Second Ave. Sagas
  • About
  • Contact Me
  • 2nd Ave. Subway History
  • Search
  • About
  • Contact Me
  • 2nd Ave. Subway History
  • Search
Second Ave. Sagas

News and Views on New York City Transportation

MTA EconomicsService Cuts

With more budget cuts, a system begins to slide

by Benjamin Kabak May 7, 2010
written by Benjamin Kabak on May 7, 2010

Scratchiti will become more prevalent as the MTA scales back on maintenance costs. (Photo by flickr user rdcapasso)

Throughout the 1970s and into the early 1980s, New York City’s subways became a dangerous and unreliable system. As the city went broke and the MTA had little money, maintenance schedules slipped. Graffiti took over the system; trash filled the stations; and car breakdowns and track fires were a way of life.

Since then, the MTA has invested heavily in its rolling stock and maintenance programs. Recognizing that the MTA’s network is one of the — if not the top — drivers of the city’s economy, the authority has spent the last three decades ensuring that trains are graffiti-free and do not break down nearly as often and that stations are relatively cleaner than they once were to minimize track fires.

As the MTA looks to cut more services and employees, we could see the beginnings of a return to the bad old days. Yesterday, the authority announced a series of austerity cuts that will strike at the heart of the system. While I was taking an exhausting final, the authority heads briefed reporters, and Michael Grynbaum has the story. The MTA will eliminate nearly 1000 positions — some administrative and some maintenance-oriented — in an effort to save $115-$150 million. The authority will still face a shortfall of over $200 million that will have to be closed with a larger-than-anticipated fare hike next year. Grynbaum has more:

Hundreds of maintenance workers will be laid off, subway cleaning regimens will be reduced and officials will “let an additional amount of scratchiti occur on windows system-wide” under the plan, said Thomas F. Prendergast, the president of New York City Transit.

The cost-cutting measures are part of an agency-wide plan to close a $400 million budget shortfall, and subway riders will not be the only ones to suffer. Riders on the Long Island Rail Road will be packed into smaller trains on the weekend and occasionally in the morning rush. Football fans will have fewer options for train rides to games at the Meadowlands, and the Metro-North Railroad will place fewer customer assistants in Grand Central Terminal…

Inconvenience is another matter. One item on the chopping block is a program that created two dozen subway announcers, who alerted riders to delays and train progress over station intercoms. Officials said the program proved to be a poor investment.

Prendergast tried to assuage the fears of passengers who still remember the system as it was before the capital investments took hold. “There will be no degradation to safety and reliability,” he said.

Still, programs that improve the underground quality of life are being sacrificed in the name of economics. For instance, anti-scratchiti programs that appeared to be successful are being eliminated due to the expense. Now, the agency will, in the words of Grynbaum, “allow more scratches to accumulate before it replaces windows on trains throughout the system.”

Additionally, trains will be cleaned less frequently. As Heather Haddon of amNew York reports, cleaners will scrub trains only “at one end of the route — meaning a car can travel for more than three hours before it is scrubbed.” Unless New Yorkers make an effort to clean up, train cars will just be dirtier.

This is, of course, nothing short of a failure of politics. The MTA, created 42 years ago to isolate the subways from politicians, has always relied on state funding to break even, and as pension, benefit and debt obligations have saddled the MTA with ever-rising costs, politicians have simply stopped coming up with solutions. East River bridge tolls or congestion pricing with revenue dedicated to the MTA remain the most equitable and rational solutions. Yet, New York State politicians can’t see past their windshield perspectives to understand the role transit plays in the lives of countless millions of New Yorkers a day. The system will have to break down before it is rescued, and it is quickly heading that way.

Site Note: Apologies for the late start this morning. I had a long takehome final yesterday and fell asleep before I could get a post up. I’ll have another one later before the weekend service advisories tonight.

