Second Ave. Sagas
  • About
  • Contact Me
  • 2nd Ave. Subway History
  • Search
  • About
  • Contact Me
  • 2nd Ave. Subway History
  • Search
Second Ave. Sagas

News and Views on New York City Transportation

AsidesPublic Transit Policy

On the need for better transit funding policies

by Benjamin Kabak August 26, 2010
written by Benjamin Kabak on August 26, 2010

In a few weeks, the MTA will host a series of public hearings on a proposal to raise fares by approximately 7.5 percent, and then a few weeks after that, New Yorkers will go to the polls at Election Day to send a bunch of unqualified and largely inept legislators back to Albany. As the vote and the fare hike draw ever closer, one topic not on the lips of politicians this year is a funding solution to the MTA’s woes. While congestion pricing or bridge tolls remain untapped, the only solutions Albany can offer involve service cuts, fare hikes or more borrowing, quite destructive in the long-term. The MTA’s funding crisis so no signs of abating.

Today in the Albany Times Union, John Petro of the Drum Major Institute takes Albany to task for neglecting its duties to public transit in and around the New York City area. “State lawmakers,” he says, “must craft a long-term plan for taming the debt they let grow out of control and for maximizing new sources of transit funding without overburdening average taxpayers or the riding public.” The only problem with this seemingly simple mandate is that state lawmakers have buried their heads in the sand and have taken dedicated funds away from the MTA at the time of greatest need.

In his piece, Petro urges the media to push hard on Andrew Cuomo’s non-stance on the MTA. In his campaign literature so far, Cuomo has barely paid heed to the MTA’s problems and has instead hinted that he might rollback the payroll tax, a source of $1.4 billion in annual revenue for public transit. Petro also urges New York’s representatives in Washington to secure more funding for operations assistance. As he says, “Our public transit system is an irreplaceable asset and an invaluable part of the nation’s infrastructure that should be protected. Leaders in state government better start treating it that way.” I hope someone is listening.

August 26, 2010 14 comments
1 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
BronxMetroCard

So far, praise for the Yankee Stadium Metro-North stop

by Benjamin Kabak August 26, 2010
written by Benjamin Kabak on August 26, 2010

Brian Cashman and Jorge Posada pose last May at the opening of the Yankee Stadium Metro-North stop. (Photo by Benjamin Kabak)

For twenty years, MTA officials and city politicians spoke about securing Metro-North access to the South Bronx. The tracks were there, and the draw — a popular baseball stadium — ensured high demand for a good portion of the year. But as long as the Yankees threatened to leave the Bronx, no party wanted to commit to spend $90 million on a station that wouldn’t see much traffic otherwise.

When the Yankees announced plans for their new stadium, though, everyone sprang into action. The city paid $39 million to help build the station, and the MTA covered the remaining $52 million. Since then, as Judy Rife explores in the Times Herald-Record this week, the station has seen increased ridership and has been deemed a success so far. She writes:

Metro-North Railroad’s statistics are something of a wowser, too. In June, the first month when a year-over-year comparison was possible, about 44,500 fans took the train to the game — a whopping 45 percent increase. The new Yankees/153rd Street station opened last year.

And, yes, there were two more games this June than last, but Metro-North is still registering significantly higher average ridership for the season to date — 3,219 for weekday games and 3,819 for weekend ones. Not bad for a year-old service to a 51,800-seat stadium, where attendance is usually in the mid-40,000s.

Bob MacLagger, Metro-North’s vice president for planning, shamelessly calls the new station a “grand slam” and waxes promotional in recounting the reviews it’s received: “It’s better, faster, quicker, cheaper, easier — no driving, no traffic, no parking, no brainer.”

Transit advocates too have praised the station for its high ridership in its infancy. “There are all sorts of spin-off benefits to the station,” Jeff Zupan of the Regional Plan Association said.” But I think what it has done, perhaps more than anything else, is introduce people who may not have used public transportation before to the train.”

