Second Ave. Sagas
  • About
  • Contact Me
  • 2nd Ave. Subway History
  • Search
  • About
  • Contact Me
  • 2nd Ave. Subway History
  • Search
Second Ave. Sagas

News and Views on New York City Transportation

MetroCard

If a tree falls in the woods…

by Benjamin Kabak June 14, 2010
written by Benjamin Kabak on June 14, 2010

In the Sunday Times this week, City Critic Ariel Kaminer profiled the MTA’s new contactless fare payment trial. I first introduced the trial in late May and discussed the impending end of the MetroCard swipe two weeks ago. In that sense, Kaminer’s piece is similar to the prior coverage. She tests the technology in New York City Transit’s subways, along the PATH trains and in New Jersey Transit buses and finds the intermodal system in various states of readiness.

Where her piece gets more interesting, however, is in its discussion of those who are and are not using the Pay Pass. “If news of this brave experiment hasn’t quite made its way to the bus drivers of the Garden State,” she writes, “it doesn’t seem to have seized the riders of Manhattan either. Stand at the PayPass turnstile in the Grand Central subway station and, I predict, your interest in technology and transportation will give out hours before you see anyone even try it.” A few straphangers with whom she spoke said they were interested in but had not planned to take advantage of the MTA’s six-month trial.

And so this begs the question: What good is a trial if no one comes? How will the MTA evaluate a technology in use along very few bus routes and only a select stops along one subway line? It can’t assess how the Pay Pass fares under the pressures of regular and heavy users of the transit system and is, for now, only as comprehensive as the trial makes it out to be. MTA officials assure me that they will consider these obstacles as they evaluate the trial, but until the authority prepares for a system-wide rollout of something else, I can’t get too excited for this fare payment technology of the future.

June 14, 2010 45 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
7 Line Extension

Break on through to the other side

by Benjamin Kabak June 14, 2010
written by Benjamin Kabak on June 14, 2010

Despite controversy surrounding the plans for a station at 41st and 10th Ave., the 7 line extension is making fast progress along the West Side, and at the end of last week, amidst little fanfare, the tunnel boring machines hit a milestone. As the MTA posted on its website, the first of the TBMs has completed its 4661-foot journey to its receiving chamber 40 feet beneath street level at 42nd St. and just underneath the Port Authority Bus Terminal’s foundation. This spot is where the new tunnels for the 7 line will meet up with the preexisting tail tracks that now sit west of 7th Ave.

According to the MTA, the second TBM will reach this chamber in July, and the crews will then back the machines up to the launch box at 26th St. and 11th Ave. The massive equipment will be disassembled and lifted out of the future subway, and crews will begin finishing the tunnels before working on station entrances, platforms and support facilities. Thanks to cooperation between the MTA and Port Authority, some of the tunneling work initially projected to take 2-3 years was completed in 18 months, and the extension is still scheduled to enter revenue service in December 2013. Now if only we could see the station at 10th Ave. and 41 St. become a reality.

Photo of the TBM courtesy of New York City Transit.

June 14, 2010 7 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Service Cuts

On MTA protests, some get it and some do not

by Benjamin Kabak June 14, 2010
written by Benjamin Kabak on June 14, 2010

Public Advocate Bill de Blasio calls upon the MTA to rehire its station agents during a rally last week. As a City Councilman, de Blasio did not support revenue-generating plans such as congestion pricing. (Photo via flickr user Public Advocate Bill de Blasio)

Not a day went by at the end of last week when the MTA did not find itself subjected to some sort of protest. First, the TWU and Public Advocate Bill de Blasio spoke out against station agent cuts. Then, Senator Chuck Schumer and labor leaders urged Congress to pass a $2 billion emergency transit operating aid relief bill. Finally, students at public schools throughout the city walked out on classes Friday to call upon city leaders to fund Student MetroCards. As the week ended, it became instantly clear who understand what was happening and who did not. The outcome is perhaps a bit surprising.

On the surface, the de Blasio-lead protest, pictured above, seemed genuine, but I believe his was the least effective and most indicative of political grandstanding. While ignoring the seeming reality of the MTA’s precarious fiscal position, de Blasio twisted the MTA’s economic reports to meet his political ends and issued statements that seemed to have little basis in fact.

