation from 71st Street to Bay 50th Street and ADA work at Bay Parkway. Note: At all times until Friday, October 28, the southbound D is bypassing 71st Street due to stair reconstruction. So, there is no D service at 71st Street this weekend. During the day, Manhattan-bound D trains skip 53rd Street and 45th Street. Customers should use the R instead.


From 12:01 a.m. Saturday, September 24 to 5 a.m. Monday, September 26, E trains run on the F line in both directions between 36th Street, Queens and West 4th Street due to a concrete pour for switch renewal work north of Lexington Avenue. Platforms at 5th Avenue, Lexington Avenue-53rd Street and Court Square-23rd Street are closed.


From 12:01 a.m. Saturday, September 24 to 5 a.m. Monday, September 26, Queens-bound F trains run on the A line from Jay Street-MetroTech to West 4th Street due to electrical and substation work at Jay Street-MetroTech and the Broadway/Lafayette-to-Bleecker Street transfer.


From 11 p.m. Friday, September 23 to 5 a.m. Monday, September 26, there is no G train service between Court Square and Bedford-Nostrand Avs due to *deep well rehabilitation north of Bergen Street. Free shuttle buses provide alternate service. (*The deep well facilities pump out ground water, keeping water levels below the subway structure in order to prevent flooding. The wells vary in depth from about 60 ft. to 85 ft. below the sidewalk. This weekend’s work involves upgrading the currently outdated, individual control systems for six deep well facilities in the Bedford-Stuyvesant section of Brooklyn along the G line. The installation of fiber optic cables routed to each well will connect them to one another and to the NYCT network to allow for a more efficient ground water control operation in the section of the G line that they serve.)


From 1 a.m. Saturday, September 24 to 5 a.m. Monday, September 26, J shuttle trains will operate between Fulton Street and Chambers Street-Brooklyn Bridge due to work at the Fulton Street Transit Center. (No 4 or 5 trains at Fulton Street.)


From 6 a.m. Saturday, September 24 to 6 p.m. Sunday, September 25, L trains run in two sections due to fencing installation at the Canarsie Yard:

  • Between 8th Avenue and Broadway Junction and
  • Between Broadway Junction and Rockaway Parkway (every 24 minutes)


From 4 a.m. Saturday, September 24 to 10 p.m. Sunday, September 25, southbound N trains run express from Astoria Boulevard to Queensboro Plaza, skipping 30th Avenue, Broadway, 36th Avenue and 39th Avenue due to track panel installation between Astoria Boulevard and 36th Avenue.


From 12:01 a.m. Saturday, September 24 to 5 a.m. Monday, September 26, Coney Island-bound N trains operate on the D line in Brooklyn from 36th Street to Coney Island-Stillwell Avenue due to track panel installation between 59th Street and 86th Street.


From 10 p.m. Friday, September 23 to 5 a.m. Monday, September 26, uptown N trains skip Prince, 8th, 23rd, and 28th Streets due to platform edge rehabilitation at 34th Street.


From 12:01 a.m. Saturday, September 24 to 5 a.m. Monday, September 26, there is no Q train service between 57th Street-7th Avenue and Prospect Park due to tunnel ceiling inspection and structural repairs. For service between 57th Street-7th Avenue and Atlantic Avenue-Pacific Street, customers may take the N or R. For service between Atlantic Avenue-Pacific Street and Prospect Park, customer may use the free shuttle bus.


From 6:30 a.m. to midnight, Saturday, September 24 and Sunday, September 25, uptown R trains skip Prince, 8th, 23rd, and 28th Streets due to platform edge rehabilitation at 34th Street.

September 23, 2011 6 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
View from Underground

Video of the Day: An E train in the rain

by Benjamin Kabak September 23, 2011
written by Benjamin Kabak on September 23, 2011

Above ground, it’s been raining pretty hard in the New York City area today. Below ground, it has apparently been doing the same. Via amNewYork reporter Tim Herrera comes this video of an E train entering Penn Station earlier today during the deluge. It’s sort of sad, sort of dramatic and sort of hilarious when straphangers have to use their umbrellas to exit a train underground. The subways are decidedly not waterproof.

