Second Ave. Sagas
  • About
  • Contact Me
  • 2nd Ave. Subway History
  • Search
  • About
  • Contact Me
  • 2nd Ave. Subway History
  • Search
Second Ave. Sagas

News and Views on New York City Transportation

Second Avenue Subway

In second annual report card, Maloney sees SAS improvements

by Benjamin Kabak September 27, 2010
written by Benjamin Kabak on September 27, 2010

Progress along Second Ave. has increased by leaps and bounds this year as the MTA switched on the new subway’s tunnel boring machine and finally started digging out the tubes. Yet, as far as project management has gone, the Upper East Side’s politicians see only incremental improvement. After handing out a B- last year, Rep. Carolyn Maloney, Assemblyman Micah Kellner, and Councilwoman Jessica Lappin have given the Second Ave. Subway a B in their second annual report card.

“Real progress has been made on the Second Avenue Subway this year – with the subway’s tunnel boring machine literally moving closer to the finish line with each passing hour,” Maloney said on Saturday. “This is a great project and it’s been a vital source of good-paying jobs in the worst economic environment we’ve seen since the Great Depression. But today, we’re serving notice that we’re keeping an eye on the MTA, and we’re going to keep pushing to make sure this project keeps moving forward, with no further delays. The MTA must complete the Second Avenue Subway by its current 2016 deadline. We cannot afford to have it take any longer.”

Maloney’s report both praises and criticizes the MTA. As she has in the past, the House representative highlights the economic impact of the jobs the Second Ave. subway construction has brought to New York City. “The project is employing thousands of workers at a time when the construction industry is experiencing a sharp downturn, making the Second Avenue Subway an ideal stimulus project,” the report says. “In fact, SAS qualified for funding under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 and received $78,870,000.”

Of concern to Maloney are the various completion dates. As I reported back in July of 2009, the Federal Transportation Authority fears that the Second Ave. Subway will wrap in 2018 and cost $5.7 billion while the MTA’s official documents still predict revenue service in late 2016. “The construction is taking a toll on local businesses and residents,” Councilman Dan Garodnick said, “and the longer it lasts, the greater that impact will be — which is why this project must be completed without any further delay.”

Despite the FTA’s initial concerns, the report card itself notes that the MTA has ironed out some early kinks in the process. Even though the FTA’s assessment hovers over the project, there have not, the report said, “been significant changes in cost or timetable since then.”

In the end, Maloney’s biggest fears remain focused around the project’s funding and its future as New York state’s economy enters uncertain times and the threat of a new governor looms. “Finally, while the federal government has already contributed $752.2 of its $1.3 billion commitment (with another $197 million expected for FY2011, which would bring the federal total to roughly $950 million), and the State has allocated more than $1.5 billion to the project, there is still some concern about the State’s ability to provide the funding during this time of fiscal crisis,” the report says. “It is encouraging to know that the current MTA Chair appears to be committed to completing the capital projects that are currently underway, but there will be a change in the Governor’s office in January, introducing an element of uncertainty.”

After the jump, I’ve posted the report card in its 3000-word entirety. As you’ll see, community relations and overall planning remain a concern of the politicians, and the authority loses significant points for its inability to keep the project on time and on budget.

Continue Reading
September 27, 2010 2 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
MTA

One year in, grading Jay Walder

by Benjamin Kabak September 27, 2010
written by Benjamin Kabak on September 27, 2010

Nearly one year ago, Jay Walder took over the reins of the MTA from Elliot Sander. The outgoing MTA CEO and Executive Director had been well regarded among transit planners, but when the state agreed to institute its payroll tax plan, Sander’s job was no more. The state reorganized the MTA’s governing structure so that the CEO and board chairman would be one person, and that one person would be Jay Walder.

A year later, the MTA is struggling through more financial problems, and Walder has moved ahead in his rather thankless job. In good times, politicians will use the authority’s bureaucratic bloat to gain political points, and during bad times, those same politicians will blithely rob from the MTA’s revenue streams and then bash the authority for slashing service, raising fares or both. Even as the MTA often deserves a heavy dose of criticism, those in charge are judged and harshly at that.