“We cannot cut corners when it comes to straphangers’ safety,” de Blasio said. “New Yorkers who depend on station agents for security and essential services deserve a chance to have their voices heard. The MTA’s new public hearings will only work if they listen to New Yorkers and commit to incorporating their feedback before final decisions get made.”

His office’s press release touting the rally made sure to note that the MTA claims lost revenue due to fare-beating grew from $7 million to $20 million last year. Why? Because the MTA, he says, eliminated over 200 station agents. The Public Advocate fails to note that the MTA’s accounting methods changed as well. Perhaps the increase in fare-jumping — still a de minimis loss — was related to the axing of the agents, and perhaps, it was not. To draw that conclusion is unwarranted.

What de Blasio did not mention at his rally last week was his record on measures that would have provided the MTA with enough money to halt potential service cuts. As a City Council representative, de Blasio voted against congestion pricing because he feared it did not allow for enough additional transit options for his Brooklyn-based constituents. Now, we get service cuts and fewer station agents. Seems like a terrible trade-off to me.

Luckily, though, de Blasio wasn’t the only one raising a stink last week. A group of teenagers called upon the city to fund the Student MetroCard program. The kids left school, hopped on the subway and marched from City Hall to the MTA’s 370 Jay St. building to protest cuts to the free travel program, and as they did so, they targeted the politicians and not the MTA.

The politicians responded with words of support, but as City Council members and even Pedro Espada professed their desires to see student travel remain free, little progress has been made to shore up the program’s finances. Students, though, recognize that talking to politicians and not the MTA is the proper route. After all, the politicians are the ones who have stopped paying for this program, and the MTA isn’t a school bus operator. New York State and its municipalities foot the bill for student travel elsewhere; they should be doing the same in the city.

Finally, Senator Schumer and a group of transit labor leaders rallied in support of a federal measure that would deliver $2 billion nationwide to troubled transit agencies. The money probably won’t come from Washington until well after the MTA implements its service cuts, but as states dither on implementing tough funding schemes for their urban areas’ economic drivers, Washington may have to pick up the slack, albeit temporarily. As with the students, Schumer understands what needs to be done. He isn’t always the most vocal leader on transit matters, but if the money needs to come — if the pork has to flow — the state’s senior Senator has a way of delivering.

Yet, we shouldn’t have to rely on Schumer’s logrolling measures. We shouldn’t have to sit through Bill de Blasio’s public hypocrisy. We shouldn’t see this city’s students speaking out as lone voices of reason lost amidst bitter political debates. In two weeks, subway service will slow down. In two months, student rides may not be free. Neither of these outcomes are predestined, but as long as the city and state politicians we entrust to govern fail to do so, the millions of us who rely on transit will have to pay.

June 14, 2010 13 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Service Advisories

Weekend service changes

by Benjamin Kabak June 11, 2010
written by Benjamin Kabak on June 11, 2010

We’re just two weeks away from the MTA’s service cuts. The new maps are out; the signs are being changed; and all that’s left is for the trains and buses to cease running. Yet, capital work continues apace, and the weekends will always bring service changes.

The following are the scheduled weekend service changes are sent to me by New York City Transit. These are subject to change without notice. Please listen for announcements on trains and read the signs in stations. As always, Subway Weekender has a map visualizing the changes. I’ve always believed Transit should look into producing its own weekend map, at least as a PDF.


From 12:01 a.m. Saturday, June 12 to 5 a.m. Sunday, June 13, uptown 1 trains run express from Times Square-42nd Street to 72nd Street due to rail work between 34th Street and 72nd Street.


From 12:01 a.m. Saturday, June 12 to 5 a.m. Sunday, June 13, downtown 2 and 3 trains run local from 96th Street to Times Square-42nd Street due to reconstruction of the track bridge at the underpass at 96th Street.


From 12:01 a.m. Saturday, June 12 to 5 a.m. Sunday, June 13, uptown 2 trains run express from Times Square-42nd Street to 72nd Street, then local to 96th Street due to reconstruction of the track bridge at the underpass at 96th Street.


From 12:01 a.m. Saturday, June 12, to 5 a.m. Sunday, June 13, uptown 3 trains run local from 72nd Street to 96th Street due to reconstruction of the track bridge at the underpass at 96th Street.