The new station certainly has made getting to and from Yankee Stadium easier for many people, and it’s opened up the new Gateway Center at the Bronx Terminal Market to transit as well. Yet, although we should be praising this new station, its success and its long and tortured history showcases how integration between the city’s commuter rail lines and the five boroughs is generally lacking. It shouldn’t take a baseball stadium to provide Metro-North service to the South Bronx just as it shouldn’t take a massive real estate complex to ensure a Metro-North access point at West 60th St. and the Hudson River.

As a Yankee fan and a transit supporter, I’m certainly pleased to see this Metro-North stop siphoning cars away from the South Bronx and providing the neighborhood with another alternate means of transportation. Next time, hopefully, it won’t take twenty years for a station so obvious to see the light of day.

August 26, 2010 26 comments
3 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Brooklyn

Building a better BQE

by Benjamin Kabak August 26, 2010
written by Benjamin Kabak on August 26, 2010

The BQE as seen from the Brooklyn Bridge Park. Photo via flickr user xbettyx.

A few weeks ago, I took a walk through Brownstone Brooklyn from Park Slope to the East River. I wanted to check out the new happenings at the Brooklyn Bridge Park, and after a stroll through the playground at Pier 6, I started to head toward Pier 1. Now, this week, a walking and biking path along the waterfront opened, but in early August before this path was ready, the best way to go from Pier 6 to Pier 1 was along Furman St., a little-used road underneath the double-decked BQE. Instead of tracking the cantilevered road way that serves as a barrier between Brooklyn and its picturesque waterfront, we opted for a leisurely stroll through Brooklyn Heights and along the Promenade instead.

Since Robert Moses first started tracing the contours of the Brooklyn-Queens Expressway and the connecting Gowanus Expressway, it was a controversial road. Built mostly above-ground, this elevated magnet for traffic jams tore through neighborhoods, and Moses famously refused to move the planned route one block west so it wouldn’t destroy a vibrant mixed-use community along 3rd Ave. in Brooklyn’s Sunset Park. Built without space for transit options, the BQE has cast a shadow on New York’s two most populous boroughs for decades.

Today, the BQE is a mess. It’s part of an important arterial road through that connects New Jersey, Staten Island, Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx; provides access to key East River bridges; is well over capacity; and is living on borrowed time. While the road isn’t in danger of an imminent collapse, the physical structure is degrading quickly. Since the late 1990s, the city has toyed with the idea of righting the wrongs of the Moses Era and burying the parts of the BQE that shouldn’t be above ground.

A map of the proposed tunnel to replace the BQE. Click to enlarge.

In The Brooklyn Paper this week, reporter Stephen Brown explores one plan to tunnel the BQE underneath Brownstone Brooklyn, thus freeing up the two decks underneath the Brooklyn Heights Promenade for local traffic or other uses entirely. He writes:

State transportation officials are considering a tunnel under Brownstone Brooklyn that would stretch all the way from the Prospect Expressway to the Brooklyn Navy Yard, thereby bypassing all of Downtown and clearing the way for a major repair of the crumbling, sclerotic triple-cantilevered portion of the Brooklyn-Queens Expressway in Brooklyn Heights.

The extraordinarily ambitious two-and-a-half-mile tunnel is one of several options for replacing the beleaguered highway that is being considered by the state Department of Transportation, but it is already emerging as a favorite. “It’s brilliant,” said Allen Swerdlowe, an architect participating in state-sponsored design workshops, who praised the tunnel idea because it would discourage traffic-enraged drivers from exiting the highway as they do now and driving on local streets…

According to [Roy] Sloane [a Cobble Hill resident who proposed the idea], the tunnel could serve as an express route to North Brooklyn, while the triple-cantilevered stretch of the BQE would become a “local” route that would funnel traffic to the Brooklyn and Manhattan bridges as well as local streets.

