Second Ave. Sagas
  • About
  • Contact Me
  • 2nd Ave. Subway History
  • Search
  • About
  • Contact Me
  • 2nd Ave. Subway History
  • Search
Second Ave. Sagas

News and Views on New York City Transportation

Service Advisories

Weekend changes before permanent ones

by Benjamin Kabak June 25, 2010
written by Benjamin Kabak on June 25, 2010

Tonight is the final day of service for the V and W. It’s also the last chance to take the M from Metropolitan Ave. to Bay Parkway. Various riders are out mourning the demise of these trains. Act now to hop on board with those parties.

Otherwise, the weekend service changes are below. As always, these come to me from New York City Transit and are subject to change without notice. Check signs in your local station and listen to on-board announcements. Subway Weekender has the map.


From 4 a.m. to 10 p.m. Saturday, June 26, downtown 1 trains run express from 137th Street to 96th Street due to track panel installation north of 125th Street.


From 12:01 a.m. to 10 p.m. Saturday, June 26, uptown 1 trains run express from 72nd Street to 96th Street due to reconstruction of the track bridge at the underpass at 96th Street.


From 12:01 a.m. to 6:30 a.m. Saturday, June 26, uptown 2 trains run express from 72nd Street to 96th Street due to reconstruction of the track bridge at the underpass at 96th Street.


From 4 a.m. to 10 p.m. Saturday, June 26, the last stop for some Bronx-bound 6 trains is 3rd Avenue-138th Street due to track panel installation.


From 4 a.m. to 10 p.m., Saturday, June 26, Pelham Bay Park-bound 6 trains run express from Hunts Point Avenue to Pelham Bay Park due to station rehabilitations and track panel installations. Note: Pelham Bay Park-bound 6 trains stop at Parkchester. Train doors open onto the Manhattan-bound platform.


From 12:01 a.m. to midnight, Saturday, June 26, A trains run local between 168th Street and Canal Street due to a track drain pipe installation at 59th Street-Columbus Circle.


From 12:01 a.m. to midnight Saturday, June 26, A trains run local between Euclid Avenue and Hoyt-Schermerhorn Sts. due to track drain pipe installation at 59th Street-Columbus Circle.


From 12:01 a.m. Saturday, June 26 to 8 a.m. Sunday, June 27, A trains skip Broadway-Nassau St. in both directions due to work on the Fulton Street Transit Center.


From 6:30 a.m. to midnight, Saturday, June 26, there are no C trains running due to track drain pipe installation at 59th Street-Columbus Circle. Customers may take the A or E instead. Note: A trains run local with exceptions. E trains make C stops between 50th Street and Canal Street.


From 6:30 a.m. to 8 a.m. Sunday, June 27, C trains skip Broadway-Nassau St. in both directions due to work at the Fulton Street Transit Center.


From 11 p.m. Friday, June 25 to 5 a.m. Monday, June 28, Manhattan-bound D trains skip 174th-175th Sts. and 170th Street due to a track chip out north of 170th Street.


From 12:01 a.m. Saturday, June 26 to 5 a.m. Monday, June 28, Coney Island-bound D trains run on the N line from 36th Street in Brooklyn to Coney Island-Stillwell Avenue due structural repair and station rehabilitation work from 71st Street to Bay 50th Street and ADA construction at Bay Parkway.


From 11 p.m. Saturday, June 26 to 8 a.m. Sunday, June 27, Manhattan-bound E trains run express from Forest Hills-71st Avenue to Roosevelt Avenue due to a track chip out north of Elmhurst Avenue.


From 6 a.m. Saturday, June 26 to 5 a.m. Monday, June 28, downtown F trains skip 23rd and 14th Streets due to a substation rehabilitation.


There are no G trains between Forest Hills-71st Avenue and Court Square due to a track chip out north of Elmhurst Avenue. During the day, customers should take the R. Late nights, customers should take the E. Note: Beginning 11 p.m. Saturday, June 26, Manhattan-bound E trains run express from Forest Hills-71st Avenue to Roosevelt Avenue.


From 11:30 p.m. Friday, June 25 to 8 p.m. Saturday, June 26, free shuttle buses replace L trains between Lorimer Street and Myrtle-Wyckoff Aves. due to the replacement of signal wires and concrete work on the track bed.


