Second Ave. Sagas
  • About
  • Contact Me
  • 2nd Ave. Subway History
  • Search
  • About
  • Contact Me
  • 2nd Ave. Subway History
  • Search
Second Ave. Sagas

News and Views on New York City Transportation

Fare Hikes

Mourning the day the fares go up

by Benjamin Kabak December 30, 2010
written by Benjamin Kabak on December 30, 2010

The Wall Street Journal's chart shows how our MetroCard fares are going up today. (Via)

By the time you read this post, a 30-day MetroCard, just $63 ten years ago, will now set you back a Benjamin and four Georges. The MTA’s pay-per-ride discount will dip to just seven percent on purchases over $10, and the one- and 14-day unlimited ride cards are going the way of the dodo. The MTA says the average fare hike is in line with promises it made to Albany to raise fares by 7.5 percent and generate nearly $400 million in added revenue, but that’s little consolation for everyone who has to, for the third time in three years, pay more and more just to maintain services constantly under attack.

When I started this site back in 2006, the MTA fares were downright cheap compared to their prices today. A swipe of a pay-per-ride card cost just $2, and the bonus was 20 percent on purchases over $10. Today, that bonus has been reduced to just seven percent, and it’s only a matter of time before the MTA eliminates it entirely. A seven-day card cost $24, and a 30-day card set you back just $76. Today, those cards will cost $29 and $104 respectively, and they are the only remaining unlimited ride offerings available. Even worse, today’s fare hike is the third in three years.

As Andrew Grossman of the Wall Street Journal noted in his brief run-down of the fare hikes, the authority has “tried to limit the increase for their lowest-income customers.” Thus, as those of us who buy the 30-day cards “tend to be wealthier commuters with stable jobs,” we’ll be saddled with a 16.9 percent hike while the seven-day card increase is under 10 percent.

But this fare hike is about more than just the numbers. We will indeed be paying more for our cards, and we’ve now scaled the triple-digit point. But the MTA’s new fare-related policies could be just as important as the higher rates. In a press release yesterday, the Metro-North and Long Island Rail Road Commuter Councils highlighted the hidden aspects of the fare hikes. These two organizations are “strenuously opposed” to the MTA’s new measures and for good reason.

Essentially, the MTA is making it harder not to plan ahead. One-way and round trip commuter rail tickets will be good only for 14 days from the date of purchase instead of six months. Ten-trip tickets will be good for only six months instead of one year. Meanwhile, these tickets will be refundable for only 30 days after purchase and now come with a $10 refund transaction fee. As the Commuter Councils note, “in many cases,” the refund with the transaction fee now “equals or exceeds the cost of a ticket.” On-board ticket sales will now come with a fee of at least $5.75. Public transit should be easy, simple and affordable. With more and more policies and higher fares in place, it’s becoming a burden.

Ultimately, the fare hike represents something of a devil’s choice for the MTA. Without it, the authority would be facing a massive $400 million deficit, and it can’t cut services by that much while still providing adequate public transportation. But as the MTA’s budget documents make exceedingly clear, the authority is not out of the financial woods yet. It projects razor thin surpluses for 2011, and odds are good that state tax revenues will come in below expectations again. In out years, the MTA expects to alternate between deficits and surpluses, but good times are not on the horizon.

For now, the fares go up. The break-even point on the unlimited cards — now set to 50 rides — creeps higher, and the pay-per-ride discount drops lower. Both moves are part of the MTA’s attempt to raise the average fare, which is still lower today in inflation-adjusted dollars than it was in 1996. That’s hardly going to make anyone feel better about the higher prices though.

As the city’s economy is slow to rebound, people — the middle class — will have to find $15 a month more for public transit. Without a better solution, without East River Bridge tolls, congestion pricing or more state subsidies, the MTA can only raise fares to generate revenue. Hopefully, in four more years, we won’t be paying $132 for a 30-day monthly, but at the current rate and without more state assistance, the MTA will continue to put more and more of its revenue burden on the shoulders of its riders. We’ll pay tomorrow. We always do.

For all the details on the MTA’s newest rates, check out the authority’s fare hike page. For more on the new break-even point for 30-day cards, check out this November SAS post.

