Second Ave. Sagas
  • About
  • Contact Me
  • 2nd Ave. Subway History
  • Search
  • About
  • Contact Me
  • 2nd Ave. Subway History
  • Search
Second Ave. Sagas

News and Views on New York City Transportation

View from Underground

Improving the way we find the way

by Benjamin Kabak June 29, 2011
written by Benjamin Kabak on June 29, 2011

An example of NYCDOT's proposed neighborhood map. (NYC Department of Transportation)

Few New Yorkers would ever admit it, but now and then, a map comes in handy. Sure, most neighborhoods throughout large stretches of the Bronx, Brooklyn, Queens and, of course, Manhattan are laid out on a grid, but maps can be useful. Perhaps one is bound for a new neighborhood; perhaps one doesn’t know where they are at the top of an unfamiliar subway staircase; perhaps one finds oneself in Chinatown and just can’t figure out where Pell St. is anyway.

And then of course, there are the tourists who get lost trying to figure out which way’s 8th Ave. and which way is 6th Ave. when they’re standing on 7th Ave. Forget trying to guide them through neighborhoods where the streets have no numbers. That’s hopeless.

Other cities have solved this problem through an innovation called a map. In Philadelphia, for instance, the city has taken the initiative to encourage walking by posting signs directing pedestrians to nearby attractions (PDF) while hanging up neighborhood maps that guide the way. These maps show an entire neighborhood with distance-based circles showing how far away the walker may be from his or her destination. Talk about convenience.

Now, New York wants to get in on the game. On Monday, NYC’s Department of Transportation has issued an Request for Proposals for surface-based maps. The initial contract for five years would cover four neighborhoods with an additional option on the deal for another five years and another five neighborhoods. It seems like a slow process for something that could help with city life, but that’s New York’s bureaucracy for you.

“New Yorkers seem to know it all, except how to get around town sometimes,” Transportation Commissioner Janette Sadik-Khan said. “We’ve got great signage for cars, but we don’t have great directional signage for pedestrians.”

For now, DOT would like to test out signs in the following neighborhoods: Long Island City, Queens; Prospect Heights/Crown Heights, Brooklyn; and Chinatown and parts of Midtown in Manhattan. The Times reports that this initiative will cost $1.5 million with federal and business dollars accounting for $1.2 million of that total. The Wall Street Journal noted that the city is willing to spend up to $9.5 million on the project.

The impetus for the project, NYC DOT says, came from a recent intercept survey conducted citywide. Five hundred pedestrians were stopped and peppered with questions, and the findings were not too comforting. Nine percent of city residents and 27 percent of visitors said they had been lost within the past seven days while 13 percent of New Yorkers were unfamiliar with the area they were in. A whopping 27 percent of visitors couldn’t even name the borough in which they were surveyed, and 33 percent of city residents couldn’t point north. It’s seemingly a wonder anyone gets around.

As The Journal noted, this effort is part of a larger initiative to better unify city neighborhoods and help New Yorkers navigate. For instance, the area between the Manhattan and Brooklyn Bridges in Manhattan has suffered through an identity crisis. “In different spaces, according to the Department of Transportation,” The Journal said, “that space has been labeled as Chinatown, Two Bridges, Knickerbocker Village and the Seaport Historic District.” And of course, there’s Queens with its various Roads, Streets, Drives and Avenues all with the same numbers.

It might, as The Times says, be a badge of pride to know the way around, but getting lost too seems to be a hallmark of a New Yorker. Why not solve that problem too?

June 29, 2011 23 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
AsidesSecond Avenue Subway

MTA: UESers should push pols on capital funding

by Benjamin Kabak June 28, 2011
written by Benjamin Kabak on June 28, 2011

While complaints over construction dust and debris fill the air along Second Ave., the MTA has asked Upper East Siders for help. With the current authorization for the authority’s five-year capital plan set to expire at the end of the year, the MTA will not be able to continue apace with its big-ticket items — including the Second Ave. Subway — without legislative action. To that end, the authority is urging Upper East Siders who do not want to deluged with a construction slowdown to push their elected representatives to find a solution.