From 5 a.m. to 8 a.m. Sunday, June 27, Manhattan-bound R trains run express from Forest Hills-71st Avenue to Roosevelt Avenue due to a track chip out north of Elmhurst Avenue.

June 25, 2010 6 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
View from Underground

The temporary permanence of subway routes

by Benjamin Kabak June 25, 2010
written by Benjamin Kabak on June 25, 2010

New Yorkers have a very stubborn relationship with history. In a city nearly 400 years old that does little to remember its past, the subways are but another example of the way we live in the present. As far as most riders are concerned, the subway map is immutable representation of where the trains go, where they have always gone and where they will go.

So on Monday morning, New Yorkers will be in for a surprise. What is this train going from Essex St. to Broadway/Lafayette? Many aren’t even aware that this service route is possible. While we know about the Chrystie St. Cut, it hasn’t seen revenue service since the mid-1970s and remains a tunnel lost in time — until Monday, that is.

In a few years, the W and V trains will fade from memory. They will be nothing more than nine-year blips just as the nearly-forgotten 9 and K trains are. “The W to Astoria?” a future New Yorker will question. “Don’t you mean the Q?”

Nearly ten years ago, when the MTA announced plans to introduce the V and W trains, Randy Kennedy of The Times explored the new train designations. Those two trains were the first new ones since Transit introduced the skip-stop Z and 9 service in 1988 and 1989 respectively. Suddenly, the city would have to come to grips with interlopers on its subway map.

These new trains led Kennedy on a hunt to find out how Transit names its trains, and no one could explain the rational behind the numbered and lettered line. The following passage though jumped out at me:

A call was put in to Clifton Hood, the author of ”722 Miles: The Building of the Subways and How They Transformed New York” (Simon & Schuster, 1993). Mr. Hood admitted that in a subject as sprawling as the subway, he had to leave many things out of his research for the book, the shadowy system of subway naming among them.

But Mr. Hood said that he has noticed how firmly each generation seems to latch on to the subway designations of its era, acting as if the names had been handed down from a mountain on stone tablets. Subway riders of a certain age, for example, will never think of the D train as the D train. It is the Brighton Line. They do not switch from the N train to the No. 4. They switch from the BMT (Brooklyn-Manhattan Transit Corporation) to the IRT (Interborough Rapid Transit Company).

”Each generation invests its own infrastructure with some emotionality,” Mr. Hood said. ”And it serves a purpose. They need to take possession of it for themselves. Otherwise, how do you make sense of it every day? You need to make it yours.”

Today, the W is ours. The V is ours. Some people will ride those trains home from work in a few hours and practically ignore the train. It pulls up; they get on; they get off. On Monday, the V won’t arrive, but the M will. In the W’s stead, the Q will show. Those trains too will be ours soon enough. and they will become part of the temporary permanence of the subway map.

June 25, 2010 11 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
AsidesService Cuts

‘I’m thinking of driving to work’

by Benjamin Kabak June 25, 2010
written by Benjamin Kabak on June 25, 2010

Mariella Pallazzo is a Queens resident who, according to public records, lives north of the LIE but south of Flushing Meadows. Her nearest subway stops are a bus ride away, and Pallazzo, according to the Daily News, commutes to her job in Midtown on the X51, a bus that will make its latest express ride this evening. Her 35-minute, one-seat ride will soon become significantly longer.

In speaking with the News today, Pallazzo bemoaned the service cuts. “I’m so depressed about it. It’s going to be so inconvenient,” she said. “The No. 7 train is so crowded and packed. I’m thinking of driving to work.” Pallazzo is an administrative assistant, and it’s unlikely she can afford to costs in terms of time, gas, tolls and $30-a-day Midtown parking rates on a daily basis. She’ll probably just take a bus to the 7 and weather the crowds.

Her attitude though is illustrative of many people’s approach to service cuts. People use transit in New York City because it’s cheap, efficient and quick. It allows them to avoid traffic and travel long distances in short order. It allows the city to function. When services are cut, workers from all walks of life and businesses along with them suffer. With two subways and numerous buses set for their final rides this evening, today is a sad day in the history of transit in New York. Despite Albany’s best wishes, the MTA is not bluffing, and the city will be worse off for it come Monday.