Still, there were some differences among proponents of the tunnel as to what should be done with the decaying stretch of the BQE. “I don’t like that because it creates more capacity, and once you increase capacity drivers start using it and you create more problems,” said Swerdlowe, adding that he preferred a tunnel with exits to local streets and that the triple-cantilevered roadway could be converted into a recreation area of some sort.

In an ideal world, Swerdlowe’s dream would become a reality. A tunnel to replace the BQE would allow for adequate connections to local roads and the Brooklyn and Manhattan Bridges while the cantilevered roadway would be opened up to allow more direct access to the Brooklyn Bridge Park and waterfront. Furthermore, one goal of the road repair and replacement project should not be to encourage more driving in and around downtown Brooklyn.

For now, this tunnel remains a great idea on paper, but it’s a long way from reality. The Downtown Brooklyn BQE project is already 13 years in the making, and the New York State Department of Transportation doesn’t anticipate construction to start until 2017. By 2020, this road replacement, now budgeted for $254 million, will be complete. A tunnel through Brooklyn would cost significantly more than that and, if Boston’s Big Dig is any indication, take far longer than three years to complete. Still, the city needs to dream big, and by doing so, it can restore access to a part of the Brooklyn waterfront people, and not cars, should be enjoying.

August 26, 2010 39 comments
1 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
LIRR

As LIRR delays continue, new signal technology awaits

by Benjamin Kabak August 26, 2010
written by Benjamin Kabak on August 26, 2010

Signal men performing functional tests following fire at Hall Tower. Photo via Long Island Rail Road.

For the third consecutive day, Long Island Rail Road is warning its commuters to expect “significant schedule changes and delays” during the AM and PM rush hours on Thursday. Work crews are busy repairing the damaged Hall Tower switches east of Jamaica, but progress is slow as each of 200 wires must be checked manually and more damage may be found during the inspection. So far, the LIRR has maintained that the signal fire was “weather-related” as water from weekend rain shorted an electrical circuit and thus sparked a fire.

Although the signaling system is still being operated manually, train service is slowly reaching something resembling normal. The LIRR will be running 75 percent of the 144 trains that normally operate in the mornings, but the agency expects residual delays due to added station stops. Trains stopping at Jamaica will not be held for scheduled connections, and the full list of the 33 canceled westbound trains is right here.

For the PM rush, 68 percent of the LIRR’s 127 trains will be in service, but as with the morning, the LIRR warns of slower schedules. For connections to Oyster Bay stops, travel to Mineola. For service to West Hempstead, travel to Valley Stream for shuttle buses. For Patchogue, Speonk and Montauk, connect at Babylon.

Signal men checking control wires within a switch machine. Photo via Long Island Rail Road.

Meanwhile, John Mancini, the new transit beat writer for NY1, takes a look at the old technology in use at the Hall Signal tower. The irony of this week’s fire is that the MTA was planning to replace the 90-year-old Hall tower with a fully computerized switching system this November. He reports:

It will computerize switching for the 10 lines that run through the Jamaica hub, replacing a burned-out console designed in 1913. And while the new system is a high-tech upgrade, there’s no guarantee it can’t be knocked out in the same way. “If for instance, you were to have a fire, you would still obviously have damage. The difference with this system is that you’d be able to diagnose the problem faster, and bring it up faster,” said Long Island Rail Road Spokesman Joe Calderone.

LIRR officials say one of the advantages of moving to a computerized switching system is that many of the old system’s outdated components will be going away…

Friday may be the soonest business as usual could return. For now, the railroad finds itself relying on the oldest of methods to keep trains on the right track across each of 77 switches. “We simply block it with that yellow block you can see down between the running rail and the stock rail, and then there’s a spike,” said Long Island Rail Road Senior Vice President of Operations Ray Kenny.

The spike Kenny refers to keeps the switch from moving out of line. It’s an old, yet reliable technique that will also be necessary during the transition to the new system. And even as the LIRR powers ahead into the modern age, it appears that everything old is new again.