From 12:01 a.m. to 6:30 a.m. Saturday, June 12 and 12:01 a.m. to 5 a.m. Sunday, June 13, 3 service is extended to/from 34th Street-Penn Station due to reconstruction of the track bridge at the underpass at 96th Street.


From 12:01 a.m. Saturday, June 12 to 5 a.m. Sunday, June 13, downtown 4 and 6 trains run express from 14th Street-Union Square to Brooklyn Bridge due to gap filler replacement at 14th Street-Union Square.


From 5:30 a.m. to 11:30 p.m., Saturday, June 12, 5 trains run every 20 minutes between Dyre Avenue and Bowling Green due to gap filler replacement at 14th Street-Union Square.


From 12 noon to 5 p.m., Saturday, June 12, the 116th Street 6 station will be EXIT ONLY in order to prevent overcrowding on platforms and stairways during the 116th Street Festival. Customers may use the 110th Street or the 125th Street 6 stations.


From 7 a.m. to 9 p.m., Sunday, June 13, the 77th Street 6 station will be EXIT ONLY in order to prevent overcrowding on platforms and stairways during the Puerto Rican Day Parade. Customers may use the 68th Street or the 86th Street 6 stations.


From 8 a.m. to 7 p.m., Saturday, June 12, Manhattan-bound 7 trains skip 69th, 52nd, 46th, 40th, and 33rd Streets due to rail replacement.


From 11:30 p.m. Friday, June 11 to 6 a.m. Saturday, June 12, from 11:30 p.m. Saturday, June 12 to 6 a.m. Sunday, June 13, and from 11:30 p.m. Sunday, June 13 to 5 a.m. Monday, June 14, uptown A trains run express from Canal Street to 59th Street due to a track chip out north of West 4th Street.


From 11:30 p.m. Friday, June 11 to 11:30 p.m. Saturday, June 12, free shuttle buses replace A trains between 168th Street and 207th Street due to cable work between Dyckman and 207th Streets. Note: A trains run local between 145th Street and 168th Street.


From 4:30 a.m. to 10 p.m. Sunday, June 13, free shuttle buses replace A trains between Far Rockaway and Beach 90th Street due to station rehabilitations.


From 6:30 a.m. to 11:30 p.m. Saturday, June 12, there are no C trains between 168th Street and 145th Street due to cable work between Dyckman and 207th Streets. Customers should take the A instead.


From 11 p.m. Friday, June 11 to 6 a.m. Saturday, June 12, from 11 p.m. Saturday, June 12 to 7 a.m. Sunday, June 13, and from 11 p.m. Sunday, June 13 to 5 a.m. Monday, June 14, Manhattan-bound D trains skip 174th-175th Sts. and 170th Street due to a track chip out north of 170th Street.


From 11 p.m. Friday, June 11 to 7 a.m. Saturday, June 12, Manhattan-bound E trains run express from Forest Hills-71st Avenue to Roosevelt Avenue due to a track chip out north of Elmhurst Avenue.


From 11:30 p.m. Friday, June 11 to 6 a.m. Saturday, June 12, from 11:30 p.m. Saturday, June 12 to 6 a.m. Sunday, June 13, and from 11:30 p.m. Sunday, June 13 to 5 a.m. Monday, June 14, uptown E trains skip Spring and 23rd Streets due to a track chip out north of West 4th Street.


From 11:30 p.m. Friday, June 11 to 5 a.m. Monday, June 14, free shuttle buses replace E trains between Jamaica Center and Union Turnpike due to track switch renewal and asbestos abatement at Jamaica Center. Note: E trains are rerouted on the F between Forest Hills-71st Avenue and Jamaica-179th Street.


There are no G trains between Forest Hills-71st Avenue and Court Square. Customers should take the E or R instead. Note: Saturday, Manhattan-bound trains run express from Forest Hills-71st Avenue to Roosevelt Avenue – E overnight or R 5:30 a.m. to 7 a.m.


From 8 a.m. to 8 p.m., Saturday, June 12, L trains run in two sections due to CBTC testing:

  • Between 8th Avenue and Broadway Junction and
  • Between Broadway Junction and Rockaway Parkway (every 24 minutes)


From 5:30 a.m. to 7 a.m., Saturday, June 12, Manhattan-bound R trains run express from Forest Hills-71st Avenue to Roosevelt Avenue due to a track chip out north of Elmhurst Avenue.