June 25, 2010 5 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Service Cuts

For the V and the W, a final day

by Benjamin Kabak June 25, 2010
written by Benjamin Kabak on June 25, 2010

On December 17, 2001, the V train made its first controversial run from Queens to Manhattan. Nearly five months earlier, on July 23, 2001, the W had made its first run from Brooklyn to Astoria via the Manhattan Bridge and the BMT Broadway line. Today marks a sad day in the history of those two trains as later this evening they will each run their last route before suffering at the hands of the MTA’s planned service cuts.

On Monday morning, the rush hour will be chaotic. Subway riders in Astoria will see the Q arrive instead of the W, and while the N will make local stops in Manhattan, the Q as the W’s replacement will still run express along Broadway. Meanwhile, those in Middle Village will be even more confused when their M trains go from Essex St. to Broadway/Lafayette via the Chrystie St. Cut. Along Queens Boulevard, the V train will be a part of New York subway history, lost to a budget crisis and a lack of funding from Albany.

For many New Yorkers, the deaths of these train lines will be unnoticed. V riders will hop the M without a second thought, and while some Brooklyn riders from Bay Parkway will miss the M, most people will go about their subway-riding lives with nary a thought to it. But for others, the deaths of these subway lines means funeral.

One Astoria resident is hosting a remembrance of the W train tonight. Bill Reese is celebrating the “short, complicated and often pathetic life of our beloved W.” At 10 p.m., he and other W train riders will gather at Ditmars Boulevard to ride the last W train to Union Square. They’ll hop the return train — the ultimate W to head to Astoria — before celebrating at the beer garden. It is a wake fit for a train, and rumor has it that the organizer will be decked out in W train paraphernalia.

Reese isn’t the only one mourning the death of subway lines. In fact, some politicians are exploiting the moment to gain the spotlight as well. Peter Vallone will join Transportation Alternatives at 8:30 this morning to ostensibly call for more transit funding. I’m surprised to see Vallone lend his name and face to this campaign as he hasn’t been very transit-friendly. Later in the day at 8:15 p.m., Transportation Alternatives will rally in Astoria for better transit before also heading to the beer garden. Service cuts make for strange bedfellows.

The V train too will be feted as NYCentric and Newmindspace, the creators of the hipster-haven that is the New York City pillow fight, have organized a final V train ride. Revelers will gather at Second Ave. before 11 to ride the last V train, set to arrive in Forest Hills at 12:11 a.m. Those who join are encouraged to wear orange.

As New Yorkers celebrate these trains, though, it’s important to remember that these service cuts are going to impact everyone. Some Bronx residents can’t get to the nearest pool. Others will find their neighborhood buses unceremoniously eliminated. Others will find longer waits and crowded trains during off-peak hours. Service cuts are unpleasant business.

One day, the MTA may restore service when its finances improve. Today, though, is a sad day for the millions of New Yorkers who depend upon the subways and buses to take them to work, school and fun. In a city so dependent upon transit, these cuts show just how ineffective our state government is. Will anyone be held accountable?

After the jump, some info about the final rides of the M, V and W trains in their current configurations.

Continue Reading
June 25, 2010 16 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
AsidesSubway Security

NYPD set to help MTA with camera problem

by Benjamin Kabak June 24, 2010
written by Benjamin Kabak on June 24, 2010

As the saga of the MTA’s pesky surveillance cameras continue, Metro’s Carly Baldwin reports that the authority is turning to the NYPD to help get the cameras up and running. The transit authority is trying to install nearly 1000 new cameras this month, but its surveillance project has run into a few speed bumps including a law suit. With the NYPD’s help, the authority hopes to have the $20-million program operational soon. “They’re going to the right people to help them fix a system that doesn’t work too well,” Assemblyman Richard Brodsky said. “What they said was, ‘We have a problem and we’re trying to figure it out.’ Give Walder credit: When things aren’t working, he tries to fix them.”

June 24, 2010 3 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
AsidesTWU

To save current jobs, fewer benefits for new ones

by Benjamin Kabak June 24, 2010
written by Benjamin Kabak on June 24, 2010

As the MTA looks to both cut $400 million from its deficit and save numerous endangered TWU jobs, the authority has offered a carrot to the unions. According to The Daily News, the MTA will rescind pink slips for 700 bus drivers and station agents in exchange for changes to the packages offered to new workers. According to Pete Donohue, the changes include a “less generous pension” that would kick in when workers are 57 with 30 years of experience or 66 with a decade’s worth of work instead of the current 55/25 plan; top hourly pay after five instead of three years on the job; and higher contributions for health care coverage.