While the visible parts of transportation infrastructure such as subway stations show the wear and tear of old age, the decades-old signal systems are a greater cause for concern. The money to upgrade this technology can’t come soon enough.

August 26, 2010 7 comments
1 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Manhattan

Despite ESB protests, Council approves 15 Penn Plaza

by Benjamin Kabak August 25, 2010
written by Benjamin Kabak on August 25, 2010

15 Penn Plaza, right, could lead to numerous improvements in and around Penn Station. (All renderings courtesy of The Architect’s Newspaper)

By a vote of 47-1, the City Council approved Vornado’s plans to build a 1216-foot tall building at 15 Penn Plaza. In recent weeks, the plan had come under fire by the owners of the Empire State Building who claimed that another tall building just two avenue blocks away from the iconic tower would disrupt the skyline. The City Council, however, encouraged by Vornado’s pledge to spend $100 million on transit improvements, gave the new tower the go-ahead anyway.

“New York as a city has to grow,” David Greenbaum, the head of Vornado’s New York office, had told reporters this week. “This project has been fully, fully considered by the City Planning Commission, it has been considered in the context of SEQRA and the EIS. In our opinion, and theirs, there will be no adverse impacts.”

At one point during the debate, Anthony Malkin, owner of the Art Deco New York City icon, had proposed limiting buildings within 2000 feet of the Empire State Building. The city, said Greenbaum, would be foolish to kill development within such a significant swath of midtown. City Council members, including Leroy Comrie, chair of the Land Use Committee, were highly skeptical of this argument. “I think what you’re asking us to do is beyond any one project,” Comrie said. “You’re asking us to make a policy decision. You’re asking us to look at many things beyond this one project.”

To dispute this claim, Vornado released a set of renderings that show how the Manhattan skyline will appear with both the Hudson Yards development and 15 Penn Plaza. The Empire State Building’s owners may have been overstating their case a bit. Take a look and click to enlarge:

While the development rights battle has played itself out, the underground development will soon take center stage. Of the $100 million pledged to Penn Station, the bulk of that would go toward reopening the Gimbels Passageway, shown in renderings below. Other plans include plans include wider staircases, a direct entrance to the express platforms at 32nd and 7th and a variety of new entrances and connections between the subway and PATH at 6th Ave.

With City Council approval, Vornado will now search for an anchor tenant before beginning construction. It will still be a few years before the skyline looks different so enjoy those Empire State Building views while you still can. I’m eagerly awaiting the transit improvements and see this is a model for private investment in public transit. Since Vornado’s development will lead to a massive increase in transit demand for the area, the real estate giant should contribute to the transit infrastructure in the area.

August 25, 2010 8 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
MTA Technology

Restoring the surprise in the age of countdown clocks

by Benjamin Kabak August 25, 2010
written by Benjamin Kabak on August 25, 2010

For when you don't want to know how or when your long wait ends.

From the folks who brought you Star Wars in a subway car, come the latest and greatest in guerilla labeling. Jason Eppink, a self-proclaimed mischief maker who says he “engages the public with victimless pranks, urban interventions, and interactive sculpture,” has decided that New York City Transit’s countdown clocks are just too practical. So to restore an element of surprise to the tedious task of waiting for the subway, Eppink has installed Spoiler Alert signs to the system’s signs.

He offers up an explanation on his website:

In 2007, the New York City Transit Authority began installing LED signs on subway platforms that display estimated wait times for arriving trains. Unfortunately the information is little more than trivia: except for a few stations, it is only visible to travelers after they’ve paid their fare, so the data has little bearing on commuter decision-making.

Their primary effect, then, is to erode faith in the system, to create expectations that can’t always be met, to raise false hopes, and to erase the mystery and magic of the wondrous system that transports more than five million riders a day.