In The Daily News this weekend, Pete Donohue rounded up some of the city’s transit advocates and business community heads to grade Jay Walder. Somewhat surprisingly, the marks were mostly high, but Gene Russianoff of the Straphangers Campaign leveled the harshest criticism. If anything, the judges are almost too generous in their grades.

Donohue asked his panel to grade on five categories: finances/fares, technology, labor relations, efficiency/eliminating waste and service improvement. In a year dominated by service cuts and fare hikes, the MTA’s economic situation and Walder’s handling of it have taken many of the headlines, but these judges, with one exception, gave Walder grades in the A range. “Walder was dealt a bad deal,” Robert Yaro, head of the Regional Plan Association, said. Yaro, who gave Walder an A-, continued, “The State Legislature grabbed money from the budget and payroll taxes are coming in under expectations. He’s facing an unparalleled situation and it is real.”

Others on the panel praised him for opening up the MTA’s finances and “leveling with the public on the need for fare hikes and service cuts .” Yet, Walder was docked marks for not setting a fare policy that, in the words of CBC’s Charles Breacher, “links fares to the cost of a ride.” Gene Russianoff gave him the MTA head a C- but noted that “the economy handed Walder this mess.”

Across the board, the judges praised Walder’s handling of technological innovation. Walder’s relationship with technology is, after all, why Gov. David Paterson tabbed the form Transport for London official. Robert Paaswell, director of the Urban Transportation Research Center at CUNY, gave Walder an A. “This is a strength and changes are being made,” he said, “but he needs to be selling the importance of next generation technology to the public more.” Kathryn Wylde of the Partnership for New York City noted that, despite Walder’s expertise, “budget problems have pushed tech investments to the back burner.”

As the report card progressed into the hot-button area of labor relations, the grades grew worse. Russianoff gave Walder and F for his handling of the TWU. “Raw tensions fueled by hundreds of layoffs, management’s mean hit on spit-on bus drivers and personal attacks on Walder” is how he explained the grade. “Riders” — Russianoff’s constituents — “need the warring parties to find common ground.” Brecher, on the other hand, praised him with a B grade for “pushing for changes in overtime and scheduling.”

The panel spoke glowingly of Walder’s attempts at internal restructuring and consolidation, moves that have already saved the MTA approximately $500 million annually. “More than any other chief executive, he’s aggressively taken on combining functions,” Yaro, who gave him an A, said. Scoring Walder an A+ here, Wylde echoed, “Walder has accomplished more in one year than we saw happen in the previous decade.”

Yet, Russianoff, who gave Walder a B+, hit upon the key challenge facing anyone in charge of the MTA. Walder, he says, has “miles to go before public sees MTA’s action as credible.” It’s tough to get the public exciting over the minutiae of bureaucratic reorganization, and until Walder can translate his internal cost savings into better service for the MTA’s riders, New Yorkers will not embrace the notion of a leaner MTA.

Finally, the panel discussed service improvements, an area clearly lacking at the MTA. Russianoff and Wylde were the most critical as the two handed out an F and a D respectively. “Cuts in express bus and other services have been very painful to neighborhoods like Bay Ridge, where I live. Progress on Bus Rapid Transit seems to have slowed,” Wylde said.

Charles Brecher’s C and his assessment seem to capture the reality of the situation best. “The effort to accelerate bus rapid transit services is a plus,” he said, “but still missing is strategic thinking about long-run improvements. …More reliable service on the existing lines requires more attention to state-of-good-repair work.” Without money, though, none of this is possible, and the five critics seemed to offer up a fair assessment of Walder’s strengths and weaknesses over his first year on the job.

Of course, I can’t end a report card piece without chiming in with my own views. So without ado…

Continue Reading
September 27, 2010 14 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Service Advisories

Weekend service advisories

by Benjamin Kabak September 25, 2010
written by Benjamin Kabak on September 25, 2010

Friday night already. Time for some service changes. These come to me from New York City Transit and are subject to change without notice. Listen to on-board announcements and check signs in your local station. Subway Weekender is back with the map.