December 30, 2010 20 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
MetroCard

How the Unlimited MetroCard revolutionized transit

by Benjamin Kabak December 29, 2010
written by Benjamin Kabak on December 29, 2010

As I’m in Philadelphia for a few days this week, I’m not going to be around to cover all of the breaking subway news and snow service watch. I did, however, want to make sure that some fresh content finds its way to the site, and I’ll be running a few of my archived pieces. As the fares go up tomorrow and unlimited cards remain, thankfully, unlimited, let’s look back at how the unlimited MetroCard changed transit for the better in New York City.

When Tuesday dawned another cold, windy and rainy day, I pondered how New Yorkers ride the subway in those ugly conditions. On rainy days, the trains are damp and more crowded than usual. People who would otherwise walk or bike to their myriad destinations head underground for a ride free from rain.

Meanwhile, throughout the city, people running errands opt to duck underground as well. Instead of walking from, say, 50th St. to 40th St., the one-stop ride along the Sixth Ave. IND often calls out, and while 15 years ago, that ride would have cost $1.25, today, the Unlimited MetroCard urges you to take that one- or two-stop ride. Straphangers, in fact, get better deals on their weekly or monthly cards if they ride more frequently, and the MTA earns less per ride. In a way, it is a perverse incentive.

Today, the Unlimited MetroCard is a way of life. In January, over 50 percent of all non-student trips came from one of the four unlimited ride offerings. Yet, 12 years ago, few were aware of the looming debut of these cards that have changed the way we ride.

Gov. George Pataki first announced unlimited ride cards in early December 1997. Original plans called for a $63 30-day card, a $17 seven-day card and a $4 one-day fun pass. In a twist of history, the MTA could afford to offer these discount cards because of a surplus of tax revenue in 1997. The agency was expected to lose over $230 million on the per-ride discounts, and as riders today pay an inflation-adjusted fare that is 36 cents lower than the average fare was in 1996, this loss is still haunting the MTA today.

While the 30-day cards then — and still do today — require someone to ride at least 47 times to be a better deal than the pay-per-ride discounts, the new passes were designed to encourage use. Original MTA estimates projected 100 million more riders per year, an increase of six percent. ”The goal here,” Pataki said said to The Times, ”was very simply to empower the rider. Empower the person who takes the subway and the person who takes the bus by giving them the broadest possible range of options as to how they want to choose to use the mass transit system.”

When the unlimited cards debuted on July 4, 1998, they were an immediate hit. Even though plans for the one-day card were delayed, lines at the token booths snaked through stations, and New Yorkers were eager to take advantage of the potential savings. ”Maybe it would stop me from taking so many cabs,” one rider said at the time. ”It has to do with commitment. Once I’ve made that $17 investment up front, I see it as a free situation, rather than a $5 cab ride minus the dollar-and-a-half public transportation.”

The only down side riders could find was the original 18-minute use restriction. The unlimited ride cards could be used once system-wide every 18 minutes, and many straphangers taking short trips found themselves waiting for time to expire. Eventually, Transit agreed to reduce the limitations to their current form. Today, riders can swipe in at the same station only once every 18 minutes but can enter the system at other points before the time limit is up.

Immediately, the savings were apparent. As The Daily News noted, messenger services and frequent train riders were going to realize savings of hundreds of dollars annually. First day sales were very brisk and have continued to be for the past 12 years.

Today, the unlimited ride cards are still a great deal. As a student and frequent subway rider, my pay-per-ride cost off of the $89 monthly card is only just around $1.10 per ride. I can hop on and hop off the trains and buses as I please, and I don’t have to think twice about taking a trip we used to view as unnecessary 15 or 20 years ago. The Unlimited MetroCards changed the way we ride and interact with the system, and that was true transit innovation for New York City.

December 29, 2010 4 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Fare Hikes

On the day before the fare hike…

by Benjamin Kabak December 29, 2010
written by Benjamin Kabak on December 29, 2010

As the MTA struggles to restore subway service in the wake of a paralyzing blizzard, the authority must also cope with the reality of a fare hike. Tomorrow — Thursday, December 30, 2010 — brings with it new fares. The 30-day card will cost $104 and the seven-day card $29. The 14- and one-day cards will go the way of the dodo, and the pay-per-ride discount will drop to seven percent on purchases above $10. Talk about bad timing.