“I would encourage all of you to contact elected officials, particularly the state elected officials who represent you, to encourage them to appropriate the money,” MTA Senior Vice President for Capital Construction William Goodrich said to CB8 last week. “Without additional funding, we won’t have the ability to procure and award the remaining three contracts.” Those three remaining contracts are for the SAS stations at 72nd, 86th and 96th Streets.

Meanwhile, as of the June 22 meeting, the Tunnel Boring Machine had reached south of 77th St. during its east bore, and the MTA has been working to overhaul the 63rd St. station for service on both tracks. The authority also anticipates adding the so-called model block wrap to construction sites up and down the avenue by Labor Day. For more on those beautification efforts, check out my previous coverage.

June 28, 2011 18 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
AsidesMTA Bridges and Tunnels

Roads? Where we’re going we don’t need roads.

by Benjamin Kabak June 28, 2011
written by Benjamin Kabak on June 28, 2011

Updated (1:13 p.m.): As New York City copes with its limited transportation budget and the state of its roads after a very rough winter, the way the MTA allocates funds has come under a small microscope. Yesterday’s Post featured a piece on the state of MTA bridges, and the results were not pretty. “One-fifth of the agency’s spans or their approaches scored below the middle point on the state’s bridge-maintenance rating system,” the paper reported. A more recent assessment of the MTA’s crossings, however, found that all MTA Bridges & Tunnels crossings rated between a 4 and a 6, well within safety parameters.

With that in mind, The Post questioned whether or not enough of the $60 million the bridges and tunnels generate per month are being reinvested into MTA crossing maintenance. “You want to keep the bridges from a point where it forces you to change their use, whether it’s changing their load limit or closing them for an extended period of time,” Bill Henderson of the Permanent Citizens Advisory Committee to the MTA, said. Bridge maintenance is covered in the authority’s five-year capital plan, and the MTA will spend over $1 billion on the RFK and Verrazano Bridges alone during the current five-year stint — provided that Albany comes through with the funding.

The MTA, meanwhile, disputed The Posts charges. In statement, the authority said, “All MTA Bridges and Tunnels crossings are safe and well-maintained , with no weight restrictions due to structural deficiencies or safety issues identified at any facility. In the last and current capital budgets we will have spent $3.7 billion on capital improvements, and we continually invest in the maintenance of bridges and tunnels that range in age from 46 to 75 years old. Toll revenues are used first and foremost for this purpose, and only go to support public transit after maintenance needs are addressed.”

Meanwhile, today, The Post tells us that bridge and tunnel traffic is down by nearly 1 million cars this year. In percentages, that’s a 3.9 percent decline in passenger cars and a 6.6 percent decline in travel by trucks and buses. The MTA — which is short $6.4 million due to the decline — seems willing to blame the fare hike, but I think extremely high gas prices and fewer overall auto trips can’t be dismissed quite so easily. As the MTA has urged more drivers to use E-ZPass, though, trips by cars with transponders has increased by 3.5 percent through April of 2011 as compared with the same time period last year while the numbers of those paying with cash fell by over 17 percent.

June 28, 2011 7 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Public Transit Policy

Thoughts on prioritizing urban space and roads

by Benjamin Kabak June 28, 2011
written by Benjamin Kabak on June 28, 2011

Once upon a time, cities reached only as far as people could walk and horses could ride. In the early days of New York City, Washington Square Park was for the rich while Washington Heights was the country, far out of town. Slowly, the arrival of railroads changed that perspective.

At first, in the late 1880s, the elevated lines allowed folks to commute to downtown from 14th Street and beyond. By the dawn of the Twentieth Century, the subways started to open up even more frontiers. The Upper East and West Sides were no longer 90-minute elevated rides away from downtown. Instead, they were 25-minute subway rides away. As the subway expanded, the neighborhoods filled with people sprang up all over town. The jobs were concentrated in certain areas in Manhattan, but one could live a life by walking around the area near subway stops.

