Second Ave. Sagas
  • About
  • Contact Me
  • 2nd Ave. Subway History
  • Search
  • About
  • Contact Me
  • 2nd Ave. Subway History
  • Search
Second Ave. Sagas

News and Views on New York City Transportation

AsidesView from Underground

Try the subways for a slight respite from the heat

by Benjamin Kabak July 7, 2010
written by Benjamin Kabak on July 7, 2010

As temperatures in the city climb toward the upper 90s for the second day in a row, New Yorkers are searching in vain for some relief from the heat. We huddle in air conditioned apartments and offices, hoping that the Con Ed power grid will hold up as the city’s streets remain empty. Of course, to get from one air conditioned site to another often requires a ride in the subway, and during heat waves, the temperatures below ground can spike. Take comfort though, in a Wall Street Journal investigative report: It’s actually cooler underground than it is above ground.

Armed with a store-bought thermometer, Joy Resmovits hit the streets. At Grand Central, enjoying air-controlled platforms, the temperatures were just 86.5 degrees while above ground the mercury hit 96. As temperatures reached 102 during the afternoon, the Times Square platforms registered at a downright chilly 99 degrees. But at 116th St., the differences were just a matter of one degree. Cooler they may be, the platforms are not comfortable.

Of course, this temporary equilibrium will last only as long as the heat wave does. Once outside temperatures drop to the high 80s, the platforms will remain stifling as heat generated by the subway’s air conditioners stays trapped underground. I’d rather have cooler train cars than not, but it doesn’t make waiting on intolerably hot platforms any easier during the dog days of a New York City summer.

July 7, 2010 15 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
MTA Politics

From Staten Island, an insight into Albany’s crazy thinking

by Benjamin Kabak July 7, 2010
written by Benjamin Kabak on July 7, 2010

Most Assembly members don’t seem to know what happens on the Assembly floor.

For transit advocates, Albany is the gift that keeps on giving but in the wrong vein. Representative after representative spew falsehoods about the state of public transit funding in New York City, the MTA’s role in the budget crisis and their duties to their constituents. Yesterday, I challenged Jose Peralta’s open letter to Jay Walder. Today, even more state officials are commenting in ways that are both stunningly inept and illuminating.

This tale starts with Peralta’s letter. In it, the good Senator from Queens accuses the MTA of suffering from the political equivalent of Munchausen Syndrome. “While the state Senate,” he said, “is working to restore public transportation cuts, the MTA has chosen to distort this fact in an effort to conceal its own budgetary failures.” The truth is that the State Senate voted to withdraw $143 million in what was supposed to be dedicated MTA revenues and use it in the state’s general fund instead. The MTA has highlighted this fact, and Peralta has taken exception to that reality. He isn’t alone.

In a post on the SILive.com politics blog that got lost over the July 4th weekend, Tom Wrobleski talks to some Staten Island reps about the state of transit funding, and their comments show an utter lack of preparedness and legislative understanding. The narrative is a simple one: Constituents facing election challenges are under fire for their willingness to vote away that $143 million and sit idly by while the MTA enacted a sweeping array of service cuts that hit Staten Island bus commuters particularly hard. I’ll let Wrobleski tell the story:

Republican Nicole Malliotakis took Assemblywoman Janele Hyer-Spencer (D-East Shore/Brooklyn) to task for the vote, but Ms. Hyer-Spencer wasn’t alone in voting to move the money. State Sen. Diane Savino and Assemblymen Mike Cusick and Matt Titone, Democrats all, also voted for the plan.

We don’t know if she’ll get any credit for this, but Ms. Savino (D-North Shore/Brooklyn) admitted that she wasn’t aware that the MTA money was part of the plan. “Most of us didn’t realize what was in that reduction plan,” she told us. “That’s the truth. Sometimes, you only see the big picture. The devil is in the details.”

Ms. Savino said that lawmakers were concerned with meeting the overall financial goal of reducing the state deficit when they cast their votes. “It should not have been done that way,” she said. “But it was done. We took $143 million in dedicated transit funding. That didn’t cause all the trouble, but it certainly made it worse.”