Interestingly, the MTA is also proposing a way to get around next year’s mandated three-percent raise for TWU members. Instead of a raise, workers would receive a one-time bonus of three percent. This bookkeeping would allow the MTA to start negotiations for a new TWU contract with the annual salaries at a lower point than they otherwise would be. The agency would still have to reduce the number of workers it employs but could do so through attrition instead of firings.

Although neither side had an official comment for the story, TWU head John Samuelsen has said in the past that, according to Donohue, he “opposes opening up the existing contract to make permanent changes, especially without a written no-layoff clause for the future.” I’d imagine we’ll see a compromise somewhere in that highly sought-after middle ground as the authority might be asking for too many concessions here.

June 24, 2010 11 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Service Cuts

A warning of services to change, but who’s listening?

by Benjamin Kabak June 24, 2010
written by Benjamin Kabak on June 24, 2010

Updated (11:45 a.m.): Nearly six years ago, the MTA changed its service patterns and didn’t tell anyone. In 2004, when the Manhattan Bridge reopened, service patterns along the B, D, Q and N trains changed in parts of three boroughs, and riders ignored the warnings.

In the build-up to the services changes, the MTA tried to draw out as many people as they could. Mayor Bloomberg and the city’s politicos took a heavily-publicized ride across the Manhattan Bridge. The TA printed new maps that celebrated the system’s centennial anniversary while drawing attention to the new service patterns across the Manhattan Bridge. After two decades of construction, the publicity campaigns were tremendous.

Still, many riders were left confused. Tourists bound for one part of the city found themselves a river away from their destination, and people trying to get home ended up bound for the 4th Ave. stations instead of the Brighton Line. Despite numerous employees with new maps, a signage blitz that alerted riders to the new patterns and a lot of media attention, a good number of New Yorkers ignored the warnings.

Enter 2010. This weekend, the MTA will cut two train lines and re-route a third. These are the most significant service changes since the Manhattan Bridge reopened in 2004, and for the last month, the MTA has gone on the offensive. Posters, such as the one at right, have appeared in stations throughout the system instructing straphangers of the changes. New maps have been available since early June. The bullet decals throughout the system have been changed. It’s impossible to miss the fact that the service is going to change.

Yet, in a brief article in Metro, Carly Baldwin found people who have no idea service cuts are coming. Two-thirds of passengers polled on a rush-hour M train had no idea, says Baldwin, that the train would soon be destined for Forest Hills by way of 6th Ave. “What? Are you serious?” Jose Gonzalez said of the service change. “This sucks. The M train is right by my house. Now I’ll have to change trains.”

I couldn’t believe that people could be this ignorant of the subway service changes. Although the bus cuts have been less transparent, signs are up at every bus stop in the system where the service will change, and the subways are plastered with signs. As my girlfriend said tonight when I told her of the widespread ignorance, “What do you mean? It’s been everywhere. The signs are everywhere. The brochures are everywhere. The new maps are up.”

Beyond the MTA’s own efforts at alerting people, the service cuts have been in the news since January. It’s true that the Student MetroCards may have dominating the coverage, but the subway cuts have not gone unreported in the papers and on TV and the radio. Anyone who doesn’t know service is going to change this weekend simply hasn’t been paying attention.

And therein lies the rub. People don’t pay much attention to the MTA. They don’t read weekend service signs; they don’t listen to on-board announcements; they don’t educate themselves about transit issues. They simply ride the trains and complain. Maybe the misleading politicians drown out the MTA’s own press efforts; maybe people just don’t want to know. Whatever the reason, New Yorkers are generally woefully under-educated about transit happenings.

So on Monday, confusion will rein supreme. Wall Street-bound M riders will be surprised to find their train at Broadway and Lafayette. Those waiting for the W will be in a for a long wait. The riders will blame the MTA; the MTA will have to herd the crowds. It will be business as usual in the subways.

June 24, 2010 26 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Service Cuts

At the last minute, protesting a bus cut

by Benjamin Kabak June 23, 2010
written by Benjamin Kabak on June 23, 2010

A bus stop no longer With the MTA’s service cuts to subway and bus service now just a handful of days away from becoming a reality, neighborhood associations are finally waking up to the reality of the situation. Although the cuts were first announced in January and the MTA hosted hearings on their plans over the winter, many have either ignored the news or been in denial. No longer, though, will a group of Brooklynites remain silent.