These LED signs also threaten historical social behaviors, rendering obsolete the time-honored New York tradition of leaning over the platform edge with the hope of glimpsing headlights from an approaching train.

The Spoiler Alert signs warn waiting riders of this potentially unwanted information – allowing them to avert their eyes so they may preserve their spirit of adventure – while still leaving visible the data for travelers who wish to ruin the surprise for themselves.

I, for one, love the countdown clocks. I find myself consciously taking rides on the IRT lines just so I can enjoy the stress-free experience of waiting with a clock, and even though the clocks aren’t bug-free, they’re right more often than they’re not. I don’t miss that “time-honored New York tradition of leaning over the platform edge” one iota even if, as Eppink notes, it is a distinctly New York thing to do.

I’m sure some New Yorkers — and the MTA — won’t appreciate these signs and will find them too subtly sarcastic or cutesy for the serious business of riding the subway. But as the countdown clocks have made riding less stressful, this public art/prank can add a moment of levity to a dour subway commute.

August 25, 2010 4 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
AsidesSecond Avenue Subway

As SAS construction heads south, 2nd Ave. merchants suffer

by Benjamin Kabak August 25, 2010
written by Benjamin Kabak on August 25, 2010

For the past few years, business owners along Second Ave. near the upper 90s have bemoaned the constant state of construction around the Second Ave. Subway launch box. With noise and dust filling the air, with fenced-off sidewalks and a general state of disarray, business has suffered and many stores have closed. Now that the project work is heading south along the avenue, business owners in the East 60s and 70s are finding out that life amidst a subway construction isn’t very much fun.

As The Real Deal reported this week, some merchants have found business down by 40 percent as the MTA has set up fences and has begun working between 69th and 74th Streets. The Beach Cafe at 70th St., for instance, has been open for 40 years but has seen business drop by a quarter since subway work began. There is, said owner Dave Goodside, “no guarantee that we’re going to be in business next year and that’s due to the subway construction. We’ve never felt like that before, but that’s how we feel.”

New York City politicians are attempting to usher through a bill granting these businesses tax abatements during construction, and the MTA has been promoting the “Shop Second Avenue” initiative. Additionally, once work is completed on Phase I of the SAS sometime between 2016 and 2018, these businesses will see property value shoot up, but that is little consolation as their day-to-day existences remain in limbo. These shops are but necessary victims of a badly-needed subway extension.

August 25, 2010 10 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
View from Underground

Stand clear of the opening doors please

by Benjamin Kabak August 25, 2010
written by Benjamin Kabak on August 25, 2010

The New York Post highlights the little things that bug us all. Click to enlarge.

As part of my endless commute home last week, I experienced a distinctly annoying aspect of riding the subways. When the 2 train for which I had just waited 17 minutes pulled into Atlantic Ave., the dreaded and familiar “ding” of the PA system’s manual override rang out, and the conductor announced that the 2 would be going express from Atlantic Ave. to Franklin St. Many of my fellow riders and I surged toward the door only to be greeted by an immovable mass of door-blockers. These straphangers would not relinquish their plum positions leaning against the doors and barely gave way as people filed out of the train.

A few days before that incident, The Post, in an informal survey of 300 New Yorkers discovered that the number one annoyance of urban life in the Big Apple isn’t the noise or the crowds. It’s not the frenetic pace of city life or mind-numbingly bland street fairs. Rather, it is people who block subway car doors. While 20.9 percent say slow tourists who don’t know how to walk properly are the leading cause of urban frustration, 24.8 percent say people too inconsiderate to give way at subway stations are the most annoying in New York City.

Rashaun Simon, a 23-year-old from Queens, hit the nail upon the head in his assessment of door hogs, akin to pole hogs and seat hots in their manners. “It’s a hospitality issue,” Simon said. “They’re the same people who don’t give up their seats to pregnant women.”