May 7, 2010 35 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
AsidesMTA Politics

Station agent injunction to last the weekend

by Benjamin Kabak May 6, 2010
written by Benjamin Kabak on May 6, 2010

Updating this earlier story: The Daily News is reporting that the temporary injunction barring the MTA from dismissing 475 station agents today will remain in place through the weekend. Manhattan Supreme Court Judge Alice Schlesinger heard arguments late last night and issued the TRO, but Justice Saliann Scarpulla declined to hear further arguments in the case today. The legal proceedings are expected to resume on Monday or Tuesday. In the meantime, the station agents will stay on the job, and union heads will continue to present spurious arguments concerning safety or stimulus funding. (To which I respond, wouldn’t the MTA use stimulus funding to stave off service cuts before it rolls back agent dismissal? After all, the authority is in the business of transit service.) There is no word on how much this injunction is costing the MTA, but agents will continue to draw their salaries until at least next week.

May 6, 2010 4 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
AsidesTransit Labor

For now, station agent jobs saved via injunction

by Benjamin Kabak May 6, 2010
written by Benjamin Kabak on May 6, 2010

At around 10:20 p.m. last night, Judge Alice Schlesinger of the New York Supreme Court issued a temporary injunction barring the MTA from firing nearly 500 station agents today. Questioning whether that the authority’s decision to cut agents “ has… been done pursuant to the proper procedure,” Judge Schlesinger has staved out what union officials are calling ill-advised cuts that impact the safety of the subway system. The two sides have continued their arguments this morning in court, and although I’m amidst a takehome final today, I’ll update the news as soon as I hear an outcome later.

According to The Post, the TWU is arguing that the MTA “didn’t give the booth closures public hearings, notify the local community boards, or make ‘adequate alternate arrangements for the safety and convenience of the public.'” To the best of my knowledge, the MTA isn’t legally required to hold any hearings to notify community boards of staffing changes. If that is to be a requirement going forward, the decision to implement it is one best left to the politica — and not the judicial — process. Of course, the TWU could always put a hold on its four-percent raises in an effort to stave off these job cuts, but I wouldn’t expect to see that concession any time soon.

For its part, Transit believes it will win the case. “Once this legal matter has been resolved we will proceed with the planned lay-offs of the Station Agents,” an agency statement said.

May 6, 2010 7 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Subway Cell Service

Walder: Timeframe for cell service ‘simply unacceptable’

by Benjamin Kabak May 6, 2010
written by Benjamin Kabak on May 6, 2010

The MTA, long known for its tight control of its transit data, hosted last night its first developers conference. The agency partnered with Google to discuss with local software developers how it can better create an environment of open information so that entrepreneurs and engineers can produce applications that will help riders with their commutes.

Unfortunately, I couldn’t attend the conference due to my law school finals schedule, but I was able to watch some of it online. One the more intriguing announcements came from MTA CEO and Chairman Jay Walder when he previewed an app contest the authority will host this fall. With new volumes of open data available to the public, the MTA is going to award prizes for the top three applications in three categories: Best Customer-Friendly Application, Best Visualization of MTA data and Best Mash-Up of MTA and Third-Party Data. The possibilities are endless, and smart phone-equipped riders will be the ones who benefit.

Yet, despite this attention to mobile application development, the MTA is still lacking underground cell service and a plan for implementation. Walder addressed that topic tonight during the Q-and-A session, and Allen Stern of CenterNetworks.com caught the clip on video. Walder spoke about his annoyance with the state of cell service underground and how he is “frustrated with pages upon pages of why it’s not going to happen this decade.”

Currently, he explained, the MTA has issued an RFP for wireless service on commuter rail lines and has signed a deal to equip Grand Central with wireless, but their plans for Transit remain in limbo. “We have a contractual arrangement to be able to get cell service into the subway as well and I hope that we’ll have that in the not too different future as well,” he said. “I think the timeframes we have established for this are simply unacceptable. I don’t believe we can explain to people why it will take until 2019 or something of that nature to be able to get cell service into the subways. And so we’re working on a range of different ways to be able to do it. But it does turn out to be one of the more problematic and vexing issues we’re facing.”

Walder has a reason to be annoyed. The MTA has been talking about underground cell service since 2005 and signed a deal (with a company many believed to be less than reliable) in September 2007. When the promises of a pilot six months after that failed to materialize, I figured the efforts to bring wireless underground were all but dead. It isn’t surprising to hear a decade-long timeline from Walder.