Ms. Savino said that had she been aware that the MTA money was part of the equation, she wouldn’t have voted in favor of the package. When asked how she would respond to those who say that it’s her job to know what’s in the legislation she votes for, Ms. Savino said, “It’s hard to argue with that. You have to sit and read every bill.”

Soak that in for a minute. Diane Savino, a six-year veteran of the State Senate, blindly voted for an appropriations bill that took $143 million away from transit simply because her party leadership told her to. She made no effort to investigate the money that would be shuffled around, and only after the fact, when the impact of her vote has become clear, does she sound at all remorseful.

At least Savino is willing to admit she’s wrong. Other representatives in Albany think that starving the MTA makes for sound financial policies. “Let’s not forget how much money they’ve wasted over the years,” Assemblyman Matt Titone said. “They’re standing there with folded hands because they don’t want to open their books.” The books are mostly open.

Assemblyman Mike Cusick went one step further than Titone and echoed the “two sets of books” line that grew stale when a judge found it had no merit in 2003. At least Cusick seemed to know for what he was voting. “It was a decision we had to make last year in order to get a balanced budget,” he said. “The argument can also be made that the MTA in past years ran that agency in a poor way. They had two sets of books. They spent money in wasteful ways. That argument could go back and forth.”

A few other Senators seemed to have a clue, and because New York State transit politics can make for strange bedfellows, those who knew what they were doing were a handful of state Republicans. “The last place that we should have looked to cut was OMRDD,” Senator Andrew Lanza said. “The second-to-last place was that MTA money. Among the first places on the chopping block was Staten Island.”

The reaction to these comments has been swift. The Staten Island Advance’s editorial board openly mocked those representatives who claimed either that they did not know what they were doing or thought the MTA deserved the raise. Cap’n Transit, in a piece in which he advises Republicans on a pro-transit election platform that the state GOP probably wouldn’t embrace, is appalled as well.

I don’t see this behavior changing though. In the memo attached to the station agent layoff prevention bill, the Assembly claims that there are no “fiscal implications” to the bill. Apparently, money to retain station agents will just fall from the sky and land in the MTA’s savings account. As long as Albany continues to hide its collective head in the sand and as long as Senators treat the New York City’s subway system as its own personal punching bag, we will be stuck with service cuts and fare hikes. The narrative — and the representation — in Albany has to change before we can move forward with the transit the city needs and deserves.

July 7, 2010 14 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
AsidesSecond Avenue Subway

A slow start to the TBM’s journey down 2nd Ave.

by Benjamin Kabak July 6, 2010
written by Benjamin Kabak on July 6, 2010

Over six weeks, the MTA brought politicians and reporters underneath Second Ave. for the ceremonial launch of the Second Ave. Subway tunnel boring machine. The MTA’s plans called for the TBM to dig out two 7800-foot long tunnels from 96th St. to the northern stub of the BMT Broadway tracks at 63rd St. and Lexington Ave. Digging at a pace of 40-60 feet per day, the TBM should complete the first tunnel by January, but the early going has been rough.

As Dan Rivoli reported last week, the TBM had been digging at a pace of just 10 feet a day due to some highly fractured rock underneath the avenue. Because so much is unknown about the geology of Manhattan, the MTA had to proceed cautiously through this stretch of rock. Otherwise, the TBM’s digging could have created complications and the threat of a cave-in in the eastern starter tunnel. As of Thursday, the MTA’s Aaron Donovan informed me, the TBM had broken through the area of highly fractured rock and had reached the 300-foot mark. Although it is still in the start-up phase, the TBM should now begin to pick up speed. 2016, here we come.

July 6, 2010 14 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
AsidesBuses

No tickets for parking at 570 former bus stops

by Benjamin Kabak July 6, 2010
written by Benjamin Kabak on July 6, 2010

When the MTA had to shutter 570 bus stops last week due to service cuts, the move created an odd occurrence of empty space on New York’s streets. Because NYC DOT maintains the bus shelters, no one knew what to make of the out-of-service bus stops all marked with prominent No Standing signs. Following the MTA’s signage, some brave folks tried to park in these spaces only to find a $115 ticket awaiting their return. DOT had a bunch of disgruntled New Yorkers on their hands.