September 23, 2011 6 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
AsidesMetro-North

Metro-North Quiet Car pilot coming to Hudson, Harlem Lines

by Benjamin Kabak September 23, 2011
written by Benjamin Kabak on September 23, 2011

As New York City Transit’s underground stations are on the verge of getting nosier with cell service to debut next week, Metro-North may be getting quiet. The commuter railroad announced today a Quiet Car pilot for the Hudson and Harlem Lines and an extension of a similar pilot along the Port Jervis and Pascack Valley lines.

The details are simple: Starting October 17, on certain peak trains, the last (AM) and first (PM) cars will be set aside for commuters who would like to avoid ringing cell phones, loud conversations and other gadgetry sound effects. These trains will carry a Q with them on the timetable. The program, says Metro-North, will be voluntary with customers self-monitoring. Conductors, though, will issue so-called “shh” cars to non-compliant riders. That’s sure to go over well with petulant cell-phone users. Those who wish to converse in the Quiet Cars must use subdued voices.

Along the West-of-Hudson routes, a similar pilot has been wildly successful. According to a July study, 82 percent of riders were satisfied with the Quiet Car program with nearly 20 percent moving to the Quiet Car and only four percent sitting elsewhere. After a few months, Metro-North will evaluate the East-of-Hudson pilot before deciding whether or not to expand it. “We are pleased that Metro-North’s West of Hudson quiet car program has proved popular with riders and support Metro-North extending this initiative to East of Hudson lines, as our Council has urged in the past,” David Buchwald, chair of the Metro-North Railroad Commuter Council. “We believe that giving riders a choice in their commuting environment will make for a more pleasant traveling experience.”

September 23, 2011 1 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Second Avenue Subway

At 63rd Street, Adi emerges

by Benjamin Kabak September 23, 2011
written by Benjamin Kabak on September 23, 2011

Adi breaks through at 63rd St. (Photo via Metropolitan Transportation Authority, Patrick Cashin)

On a chilly day in April of 2010 with skies grey and intermittent rain drops falling into a giant hole in the ground 70 feet below street level, MTA CEO and Chairman Jay Walder gathered with local politicians to launch Adi, the giant tunnel-boring machine that would be responsible for creating the Second Ave. Subway tubes. Yesterday morning shortly before 11:30, Adi completed her second run, and as a broke through into the preexisting station cavern at 63rd St. slightly east of Third Avenue, the MTA could celebrate a major milestone in a project that has taken 80 years and may still last at least another five.

“At street level it can be hard to notice progress sometimes, but down here you can see the Second Avenue Subway becoming a reality right before your eyes,” Walder said. “The completion of tunneling is an enormous milestone and further proof that the Second Avenue Subway is for real this time.”

Those two themes — street-level impact and progress that is “for real this time” — have dominated the coverage of the Second Ave. Subway work. In fact, on Wednesday night a few hours before the TBM finished its run, Second Ave. business owners again called upon someone, anyone to provide them with aid during the disruptive construction. “This is our 9/11,” one of them said less than tactfully during a meeting of Community Board 8.

The progress for real though is what officials came to celebrate yesterday. The Second Ave. Subway has come to stand for the city’s inability to see big projects through, and the jury is in fact still out on this one. Originally planned for construction during the 1930s, SAS ran into the Great Depression, a World War, the rise of the automobile and an economic slump in the 1970s. Along the way, politicians such as Sheldon Silver tried to kill the project by demanding the MTA fund it in full from one end of Manhattan to the next before starting construction, and even now, the FTA believes the MTA won’t meet its planned December 2016 revenue date.

Still, politicians were effusive in their praise. “This is a remarkable — and very welcome — milestone,” City Council Member Dan Garodnick said. “From above, it’s difficult to appreciate everything that is happening to move this project forward. But while it hasn’t always been smooth sailing, things are moving, and we can’t wait to see the first train come down the line. For straphangers on the overcrowded Lexington line and businesses in the construction zone, this is a moment to celebrate. It’s a moment that brings us closer to transit relief and to the additional infrastructure that will aid our City for many decades to come.”

Adi, the TBM, begin this journey through the east tunnel in March. The 485-ton, 450-long machine used a 22-foot diameter cutterhead to mine 7789 linear feet of rock at an average depth of 70 feet. Now that the tunnels are dug out, workers will line it with concrete as part of the permanent tunnel structure. While yesterday was a major milestone for Phase 1, though, the MTA has a long way to go. Stations must be built, ventilation shafts dug, money apportioned and future phases to consider.