In essence, these people are the oblivious riders. Similar to those who surreptitiously discard papers, dirty napkins or chicken fingers and french fries on the floor of subway cars without stopping to clean up, the door hogs are the people who think the rules don’t apply to them. They can stand in the door because the subways are there for them and the rest of the people on board are the ones in the way. Plus, aren’t there usually two or three other seats of doors? Just exit through those instead.

The door hogs too transcend issues of personal space. They actively hinder train operations because they act as a funnel for people exiting and boarding the car. If a door hog is blocking half of the entrance, the load times at that door are delayed, and everyone must wait just so this one person can lean back for 20 seconds in between stations.

In the face of such obliviousness then, what is a polite straphanger to do? As with anything underground, the appropriate response would be to kill them with kindness. “Excuse me please” or even a subtly sarcastic “excuse me” often do the trick. A courteous door-leaner will step out of the train at the next stop and then move to the center of the car as he or she boards again. The person who thinks they take up less space than they actually do will try to smoosh themselves against the row of seats as people file by.

The problems arise when a door hog doesn’t move when asked. Then, it becomes a question of picking a fight, intentionally or inadvertently. A well-placed shoulder, elbow or flying bag can get the message across. A dirty look might do the job too. But the trick is to leave the train car without creating a physical incident with the person who obviously cars little about anyone but themselves.

It just might a losing battle though to fight the door hogs. They don’t move because they don’t want to move, and nothing anyone can do will stop them. The door hogs will always be an identifiable part of the subway system, and as Aramis Reynoso said to The Post, “The things that annoy you about New York are usually the things that define New York.”

LIRR Update: For the latest news on the delays plaguing the Long Island Rail Road and the agency’s plan for the Wednesday commute, please read this post. I’ll update with new information as it becomes available throughout the day.

August 25, 2010 26 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
LIRR

LIRR anticipating ‘several days’ of reduced service

by Benjamin Kabak August 25, 2010
written by Benjamin Kabak on August 25, 2010

A Newsday video story highlights the way commuters have adjusted to the reduced LIRR service this week.

As the Long Island Rail Road prepares for another day without full service, the latest word from the agency is that it will take several days to restore full service. “Over two-hundred wires need to be checked for possible damage from the fire,” the LIRR said in a press release.” Once the repairs are completed, intricate and thorough testing must be performed on the switches and signals. From the preliminary LIRR investigation into the incident, it appears that the cause of the cable fire was weather-related; it is still under investigation.”

Still, the majority of service is moving through Jamaica now albeit at slower speeds. For the morning rush, the authority offers up these words of advice:

While the Wednesday AM Rush service plan includes cancellation of 33 westbound AM rush hour trains, the LIRR will be running 75 percent of the 144 trains that normally operate. However, there will be residual delays from added station stops. Customers will be able to exit or board trains at Jamaica Station, however trains stopping at Jamaica will not be held for scheduled connections to/from Penn Station, Atlantic Terminal, Hunterspoint Avenue, and Long Island City. LIRR station personnel will be available at Jamaica to assist customers with service information.

The service on the Port Washington Branch will operate normally while there is still no train service between West Hepstead and Valley Stream or westbound service from St. Albans. The full list of canceled trains is available here.

PM rush service is as follows with canceled trains at the above link. The MTA estimates that 66 percent of evening trains will run as scheduled.

Aside from the regular Port Washington service, the evening rush hour service from Penn Station will consist of dedicated trains making local stops to Huntington/Port Jefferson, Ronkonkoma/Greenport, Long Beach, Babylon and Montauk. Customers are advised to board trains that do not require a change at Jamaica.

LIRR is offering Hempstead and Far Rockaway-bound trains only from Atlantic Terminal in downtown Brooklyn, which can be reached by subway. There will be no Hempstead and Far Rockaway service from Penn Station.