From 11:30 p.m. Friday, September 24 to 5 a.m. Monday, September 27, 1 service is suspended due to rehab work at Dyckman Street and 242nd Street stations, track panel installation at 215th Street, signal cable replacement north of 96th Street and Port Authority work at the WTC site. The 2, 3 and A trains, free shuttle buses and the M3 bus provide alternate service. 2 and 3 trains run local and replace 1 service between 96th Street and Chambers Street. (Note: Downtown 2 and 3 trains skip 86th and 79th Streets.) Free shuttle buses run in four sections:

  1. On Broadway between 242nd Street and 215th Street stations, then connecting to the 207th Street A station.
  2. On St. Nicholas Avenue between 191st and 168th Street stations.
  3. On Broadway between 168th and 96th Streets (express and local service).
  4. In lower Manhattan between Chambers Street and South Ferry.


From 7 a.m. to 8 p.m. Saturday, September 24 and Sunday, September 25, Bronx-bound 2 trains skip 219th, 225th, 233rd Streets and Nereid Avenue due to elevated structure painting.


From 12:01 a.m. Saturday, September 25 to 5 a.m. Monday, September 27, uptown 2 and 3 trains run local from Chambers Street to 96th Street. Downtown 2 and 3 trains run express from 96th to 72nd Streets, then local to Chambers Street. These changes are due to rehab work at Dyckman Street and 242nd Street stations, track panel installation at 215th Street, signal cable replacement north of 96th Street and Port Authority work at the WTC site.


From 3:30 a.m. Saturday, September 25 to 10 p.m. Sunday, September 26, free shuttle buses replace 6 trains between Pelham Bay Park, Parkchester and St. Lawrence Avenue stations due to track panel installation at Westchester Square. (Manhattan-bound shuttle buses leaving Parkchester make a connecting stop at St. Lawrence Avenue station.)


From 6 a.m. to 7 p.m., Saturday, September 24 and Sunday, September 25, Manhattan-bound 7 trains skip 111th, 103rd, 90th, and 82nd Streets due to elevated structure painting.


From 12:01 a.m. Saturday, September 25 to 5 a.m. Monday, September 27, A trains skip Broadway-Nassau/Fulton Street in both directions due to work on the Fulton Street Transit Center.


From 12:01 a.m. Saturday, September 25 to 5 a.m. Monday, September 27, downtown A trains skip 50th, 23rd, and Spring Streets due to a track chip-out at 42nd Street.


From 6:30 a.m. to midnight, Saturday, September 25 and Sunday, September 26, C trains skip Broadway-Nassau/Fulton Street in both directions due to work on the Fulton Street Transit Center.


From 6:30 a.m. to midnight, Saturday, September 25 and Sunday, September 26, downtown C trains skip 50th, 23rd, and Spring Streets due to a track chip-out at 42nd Street.


From 12:01 a.m. Saturday, September 25 to 5 a.m. Monday, September 27, Coney Island-bound D trains run on the N line from 36th Street to Coney Island-Stillwell Avenue due to structural repair and station rehabs from 71st Street to Bay 50th Street and ADA work at Bay Parkway.


From 12:30 a.m. Saturday, September 25 to 5 a.m. Monday, September 27, E and F trains run local between Roosevelt Avenue and Forest Hills-71st Avenue due to substation cable work at Grand Avenue.


From 12:01 a.m. Saturday, September 25 to 5 a.m. Monday, September 27, there is no E service between 34th Street and World Trade Center due to signal rehabilitation at Lexington and 5th Avenues.


From 12:01 a.m. Saturday, September 25 to 5 a.m. Monday, September 27, Manhattan-bound F trains run on the A line from Jay Street to West 4th Street due to signal cable replacement.