Underground cell service is a tricky thing though. As Stern wrote, “I can’t say I am a huge fan of cell phone service underground. It’s bad enough having to listen to music I am not interested in as if I was at a concert, now we will be subject to 200 phone calls as well.” One of my Twitter followers echoed those sentiments: “Personally I enjoy the one hour of my day that isn’t interrupted by phones, texts and emails.”

But it goes well beyond idle chit-chat and personal conversations. Having a wireless-equipped subway system will allow for greater productivity. It will accomodate those who need to work and those who can’t afford to spend 40 minutes a ride without cell service the opportunity to be plugged in. It will allow New York to better take advantage of its position in a global economy. With the good will, obviously, come the bad of conversations that are too loud or too inappropriate, but that’s the price we pay today. The subways shouldn’t be island away from the technologies of the 21st Century.

It is, then, somewhat ironic for the MTA to be so invested in open data when the phones that run these promised applications don’t work underground. Hopefully, the authority can show a commitment to this aspect of the technology as well.

May 6, 2010 26 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
AsidesMTA Technology

Watch the MTA’s developers conference live

by Benjamin Kabak May 5, 2010
written by Benjamin Kabak on May 5, 2010

This evening, from 6:30 p.m. until 10 p.m., the MTA and Google will be hosting a developers conference as the authority prepares to release more data for mobile apps. Moderated by Anil Dash, the conference is now set to include the MTA’s Jay Walder, Derek Gottfrid of The Times, Berhard Seefeld from Google Maps, Nick Grossman from OpenPlans, Beth Noveck from the White House and Anthony Shorris from the NYU’s Rudin Center for Transportation Policy and Management. Due to a final exam I have to take tomorrow, I won’t be able to make it to the conference, but those of you at home can watch it live on UStream. The MTA’s live video feed will start promptly at 6:30, and the authority says it will make an archived video available on its website later this week.

May 5, 2010 0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
AsidesService Cuts

Report: Albany neglected station-agent funding request

by Benjamin Kabak May 5, 2010
written by Benjamin Kabak on May 5, 2010

Tomorrow morning, 478 station agents will not show up for work. In a move that will save $21 million and is part of the MTA’s overall efforts at cutting costs, these station agents are being let go, but it seems the union tried to save them. According to Heather Haddon of amNew York, labor leaders asked Albany for an eleventh hour bailout today, but state officials have so far failed to act. With Albany deadlocked over a budget, I wouldn’t expect any money to come the MTA’s way to avoid firings of service cuts.

Meanwhile, the Haddon article supposedly highlights how, anecdotally at least, crime is on the rise underground, but the accompanying photo is an absurd one of an elderly station agent. I don’t think any potential criminal would be deterred by his presence, and both the MTA and NYPD say that crime is holding steady underground as compared with the overall crime rate in the city. The biggest issue may be fare jumping, but the MTA has not committed to replacing turnstiles with the HEETs at those entrances losing their station agents.

May 5, 2010 6 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Subway History

The tribulations of bringing AC to the subways

by Benjamin Kabak May 5, 2010
written by Benjamin Kabak on May 5, 2010

The R-17, shown here in operation as the Shuttle in 1982, was the first subway car outfitted with air condition. (Photo via Steve Zabel/NYCSubway.org)

For the last few days, New York City has been enjoying some unseasonably warm weather. Although temperatures should dip back into the 60s over the weekend, the days of sun and 80 degrees remind me of the summer to follow. Summer in New York — with free concerts, long days and, of course, baseball games — is my favorite season but for one thing: The subways are utterly unbearable.

The worst part of riding around New York City in the summer are the underground waits. With train cars spewing heat from industrial-strength air conditioners, the stations themselves see temperatures sore beyond tolerable levels. The stagnant air induces sweat at hours of the morning far too early for that kind of heat, and only the blessed air conditioning of the train cars makes a commute tolerable.

These days, we take our air conditioned subway cars for granted. The MTA undertook its current air conditioning efforts in 1967, and the thought of a summer ride without AC lives on only in the memories of long-time New Yorkers. So as we sit on the cusp of summer and Transit turns on the AC, let’s hop in the Wayback Machine to a time when the New York City Transit Authority just couldn’t quite get air conditioning right.