Cars, of course, changed the city landscape as well. Now, even the areas with no subway access weren’t that far away, and the suburbs become the idealized American Dream: two cars, a garage and a backyard. Those living in Westchester and Long Island and New Jersey could make it into the city. Slowly, the city had to accomodate cars. Highways tore apart neighborhoods, and sidewalk widths decreased to make room for parking. Urban population decreased.

Today, the pendulum has seemingly swung back the other way. Urban life is more desirable than ever, and more of the U.S. population than ever before resides in cities. Still, the battle goes on between cars and pedestrians. The livable streets crowd say that cars are a drain on urban resources. They take up space and cause pollution and congestion. Our investment priorities should be in mass transit in order to free up road space for vital trips and discourage auto use. Others say the car is a personal choice and one that should not be taken away from Americans. Where I fall on this divide is obvious.

Over the weekend, The Times looked at the new focus on pedestrians in cities except they do so through the lens of Europe. Elisabeth Rosenthal wrote:

While American cities are synchronizing green lights to improve traffic flow and offering apps to help drivers find parking, many European cities are doing the opposite: creating environments openly hostile to cars. The methods vary, but the mission is clear — to make car use expensive and just plain miserable enough to tilt drivers toward more environmentally friendly modes of transportation.

Cities including Vienna to Munich and Copenhagen have closed vast swaths of streets to car traffic. Barcelona and Paris have had car lanes eroded by popular bike-sharing programs. Drivers in London and Stockholm pay hefty congestion charges just for entering the heart of the city. And over the past two years, dozens of German cities have joined a national network of “environmental zones” where only cars with low carbon dioxide emissions may enter…

While some American cities — notably San Francisco, which has “pedestrianized” parts of Market Street — have made similar efforts, they are still the exception in the United States, where it has been difficult to get people to imagine a life where cars are not entrenched, [Stanford’s Lee] Schipper said.

I found this article to be a strange one because of the way it almost fetishizes “pedestrianization.” Those kooky Europeans in Zurich where 90 percent of elected officials ride public transit might be deprioritizing cars, but that’s just a European thing, says the article. In fact, Rosenthal seems to miss a major component of congestion alleviation efforts: It’s all about economics.

As cars sit in traffic, they impact the environment around them. I waste time inching across Canal Street or up 6th Ave., and time, as we know, is money. Meanwhile, my car isn’t operating at optimal speeds, and I have to spend more on gas while my emissions increase. Furthermore, constant overuse leads to disrepair, and the money invested in roads could be better utilized by promoting vibrant urban life. It’s more than just about the crazy ideas.

Ultimately, road development has been driving American transportation policy for six decades, and that likely won’t slow down. We can’t get high-speed rail off the ground, and transit agencies throughout the country struggle for money. Until Americans embrace city life and recognize what that means for our transportation policies, efforts at curtailing car use in dense urban environments not initially designed for cars will be met with skepticism. It’s too European for us.

June 28, 2011 28 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
View from Underground

Video of the Day: Rider rage on the B62

by Benjamin Kabak June 27, 2011
written by Benjamin Kabak on June 27, 2011

Just last week, I highlighted the tale of a Bronx woman who assaulted a bus driver when her dog was refused entry to the Bx9. Today, another video of rider rage directed toward a bus driver is making the rounds. This one originated on FiPS and features some graphic language. Be forewarned.

According to FiPS, the bus driver had asked the lady to turn down her music after she started playing it through her phone’s speaker. We’ve all been subjected to loud music on trains, and this is why few people ever ask rude and inconsiderate passengers to turn down the volume. Take a look:

The bus driver probably shouldn’t engage in an insult match with passengers, but there is absolutely no excusing this lady’s behavior.

June 27, 2011 13 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
View from Underground

Highlighting the trash that lingers

by Benjamin Kabak June 27, 2011
written by Benjamin Kabak on June 27, 2011

Photo courtesy of Jeffrey Omura

Earlier this year in February, Jeffrey Omura, SAS reader, sent me the above photo of the 157th St. platform with a note explaining how the trash would stick around for a few weeks. MTA workers would bag the garbage, but no one would ever come to collect it. Rats would move in and a stench would invade the rear of the platform.