This past weekend, to clear up the confusion, the NYPD has told its parking enforcement agents not to issue parking tickets for those cars parked at bus stops the MTA has designated out of service. This move is an unofficial one as DOT is still trying to determine the future for the 30,000 feet of unused curb space it now has at its disposal. I’m holding out hope for some combination of bike storage areas, mini green spaces and market-rate on-street parking spots.

July 6, 2010 12 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
MTA Politics

Peralta joins the MTA Deniers Club in Albany

by Benjamin Kabak July 6, 2010
written by Benjamin Kabak on July 6, 2010

Meet Jose Peralta. If his name sounds familiar, it’s because one of the newest State Senators made headlines when he won the special election of fill Hiram Monserrate’s seat earlier this year. He represents the 13th District which consists of East Elmhurst, Jackson Heights and Corona, three neighborhoods very dependent upon public transportation, but he now joins a growing list of elected officials who won’t fess up to the truth about transit.

Peralta has attracted my ire with an open letter to Jay Walder that the Queens Village Times printed late last week. Peralta attempts to blame the MTA for Albany’s failures and does so in spectacular fashion. Let’s break it down.

I am writing to express my concerns with the MTA’s latest plan to balance its budget on the backs of my constituents. I am not surprised the MTA is facing another crisis…

Peralta starts out on a typically populist note. Someone must teach politicians to blame the MTA for balancing the budget on the back of constituents as part of an Albany orientation package. After all, the authority isn’t about to balance its budget on the backs of State Senators or Assembly representatives. But Peralta ends on an optimistic note here: He isn’t surprised that the MTA is facing another crisis. Could it be that he’s going to admit that Albany stole money from the beleaguered authority?

— given the history of fiscal incompetency, fare hikes and services cuts this agency has imposed on riders. Rather than addressing the real problem, which is the MTA’s long history of mismanagement and overspending, you are once again expecting the public to pay the price for your mistakes.

Nope. Of course not. Ignoring history and the fact that fare hikes come about to either keep up with inflation or keep the subways running, Peralta pinpoints “fiscal incompetency,” a great catch-all that doesn’t catch anything. I wonder why Peralta doesn’t talk about the long history of Albany’s inability to fund transit or create a lockbox for revenues that are supposed to be dedicated to the MTA so that the legislature can’t later remove those to the general fund.

Common sense dictates you cannot cut an entire subway line or slash express service like the latest No. 7 train cut proposal and not expect these measures to negatively affect New Yorkers. You do not cut services to a borough like Queens, where the population is growing.

Of course, Peralta ignores the fact that even though two subway lines were cut, rush hour train service in Queens has remained the same with the Q taking over for the W and the M covering the V’s stops. The MTA doesn’t want to cut services to growing areas of the city, but when facing an $800 million budget gap, what choices does it have? Peralta, though, really gets rolling with the next paragraph.

The MTA is once again facing an astounding budget deficit. The MTA deficit will continue to grow unless the systemic problems that have plagued this agency, including mismanagement, overspending and duplication of services, are finally addressed. And while the state Senate is working to restore public transportation cuts, the MTA has chosen to distort this fact in an effort to conceal its own budgetary failures. This is deceptive and counterproductive in seeking a solution to the growing deficit.

Here, Peralta ignores how Walder himself has engaged in an effort to make every dollar count and to trim the fat. He discounts the millions in internal savings the authority has already identified and the ways in which the new MTA management is streamlining operations while eliminating overspending and duplications of services (such as media relations and communications staffs). Meanwhile, Peralta who, in December while still in the Assembly, voted for the bill that took $143 million in dedicated MTA revenue away from the authority, claims the MTA is using this to “distort the fact” that it has budget problems. In reality, that misappropriation is one of the main drivers behind the need to implement service cuts and the budget deficit. It isn’t deceptive or counterproductive; it’s just honesty.

I don’t expect anything less or anything more from Peralta. He openly extols his opposition to congestion pricing and has shown no knowledge of transit issues. Despite his attempts at phrasing his critique of the MTA as some sort of constituent fight against the Big Bad Wolf, he’s not doing those he purports to represent any favors. Welcome to the club, Senator Peralta.