Today, then, is the last day to stock up on pre-hike cards. For pay-per-ride cards, the sky is the limit. Put as much as you can on as many pay-per-ride cards as you’d like to enjoy cheaper rates. But unlimited riders must be ware the sunset dates. The MTA is allowing a very short grace period on cards bought before the hike that remain unactivated. Essentially, you have to begin using your old cards by January 10 to get full value.

Take a glance at this chart:

Days on Card Sunset Date
1 January 10
7 January 16
14 January 23
30 February 8

Essentially, those who buy a card today but start using it after January 10 will not be able to use their cards until the end. Instead, straphangers will have to mail their cards back to the MTA for a refund. My advice is to start using those cards before January 10 to save the headaches of a refund process.

For the authority, the timing of the fare hike could not be worse. The snow storm has left riders stranded and disgruntled, and the MTA has to repair its public image while upping the fares at the same time. I guess the higher fares are better than crippling service cuts, which are, in essence, the alternative, but that $104 price tag certainly looks steep today.

December 29, 2010 3 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Service Advisories

MTA: Subway service is ‘near normal’

by Benjamin Kabak December 29, 2010
written by Benjamin Kabak on December 29, 2010

MTA workers dig down to the track, ballast & the third rail at Cortelyou Road yesterday. (Photo via New York City Transit)

According to a note on the MTA’s website, subway service this morning has been “restored to near normal levels on most lines.” The authority is still not running the Franklin Ave. shuttle, but B and Q service along the Brighton line has returned “with residual delays.” There is still no N service from Whitehall St. to Coney Island. Bus service across the city remains limited, and Transit is urging its passengers to allow extra time for travel.

December 29, 2010 4 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
MTA

Scenes from the Snow: The fallout of digging out

by Benjamin Kabak December 29, 2010
written by Benjamin Kabak on December 29, 2010

Considering the snow, it's tough to say if the 14th St. station is above ground or below. (Photo by flickr user Jeffrey Keefer)

Snow stopped falling in the New York area nearly two days ago, and yet, the city’s transit network remains at less than full service. Buses are stranded; elevated subway routes are shuttered. Even as the commuter rail lines return to full service, New York City Transit is still trying to figure out what went wrong. After all, isn’t this the agency that’s supposed to be improving, non-stop?

For Wednesday, straphangers will find a system slowly returning to normal. The MTA continues to promise that crews are “continuing round-the-clock work to restore service throughout the system.” As of late Tuesday, the state of subway service was as follows:

Service has been restored with residual delays on the 5 to Dyre Avenue, the A to Far Rockaway, and the C, D, F, and G lines. Service remains suspended on the B and Q lines, the Franklin Avenue Shuttle and the Rockaway Park Shuttle. The L line is restored, operating in two sections: 8th Ave to Broadway Junction and Broadway-Junction to Rockaway Parkway. There is no N train service between the Coney Island-Stillwell Avenue Station and the Whitehall Street Station. New York City Transit expects to restore further service segments in time for the morning rush hour.

Despite assurances of an easier Wednesday morning commute, the Outer Boroughs are rife with dissent. For now, their anger is directed at city agencies and leaders. Take, for instance, this post on Sheepshead Bites. The Brooklyn-based blog notes that Mayor Bloomberg’s Manhattan street is perfectly plowed while streets in Sheepshead Bay are awash in snow. Buses cannot pass; cars are stranded; the subways aren’t running. This is city government at a stand-still.

Meanwhile, MTA officials are promising to figure out just what went wrong. Around Brooklyn, 250 buses remained stuck in the snow, and many of those were not equipped with snow chains. “We typically have not had difficulties with stuck buses with the types of buses we have today. The hybrid buses we use are typically able to get through the snow but for whatever reason this snow they didn’t get through. I’m not a snow expert to tell you why,” Jay Walder said. “We do need to look back. I’m not minimizing the fact that we have had a large number of stuck buses and we do need to look back.”

Based upon my conversations with those who have knowledge of the situation, it appears as though the MTA severely underestimated the extent of the snow. While Boston’s MBTA ran ghost trains to keep tracks warm and free from the snow, the MTA had to contend with stronger-than-expected winds and deep snow drifts. The authority did not call in snow emergency squads until roads in the city were nearly impassable, and the authority was simply not ready to respond to a blizzard of this magnitude. Forty-eight hours later, we’re still paying the price.