Omura’s story isn’t an isolated one in the days of the MTA’s austerity budgets. A few years ago, then-Transit president Howard Roberts told me that cleaning budgets were going to be cut, and we’re still feeling — and smelling — the effects of those cuts. Today in his Daily News column, Pete Donohue explores the trash problem. No one is picking up the garbage, he writes:

Subway riders are being forced to wait on platforms that have plastic bags stuffed with foul-smelling dreck because the MTA regularly fails to meet its own garbage collection schedule, the Daily News has learned. On an average night, MTA trash trains and garbage trucks don’t make it to more than 100 stations that are scheduled for a pickup, Metropolitan Transportation Authority data show.

When the temporary storage space in a station fills up, the trash is left on a platform. It remains there – sometimes for days – before being carted away. It could be a bag tucked in the corner or more than a dozen bags near an entrance…The News found between one and 10 bags at a string of other nearby G train stations such as Bedford-Nostrand – and 30 piled on a platform at the elevated Astoria-Ditmars Blvd. station in Queens.

The MTA has eight garbage-hauling trains with flatbed cars. From Tuesday, June 14, through Tuesday, June 21, those trains missed 962 of their scheduled stops, NYC Transit division records show. (They made about 200 unscheduled stops.) The authority has nine garbage trucks assigned to the subways. They missed 260 scheduled stops over the same eight days, the records show, even as they made about 60 unscheduled stops. Some stations are supposed to get garbage collection once a day. At the other end of the spectrum, the least-busy stations are supposed to get it twice a week. The pickup rate is about 60% or 70%, depending on how you crunch the numbers.

According to Donohue, the MTA has put forward a handful of reasons why garbage collection suffers. He says that crews have to work around passenger train schedules as well as capital repair-related shut downs. He also notes that the nine garbage trucks are old and are out of service for around 118 days per year.

While he doesn’t mention previous years’ budget cuts, I have been told in the past that those cuts have also led to more trash on the platforms, but now the MTA plans to add more garbage collectors. “We’re certainly conceding trash in all instances is not being picked up in a timely fashion,” MTA spokesman Charles Seaton said to The News. “We have taken steps to improve the situation, and we will take further steps.”

June 27, 2011 3 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Second Avenue Subway

Second Avenue dust sagas

by Benjamin Kabak June 27, 2011
written by Benjamin Kabak on June 27, 2011

The muck conveyance system at 72nd Street is designed to reduce dust in the air due to subway construction. (Photo courtesy of The Launch Box)

It’s getting dusty up in here, Second Ave. residents and business owners have said to the MTA. With non-stop subway construction moving ever southward along the busy commercial strip, those who have lived through four years of noise and still have a few more to go say the air is dustier than ever, and now East Side politicians want some answers from the MTA.

“The Second Avenue Subway will one day benefit all New Yorkers, but right now the construction of the new line is putting a heavy burden on merchants and residents near Second Avenue,” Representative Carolyn Maloney said over the weekend. “The MTA must redouble its efforts to minimize dust and foul odors emanating from the construction site – and take steps to assure the public that the air is safe to breathe. Chairman Walder takes quality-of-life concerns seriously and I know that those who live and work near Second Avenue would be grateful for his attention to these important concerns.”

The story broke late last week in a brief item in The Post. Locals were complaining that the air near key construction sites had become dangerously dusty. “I’ve been in some bad military situations, and it’s not as bad as that,” Ralph Leviton, an Upper East Sider, said.

The MTA admitted that project managers were testing the air and noted that mitigation efforts — including the construction of some dust-reducing conveyors were underway. Still, dust levels were above normal. “Over the past four weeks there have been instances where the reading has exceeded the established threshold for 15 minutes or less on a given day,” an authority spokesman said to DNA Info. “Going forward we are assigning additional supervision to ensure that the dust is thoroughly hosed down and we will continue to closely monitor the site.”

This weekend, area politicians asked the MTA to respond to these complaints and better test and clean up the air. In a letter to Jay Walder, Rep. Maloney pushed for more attention to the issue: “I urge you to conduct — or, if you are already conducting, redouble — air-quality testing in and around the construction zone along Second Avenue and East 69th and 70th Streets to make sure that the construction is not exposing area residents to environmental hazards. In addition, I hope you will explore the feasibility of periodically spraying the construction area to suppress the dust or taking other measures to minimize the impact of construction dust and odors on the neighborhood.”