Sandhogs pose in front of the Second Avenue Subway tunnel boring machine. (Photo via Metropolitan Transportation Authority, Patrick Cashin)

Ultimately, though, SAS is keeping construction workers on the job, and as the MTA looks ahead to some debt-filled years, I have to hope that the parts of the SAS we’ll see in my lifetime don’t just involve a northern extension of the Q train. One day, the T should arrive.

“This milestone is a tribute to the skilled contractors and trades people who work tirelessly every day to solve the complex engineering challenges and build the Second Avenue Subway in the most dense construction environment in the country,” Denise Richardson, managing director of the General Contractors Association of New York, said. “With this milestone, New York comes one step closer to completing a vision of the Second Avenue Subway first planned in the 1920’s. Let’s make sure we continue to have the vision and fortitude to continue to build the transportation network that is so critical to New York’s economy and basic mobility.”

For more on this milestone, check out Ben Heckscher’s post at The Launch Box. He snapped some great photographs of the event, and there’s a video as well that I’ve embedded after the jump.

Continue Reading
September 23, 2011 29 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
AsidesSubway Cell Service

Report: Transit Wireless cell service pilot set for Tuesday launch

by Benjamin Kabak September 22, 2011
written by Benjamin Kabak on September 22, 2011

In September of 2007, I wrote a short article about an impending plan to bring cell service underground. Since then, Transit Wireless, the MTA’s contractor chosen for the pilot program, failed to sign up carriers, appeared to be a bogus company, went belly-up for a few years and emerged in late 2010 with a mandate from Jay Walder along with cell carriers and a late 2011 launch date. That day may be drawing even nearer.

According to a brief report in amNew York, Transit Wireless’ subway cell service pilot will go live on Tuesday at various platforms downtown. The first stations to receive a cell signal will be along the 14th St. L train corridor as well as the A/C/E platform at 14th St. and 8th Ave., the 1/2/3 station at 14th St. and 7th Ave., the F/M stop at 14th St. and 6th Ave. and the local stop at 23rd St. and 8th Ave. Neither Transit Wireless nor the MTA have confirmed the Tuesday launch date, but they have not denied it either. Initially only T-Mobile and AT&T services will be available underground. If you’re a Verizon subscriber like me, you’re out of luck.

Transit Wireless believes it can outfit the rest of the MTA’s underground stations by 2016. The era of “can you hear me now?” and mindlessly inane cell conversations on subway platforms is drawing ever closer.

September 22, 2011 20 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
TWU

From the TWU, a petition against rats and irony

by Benjamin Kabak September 22, 2011
written by Benjamin Kabak on September 22, 2011

The TWU's petition drive will persuade this rat to leave the subway. (Photo by flickr user Ludovic Burtron)

No one likes seeing rats in the subway. It’s one of those universal things about New York City because rats are disgusting, unpleasant to look at and dirty creatures with which we co-exist uneasily. If it were possible to get rid of them all, the MTA would in a heartbeat.

Lately, though, rats have become more prevalent underground. Transit has cut its cleaning budget, and garbage collection runs have become less frequently. As trash sits, rats take over. Now, though, the TWU wants the MTA to take action.

Yesterday, the Transport Workers Union Local 100 unveiled a new petition effort. They are asking riders to sign a letter that urges the MTA to “adopt a System-Wide Rat Eradication Initiative immediately.” The petition is available online, and TWU operatives were out and about on Wednesday. “We have a huge rat problem,” Kevin Harrington of the TWU said at Parsons/Archer in Queens yesterday.

As union members called for more cleaners, the MTA said they were working on, well, something. “We are working with the city in an effort to find more effective ways of addressing the rodent problem,” the authority said.

It’s hard not to applaud the TWU for this initiative, but there’s no small sense of irony here either. Because of restrictive work rules, the MTA can’t use existing station personnel — many of whom have little to do — to help clean the system. They have employees who sit in their booths but can’t sweep the platforms or help with trash collection. Instead, we have a regimented system of jobs, and with the MTA eying the dismissal of over 200 cleaners in the looming years, the stations will just get dirtier and thus more rat-infested.

Subway Rider, a commenter on Streetsblog, put it best:

They think that attacking, undermining and directing populist and politician anger toward the MTA is a great strategy for them. Yet, all this strategy has done over the last 15 years is undermine the public’s confidence in the MTA and make it easier for Albany politicians to steal funding and resources from TWU employees! The result of TWU strategy is that TWU workers get laid off, their salaries are frozen and cut, their work conditions deteriorate.