From 10:30 p.m. Friday, September 24 to 5 a.m. Monday, September 27, free shuttle buses replace G trains between Court Square and Bedford-Nostrand Avenues due to a track chip-out at Metropolitan Avenue. (Shuttle buses connect the 21st Street-Queensbridge F and Queens Plaza R stations, and then make all G station stops between Court Square and Bedford-Nostrand Avs.


From 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. Sunday, September 26, the L train runs in two sections (due to signal maintenance): • Between 8th Avenue and Broadway Junction and • Between Broadway Junction and Rockaway Parkway (every 24 minutes)


From 11:30 p.m. Friday, September 24 to 5 a.m. Monday, September 27, free shuttle buses replace M service due to station rehab work from Metropolitan to Central. Avenues.


From 6:30 a.m. to midnight, Saturday, September 25 and Sunday, September 26, N trains run local on the R line between Canal Street in Manhattan and 59th Street in Brooklyn due to station rehab work at 86th Street.


From 11 p.m. Friday, September 24 to 5 a.m. Monday, September 27, Q trains run local between Canal Street and 34th Street-Herald Square due to a concrete pour at 28th Street.


From 9:30 p.m. Friday, September 24 to 5 a.m. Monday, September 27, free shuttle buses replace Q trains between Prospect Park and Coney Island-Stillwell Avenue due to station reconstruction work at Avenues H, J, M and Kings Highway.


From 11:45 p.m. Friday, September 24 to 5 a.m. Monday, September 27, there are no R trains between Whitehall Street in Manhattan and 95th Street in Brooklyn due to station rehab work at 86th Street. For service between Whitehall and 59th Streets, customers should take the N. For service between 59th and 95th Streets, customers should take the free shuttle buses.

(Rockaway Park Shuttle)
From 10:30 p.m. Friday, September 24 to 5 a.m. Monday, September 27, free shuttle buses replace S (Rockaway Park Shuttle) trains between Rockaway Park and Beach 60th Street due to station rehabilitations. (Note: Manhattan-bound A trains skip Beach 67th Street.)

September 25, 2010 0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
AsidesNew York City Transit

TAB tabbed for lack of translators

by Benjamin Kabak September 24, 2010
written by Benjamin Kabak on September 24, 2010

New York City Transit’s much-maligned Transit Adjudication Bureau has once again come under fire from civil liberties advocates. As Pete Donohue of the Daily News reports today, the NYCLU, in a letter to NYC Transit, claims that these administrative hearings are violating the law by not providing translators to defendants who cannot speak or understand English. “Beyond being unfair, this practice is illegal,” the letter says. “Not only does the Transit Authority’s failure to provide interpreter services violate the Civil Rights Act, it violates the United States Constitution and New York Constitution.”

To bolster this argument, Times reporter Karen Zraick observed one TAB hearing in which a Spanish-speaking defendant had to resort to another person in the waiting room who could offer a bare-bones translation of the proceedings. This is not the first time the NYCLU has challenged part of the TAB process. Late last year, the group won a legal fight to open up the hearings. The MTA has so far declined to comment on this current matter.

September 24, 2010 14 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
AsidesMTA Technology

A bus GPS tracking system for NYC but not the MTA

by Benjamin Kabak September 24, 2010
written by Benjamin Kabak on September 24, 2010

As the MTA struggles to get a bus-tracking system — a late-20th century technology — off the ground, the Downtown Alliance has brought a real-time GPS-based bus-tracking system to its Downtown Connection service. This 37-stop free bus route connects the South Street seaport with Battery Park City, and seven stops along the route now have real-time tracking information, thanks to money from Goldman Sachs, the Department of Transportation and State Senator Daniel Squadron.

“NextBus signs will make a great service—free buses for the Lower Manhattan community—even better,” Squadron said in a statement. “Now, bus riders can spend less time waiting for a bus, and more time enjoying the shops, restaurants, cultural institutions and more in this wonderful neighborhood. I am pleased to have supported this program, and I thank the Downtown Alliance and the DOT for their work in making it happen.”