From 5 a.m. to 10 p.m., Sunday, June 13, A trains replace the S between Broad Channel and Rockaway Park due to station rehabilitations.

June 11, 2010 5 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
AsidesBuses

City Council sends Albany a home-rule message on bus lane enforcement

by Benjamin Kabak June 11, 2010
written by Benjamin Kabak on June 11, 2010

The City Council has sent a home-rule bill to Albany requesting permission to implement camera enforcement measures in the city’s new bus lanes. While the State Senate has approved such a measure, the New York Assembly has yet to pick up the issue. If this sounds familiar, well, it’s because history is repeating itself. The bill, which passed by a 46-4 vote, will once again have to clear Sheldon Silver Assembly, and the last time a bus measure bill got this far, David Gantt killed it.

This year, however, things should be different. For starters, as I mentioned, the State Senate has already signed off on these measures, and the city and the MTA have ramped up bus lane expansion plans. Furthermore, Assembly Transportation Committee head Gantt has said he’s more amenable to a bill this time around. For the city to implement effective bus service, it needs this approval from the state. “Today’s home rule message sends a clear signal to the state legislature that expedient public transportation in bus lanes is a top priority for the city of New York,” Gale Brewer, a council sponsor of the bill, said. And now we wait while putting pressure on Albany.

June 11, 2010 1 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Service Cuts

MTA ‘optimistic’ Student MetroCards will be saved

by Benjamin Kabak June 11, 2010
written by Benjamin Kabak on June 11, 2010

I have such mixed thoughts about the future of the Student MetroCard program. On the one hand, students in New York City should enjoy free rides to and from their public schools as every other public school student in the country does. On the other hand, the city and state — and decidedly not the MTA — should be picking up the tab for this benefit. On other other, other hand, I have to wonder why Albany can get so up in arms when Student MetroCards are threatened but can’t be bothered to lift a finger when buses and subway routes are eliminated.

Today, the news is guardedly optimistic for the future of the Student MetroCards as politicians and MTA officials believe something will happen to save the free rides for students. Even as New York State prepares to shut down its services because warring factions in Albany can’t come to a budget agreement, legislatures will step in to save student fares. Time, though, is of the essence as the MTA Board plans to vote in less than two weeks on its proposal to eliminate the free rides.

“The sentiment of almost everybody in our conference is that the money has to be put in there,” Dov Hikind, a Brooklyn assembly rep, said to The Wall Street Journal. While other state officials echoed Hikind’s line of thought, no one could say from where the money will flow. In March, Pedro Espada proposed bridge tolls to fund student rides, but that plan hasn’t garnered much attention since then.

Meanwhile, a quote from Richard Brodsky in The Journal struck me as appropriate too. “When the MTA said that the number was $210 million,” he said, “that was clearly not the case. When I announced that they could do this for nothing, that was clearly not the case.” I’m glad to see Brodsky’s admitting that student travel comes at a cost to the MTA, and I’m relieved to see Brodsky’s recognizing that the MTA’s $214 million figure appears to rely on what they would draw in as revenue if they charged students full fare. The actual cost of administering the student travel program and allowing students to ride for free remains to be seen.

At 347 Madison, the MTA, in the words of spokesman Jeremy Soffin, remains “optimistic” that Albany will come through. Yet, I embrace this rescue plan with some hesitation. What about we the fare-paying public? Don’t we deserve a proper funding package as well?

When the MTA implements its service cuts on June 28, over 2 million straphangers and countless more bus riders will find their commutes and travel around the city drastically altered. Trains will be slower in arriving and more crowded. Some trains won’t run at all; others will see new service patterns; and everyone will pay the price. The people suffering are the workers in New York who drive the city’s economy. Just as the city’s students deserve their free rides, so too do the rest of us warrant subway service that meets demands regardless of the price tag.

If Albany is willing to sacrifice something for students — bridge tolls, congestion fees, whatever it might be — it should be willing to up the ante for the rest of us who need the subways to lead productive lives. Our collective trips to work and to play are just as important as a high schooler’s trip to school, if not more so. Where’s our funding package?