Soon — probably today — subway schedules will return to something approximating normal and buses will begin to run. The authority will look to improve its emergency response protocols, and we’ll remember the Blizzard of 2010 as we do the rainstorm of August 2007. The authority must seek to improve out of the aftermath of the last two days. It cannot do much worse.

December 29, 2010 13 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Subway History

Dreams of taking the N to LaGuardia

by Benjamin Kabak December 28, 2010
written by Benjamin Kabak on December 28, 2010

As I’m in Philadelphia for a few days this week, I’m not going to be around to cover all of the breaking subway news and snow service watch. I did, however, want to make sure that some fresh content finds its way to the site, and I’ll be running a few of my archived pieces. I first ran this look at a proposed subway line to LaGuardia back in January. After this week’s blizzard, the airport has reopened, but subway service to LaGuardia remains but a dream.

The Fiorello H. LaGuardia Airport in Queens is one of the nation’s most infuriating urban airports. It is so close to midtown and Manhattan’s Central Business District that a commuter in a hurry could make the trip in 30 minutes. Yet, it’s so far away because congestion frequently creates trips to Queens that last an hour and 30 minutes. The only public transit option to the airport is a packed and slow bus that, on a good day, goes from 125th St. and Lexington to the airport in a half an hour.

Over the last few decades, city officials have become quite intimate with the problems plaguing LaGuardia, and many have tried to fix it. The N train, whose northern terminus is less than three miles away from the LaGuardia terminals, is so tantalizing close to the airport and yet so far away.

Last week, in his “Why Train” segment, NBC 4’s Andrew Siff posted just this question. “What about the train to LGA?” asks Siff. In a one-minute piece, he mentioned how, 12 years ago, city and MTA officials were heavily invested in a plan to extend the N to LaGuardia, but in the face of other pressing transit needs and widespread community opposition, the agency eventually shelved this much needed link to LaGuardia.

So what then were the plans that engendered widespread community outrage and still cause politicians to chime in now and then, nearly a decade after the MTA discarded the idea? Let’s hop in the Wayback Machine and explore some Giuliani-Era transit developments.

The plans to extend the N to LaGuardia first came to light in 1998 as city officials recognized the need to build better access to the airports. As part of a $1.2 billion package with funding coming from the MTA, the Port Authority and the city, Giuiliani put forth a plan to build an airtrain to JFK and extend the subway to LaGuardia. The JFK line — built over preexisting rights-of-way — survived. The LaGuardia plans, obviously, did not.

The first and biggest problem the city faced in Queens came about because of the proposed routes. The preferred route would have extended the N along 31st St. north onto Con Edison’s property at the edge of Astoria and then east along 19th Ave. to the Marine Air Terminal. The MTA also considered an eastward extension along Ditmars Boulevard, a plan to reroute LaGuardia-bound N trains from Queensboro Plaza through the Sunnyside rail yard and along the eastern edge of St. Michael’s Cemetary to what Newsday called “elevated tracks parallel to the Grand Central Parkway.” A barely-acknowledged fourth route would have seen trains head east via Astoria Boulevard.

On the surface, these plans seem no worse than building the Second Ave. Subway through densely populated neighborhoods on the East Side. In Queens, however, the MTA would have had to build a spur line off a pre-existing elevated structure, and all of the plans called for the train to LaGuardia to run above ground through significant portions of Astoria. So while airport access ranked tops amongst Queens residents transit expansion wishlist, no one wanted to see Astoria further scarred by elevated structures.

The Daily News termed the opposition response NAMBYism — Not Above My Backyard — and nearly every single Queens politician opposed the idea. Some preferred the Sunnyside alternative, but at the time, NYCDOT said plans to widen the Grand Central Parkway would interfere with the train proposal. Others called upon an extension from Long Island City to skirt the borough from 21st St. along the East River to the airport. Still others preferred a longer Willets Point extension of the LIRR to the airport.

Peter Vallone exemplified the opposition. “Extending the elevated track will cause unnecessary hardship to residents and businesses in the area,” the City Council member said in 1999. “The MTA wants to go their way, not our way.”