The following changes will also be in effect:

  • Oyster Bay: Travel to Mineola for connections to all Oyster Bay branch stops.
  • West Hempstead: Travel to Valley Stream where buses will be available to take them onto to their home stations.
  • Patchogue, Speonk and Montauk: Customers can connect to those trains at Babylon.
  • There is no train service between Valley Stream and West Hempstead – bus service will be provided for train service at Valley Stream.
  • There will be no eastbound train service from St. Albans – bus service will be provided between St. Albans and Jamaica.

I’ll continue to offer updates as more information becomes available.

August 25, 2010 5 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Fare Hikes

The fear of a $130 unlimited MetroCard

by Benjamin Kabak August 24, 2010
written by Benjamin Kabak on August 24, 2010

As the MTA gears up to host a slate of public hearings in September on the fare hike proposal, the Authority has officially released the details of the competing plans. Either the monthly MetroCard will have a rider cap or the cost will sneak past $100. The news coverage though has focused on a third proposal: the cost of a true unlimited ride card if the MTA were to adopt both fare options.

“Riders stunned by $130 monthly card!” says the Daily News. “Fare hike just got steeper!” NBC New York proclaims. There is but one problem, as MTA spokesman Aaron Donovan said to me, “This is not an official MTA proposal.”

The official fare proposals are pretty straightforward as the MTA works to raise fare revenues by 7.5 percent. The base fare — paid by just 14 percent of riders — will remain at $2.25, but disposable single-ride tickets will come with a 25-cent surcharge. All new MetroCards will come with a $1 fee, but the MTA says few, if any regular riders, will have to pay. I’ve also been told that Unlimited Ride cards will be refillable when this fee goes into effect as well.

“This is a charge that no one needs to incur: most everyone has a MetroCard in hand, which can be reloaded in system at no cost,” the authority said. “If the card has expired, MetroCard vending machines will offer to load any remaining value on a new card at no cost; passes will now be reloadable with time or value without cost; and the charge will not apply to out of system vendor sales, elderly/disabled customers, transit benefit organization customers, combination commuter railroad-MetroCard ticket users, or stolen cards.”

The pay-per-ride discount will be decreased from 15 percent for purchases of at least $8 to 7 percent of purchases of at least $10. Approximately 36 percent of subway riders use the pay-per-ride bonus, and these straphangers will see their effective base fare jump from $1.96 a ride to $2.10 per swipe.

The competing unlimited ride proposals — one with capped cards and one without — require a table:

Pass Type Current Fare Unlimited Proposal Capped Proposal
30-Day Card $89 $104 $99/90 trips
Fare Per Trip      
59 rides $1.51 $1.76 $1.68
90 rides $0.99 $1.16 $1.1
110 rides $0.81 $0.94 N/A
       
7-Day Card $27 $29 $28/22 trips
Fare Per Trip      
16 rides $1.69 $1.81 $1.75
22 rides $1.23 $1.32 $1.27
30 rides $0.90 $0.97 N/A

The barely-used 14-day and 1-day MetroCards will be eliminated.

Now, these numbers weren’t chosen at random by the MTA. Rather, straphangers who use the unlimited card cards make, on average, 59 trips over the 30-day span and 16 trips on the seven-day cards. Transfers would not count against the cap, and the authority explains the reasons behind the two proposals. “An unlimited pass provides the convenience of not having to consider the number of trips, but has a higher price,” it said. “The capped pass would limit the total number of trips that can be taken, but with a smaller fare increase.”

The $130 figure — which has scared and scarred New York subway riders — came about because the MTA Board asked the authority to include a joint proposal on the fare hike hearing materials. How much would it cost to include both a capped option and true unlimited ride card? Since the MTA wants to limit fraudulent uses of the unlimited MetroCards and ensure that the heaviest of users are shouldering their fair share of the fare burden, the $130 amount was released as an estimate. “To ensure maximum flexibility for the Board in making its determination, and to encourage robust public discourse, the public notice of fare and toll adjustments provides some leeway to allow for the adoption of other alternative pricing combinations,” Donovan told me.