June 11, 2010 34 comments
1 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
AsidesNew York City Transit

A train operator takes questions

by Benjamin Kabak June 10, 2010
written by Benjamin Kabak on June 10, 2010

As part of its “Taking Questions” series, The Times’ City Room blog hosted Dennis Boyd, a TO along the 4 line last week. He answered three sets of questions about his job and his views on working underground (Part 1, Part 2 and Part 3). I found his answers very illuminating because it presents a view New Yorkers rarely see. We know that trains enter and leave stations; we know two people are responsible for their operations; but we don’t know why some express don’t wait for local trains or what the various markings and signal patterns mean. In Part 1, Boyd talks about the new automated announcements and how his job changed. In Part 2, he talks about why Lexington Ave. express trains crawl up and down the line at rush hour, and in Part 3, Boyd delves into train delays. Good stuff.

June 10, 2010 4 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
7 Line Extension

A faint glimmer of hope at 10th Ave. and 41st St.

by Benjamin Kabak June 10, 2010
written by Benjamin Kabak on June 10, 2010

It is the phantom subway station that just won’t fade away. It is the the phantom subway station that, for the sake of a neighborhood and New York City’s future, has to be built. And it is a phantom subway station that just might be inching one step closer to a return to reality.

I’m talking, of course, about the on-again, off-again station at 10th Ave. and 41st St. that will nearly make or break the way we judge the 7 line extension. To recap: The original plans for the extension called for a stop to serve Hell’s Kitchen and the developments near the Hudson River in the low 40s, but as cost overruns became steep, the city — which is funding the entire extension — dropped its plans to build this station. Only the new terminal at 34th and 11th Ave., the lynchpin to the Hudson Yards development, would see the light of day.

First, the city promised to build a shell station at 41st and 10th Ave. so that the MTA could later build a full station, but when that became too expensive and the economy went south, those plans were scraped. At one point in 2007, then-Deputy Mayor Dan Doctoroff offered to go halfsies with the MTA, but the cash-starved authority with bigger capital fish to fry declined. Then, nearly three and a half years after rumors of the station’s demise first emerged, the Real Estate Board of New York, under new leadership, decided to launch a last-second effort to save the station at 10th Ave., and that is where we find ourselves in 2010.

The news today is guardedly optimistic. Eliot Brown of The New York Observer rehashes recent history and finds that REBNY’s efforts could be paying off if only Mayor Bloomberg weren’t such an obstructionist. He reports:

Now, REBNY feels it has a plan that could keep the station alive, but the Bloomberg administration rejects it as unfeasible. Still, the administration, which initially resisted entertaining the late-in-the-game effort, is itself examining other funding options.

Steven Spinola, president of REBNY, said he had a consultant produce a report that recommended about $100 million in work to move utilities, an amount that could keep the option open for later funding to finish the station. The full cost of the station is estimated by the city to exceed $800 million.

“What we’re looking to do is preserve the ability that the station will eventually be built,” he said. “Nobody ever really expected the station to be built immediately–$800 million was not ever going to just come from some add-on in a bill in Washington. But can we do something so that over the next five, six years, money can come in from Washington?” …

A spokesman for the Bloomberg administration, Andrew Brent, dismissed Mr. Spinola’s plan as something that would disrupt the current project, which anticipates a line to 34th Street and 11th Avenue by 2013. “We’re not going to entertain any plans that add meaningful time or cost to the subway extension,” Mr. Brent said in a statement. “If a plan can be worked out that preserves the possibility of a station getting built in the future without delaying or adding cost to the project, we’re open to it. That remains a big if.”

Bloomberg’s line of reasoning is utterly spurious. The city has gone this long without 7 service to the Hudson Yards area, and considering that real estate development won’t take off for years in that neighborhood, if New Yorkers have to suffer a delay of a year to ensure that something forward-looking is built at 41st and 10th, the subway-riding public would be better off for it.

Vaguely, Spinola, whose organization didn’t realize for years that the station at 41st and 10th had been axed, ended with some words about the city’s trying to “find a solution.” He said, “At the moment, I think they are taking the concern seriously that the station will not get built unless they do something about it, and I think they are exploring the possibilities.” How comforting.