But even more significant: The TWU doesn’t seem to get that making the public hate the MTA is bad for TWU workers. As far as the public is concerned, TWU employees are the face of the MTA. It’s the TWU workers who are sitting there napping in bullet-proof glass boxes while garbage collects in piles around them. The public doesn’t get angry at Jay Walder and the MTA board for that. The public looks at that TWU worker sitting in his box doing nothing and thinks: Hmm? Really? Is that a good use of MTA resources? Why is that man sitting in a glass box while machines dispense MetroCards and no one picks up the rubbish or puts up proper signage in this station?

When the group advocating for a solution is part of the problem, it’s hard not to grow cynical.

September 22, 2011 30 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
MTA Economics

On debt, a comptroller’s report reveals the obvious

by Benjamin Kabak September 22, 2011
written by Benjamin Kabak on September 22, 2011

The latest Comptroller's report echoes findings issued last month by the RPA. Image via RPA/ESTA.

When the MTA unveiled its latest three-year budget projections, transit advocates and transportation experts raised the debt alarm. As I detailed in early August, the MTA’s three-year projections relied on numerous assumptions and a larger debt burden. A few weeks ago, a recent report by the Regional Plan Association and the Empire State Transportation reinforced that idea. Debt service could account for nearly a quarter of the MTA’s operations budget by 2014.

It is, then, no surprise that yet another report issued by Thomas DiNapoli, New York State Comptroller, reaches the same conclusions. What is surprising, though, is the amount of time it took DiNapoli’s office to release this report and the ways in which it does little to help the MTA’s economic position. In an eight-page report (available here as a PDF) with lots of graphs published at a size far too small, DiNapoli explores the MTA’s basic assumptions and raises the same debt alarm.

“The MTA is in a very difficult position as it struggles to hold together a strained operating budget while proposing the largest borrowing program in its history to fund capital projects,” DiNapoli said. “There is no debating that the capital program is critically important, but my analysis shows that the magnitude of this borrowing plan will have serious implications for the operating budget in the coming years. Before taking on nearly $15 billion in new debt, the MTA must present the public with the facts about the potential long-term implications of this new borrowing on services, fares and budget gaps.”

The MTA hasn’t yet been forthcoming with the real impact the debt will have on services, fares and budget gaps, but the RPA/ESTA analysis did. DiNapoli’s work basically rehashes those findings. Here are his key conclusions in bullet-point form:

  • Debt service as a percent of total revenue could rise from 16.4 percent in 2011 to 22.7 percent in 2018 without new fare and toll increases. (The burden could reach 20.5 percent in 2018 even with biennial fare and toll increases of 7.5 percent).
  • In total, the proposed financing program would cost the authority’s operating budget $33 billion over the term of the loans, or nearly $13 billion more than the approved financing program.
  • The July financial plan assumes that any wage increases during the first three years of a new labor agreement will be offset by savings from union concessions. Wage increases at the projected inflation rate, for example, without offsetting savings would increase costs by $62 million in 2011 and as much as $327 million by 2015.
  • Spending continues to rise at a rate more than twice that of inflation. Despite an assumed three-year wage freeze, the MTA projects annual spending increases of 5.1 percent through 2015 based on rising costs for health insurance, pensions, debt service and services for disabled commuters.
  • The pace of the economic recovery is a matter of grave concern. Roughly one-third of the MTA’s revenues come from economically sensitive taxes, and the use of mass transit is closely tied to employment levels in the region.

Now, over the years, I’ve been fairly critical of DiNapoli’s reports. They don’t really shed light on any new problems with the MTA. In fact, we’ve known about the debt bomb for years; the recent three-year plan just accelerates the high percentage of the operating revenue that will have to be spent on debt service rather than on transit service. How many taxpayer dollars are going to DiNapoli’s office to duplicate research that’s already been published?

Yet, this report shows glimpses of, well, something. DiNapoli notes that spending has increased at twice the rate of inflation, and he pinpoints a variety of causes — labor costs, debt service and services for disabled commuters — as the primary culprits. The next steps then involve addressing these problems. How can the MTA lower its health care and pension obligations? What must be done to streamline debt service? How can we reduce Access-A-Ride costs? Those question don’t even address the concerns astutely raised by Andrew Smith in this extensive comment he left yesterday.