In the end, despite opposition, political support for the plan from City Hall continued well into the 21st Century. With the backing of Mayor Guiliani and Queens Borough President Clare Shulman, the MTA’s 2000-2004 Five-Year Capital Plan included $645 million for the LaGuardia subway link, and even though a $17 million planning study was the project’s only expense, in late 2002, Mayor Bloomberg threw his weight behind the LaGuardia extension as a key post-9/11 revitalization plan.

Finally, in mid-2003, the Queens communities won the battle as the MTA announced plans to shelve the airport extension. With money tight after 9/11 and Lower Manhattan on the radar, then-MTA Chair Peter Kalikow said that the agency’s attention had turned to the JFK Raillink from Lower Manhattan, another plan that never materialized, and that the agency was prioritizing the 7 Line Extension, the East Side Access Plan and the Second Ave. Subway over the LaGuardia N train extension. “LaGuardia is a good project, but you have to prioritize,” Elliot Sander, then at NYU, said. “In terms of political support from City Hall, Albany and Washington, it’s moved back in the queue.”

And so in the end, we sit here in 2010 with the same travel options to LaGuardia as we have always enjoyed (or suffered through). The M60 remains the best public transportation option, and the MTA is in no position to take another crack at sending the subway to the airport. Oh, what could have been.

December 28, 2010 43 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
View from Underground

Videos of the Day: Clearing the tracks of snow

by Benjamin Kabak December 28, 2010
written by Benjamin Kabak on December 28, 2010

The above video was shot yesterday morning near the Howard Beach station on the currently shuttered A line. The night before, over 400 passengers found themselves snow-bound on a freezing, powerless train, and workers had to face the daunting task of clearing the tracks of snow. There’s something utterly peaceful in the white powder that blankets the train tracks, but in the second video below, that peace is shattered as Transit’s snow removing slowly makes it way toward the Rockaways. It might be fun for snowballs and snow angels, but as New York learned this week, that blizzard can be a powerful force of nature.

December 28, 2010 1 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
AsidesService Advisories

A mid-morning service update

by Benjamin Kabak December 28, 2010
written by Benjamin Kabak on December 28, 2010

I wish I had better news to report this morning, but it appears as though most subway service is still delayed or suspended. The MTA has a full list of changes on their website, but the authority did say that service along Dyre Ave. on the 5, the A to the Rockaways and service along the C, D, F and G have all been restored. The Q from Queens to Coney Island and the N south of Whitehall remain out of service.

The real problem, as NY1 reports this morning, involves the buses. Because the Sanitation Department has not, for whatever reason, plowed many of the streets in the Outer Boroughs, bus service remains impossible. In a comment on the Sheepshead Bites website, Brian Hedden of BK Southie and Allan Rosen point fingers at Sanitation while Jay Walder been forthcoming with the admission that the MTA’s inability to get buses running two days later is unacceptable. I’ll update this post as I can today with more information.

December 28, 2010 4 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Service Advisories

Scenes from the Snow: Day 2

by Benjamin Kabak December 28, 2010
written by Benjamin Kabak on December 28, 2010

A stranded N train sits idle at 8th Ave. as an MTA worker attempts to dig out the station. (Photo courtesy of New York City Transit)

It’s been a rough 24 hours for the MTA. Faced with what one spokesman called the worst weather-related service impact “in recent memory,” the authority spent Monday trying to get its system up and running again. Bus sat stranded in the snow-bound streets of New York while commuter rail lines and above-ground subway routes were felled by the snow.

As Tuesday dawns and temperatures remain near the freezing mark, the MTA assures its riders that crews are working to free the subways and buses that power the city. “Our real priority now is digging everything out and getting everything in place for service,” MTA CEO and Chairman Jay Walder said during a press conference. “It will be a tough day. We will have limited service.”

Like much of the city, the MTA was knocked out by the sheer force of the snow. The storm dumped nearly 20 inches of snow on New York in short order, and workers found themselves unable to reach areas buried after the blizzard. Stations — such as Carroll Street along the Culver Line — remained largely inaccessible, and as snow drifted through air grates, even some underground stops saw accumulations of up to a few inches.