June 10, 2010 45 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Service CutsTransit Labor

A proposal to fix the station agents

by Benjamin Kabak June 10, 2010
written by Benjamin Kabak on June 10, 2010

This station kiosk at the local BMT stop at Prince St. closed on May 13. (Photo via flickr user Tim Faracy of Bklyn)

Taxpayers have to shell out $40,000 per day as long as the MTA is not allowed to dismiss its station agents. At least, that’s what Jay Walder, MTA CEO and Chairman, estimated the costs were yesterday morning at an emergency meeting of the MTA Board held to address recent legal setbacks as the MTA looks to dismiss station agents and shutter kiosks throughout the system.

The saga of the station agents is one oft examined here at Second Ave. Sagas. Recently, the news has been coming fast and furious. On Friday afternoon, after issuing a temporary injunction against the station agent dismissals last month, a Manhattan Supreme Court judge ruled that the MTA could not shutter station kiosks without holding public hearings. Even though the authority had held these hearings a little more than a year ago on the same closure plans, because Albany averted the layoffs through a funding package and because the MTA had rescinded the cuts last year, the MTA had to host new hearings because “concerns of the citizenry” could have shifted in time.

On Tuesday afternoon, the same judge amended her order to require the MTA to reopen booths it had closed earlier this year. This order has been stayed pending an appeal. Meanwhile, the MTA Board voted unanimously to host four hearings — one per borough impacted by the booth closures — in mid-July before voting to cut station agents and close kiosks after that. It is, as Walder said today, a foregone conclusion, and the MTA is holding these hearings simply to comply with the court’s order.

“I wish I could tell you that that situation changed,” Walder said. “There’s no indication today, as we stand here or sit here today that the situation, the financial situation is any better than it was when we took this action months ago.”

As expected, the response from the TWU was one of protest. Union officials and Public Advocate Bill DeBlasio are going to host a press conference urging the MTA to hire back, albeit temporarily, the laid-off station agents (at a cost to the taxpayers), and the union continues to push its safety-first platform. “Digital signage and cameras can’t come to the aid of passengers, and can’t offer that immediate link to police and fire that our station agents provide,” TWU Local 100 president John Samuelsen said.

And that’s where we come in. For years, I’ve doubted the efficacy of the station agents. While they may act as a psychological security blanket for straphangers and a limited deterrent for some criminals, they’re not allowed to assist a victim in the midst of a crime and have little effect on those determined to do something bad. Maybe the solution lies in fixing the agents’ roles.

Let’s take a look at a station diagram. Below is a map of the 28th St. stop at on the 7th Ave. IRT.

This station today features just one agent and remaining station booth on the uptown platform in between the two staircases at 28th St. The booth and agent are in the fare-control area and thus have a limited view of the platform. Those people waiting on the platform between 28th and 27th Sts. aren’t visible to the station agent, and those waiting at the southern end of the station are a block and a half away. By sitting behind the turnstiles inside a booth, the agent is useless for anyone under duress at the far reaches of the platform, and this reality is acted out at stations around the system.

To solve this problem while actually increasing safety, the MTA and TWU should work together to change the job. Station agents should be positioned anywhere throughout the station. They should be available to help those at the fare-control area, but they should also patrol the platforms as a set of eyes. They aren’t police officers and don’t have law enforcement powers, but the agents could be used as a community watch for the subways. That has to be a stronger deterrent than the mostly useless agents out in force today.

The MTA, though, can’t enact this plan without more money, and the TWU has spent its efforts defending jobs instead of offering up better suggestions. We the taxpaying and subway-riding public instead will get a labor fight, more layoffs and the bill for what amounts to a legal technicality under the station agents can be eliminated through the proper procedures in six-to-eight weeks. It hardly seems worth it.

June 10, 2010 7 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Service Cuts

In Bushwick, sugar-coating a service cut

by Benjamin Kabak June 9, 2010
written by Benjamin Kabak on June 9, 2010

When residents who live along the M line from Bushwick to Middle Village wake up on June 27, they will find their commutes drastically altered. The M will no longer travel down Nassau St. and into Southern Brooklyn. Instead, with a new orange bullet denoting a Sixth Ave. trunk route, the M will take the Chrystie St. Cut to Broadway/Lafayette and make local stops up Sixth Ave. to Forest Hills. It is a service cut with a purpose.

For thousands of commuters, this new service pattern will be a step up. Having a one-seat ride from Bushwick to Midtown while bypassing the need to switch to the crowded F train is a service improvement the MTA should have implemented years ago, and today, Metro explores how residents in the norther parts of Brooklyn are looking forward to the new service patterns.