Still, as the people protest, one MTA Board member doubts the agency will embrace such a high figure simply due to sticker shock. Even if most people wouldn’t need or have to pay the $130 card, that the idea exists could be a blow to what little faith the public has in the MTA. “It’s not going to happen,” Andrew Albert said to The Post.

It makes for a good headline, but when all is said and done, we’ll be facing capped cards that cost less than $100, for now, or an uncapped card that require us to fork over $100 a deal. The $130 card elicits fear that is unwarranted. For now, these monthly options are still good deals, but the prices just keep on going up, up, up as the authority tries to avoid more service cuts.

Let’s end this one with a poll. Pick your poison.

Would you rather:
  • Pay $99 for a card capped at 90 rides per month
    11430% of all votes
  • Pay $104 for a true 30-day unlimited card
    26670% of all votes
Total Votes: 380 Started: August 24, 2010 Back to Vote Screen
August 24, 2010 54 comments
3 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Load More Posts

About The Author

Name: Benjamin Kabak
E-mail: Contact Me

Become a Patron!
Follow @2AvSagas

Upcoming Events
TBD

RSS? Yes, Please: SAS' RSS Feed
SAS In Your Inbox: Subscribe to SAS by E-mail

Instagram



Disclaimer: Subway Map © Metropolitan Transportation Authority. Used with permission. MTA is not associated with nor does it endorse this website or its content.

Categories

  • 14th Street Busway (1)
  • 7 Line Extension (118)
  • Abandoned Stations (31)
  • ARC Tunnel (52)
  • Arts for Transit (19)
  • Asides (1,244)
  • Bronx (13)
  • Brooklyn (126)
  • Brooklyn-Queens Connector (13)
  • Buses (291)
  • Capital Program 2010-2014 (27)
  • Capital Program 2015-2019 (56)
  • Capital Program 2020-2024 (3)
  • Congestion Fee (71)
  • East Side Access Project (37)
  • F Express Plan (22)
  • Fare Hikes (173)
  • Fulton Street (57)
  • Gateway Tunnel (29)
  • High-Speed Rail (9)
  • Hudson Yards (18)
  • Interborough Express (1)
  • International Subways (26)
  • L Train Shutdown (20)
  • LIRR (65)
  • Manhattan (73)
  • Metro-North (99)
  • MetroCard (124)
  • Moynihan Station (16)
  • MTA (98)
  • MTA Absurdity (233)
  • MTA Bridges and Tunnels (27)
  • MTA Construction (128)
  • MTA Economics (522)
    • Doomsday Budget (74)
    • Ravitch Commission (23)
  • MTA Politics (330)
  • MTA Technology (195)
  • New Jersey Transit (53)
  • New York City Transit (220)
  • OMNY (3)
  • PANYNJ (113)
  • Paratransit (10)
  • Penn Station (18)
  • Penn Station Access (10)
  • Podcast (30)
  • Public Transit Policy (164)
  • Queens (129)
  • Rider Report Cards (31)
  • Rolling Stock (40)
  • Second Avenue Subway (262)
  • Self Promotion (77)
  • Service Advisories (612)
  • Service Cuts (118)
  • Sponsored Post (1)
  • Staten Island (52)
  • Straphangers Campaign (40)
  • Subway Advertising (45)
  • Subway Cell Service (34)
  • Subway History (81)
  • Subway Maps (83)
  • Subway Movies (14)
  • Subway Romance (13)
  • Subway Security (104)
  • Superstorm Sandy (35)
  • Taxis (43)
  • Transit Labor (151)
    • ATU (4)
    • TWU (100)
    • UTU (8)
  • Triboro RX (4)
  • U.S. Transit Systems (53)
    • BART (1)
    • Capital Metro (1)
    • CTA (7)
    • MBTA (11)
    • SEPTA (5)
    • WMATA (28)
  • View from Underground (447)

Archives

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram

@2019 - All Right Reserved.


Back To Top