In a statement sent out late on Monday night, the MTA promised better service on Tuesday, but it won’t be perfect. Bus service will slowly return to something resembling normal while subway service, with some notable exceptions, will be on or close to schedule. The authority offered up more: “MTA crews are continuing round-the-clock work to restore service throughout the system as soon as possible in a manner that is safe for our customers, employees and equipment after the blizzard that dumped almost two feet of snow throughout the MTA’s service territory. Nonetheless, impacts on service will continue into tomorrow, and MTA customers should look to MTA.info before they leave for the latest specific information, and should allow extra travel time.”

As far as the subways go, the MTA had the follow to say: “The New York City Subway is operating with outages affecting a number of lines that are elevated or in open cuts, particularly in Brooklyn, the Bronx, and the Rockaways in Queens. New York City Transit expects to restore service to all portions of the subway system for tomorrow morning’s rush hour except for the Q train, the A line between Euclid Av. and the Rockaways, the N line in Brooklyn, and the L line from Myrtle Av. to Canarsie. Customers should go to MTA.info for the latest service updates.”

It’s unclear when the Brighton line, the elevated A sections, the Sea Beach line and the L will reopen. Right now, crews are trying to remove snow drifts that blanket the tracks, and the trenched subway lines make removal very difficult. As long as no one else has to spend all night trapped on an A train, most New Yorkers will find travel through Manhattan sluggish but acceptable on Tuesday.

This snow storm, the region’s first of the winter, was a bad one. Hopefully, it’s not a harbinger of things to come. Our generally reliable transit network just couldn’t stomach the snow this time around, and the system should resurface later this week just in time for a fare hike. Mother Nature seems to have a funny sense of humor that way.

Stranded N trains await rescuing. (Courtesy of New York City Transit)

December 28, 2010 5 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Subway Movies

Second Ave. Sagas goes to the movies

by Benjamin Kabak December 27, 2010
written by Benjamin Kabak on December 27, 2010

As I’m out of New York for a few days this week, I’m not going to be around to cover all of the breaking subway news. I did, however, want to make sure that some fresh content finds its way to the site, and I’ll be running a few of my archived pieces. We’ll start off with a gem from December 27, 2007, three years ago today. December is, after all, always a great time for movies.

Over the long holiday weekend, I took a trip to the movies to catch I Am Legend, the latest in New York City destruction. While Will Smith, the only surviving human on the island of Manhattan, shuns what I imagine to be a deserted subway in exchange for his product-placed Ford cars, I couldn’t help but imagine the subway in an empty Manhattan. Devoid of people, there would be seats for anyone left alive. Who would drive the trains remain to be seen, and it would probably make sense to seal the subway tunnels to avoid a zombie apocalypse.

But I digress. Hollywood has always loved the New York City subways. Film makers have preyed on tales of crime-filled subway rides, glorified life in the tunnels and found new and creative ways to hijack trains. What follows are a few of my favorite subway movies.

Any discussion about the subway movies must begin with the Joseph Sargent classic The Taking of Pelham One Two Three. Preying on the fears of New Yorkers during the city’s economic and social problems in the 1970s, the movie, based on a bestselling book, features a hijacking of a subway. Led by Robert Shaw, a group of men who clearly influenced Quentin Taratnino’s Reservoir Dogs take a subway car hostage and threaten death if they don’t get one million dollars. It’s up to an excellent Walter Malthau to rescue the hostages and catch the criminals.

The movie, notable for its wit and irreverent take on New York City circa 1975, the movie was filmed on location in the subway system and garnered a mention in a Beastie Boys song. The MTA allowed Sargent to film in the then-abandoned Court Street station and tunnels between what is now the Transit Museum and the Hoyt/Schermerhorn stop. The movie was remade poorly in 1998 and again in 1999. See the Mathau/Robert Shaw version and skip the over-the-top Denzel Washington/John Travolta version. The new one has twice the action and none of the fun of the original.

On the other side of subway crime thrillers is Money Train, a 1995 movie with Wesley Snipes, Woody Harrelson and Jennifer Lopez. Harrelson, a disgruntled former employee of the the Transit Authority, conspires to rob the money train. While filming took place in Los Angeles, filmmakers modified an old R22 car that was eventually donated to New York City Transit. The film was criticized after its release when teenagers perpetrated copy-cat crimes in firebombing token booths. Authorities, however, did not believe that the crimes were related to the movie. The money trains have since been retired.