The MTA, meanwhile, is still struggling with its own bus-tracking pilot program. In the past, the authority has claimed that the city’s tall buildings have interfered with GPS-based systems, but if the Downtown Alliance can bring it — and a live-tracking website — to a route, albeit a solitary one, with some of the city’s tallest buildings, the MTA’s own version shouldn’t be far behind.

September 24, 2010 12 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
View from Underground

Musings on the way we ride

by Benjamin Kabak September 24, 2010
written by Benjamin Kabak on September 24, 2010

This photo is entitled “Pet Peeve.” It’s easy to see why. (Photo by flickr user animalvegetable)

Let me tell you a secret: When I ride the subway, I judge people. I judge the way they board, where they stand, how they sit. I judge what they read and the way they read. I judge their headphone qualities and the volume of their music. I am, in other words, a people-watcher.

Now, don’t get me wrong; I’m not a ruthless critic of New York’s straphangers and their approach to their shared commutes. I watch — and judge — because I enjoy seeing how other people relate to the subways. Do they treat it with respect as they would their own car or apartment or do they eat and discard without regard to the communal nature of it? Are they aware of leaking headphones and music that’s too loud? Do they recognize that taking up two seats is frowned upon and that the elderly and expectant mothers should be offered seats at the right time?

The answers to these questions vary. Many people ride respectfully. They aren’t pole-huggers or door-blockers. They throw out their leftovers in the trash cans and listen to music at volumes that do not disturb others. They don’t spread their newspapers out across three seats during the morning rush, and they do give up their seats when appropriate. The rude ones always stand out, but by and large, New Yorkers are more respectful of each other than the stereotypes say we are.

Yet, etiquette aside, New Yorkers exhibit behavioral tendencies of all stripes on the subway, and in one of her last amNew York pieces on transit before heading to The Post, Heather Haddon and a behavioral psychologist examined those tendencies. What, Haddon asked, does the way you ride say about your personality?

Haddon and her panel of experts — a body language instructor, an etiquette maven and the aforementioned psychologist — looked at six different styles of subway riding: the door-blocker, the pole-hugger, the seat hog, the wanderer, the pole avoider and the corner sitter. As you might expect, the answers are obvious and amusing.

Of the door-blocker, for instance, Haddon and the experts say:

Typically, this is someone who wants to keep his or her options open, is claustrophobic or is a “business guy with complete disregard for others,” Brehove said. These riders spark widespread disdain among commuters. “It drives me crazy when people stand right next to the door,” said Lisa Wagner, 40, of Manhattan. “Usually there’s room in the middle of the car but they just won’t go there.”

The person who takes up more than one seat, they say, is either confrontational or inconsiderate (or both). The pole hogs, says one rider, are the worst. “Clueless and ignorant immediately come to mind,” Regina Iulo of Brooklyn said. But my favorite is their assessment of those who seek corner or aisle seats:

Our experts agree that this is likely an anxious person seeking refuge from the masses. “It’s like crossing your arms in front of yourself. They want to be as far away as they can get,” Fitzpatrick said. “I am a big fan of personal space,” said Danielle Marie, 24, a Manhattan rider who prefers the corner. “I don’t want anyone to crowd me and I don’t want to crowd anyone else.”

Who can be faulted for wanting to take a bit of refuge from the maddening crowd? The middle seats, after all, are a recipe for a sandwiched and uncomfortable commute.

New York’s subways are, as I’ve said in the past, a great social incubator. Millions of people come together for the shared experience of riding the rails every day, and this diverse crowd comes from all walks of life and all backgrounds. How we ride speaks volumes about the way we interact with others. Whether we like it or not, someone else is always watching and probably judging too.

September 24, 2010 13 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
AsidesEast Side Access Project

MTA renews East Side Access management space lease

by Benjamin Kabak September 23, 2010
written by Benjamin Kabak on September 23, 2010

The MTA’s East Side Access project is expected to be ready by mid-2016, and in the meantime, the authority has to make sure it has space to house the management offices. So, reports The Observer, the MTA has renewed its lease for three floors — one of which is devoted entirely to the East Side Access project — at 469 Seventh Ave. The MTA is taking out 68,000 square feet of space at the building, and landlord Eric Meyer had been asking for $35 per square feet for a total of $2.38 million. Meanwhile, 370 Jay St. in Brooklyn is still awaiting its $150 million renovation.