“My roommate and I were thrilled when we found out,” Adam Thompson, whose nearest stop is at Central Ave. on the M, said to Carly Baldwin. “I hang out in the West Village a lot and this will be the first time I don’t need to take two trains to get there. I really think we’re the only community not getting screwed by the service changes.”

If only life in the post-service cuts era were as rosy as Thompson makes it out to be. It’s certainly true that Thompson’s weekday rides to the West Village will be vastly improved, but that’s about it. After 11 p.m. on weeknights and at all times during the weekend, Thompson will still be stuck with a three-train ride to the West Village. Futhermore, as the MTA explains, weekend headway increases and load guideline revisions means that trains will arrive less frequently and will be more crowded. A service cut is a service cut is a service cut.

At some point in the future, when the real estate tax revenues rebound, the MTA’s fiscal outlook will turn from red to black, and the agency may begin to explore restoring lost service. When it does, the M should still service Midtown via the Chrystie St. Cut, but until then, we can’t gloss over the reality that, on June 27, subway service will be worse for everyone in New York City. The new service patterns may sound alluring, but I’d prefer service to meet demand and not these cuts.

June 9, 2010 68 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Load More Posts

About The Author

Name: Benjamin Kabak
E-mail: Contact Me

Become a Patron!
Follow @2AvSagas

Upcoming Events
TBD

RSS? Yes, Please: SAS' RSS Feed
SAS In Your Inbox: Subscribe to SAS by E-mail

Instagram



Disclaimer: Subway Map © Metropolitan Transportation Authority. Used with permission. MTA is not associated with nor does it endorse this website or its content.

Categories

  • 14th Street Busway (1)
  • 7 Line Extension (118)
  • Abandoned Stations (31)
  • ARC Tunnel (52)
  • Arts for Transit (19)
  • Asides (1,244)
  • Bronx (13)
  • Brooklyn (126)
  • Brooklyn-Queens Connector (13)
  • Buses (291)
  • Capital Program 2010-2014 (27)
  • Capital Program 2015-2019 (56)
  • Capital Program 2020-2024 (3)
  • Congestion Fee (71)
  • East Side Access Project (37)
  • F Express Plan (22)
  • Fare Hikes (173)
  • Fulton Street (57)
  • Gateway Tunnel (29)
  • High-Speed Rail (9)
  • Hudson Yards (18)
  • Interborough Express (1)
  • International Subways (26)
  • L Train Shutdown (20)
  • LIRR (65)
  • Manhattan (73)
  • Metro-North (99)
  • MetroCard (124)
  • Moynihan Station (16)
  • MTA (98)
  • MTA Absurdity (233)
  • MTA Bridges and Tunnels (27)
  • MTA Construction (128)
  • MTA Economics (522)
    • Doomsday Budget (74)
    • Ravitch Commission (23)
  • MTA Politics (330)
  • MTA Technology (195)
  • New Jersey Transit (53)
  • New York City Transit (220)
  • OMNY (3)
  • PANYNJ (113)
  • Paratransit (10)
  • Penn Station (18)
  • Penn Station Access (10)
  • Podcast (30)
  • Public Transit Policy (164)
  • Queens (129)
  • Rider Report Cards (31)
  • Rolling Stock (40)
  • Second Avenue Subway (262)
  • Self Promotion (77)
  • Service Advisories (612)
  • Service Cuts (118)
  • Sponsored Post (1)
  • Staten Island (52)
  • Straphangers Campaign (40)
  • Subway Advertising (45)
  • Subway Cell Service (34)
  • Subway History (81)
  • Subway Maps (83)
  • Subway Movies (14)
  • Subway Romance (13)
  • Subway Security (104)
  • Superstorm Sandy (35)
  • Taxis (43)
  • Transit Labor (151)
    • ATU (4)
    • TWU (100)
    • UTU (8)
  • Triboro RX (4)
  • U.S. Transit Systems (53)
    • BART (1)
    • Capital Metro (1)
    • CTA (7)
    • MBTA (11)
    • SEPTA (5)
    • WMATA (28)
  • View from Underground (447)

Archives

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram

@2019 - All Right Reserved.


Back To Top