A group of protesters will gather this afternoon at 5 p.m. at Union St. and Smith St. in Carroll Gardens to protest the impending end of the B71. While the group’s press release claims the bus runs to Red Hook, the route in reality goes from Crown Heights to Van Brunt and Sackeet Sts. in Cobble Hill. This bus is near and dear to me because it stops around the corner from where I live, and the neighborhood association is now asking Assembly-woman Joan Millman, State Senator Daniel Squadron and City Councilman Brad Lander to do something.

“If this bus disappears, our developing neighborhood will be left completely in the lurch,” Brad Kerr of the Columbia Street Waterfront Association said. “We have no other public transportation, no subway, and the MTA is not offering any alternative. This move will hurt everyone who’ve struggled for years to rebuild this area.”

When I first received word of this rally, I raised a skeptical eyebrow. The B71 runs twice an hour, often not on time and with few people on board. Buses that run down Bergen and 9th Sts., while not as convenient, will pick up some of the slack, and the protest just seemed ill-timed to me. Why were these associations waiting until four days before the cuts are put into place to raise their voices?

I posed some of these questions to Marta Heilborn, a B71 rider who is part-organizer of these protests. She told me that she didn’t know about the MTA’s hearings or cuts sooner. Else, she would have started protesting then. She also informed me that she supported a congestion pricing plan that would have funded the MTA.

At the same time, the organization’s press release questions why the MTA has not used stimulus funds to help cover a gap. But, as I’ve said, even with stimulus funds, the MTA would still be staring down a $300 million. The cuts would go on anyway.

In 90 minutes, when residents gather, it will be too late. There is, of course, an online petition, but who will listen? The MTA doesn’t have the money to restore service, and the politicians seem content to put in perfunctory appearances at community protests without offering any legislative or economic solutions.

So protest away, I say. Get that outrage on the record. Make sure the politicians are listening, though, because this situation is just as much their faults as it is the MTA. Just don’t expect that bus line to be miraculously saved tomorrow. The cuts are coming.

June 23, 2010 34 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
SEPTA

In Philly, the wrong approach to naming rights

by Benjamin Kabak June 23, 2010
written by Benjamin Kabak on June 23, 2010

When the Nets’ new arena at the Atlantic Yards area opens up, the subway station beneath it will have a new name. For $4 million spread out over 20 years, Barclays will pay the MTA for the naming rights to the station, and straphangers will get off at Atlantic Ave./Pacific St./Barclays Center.

As the authority isn’t giving up the geographic identifiers, the station still serves its purpose of informing riders where they are, and the agency can draw in some dollars as well. It is the ideal naming rights deal and one cash-strapped transit agencies around the country should strive to duplicate. They can’t, after all, lose sight of the fact that the system must still be effective at making sure people can find their ways to and from various destinations.

In Philadelphia, though, SEPTA is on the verge of a naming rights deal that won’t do anyone favors. According to Plan Philly, the Philadelphia-based transit agency is going to completely rename one of its most popular terminals. The station current at Pattison Ave. is home to many fans heading to Phillies, Eagles, 76ers or Flyers games at the sports complex. For five years and $3 million, the station may become simply the AT&T Station. Every trace of Pattison Ave. would be excised from the system.

Plan Philly says that SEPTA has tried a variety of “non-traditional means” for raising revenue including asking the city’s sports teams for help. A spokesman defended the potential deal and claimed riders would not be confused “because the station is at the end of the line and is ‘unique’ because it serves the sports complex.” The station’s place as a unique destination would in fact work against a naming rights deal that completely removes geographic identifiers from the system.

Over at The Transport Politic, Yonah Freemark doesn’t like the deal. He writes:

But Philadelphia’s decision could be going further because not only does it remove the current name entirely from maps, but it does so to existing stations that have retained their current names for decades. Even worse, the names have no relevance to the areas they serve — it’s not like AT&T has a major facility at Pattison Station. The whole situation raises the frightening prospect in the near future that, instead of riding the Broad Street Subway from City Hall to Pattison, people will take the Coca-Cola Trolley from Pizza Hut to AT&T. Moreover, five years later, considering the current rate of changes in corporate names and sponsorships, all of those names may have to be modified!

There are two fundamental problems with the idea that station names can be sold to the highest bidder: One, doing so challenges a fundamental element of transit service provision, that it is a public service; and two, that the names provide an important connection between the line-based geography of transit systems and the street or neighborhood-based geography of the city around stations.