Moving back in time, we come across The Incident, Martin Sheen’s movie debut. For this one, the New York Transit Authority denied permission outright to film in the subways, and it’s easy to see why. Two kids board a train late at night and begin to psychologically terrorize the passengers. Filmed in black and white, it’s a snapshot into another era when the subways were considered dangerous, and this movie, more than any others, has set the tone for the Hollywood portrayal of the New York City subways as a dark, lonely and dangerous place.

Finally, we come to The French Connection. This William Friedkin classic stars a young Gene Hackman trying to break up a France-based narcotics ring as they smuggle drugs into New York. Hackman must drive through and around traffic underneath the elevated train line as he chases his French suspect who has hijacked a train in Brooklyn. You can watch the famous train chase scene right here on YouTube, but it’s worth it to watch the entire flick.

Of course, there are always other seminal moments of film history in the subways. Patrick Swayze meets a subway ghost in Ghost, and On The Town features Miss Turnstile, a relic lost to history. But these four featured here are great starting points, and three of them — all but The Incident — are out on DVD. While you may not have to take the train to work this week, catch a train in the movies instead.

December 27, 2010 9 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Load More Posts

About The Author

Name: Benjamin Kabak
E-mail: Contact Me

Become a Patron!
Follow @2AvSagas

Upcoming Events
TBD

RSS? Yes, Please: SAS' RSS Feed
SAS In Your Inbox: Subscribe to SAS by E-mail

Instagram



Disclaimer: Subway Map © Metropolitan Transportation Authority. Used with permission. MTA is not associated with nor does it endorse this website or its content.

Categories

  • 14th Street Busway (1)
  • 7 Line Extension (118)
  • Abandoned Stations (31)
  • ARC Tunnel (52)
  • Arts for Transit (19)
  • Asides (1,244)
  • Bronx (13)
  • Brooklyn (126)
  • Brooklyn-Queens Connector (13)
  • Buses (291)
  • Capital Program 2010-2014 (27)
  • Capital Program 2015-2019 (56)
  • Capital Program 2020-2024 (3)
  • Congestion Fee (71)
  • East Side Access Project (37)
  • F Express Plan (22)
  • Fare Hikes (173)
  • Fulton Street (57)
  • Gateway Tunnel (29)
  • High-Speed Rail (9)
  • Hudson Yards (18)
  • Interborough Express (1)
  • International Subways (26)
  • L Train Shutdown (20)
  • LIRR (65)
  • Manhattan (73)
  • Metro-North (99)
  • MetroCard (124)
  • Moynihan Station (16)
  • MTA (98)
  • MTA Absurdity (233)
  • MTA Bridges and Tunnels (27)
  • MTA Construction (128)
  • MTA Economics (522)
    • Doomsday Budget (74)
    • Ravitch Commission (23)
  • MTA Politics (330)
  • MTA Technology (195)
  • New Jersey Transit (53)
  • New York City Transit (220)
  • OMNY (3)
  • PANYNJ (113)
  • Paratransit (10)
  • Penn Station (18)
  • Penn Station Access (10)
  • Podcast (30)
  • Public Transit Policy (164)
  • Queens (129)
  • Rider Report Cards (31)
  • Rolling Stock (40)
  • Second Avenue Subway (262)
  • Self Promotion (77)
  • Service Advisories (612)
  • Service Cuts (118)
  • Sponsored Post (1)
  • Staten Island (52)
  • Straphangers Campaign (40)
  • Subway Advertising (45)
  • Subway Cell Service (34)
  • Subway History (81)
  • Subway Maps (83)
  • Subway Movies (14)
  • Subway Romance (13)
  • Subway Security (104)
  • Superstorm Sandy (35)
  • Taxis (43)
  • Transit Labor (151)
    • ATU (4)
    • TWU (100)
    • UTU (8)
  • Triboro RX (4)
  • U.S. Transit Systems (53)
    • BART (1)
    • Capital Metro (1)
    • CTA (7)
    • MBTA (11)
    • SEPTA (5)
    • WMATA (28)
  • View from Underground (447)

Archives

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram

@2019 - All Right Reserved.


Back To Top