Other local voices joined in with her calls. “The dust storms created by the subway construction make Second Avenue seem like the badlands of Texas,” Assembly Member Micah Kellner said. “This isn’t a matter to be taken lightly; asthma and allergies are at their peak during the summer months. This dust is only adding to those health concerns. We need to hold the MTA accountable so that East Siders have breathable air.”

It is apparently tough work building a subway through a densely-populated residential neighborhood, and the MTA is learning the hard way about the side effects of subway construction. When — or if — this project reaches Phase II or beyond, the authority should at least have a set of best practices off of which it can work to minimize neighborhood impact. After all, no one likes dust or debris, but everyone wants a new subway line.

June 27, 2011 11 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Service Advisories

Weekend ch-ch-ch-changes

by Benjamin Kabak June 25, 2011
written by Benjamin Kabak on June 25, 2011

Oh, you know. The usual: Highlights include no 7 train service between Queens and Manhattan. Plan accordingly.


From 12:01 a.m. Saturday, June 25 to 5 a.m. Monday, June 27, Brooklyn-bound 2 trains run express from Atlantic Avenue to Franklin Avenue due to platform edge rehabilitation at Bergen Street and Franklin Avenue.


From 6:30 a.m. to midnight, Saturday, June 25 and Sunday, June 26, Brooklyn-bound 3 trains run express from Atlantic Avenue to Franklin Avenue due to platform edge rehabilitation at Bergen Street and Franklin Avenue.


From 12:01 a.m. to 6:30 a.m. Saturday, June 25 and Sunday, June 26 and from 12:01 a.m. to 5 a.m. Monday, June 27, Brooklyn-bound 4 trains run express from Atlantic Avenue to Franklin Avenue due to platform edge rehabilitation at Bergen Street and Franklin Avenue.


From 11:30 p.m. Friday, June 24 to 5 a.m. Monday, June 27, there is no 5 service between Dyre Avenue and 149th Street-Grand Concourse due to track work south of Morris Park. Free shuttle buses and 2 trains provide alternate service. Shuttle buses replace the 5 between Dyre Avenue and East 180th Street. Customers may transfer between the shuttle bus and the 2 train at East 180th Street. The 2 makes all 5 stops between East 180th Street and 149th Street-Grand Concourse. Note: From 5:30 a.m. to 11:30 p.m., Saturday, June 25 and from 7:30 a.m. to 11:30 p.m. Sunday, June 26, 5 trains run every 20 minutes between Bowling Green and 149th Street-Grand Concourse.


From 12:01 a.m. Saturday, June 25 to 5 a.m. Monday, June 27, downtown 6 trains skip Morrison Avenue-Soundview and Whitlock Avenue due to station rehabilitation at Elder Avenue and St. Lawrence Avenue.


From 11:30 p.m. Friday, June 24 to 5 a.m. Monday, June 27, there are no 7 trains between Times Square-42nd Street and Queensboro Plaza due to chemical grouting and repair of steel roof beams at various locations. Customers should take the E, F, N, Q and 42nd Street S shuttle instead. A free shuttle bus will operate between Vernon Blvd-Jackson Avenue and Queensboro Plaza. Note: Q service is extended to Ditmars Blvd.


From 11:30 p.m. Friday, June 24 to 5 a.m. Monday, June 27, overnight uptown A and daytime uptown C trains operate express between 59th Street-Columbus Circle and 125th Street due to track work south of 110th Street. There is no uptown local service at 72nd, 81st, 86th, 96th, 103rd, 110th, and 116th Streets this weekend. Customers traveling to these stations may take the uptown A or C to 125th Street and transfer to a downtown train. Customers heading to stations above 125th Street from these stations may take the downtown A or C to 59th Street and transfer to an uptown train.