July 6, 2010 27 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Service AdvisoriesSubway Romance

The people that you meet each day

by Benjamin Kabak July 2, 2010
written by Benjamin Kabak on July 2, 2010

I’m talking off early this afternoon for the July 4th weekend, and I’ll be away until Monday. You can find the weekend service advisories at the bottom of this post or click here to jump to them.

Last night, on my way back from dinner in Manhattan, an elderly lady got on the train at Borough Hall and didn’t realize she was going the wrong way. When we pulled into Hoyt St., she asked me if she was on a Brooklyn-bound train, and then she wanted to know the best way to switch to train back to Manhattan. At Nevins St. and Atlantic Ave., she had the choice of navigating a few flights of stairs, but she preferred to transfer across the platform at Grand Army Plaza. I helped her with these directions, and she thanked me as I left.

While getting her on the way, I didn’t have a chance to talk to her about anything else, but now and then, if the opportunity arises, I’ll find myself in conversation with strangers on the trains. I’ve seen celebrities and friends; I’ve met strangers on the train. Mostly, I ride in silence, reading a book or relaxing, but the trains provide us with that space to meet someone. We’re all in it together after all.

A handful of recent stories about connections on a train struck me as amusing. Michael Grynbaum in his Off the Rails column for City Room found that most of the Craigs List Missed Connections that mention the subway take place along the L train. I can’t wait for the “Hipsters in Love” movie to come out. A few years ago, I wondered why people don’t find more romance on the subways and concluded that we mostly distrust strangers we find talking to us on the subways.

There is, it seems a cure for that. Enter Submate, the subway social networking site. Still in its infancy, the site is designed to connect people who share all or parts of the same commute. WPIX profiled Submate a few weeks ago. I wonder if that could take off. Who wouldn’t want a little companionship on a sluggish morning commute?

Finally, Good Magazine asked its Twitter and Facebook followers a very simple question: Who’s the most interesting person you’ve met on public transportation? Yesterday, they published some answers, and I enjoyed reading about riders who meet and befriend strangers. From the crazies to the friendlies, all types of riders are represented. You never know who — or what — you might find on the train.

After the jump, this week’s service advisories.

Continue Reading
July 2, 2010 3 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
MTA

A $10 million communications consolidation plan

by Benjamin Kabak July 2, 2010
written by Benjamin Kabak on July 2, 2010

As part of its never-ending mission to both close a $400 million deficit and make every dollar count, the MTA has announced a new initiative that will restructure the agency’s internal communications departments and save $10 million annually. Although the savings all small, the restructuring will lead to better organizational efficiencies across its various subagencies.

“By operating the MTA as one company instead of a loose collection of agencies we can provide the most efficient and effective service to the 8.5 million New Yorkers who rely on our transportation system every day,” Jay Walder, chair and CEO, said. “Consolidating these functions is a part of our effort to overhaul how the MTA does business to make sure that we are using every dollar as wisely as possible. These actions will pool resources, streamline operations and create savings.”

The first phase of this reorganization is very much inside baseball, and it will see the MTA overhaul its call centers, media relations and communications departments. The MTA made headlines when the New York tabloids revealed that the authority had more than 100 phone numbers and five customer service call centers. A “virtual consolidation” with a voice-recognition system will reduce the number of phone numbers and allow the authority to cut back on call centers.

On the media relations front, each sub-agency has its own fully-staffed press office. The authority will now maintain a “single, centralized press office” and cut back on the staffing levels. The same holds true for the communications departments. Diana Jones Ritter, a government executive for 26 years, will oversee this restructuring.

This is certainly a praise-worthy move by the MTA, but it’s also one that shouldn’t have been borne out of a financial crisis. The various agencies — Transit, Metro-North, LIRR — had independent press offices and communications departments because they were folded into the MTA over time. Never had any head tried as Walder has to reorganize internally, and it’s a move that any independent business consultant would recommend.

July 2, 2010 9 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Service Cuts

The maps remain the same

by Benjamin Kabak July 2, 2010
written by Benjamin Kabak on July 2, 2010

While the new routes are in effect, many stations still feature old maps.

New York City Transit has a map problem. It’s not that the new subway map is bad. In fact, the redesign with fewer bus boxes and less unnecessary information makes the map more useful as a system navigation tool. The devil, however, is in the stations as five days after the service changes went into effect, the maps present throughout the system are still in the process of being updated.