At some point, New York politicians who are in these positions of power are going to have to get serious about identifying cost savings plans. This report by DiNapoli is a small step toward that goal, but to save the MTA will require more than just small steps.

September 22, 2011 12 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
AsidesPANYNJ

A PA toll increase and the law of intended consequences

by Benjamin Kabak September 21, 2011
written by Benjamin Kabak on September 21, 2011

When the Port Authority raised its fares this month, it levied a disproportionate increase on tolls for drivers who still insist on paying cash while giving those who use E-ZPass something of a break. The thinking behind this move is simple: The Port Authority does not need to spend as much money collecting tolls if they can eliminate cash lanes. This is, not coincidentally, why the MTA wants to eliminate MetroCards as well. It’s possible to spend money up front on improvements that will realize multi-million-dollar savings down the line.

Lo and behold, the move has paid off. With cash fares so high, more drivers are turning to E-ZPass, and SI Live is ON IT.”We have had higher than usual volumes at the Staten Island E-ZPass customer service center today,” a Port Authority spokesman said. Drivers can save $2.50 per fare with an E-ZPass while bus operators can realize savings of $10 per trip. So the transportation agency can save costs on fare collection while passing those benefits onto its customers thanks to the power of a relatively simple technology.

September 21, 2011 2 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Load More Posts

About The Author

Name: Benjamin Kabak
E-mail: Contact Me

Become a Patron!
Follow @2AvSagas

Upcoming Events
TBD

RSS? Yes, Please: SAS' RSS Feed
SAS In Your Inbox: Subscribe to SAS by E-mail

Instagram



Disclaimer: Subway Map © Metropolitan Transportation Authority. Used with permission. MTA is not associated with nor does it endorse this website or its content.

Categories

  • 14th Street Busway (1)
  • 7 Line Extension (118)
  • Abandoned Stations (31)
  • ARC Tunnel (52)
  • Arts for Transit (19)
  • Asides (1,244)
  • Bronx (13)
  • Brooklyn (126)
  • Brooklyn-Queens Connector (13)
  • Buses (291)
  • Capital Program 2010-2014 (27)
  • Capital Program 2015-2019 (56)
  • Capital Program 2020-2024 (3)
  • Congestion Fee (71)
  • East Side Access Project (37)
  • F Express Plan (22)
  • Fare Hikes (173)
  • Fulton Street (57)
  • Gateway Tunnel (29)
  • High-Speed Rail (9)
  • Hudson Yards (18)
  • Interborough Express (1)
  • International Subways (26)
  • L Train Shutdown (20)
  • LIRR (65)
  • Manhattan (73)
  • Metro-North (99)
  • MetroCard (124)
  • Moynihan Station (16)
  • MTA (98)
  • MTA Absurdity (233)
  • MTA Bridges and Tunnels (27)
  • MTA Construction (128)
  • MTA Economics (522)
    • Doomsday Budget (74)
    • Ravitch Commission (23)
  • MTA Politics (330)
  • MTA Technology (195)
  • New Jersey Transit (53)
  • New York City Transit (220)
  • OMNY (3)
  • PANYNJ (113)
  • Paratransit (10)
  • Penn Station (18)
  • Penn Station Access (10)
  • Podcast (30)
  • Public Transit Policy (164)
  • Queens (129)
  • Rider Report Cards (31)
  • Rolling Stock (40)
  • Second Avenue Subway (262)
  • Self Promotion (77)
  • Service Advisories (612)
  • Service Cuts (118)
  • Sponsored Post (1)
  • Staten Island (52)
  • Straphangers Campaign (40)
  • Subway Advertising (45)
  • Subway Cell Service (34)
  • Subway History (81)
  • Subway Maps (83)
  • Subway Movies (14)
  • Subway Romance (13)
  • Subway Security (104)
  • Superstorm Sandy (35)
  • Taxis (43)
  • Transit Labor (151)
    • ATU (4)
    • TWU (100)
    • UTU (8)
  • Triboro RX (4)
  • U.S. Transit Systems (53)
    • BART (1)
    • Capital Metro (1)
    • CTA (7)
    • MBTA (11)
    • SEPTA (5)
    • WMATA (28)
  • View from Underground (447)

Archives

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram

@2019 - All Right Reserved.


Back To Top