From 12:01 a.m. Saturday, June 25 to 5 a.m. Monday, June 27, Brooklyn-bound F trains run on the A line from West 4th Street to Jay Street-MetroTech due to work on the Broadway-Lafayette-to-Bleecker Street transfer connection.


From 11 p.m. Friday, June 24 to 5 a.m. Monday, June 27, Queens-bound F trains skip 14th Street and 23rd Street due to track work north of 23rd Street.


From 11 p.m. Friday, June 24 to 5 a.m. Monday June 27, there are no G trains between Hoyt-Schermerhorn Sts. and Church Avenue due to track work north of Hoyt-Schermerhorn Sts. G trains operate in two sections:

  • Between Court Square and Bedford-Nostrand Avs and
  • Between Bedford-Nostrand Avs and Hoyt-Schermerhorn Sts. (every 20 minutes)

Note: The A provides connecting service between Hoyt-Schermerhorn Sts. and Jay Street-MetroTech.


From 6 a.m. to 6 p.m. Saturday, June 25, L trains run in two sections due to the installation of security fencing around the Canarsie Yard:

  • Between 8th Avenue and Broadway Junction and
  • Between Broadway Junction and Rockaway Parkway (every 24 minutes).


From 12:01 a.m. Saturday, June to 25 a.m. Monday, June 27, Brooklyn-bound N trains operate on the D line between 36th Street and Coney Island-Stillwell Avenue, in Brooklyn due to installation of track panels.


From 7 a.m. to 9 p.m., Saturday, June 25, and from 9 a.m. to 7 p.m., Sunday, June 26, Q service is extended to Ditmars Blvd. due to the 7 train suspension between Queens and Manhattan.


From 12:01 a.m. Saturday, June 25 to 5 a.m. Monday, June 27, the 42-Street shuttle operates overnight in order to provide crosstown service due to the suspension of 7 train service between Times Square-42nd Street and Queensboro Plaza.

June 25, 2011 0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
AsidesMTA EconomicsMTA Politics

Transit Lockbox passes Assembly; will Cuomo sign?

by Benjamin Kabak June 24, 2011
written by Benjamin Kabak on June 24, 2011

The legislation designed to protect dedicated transit funding from executive branch raids has cleared the State Assembly after gaining Senate approval earlier this week, Streetsblog reported a few minutes ago. The Transit Lockbox, as it is being called, institutes stringing reporting requirements and legislative approval for any attempt by the Governor to reappropriate transit funds into the state general fund. The text of the bill is available here, and I’ve offered up my support and analysis of the measure right here.

The bill now moves onto Gov. Andrew Cuomo’s desk for his approval, but that signature is no sure thing. As Jim O’Grady at Transportation Nation reported earlier in the week, Cuomo had not thrown his weight behind the measure. One source said to O’Grady via email, “We’re hearing that Cuomo is blocking the lockbox bill so that he can retain the ability to steal transit funds. (This is the same Cuomo who ran for governor last year on restoring honesty and ethics to government.)” The Governor has yet to comment.

June 24, 2011 4 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
MTA EconomicsMTA Politics

Final livery taxi plan to benefit MTA

by Benjamin Kabak June 24, 2011
written by Benjamin Kabak on June 24, 2011

As state officials gear up to vote on a plan that would allow Outer Borough street hails for livery cabs, we learn today that the MTA may benefit from this transportation measure as well. Call it the law of unintended consequences.

Jeremy Smerd from Crain’s New York posted the following to Twitter earlier today: “Insider says Republicans poised to pass Bberg’s outer borough taxi plan. Deal will create 50-cent MTA surcharge for livery customers.”