To illustrate, a story: Every morning, I ride the train from Grand Army Plaza to Brooklyn Bridge-City Hall. I exit the stop in Manhattan at the northern end and pass through the unstaffed entrance that leads into Foley Square. The subway maps at both stations have been updated, but every other piece of supporting navigational materials has not. The “Neighorhood” maps at both Grand Army Plaza and City Hall still show the brown M train and its route into Brooklyn via the Montague St. tunnel. The Manhattan bus map at City Hall displays the routes as of last week and not this past Monday.

These aren’t isolated incidents. I’ve ridden more than a few trains that still display the old maps, and today, my Brooklyn-bound 2 train announced that customers could transfer to the J and M trains at Fulton St. The M hasn’t stopped there since last Friday. The Fulton St. complex is the tenth busiest station in the system, and if Transit’s pre-recorded announcements are telling people wrong information, that’s a problem.

Meanwhile, at other stations, the situation remains the same. Last night, I made the trip from Chambers St. to Christopher St. The latter is a reasonably popular destination stop. In 2009, an average of 10,000 people passed through it every weekday, and it serves as the gateway to Greenwich Village for many tourists visiting the city. The former serves around 20,000 per day. In both of those stations, featured prominently at the Customer Information Center, were subway maps that hadn’t yet been updated to reflect the new routing. Now, I’m not talking about far-off stations in the Rockaways that see a few hundred people a day; I’m talking about the 65th and 128th busiest stations in the system.

Eventually, Transit workers will get around to fixing these problems. The new maps will go up; life will go on. Yet, this situation reminds me of the post I wrote earlier this week about the MTA’s customer service woes. For weeks, Transit has been planning for the new service cuts and rerouted subway lines. The authority made a big show of putting up new subway bullets and fixed an obscene meme in two days when the Internet uproar began. Yet, five days after the cuts, they still haven’t replaced the maps hanging in at least a few stations, and the Neighborhood and Bus maps might remain outdated for some time.

This delay in updating the maps — arguably as important as hanging up some subway bullets at oft-deserted ends of platforms — isn’t a grave oversight by the MTA. It just shows how the authority doesn’t consider its customers. If anything, the maps should be the first things in a station changed because they are what allows people unfamiliar with the system to get around. A tourist unfamiliar with the subway system and bound for, say, MoMA would be left waiting for a V train that won’t arrive and would find at Christopher St. no station agent able to provide them with directions. The customer, it seems, is an afterthought.

July 2, 2010 29 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
MTA

DiNapoli: MTA could beef up real estate dollars

by Benjamin Kabak July 1, 2010
written by Benjamin Kabak on July 1, 2010

For years, critics of the MTA have accused the authority of underselling its real estate offerings and not maximizing potential profits from its property holdings. In a report issued today, New York State Comptroller Thomas DiNapoli accused the MTA of doing just that. The authority, he says, doesn’t need to rent some spaces it does and hasn’t made all of its potential spaces available to rent.

Although DiNapoli used this platform to bash the MTA on service cuts, his report lacks a knockout punch.“Millions of New Yorkers rely on the MTA,” DiNapoli said. “Those New Yorkers can’t afford to pay more while the MTA ignores potential cost savings. But that’s exactly what has happened here. Before making drastic service cuts and talking about fare hikes, the MTA has to maximize the value of its real estate holdings by advertising their availability and ensuring that it’s receiving market-rate rents for prime properties. The MTA should also publish a full list of its real estate holdings as required by law and let New Yorkers know how it’s going to capitalize on these assets.”

The Comptroller’s audit (PDF), which covers a four-year period beginning in 2005, found that the MTA generates nearly $200 million in real estate revenues per year but could do more. It accused the agency of leaving its properties, such as 370 Jay St. in Brooklyn, vacant while allowing not charging interest or late fees on missed rent payments. He bulleted his findings:

  • Non-government tenants owed the MTA a total of $9 million in rent during the audit period;
  • The MTA did not effectively market the space above certain properties (known as ‘air rights’), despite estimates that the rights could generate more than $12 million in revenue;
  • Six large rental units in the 42nd Street/Sixth Avenue subway station at Bryant Park had been vacant since 2004;
  • The MTA does not ensure its rents are competitive with market values and does not charge interest and late fees when appropriate;
  • Two of the agency’s buildings—one vacant and one nearly-vacant—cost more than $6 million to maintain; and
  • More than one-quarter of the MTA’s occupied rental units sampled were not rented through the required competitive rental processes.