Freemark notes that the deal nets a pittance for SEPTA as the Barclays deal does for the MTA. When an agency is hundreds of millions of dollars in debt, a contract for a few hundred thousand a year doesn’t make a dent, and riders — the customers of the transit agency — are confused. A rider-based quasi-private government agency should not be inconveniencing the riding public.

As Freemark notes, transit stops are integral to neighborhoods and communities. Trading place names for corporate places instead of appending corporate sponsors onto the stations dehumanizes the city. “Removing the geography-based name and replacing it with a corporate name virtually ensures that either infrequent commuters are fated to be completely lost in a transit system with completely irrelevant station names (especially if it’s underground),” he writes, “or that maps and signage are threatened with being overwhelmed with multiple layers of information, some important, some not, an end product that certainly won’t add ease to getting around either.”

As the MTA moves forward with more naming rights deals and its own attempts at securing non-traditional revenue streams, it should take a lesson from Philadelphia. This isn’t the way to go.

June 23, 2010 21 comments
1 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Buses

A privatized approach to replace lost buses

by Benjamin Kabak June 23, 2010
written by Benjamin Kabak on June 23, 2010

Commuter van stops, such as the one shown here in Queens, could become more prevalent. (Photo via flickr user AllWaysNY)

In five days, the MTA will pull the plug on numerous bus routes throughout the city, and all of a sudden, denizens of neighborhoods with little subway access will find themselves without the buses upon which they rely for everyday life. To fill the void, New York City will try to turn to the so-called dollar vans that have long operated below the radar. The plan, announced yesterday, is a controversial one with labor opposed to it and politicians wary of an unregulated industry, but it just might be the first step toward a better public-private partnership for transit in New York City.

The details are, for now, simple. The city will start a year-long pilot program under the aegis of David Yassky and the Taxi & Limousin Commission that will add three to six new commuter van lines in Brooklyn and Queens. The vans will replace buses lost to the MTA’s service cuts, and the mayor — who erroneously claimed that “nobody has been out there screaming for more money for the M.T.A. more than I have” — hopes the vans will encourage transit use. “The issue here is not whether it’s more expensive or less expensive,” he said at a press conference. “It’s whether the service exists or not.”

This plan is not without drawbacks and controversies. First, as Fernanda Santos of The Times notes, because this is, in essence, a privatization plan not run by the MTA, subway-bound commuters will have to pay for the two-dollar van rides and then pay for the connecting MetroCard swipe as well. The buses provided a free transfer to other New York City Transit-operated modes of travel.

More pressing though are the concerns of labor. The Amalgamated Transit Union Local 1056 represents bus drivers in Queens, and already its officials have proclaimed that private commuter vans are “clearly not the answer.” According to union president I. Dankee Miller, a lack of industry regulation and oversight leaves passengers exposed to safety risks. In essence, the union is concerned that a successful commuter van program will jeopardize the livelihood of its bus-driving members.

On the other hand, the van owners and drivers themselves recognize the need for more government city and regulation. Noting that vans can never replace buses, one owner bemoaned the union protests. “It is unfortunate that the unions have this on an either-or situation,” Hector Ricketts said.

For now, though, the labor battle is neither here nor there, and this first step should be viewed as a victory for transit advocates who have been pushing the city to expand its potential offerings. Over at Cap’n Transit Rides Again, Cap’n Transit has been pushing for expanded commuter van offerings as the MTA’s service cuts have come into view. Today, he pens a detailed post about the new transit offerings. He writes of the plan — which also includes a $6 York Ave. taxi share program:

It occurred to me that this could be the culmination of a longstanding plot to privatize bus service, or some kind of brinksmanship to get real transit funding out of the legislature, but I think the best explanation is that the Mayor has come to the realization that Silver and Sampson will never properly fund the MTA. He sees it as a managerial challenge to provide good transit for the city, and if he gets to boost private companies and weaken a union or two, so much the better.

I have a few concerns with this plan, though. The first is the suitability of the routes. If they’ve been cut for low ridership, how does the Mayor expect them to work? Jitneys and taxis have lower overhead, but they can’t conjure up profits out of thin air. If the routes were eliminated because they duplicated other routes, then the jitneys will probably succeed. If they are the only transit route to a given place, they stand a good chance of failing.