Smerd later elaborated in a Crain’s piece. Essentially, the move will guarantee more surface transportation options for those who live north of 96th St. and outside of Manhattan while providing for another source of revenue for the MTA. As I expected, the move will allow Republicans to take aim at the payroll tax next year. Smerd writes:

State Senate Republicans were poised Friday to pass Mayor Michael Bloomberg’s plan to allow 30,000 livery drivers to pick up street hails in the outer boroughs and northern Manhattan. The legislation would also allow the city to sell 1,500 new taxi medallions over three years, which would raise more than $1 billion. The breakthrough on the bill, which had stalled in the final days of the legislative session, came in a last-minute deal that would bring much-needed revenue to the Metropolitan Transportation Authority…

The most important change is a 50-cent surcharge to be tacked on to each outer-borough taxi fare, just as it is in yellow taxis. The revenue, expected to be in the tens of millions of dollars, according to one source, would go to the Metropolitan Transportation Authority. The second amendment would effectively postpone the legislation’s implementation by six months—meaning new borough taxis would not hit the streets until January. The first 500 of the new medallions will be auctioned in July 2012…

By creating a new, dedicated revenue source for the MTA, Republican senators will strengthen their hand next year when they renew their push to repeal the payroll mobility tax, another MTA revenue source that has been criticized as unfair to suburbanites. Senate Republicans passed a plan to repeal the tax this year, a symbolic move because the bill was ignored by the Democrat-controlled Assembly.

This revenue is still just a partial accounting for the money lost to a potential payroll repeal, but the politics behind the MTA’s economic situation are coming into view. City Council action, Crain’s notes, is not required for any of these measures.

June 24, 2011 11 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Load More Posts

About The Author

Name: Benjamin Kabak
E-mail: Contact Me

Become a Patron!
Follow @2AvSagas

Upcoming Events
TBD

RSS? Yes, Please: SAS' RSS Feed
SAS In Your Inbox: Subscribe to SAS by E-mail

Instagram



Disclaimer: Subway Map © Metropolitan Transportation Authority. Used with permission. MTA is not associated with nor does it endorse this website or its content.

Categories

  • 14th Street Busway (1)
  • 7 Line Extension (118)
  • Abandoned Stations (31)
  • ARC Tunnel (52)
  • Arts for Transit (19)
  • Asides (1,244)
  • Bronx (13)
  • Brooklyn (126)
  • Brooklyn-Queens Connector (13)
  • Buses (291)
  • Capital Program 2010-2014 (27)
  • Capital Program 2015-2019 (56)
  • Capital Program 2020-2024 (3)
  • Congestion Fee (71)
  • East Side Access Project (37)
  • F Express Plan (22)
  • Fare Hikes (173)
  • Fulton Street (57)
  • Gateway Tunnel (29)
  • High-Speed Rail (9)
  • Hudson Yards (18)
  • Interborough Express (1)
  • International Subways (26)
  • L Train Shutdown (20)
  • LIRR (65)
  • Manhattan (73)
  • Metro-North (99)
  • MetroCard (124)
  • Moynihan Station (16)
  • MTA (98)
  • MTA Absurdity (233)
  • MTA Bridges and Tunnels (27)
  • MTA Construction (128)
  • MTA Economics (522)
    • Doomsday Budget (74)
    • Ravitch Commission (23)
  • MTA Politics (330)
  • MTA Technology (195)
  • New Jersey Transit (53)
  • New York City Transit (220)
  • OMNY (3)
  • PANYNJ (113)
  • Paratransit (10)
  • Penn Station (18)
  • Penn Station Access (10)
  • Podcast (30)
  • Public Transit Policy (164)
  • Queens (129)
  • Rider Report Cards (31)
  • Rolling Stock (40)
  • Second Avenue Subway (262)
  • Self Promotion (77)
  • Service Advisories (612)
  • Service Cuts (118)
  • Sponsored Post (1)
  • Staten Island (52)
  • Straphangers Campaign (40)
  • Subway Advertising (45)
  • Subway Cell Service (34)
  • Subway History (81)
  • Subway Maps (83)
  • Subway Movies (14)
  • Subway Romance (13)
  • Subway Security (104)
  • Superstorm Sandy (35)
  • Taxis (43)
  • Transit Labor (151)
    • ATU (4)
    • TWU (100)
    • UTU (8)
  • Triboro RX (4)
  • U.S. Transit Systems (53)
    • BART (1)
    • Capital Metro (1)
    • CTA (7)
    • MBTA (11)
    • SEPTA (5)
    • WMATA (28)
  • View from Underground (447)

Archives

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram

@2019 - All Right Reserved.


Back To Top