September 23, 2010 0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
MetroCard

On the not-so-imminent death of the MetroCard

by Benjamin Kabak September 23, 2010
written by Benjamin Kabak on September 23, 2010

Since Jay Walder arrived at the MTA nearly one year ago, the MetroCard and its future have been on the minds of New Yorkers. Picking up on internal fare-media development efforts, Walder has all but declared war on the familiar blue-and-gold piece of plastic that allows us unlimited access to the city’s subways and buses. While New Yorkers may be fond of the swipe and the seemingly ubiquitous messages urging us to “swipe again at this turnstile,” many at the MTA see the MetroCard as a symbol of the subway’s touchy relationship with technology. The MetroCard is early 1990s — or even late 1980s — technology, and it’s the Twenty Teens. Let’s get with the program already.

And so the battle for the MetroCard replacement has been launched. In late 2009, Walder announced that the MTA hoped to implement new fare payment technology by 2014, and the effort for a replacement would extend beyond the current market leaders. London’s Oyster card and the WMATA’s SmarTrip program may seem high-falutin’ to New Yorkers who have no exposure to contactless cards, but even those technologies are out-of-date. The follower for so long, this time around, the MTA wants to be a leader.

So far, the MTA has offered the public glimpses at its long-term strategy. A small pilot program currently in place in station salong the East Side IRT and numerous Manhattan bus routes involves automatic fare deductions from credit and debit cards. MasterCard led the pilot with its PayPass technology, and yesterday, Visa announced that its payWave would now be accepted at these stations as well. Furthermore, a new smartphone app will allow straphangers to use cutting-edge mobile payment technology as well. This — and not an RFID smart card — is how the MTA sees the future of subway fares.

The question, of course, remains why. Despite some glitches, the MetroCard appears to do the job. So what is pushing the MTA to kill it after just 16 years? In an extensive overview of the quest to kill the MetroCard, Cody Lyon at the Gotham Gazette answers just that very question. It is, not surprisingly, a matter of cost. As Lyon writes and as I’ve explained in the past, the MTA spends 15 cents per fare dollar on maintaining MetroCard infrastructure and collecting money. The MTA employs 124 workers whose sole tasks involve keeping MetroCard Vending Machines up and running, and Transit says it received 28,456 service calls for those machines in one month — this past July.

What, then, can smart cards do? By reducing fare infrastructure costs, the MTA says it will save $55 million for every cent they shave off that 15-cent total, and the proper new technology could result in nearly $200 million in increased revenue. “Transit industries across the country are finding it costs them a lot of money, in machines and service, and collecting cash out of them, to be able to operate the transit ticketing and fare payment services they offer,” Randy Vanderhoof, the Executive Director of the Smart Card Alliance, a group meeting with the MTA this week, said to Lyon. “Anything transit agencies can do to reduce the number of tickets they have to sell, and the number of machines they have to supply in the stations, will allow them to save money.”

Lyon’s pieces touches upon other goals and concerns with a charge card-based system. As he notes, the concerns focus around those who do not have credit or debit cards. For that not-insignificant percentage of New Yorkers, the MTA would have to make pre-paid cards of some shape available for purchase, and the authority wants to better integrate fare payment across its subagencies before wading into that economic experiment.

So how soon will the post-MetroCard era dawn? Walder’s early 2014 prediction may be too optimistic. MTA officials told Lyon that the timeframe may, in the grand tradition of MTA projects, be elongated. “The new smart card program will see full subway and train implementation in the coming years,” Aaron Donovan, authority spokesman, said. It’s anybody’s guess how soon that will be.

September 23, 2010 25 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Fare Hikes

Coming soon, a $104 monthly MetroCard?

by Benjamin Kabak September 23, 2010
written by Benjamin Kabak on September 23, 2010

Now that the MTA’s fare hike hearings have ended, the waiting game begins. We wait for the MTA Board to meet; we wait them to vote on the fare hike; we wait for the fare hike to go into effect. From the sound of things, New Yorkers will also be waiting not so expectantly for the first triple-digit MetroCard in subway history.