The second concern is that this would widen the existing divide between the “haves” (Manhattanites with $6 share taxis) and the “have-nots” (outer borough residents with $2 vans). It would establish two tiers of transit service to correspond to the existing two tiers of taxi service, and re-establish the two-fare zone.

This would be okay only if these two pilots eventually merge with the MTA into a single system that would include a range of well-regulated options overlapping throughout the city, from private taxis to share taxis to jitneys to scheduled buses, eventually accepting Metrocards or their smart card replacements and allowing free transfers. Most importantly, it would include quality van service for upscale passengers who are willing to pay a premium to avoid lowest-common-denominator transit.

For those of us who want to see commuter van service emerge as a viable complement to MTA bus services, the Cap’n lays out a list of seven conditions which must apply. These range from tight oversight by Yassky and the TLC; the ability of vans to duplicate existing bus routes; an eventual free transfer between vans and NYC Transit-operated subways and buses; and dedicated lanes for high-occupancy public transit vehicles. The end goal would result in better transit for everyone.

For now, this new plan is but a first step. David Yassky has hoped to expand taxi-like offerings in the outer boroughs, and the commuter vans can accomplish this at a cost to riders that’s lower than a ride in a yellow cab. This move also helps the city pick up the slack that is sure to emerge from this weekend’s service cuts. Only with proper expansion, oversight and control, though, will commuter vans emerge as another viable transit modality in New York City.

June 23, 2010 21 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Load More Posts

About The Author

Name: Benjamin Kabak
E-mail: Contact Me

Become a Patron!
Follow @2AvSagas

Upcoming Events
TBD

RSS? Yes, Please: SAS' RSS Feed
SAS In Your Inbox: Subscribe to SAS by E-mail

Instagram



Disclaimer: Subway Map © Metropolitan Transportation Authority. Used with permission. MTA is not associated with nor does it endorse this website or its content.

Categories

  • 14th Street Busway (1)
  • 7 Line Extension (118)
  • Abandoned Stations (31)
  • ARC Tunnel (52)
  • Arts for Transit (19)
  • Asides (1,244)
  • Bronx (13)
  • Brooklyn (126)
  • Brooklyn-Queens Connector (13)
  • Buses (291)
  • Capital Program 2010-2014 (27)
  • Capital Program 2015-2019 (56)
  • Capital Program 2020-2024 (3)
  • Congestion Fee (71)
  • East Side Access Project (37)
  • F Express Plan (22)
  • Fare Hikes (173)
  • Fulton Street (57)
  • Gateway Tunnel (29)
  • High-Speed Rail (9)
  • Hudson Yards (18)
  • Interborough Express (1)
  • International Subways (26)
  • L Train Shutdown (20)
  • LIRR (65)
  • Manhattan (73)
  • Metro-North (99)
  • MetroCard (124)
  • Moynihan Station (16)
  • MTA (98)
  • MTA Absurdity (233)
  • MTA Bridges and Tunnels (27)
  • MTA Construction (128)
  • MTA Economics (522)
    • Doomsday Budget (74)
    • Ravitch Commission (23)
  • MTA Politics (330)
  • MTA Technology (195)
  • New Jersey Transit (53)
  • New York City Transit (220)
  • OMNY (3)
  • PANYNJ (113)
  • Paratransit (10)
  • Penn Station (18)
  • Penn Station Access (10)
  • Podcast (30)
  • Public Transit Policy (164)
  • Queens (129)
  • Rider Report Cards (31)
  • Rolling Stock (40)
  • Second Avenue Subway (262)
  • Self Promotion (77)
  • Service Advisories (612)
  • Service Cuts (118)
  • Sponsored Post (1)
  • Staten Island (52)
  • Straphangers Campaign (40)
  • Subway Advertising (45)
  • Subway Cell Service (34)
  • Subway History (81)
  • Subway Maps (83)
  • Subway Movies (14)
  • Subway Romance (13)
  • Subway Security (104)
  • Superstorm Sandy (35)
  • Taxis (43)
  • Transit Labor (151)
    • ATU (4)
    • TWU (100)
    • UTU (8)
  • Triboro RX (4)
  • U.S. Transit Systems (53)
    • BART (1)
    • Capital Metro (1)
    • CTA (7)
    • MBTA (11)
    • SEPTA (5)
    • WMATA (28)
  • View from Underground (447)

Archives

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram

@2019 - All Right Reserved.


Back To Top