As far as recommendations go, DiNapoli’s were fairly tame. He wants the MTA to streamline its real estate databases and portfolio management system; he wants to see a “strategic marketing plan” to make sure empty spaces are being promoted; and he would like the MTA to collect interest and late fees on missed rent payments. Considering the field day The Post had with this report, nothing DiNapoli said or recommended came as a big surprise. Left unsaid by DiNapoli as well were any details as to the city as the ultimate landlord in many cases hamstrings the MTA’s ability to administer its property with any flexibility.

For its part, the MTA acknowledged DiNapoli’s conclusions. “While MTA real estate generates nearly $200 million each year to support the transit system, our ongoing financial issues demand that we think creatively and do more,” the authority said in a statement. “We are trying new technology to increase advertising revenues, working to change regulations that limit our ability to develop our assets, and better utilizing space as we downsize. No stone can be left unturned to maximize revenues and reduce costs, and we are actively pursuing each of these initiatives.”

July 1, 2010 3 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
View from Underground

Dispatches from the M: Sixth Ave. Sagas

by Benjamin Kabak July 1, 2010
written by Benjamin Kabak on July 1, 2010

The MTA reactivated the Chystie St. Cut earlier this week when service changes forced the M up Sixth Ave. to replace the V train. While commuters along 4th Ave. in Brooklyn have found R trains more crowded, others in north Brooklyn and parts of Queens are enjoying an easier trip to Midtown. Today, I have a guest post from Jowy Romano of the Subway Art Blog about the way the service changes are impacting his ride to work for the better. It hasn’t been the smoothest of sailing yet this week, but for many in fast-growing areas of Brooklyn, this service change is a welcome one.

When the MTA announced its doomsday service cuts, unlike most straphangers, I was actually excited about them. The revamped M train was to replace the V train in Manhattan. This would affect my commute significantly, since I normally take the J train into Manhattan and transfer to the F train at Essex Street / Delancey Street. The changes would create a new line that I could take all the way to work at 23rd Street and would give me time to sit and read on my commute rather than having to worry about transferring halfway through.

Naturally, I decided to experiment with the M train for the first time on D-Day. When my usual J train pulled through Myrtle Avenue – Broadway, I let it pass and hopped on the M train that arrived on the adjacent track. I knew that this would be a bit of a risk, considering the M train is local in Brooklyn and might get me to work late. Of course, the first thing it did was spend the next five minutes idling in the station.

The rest of the ride in Brooklyn was relatively smooth until it got to the Williamsburg Bridge, where it crawled into the Essex Street station and took another few minutes waiting for the track switch into the Chrystie Street cut. It stopped again at the track switch onto the Sixth Avenue line before pulling into Broadway – Lafayette. I finally arrived at work with one minute to spare (the J and F train combination gets me to work 10 minutes early).

At the end of the day, I decided to give the M another chance. I waited at 23rd Street station and watched four F trains pass by before the M came. It was crowded when I got on, but at the next stop it cleared out enough for me to get a seat. I would have pulled out a book, but I was too busy watching people’s reactions to the new train route. I would have expected to see a few people curse and walk off the train at Broadway – Lafayette due to the announcement the train would not stop at Second Avenue, but no one did—the MTA did a pretty good job of posting advisories about the change.

At Essex, the M pulled into the second Brooklyn-bound track, which was unexpected because that track is normally only used when there are service changes. This solves the problem of the track switch-related delays that I experienced on my way to work that morning, but in that direction only (there is only one Manhattan-bound track at Essex). The rest of the ride was fairly smooth, so I decided I would get up a little earlier the next day and give the M another shot.