According to MTA CEO and Chairman Jay Walder, public sentiment is firmly behind maintaining the MetroCard status quo albeit with higher prices. As City Room reported, Walder discussed the fare hike hearings earlier this week while speaking with the New York Building Congress. “It’s safe to say there hasn’t been a tremendous amount of enthusiasm for the capped pass,” he said.

As part of its fare hike offerings, the MTA had put forward two proposals — a capped and an uncapped one. Under the capped proposal, the more expensive offering would cost $99 and would be valid for either 30 days or 90 rides, whichever came first. According to the MTA, only a very small percentage of subway riders swipe their cards 90 or more times a month, but the MTA’s justification for the capped proposal, as I explored last week, has seemed sparse.

Under the more traditional fare hike, the MTA would retain the 30-day unlimited card, but the costs would shoot up even higher. The 30-day card could cost $104 while the seven-day card will cost $29. Under both proposals, the little-used one- and 14-day cards will be eliminated entirely.

According to Walder and the MTA’s analysis, the fare hike, which would send the cost of 30-day cards up by nearly 17 percent, impacts those who can better afford to pay. “One of the points about the 30-day pass is that the median household income for the 30-day pass is nearly double the household incomes for some other products,” Walder said.

But many transit advocates dispute the MTA’s assertions on the dueling fare hike proposals. Gene Russianoff of the Straphangers Campaign has been hammering the MTA on its rationale behind the hikes and believes the authority has not answered his questions to the fullest extent possible. “What will it mean to cap the ride? Will it discourage people from buying the pass? Will more people move to pay-per-ride? Will ridership go down? I’d like to know the answers to those questions,” he said to NY1’s John Mancini.

Even MTA Board members, says Mancini, want “to learn more on the fare hike options.” This tidbit about the Board is part of a larger narrative about the MTA’s proposed fare hike. Although Walder continues to insist that the fares must go up because money isn’t flowing in from elsewhere, transit advocates are calling for better solutions. The Straphangers, the Tri-State Transportation Campaign and others have called for tolling solutions, and the Permanent Citizens Advisory Committee to the MTA has done the same.

While PCAC recognizes that the MTA is in dire financial straits, it also objects to “shifting of the burden of support for MTA services increasingly onto the backs of the riders.” The group has called upon the MTA to fight for the restoration of $143 million the state legislature moved from the transit fund to the state’s general fund last year and has asked the MTA to push through East River bridge tolls before trying to raise the fares. These solutions do not appear to be politically palatable right now even as they remain more practical than yet another steep fare hike.

And so we wait. We wait for solutions that do not come. We wait for politicians who do not answer the call. And we wait for the inevitability of higher fares over and over again.

September 23, 2010 24 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
MetroCard

Visa payWave, mobile app added to contactless payment trial

by Benjamin Kabak September 22, 2010
written by Benjamin Kabak on September 22, 2010

As the MTA forges ahead with plans to bring next-generation fare payment technology to the subways, Visa announced yesterday that its users can pay for their transit fares with both the payWave contactless technology and a new mobile application. While Visa’s payWave joins MasterCard’s PayPass trial, the ability to pay for transit fares with a mobile phone application at stations along the East Side IRT and on select bus routes forges new ground for the MTA.

“Transit agencies the world over have one primary goal – to get their customers to where they need to go quickly and efficiently. What transit agencies and riders recognize is that using Visa on buses, subways and trains is the logical evolution in terms of improved speed, security and convenience,” Jim McCarthy, a Visa executive, said in a statement. “For commuters, paying with Visa means no more fumbling for change or worrying about lost transit cards. For transit authorities, accepting Visa means better customer service, integrated collections and the potential for increased ridership.”

Visa explains that the New York pilot uses a small electronic chip embedded in either a mobile phone or payment card that communicates with the contactless readers at the fare gates. Simply by holding payWave-enabled cards or phones near the designated reader will deduct a fare from the chip, and open the gate. Visa has also issued a payWave-enabled commuter benefits card called the TransitChek QuickPay Card. This card allows those participating in the trial to pay their fares using the so-called “tax-advantaged flexible spending accounts.”

According to BankTech, iPhone users who opt in to the Visa payWave trial can’t use only their phones to pay. Because iPhone technology doesn’t include a memory card slot, iPhone users will have to keep a MicroSD chip in their cases. Other smartphone users should be able to install the proper chip into the memory card slot.

For the MTA, bringing Visa on board for the last few months of this six-month trial represents the next step in the hunt for the future. By allowing smartphone payments, the MTA is trying to skip what is, in essence, already preexisting fare payment technology. Various transit agencies throughout the world have used RFID-enabled contactless cards for years, and one of the MTA’s goal in searching for the MetroCard replacement involves finding something not already obsolete. I’ll have more on that aspect of this fare payment trial tomorrow.

September 22, 2010 3 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Load More Posts

About The Author

Name: Benjamin Kabak
E-mail: Contact Me

Become a Patron!
Follow @2AvSagas

Upcoming Events
TBD

RSS? Yes, Please: SAS' RSS Feed
SAS In Your Inbox: Subscribe to SAS by E-mail

Instagram



Disclaimer: Subway Map © Metropolitan Transportation Authority. Used with permission. MTA is not associated with nor does it endorse this website or its content.

Categories

  • 14th Street Busway (1)
  • 7 Line Extension (118)
  • Abandoned Stations (31)
  • ARC Tunnel (52)
  • Arts for Transit (19)
  • Asides (1,244)
  • Bronx (13)
  • Brooklyn (126)
  • Brooklyn-Queens Connector (13)
  • Buses (291)
  • Capital Program 2010-2014 (27)
  • Capital Program 2015-2019 (56)
  • Capital Program 2020-2024 (3)
  • Congestion Fee (71)
  • East Side Access Project (37)
  • F Express Plan (22)
  • Fare Hikes (173)
  • Fulton Street (57)
  • Gateway Tunnel (29)
  • High-Speed Rail (9)
  • Hudson Yards (18)
  • Interborough Express (1)
  • International Subways (26)
  • L Train Shutdown (20)
  • LIRR (65)
  • Manhattan (73)
  • Metro-North (99)
  • MetroCard (124)
  • Moynihan Station (16)
  • MTA (98)
  • MTA Absurdity (233)
  • MTA Bridges and Tunnels (27)
  • MTA Construction (128)
  • MTA Economics (522)
    • Doomsday Budget (74)
    • Ravitch Commission (23)
  • MTA Politics (330)
  • MTA Technology (195)
  • New Jersey Transit (53)
  • New York City Transit (220)
  • OMNY (3)
  • PANYNJ (113)
  • Paratransit (10)
  • Penn Station (18)
  • Penn Station Access (10)
  • Podcast (30)
  • Public Transit Policy (164)
  • Queens (129)
  • Rider Report Cards (31)
  • Rolling Stock (40)
  • Second Avenue Subway (262)
  • Self Promotion (77)
  • Service Advisories (612)
  • Service Cuts (118)
  • Sponsored Post (1)
  • Staten Island (52)
  • Straphangers Campaign (40)
  • Subway Advertising (45)
  • Subway Cell Service (34)
  • Subway History (81)
  • Subway Maps (83)
  • Subway Movies (14)
  • Subway Romance (13)
  • Subway Security (104)
  • Superstorm Sandy (35)
  • Taxis (43)
  • Transit Labor (151)
    • ATU (4)
    • TWU (100)
    • UTU (8)
  • Triboro RX (4)
  • U.S. Transit Systems (53)
    • BART (1)
    • Capital Metro (1)
    • CTA (7)
    • MBTA (11)
    • SEPTA (5)
    • WMATA (28)
  • View from Underground (447)

Archives

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram

@2019 - All Right Reserved.


Back To Top