I figured I wouldn’t learn much more about the new line on my third trip, but I was wrong. My old pal the J train got rerouted back towards Queens after getting to Myrtle Avenue due to some delays, giving me more reason to take the M again. Five minutes later, I hopped on and was feeling pretty good until the train reached the Williamsburg Bridge. The conductor announced that a smoke condition at Broadway – Lafayette was causing the delays. We were stuck on the bridge for about 25 minutes. It was with all this time to think that I realized a potential problem with the new M—the JMZ line will now be affected when the Sixth Avenue line is delayed.

We finally reached Essex Street, which was in a state of utter chaos. The platforms were packed with confused people and at least 15 MTA employees in vests were directing people, some of them giving misinformation. Ironically, the M train I was on ended up being rerouted back onto its old route, which loops back to Brooklyn towards Bay Parkway. Yes, that’s right—it missed its old line and could not be without it for more than two days.

So I switched to the F train, which very slowly made its way to 23rd Street. I was 25 minutes late to work.

The new M clearly has a lot of problems, some of which will be easy to iron out over time, others that will probably never be addressed. Barring any more unforeseen “smoke conditions,” I think I will continue to take it. Being able to avoid the Essex / Delancey transfer is priceless and, with any luck, I’ll even get some extra time to sit and read during my commute.

Jowy Romano is the editor of the Subway Art Blog, a site that focuses on sign manipulation and other forms of subversive art found underground.

July 1, 2010 139 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Load More Posts

About The Author

Name: Benjamin Kabak
E-mail: Contact Me

Become a Patron!
Follow @2AvSagas

Upcoming Events
TBD

RSS? Yes, Please: SAS' RSS Feed
SAS In Your Inbox: Subscribe to SAS by E-mail

Instagram



Disclaimer: Subway Map © Metropolitan Transportation Authority. Used with permission. MTA is not associated with nor does it endorse this website or its content.

Categories

  • 14th Street Busway (1)
  • 7 Line Extension (118)
  • Abandoned Stations (31)
  • ARC Tunnel (52)
  • Arts for Transit (19)
  • Asides (1,244)
  • Bronx (13)
  • Brooklyn (126)
  • Brooklyn-Queens Connector (13)
  • Buses (291)
  • Capital Program 2010-2014 (27)
  • Capital Program 2015-2019 (56)
  • Capital Program 2020-2024 (3)
  • Congestion Fee (71)
  • East Side Access Project (37)
  • F Express Plan (22)
  • Fare Hikes (173)
  • Fulton Street (57)
  • Gateway Tunnel (29)
  • High-Speed Rail (9)
  • Hudson Yards (18)
  • Interborough Express (1)
  • International Subways (26)
  • L Train Shutdown (20)
  • LIRR (65)
  • Manhattan (73)
  • Metro-North (99)
  • MetroCard (124)
  • Moynihan Station (16)
  • MTA (98)
  • MTA Absurdity (233)
  • MTA Bridges and Tunnels (27)
  • MTA Construction (128)
  • MTA Economics (522)
    • Doomsday Budget (74)
    • Ravitch Commission (23)
  • MTA Politics (330)
  • MTA Technology (195)
  • New Jersey Transit (53)
  • New York City Transit (220)
  • OMNY (3)
  • PANYNJ (113)
  • Paratransit (10)
  • Penn Station (18)
  • Penn Station Access (10)
  • Podcast (30)
  • Public Transit Policy (164)
  • Queens (129)
  • Rider Report Cards (31)
  • Rolling Stock (40)
  • Second Avenue Subway (262)
  • Self Promotion (77)
  • Service Advisories (612)
  • Service Cuts (118)
  • Sponsored Post (1)
  • Staten Island (52)
  • Straphangers Campaign (40)
  • Subway Advertising (45)
  • Subway Cell Service (34)
  • Subway History (81)
  • Subway Maps (83)
  • Subway Movies (14)
  • Subway Romance (13)
  • Subway Security (104)
  • Superstorm Sandy (35)
  • Taxis (43)
  • Transit Labor (151)
    • ATU (4)
    • TWU (100)
    • UTU (8)
  • Triboro RX (4)
  • U.S. Transit Systems (53)
    • BART (1)
    • Capital Metro (1)
    • CTA (7)
    • MBTA (11)
    • SEPTA (5)
    • WMATA (28)
  • View from Underground (447)

Archives

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram

@2019 - All Right Reserved.


Back To Top