Our journey begins in September of 1955, an odd time to test air conditioning as the heat is already dissipating by then. On a day that saw the outside temperature hit just 62 degrees, NYCTA ran a successful test of its first air conditioned subway car, an outfitted R-15 car. As station temperatures hit 81 degrees and the mercury climbed to 87.5 in un-air conditioned cars, the test car saw temperatures fluctuate between 68 and 73 degrees. The authority proclaimed this one-day test a success, and plans to outfit the entire subway fleet at a cost of $700 per car were drawn up.

This was short-lived optimism. A year later, the NYCTA unveiled another test run of the air conditioned cars. Six R-17 cars equipped with loud speakers, air conditioned and in-route music provided, of course, by Muzak, made headlines as Transit officials again extolled the virtues of air conditioning. At the time, Transit planned to test these cars along various IRT routes but ran into early troubles.

The authority tried to test it on the Shuttle route, but the short trip did not provide for ample testing time. “The run between Times Square and Grand Central takes one minute,” wrote The Times, “apparently too brief a time to cool the hot subway air taken in during the stops of one and one-half to two minutes at the shuttle terminals.” Passengers complained as well of stale air and high humidity.

By 1962, the promise of air conditioning had failed to materialize, and the NYCTA declared the $300,000 experiment a failure. Even after the successful test runs, Transit found humidity levels well beyond acceptable. “As humidity built up and breathing became difficult,” The Times said in 1962, “passengers fled to the fan-ventilated cars…To add to passenger discomfort the cool air was dissipated when doors opened at stations, while the humidity remained unchanged.” While PATH announced air conditioning, NYCTA was left searching for solutions.

Five years later, the city struck air conditioning gold. After tinkering with the technology, Transit found a costly solution, and early test runs were again successful. This time, the humidity levels were kept in check, and railfans began to stalk the air conditioned cars, riding them along the F line from terminal to terminal to bask in the cool air. With a grant from the government and $15 million from the city, Transit finally promised to outfit its rolling stock with AC.

Even still, the going went slowly. By August of 1970, finding an air conditioned car was likened to finding a needle in a hay stack, and a 1973 proposal called for full air condition only be 1980. Throughout the 1980s, those struggles continued. At various points in the decade, air conditioning either didn’t work or was on the verge of breaking down. In 1983, while Transit officials alleged that 50 percent of cars were air conditioned, one rider found himself with AC during only 20 percent of his trips.

Today, with new rolling stock and a better maintenance program in place, the subways are blissfully air conditioned, a haven from the heat outside and in the station. I’m too young to remember those days of un-air conditioned trains, but I have vague recollections from the mid-to-late 1980s of stiflingly hot rides in graffiti-covered cars. Even if the new rolling stock can seem somewhat sterile at times, I’ll take that air conditioned as the mercury rises and summer descends upon us.

May 5, 2010 31 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
BusesView from Underground

Ceci n’est pas un arrêt de bus

by Benjamin Kabak May 4, 2010
written by Benjamin Kabak on May 4, 2010

A bus stop no longer

Where: On the north side of Union St. just west of 7th Ave. in Brooklyn. The B71, until June 27th, stops here.

What: A sign of the times. Throughout the city, various bus stops slated for elimination are slowly being converted into, well, warnings of a service interruption to come. Up and down Union St., these signs mark the elimination of the B71, and I’m not sure what fate awaits the bus shelters. They’re owned by the Department of Transportation and not the MTA, and the city has an extension deal with CEMUSA for the advertising rights. I’d guess that the Spain-based company will continue to sell the ads, and the shelters will be used as street furniture. They’ll also serve as constant reminders of a time when our legislatures failed us and transit faltered in New York City.

May 4, 2010 25 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
AsidesMTA Politics

A pro-transit primary challenger faces an anti-everything incumbent

by Benjamin Kabak May 4, 2010
written by Benjamin Kabak on May 4, 2010

Since 1994, Carl Kruger has brought his windshield perspective to Albany. A Democratic who represents some transit-rich and not-very-transit-rich areas of Brooklyn, Kruger emerged over the last few years as one of the Fare Hike Four, those State Senators who vowed to anything to put a stop to a rational and equitable plan of East River bridge tolls or congestion pricing that would have allowed the MTA to avoid massive service cuts. Now, with anti-incumbent sentiment running deep, Kruger has a primary challenger in Igor Oberman, an administrative judge at the Taxi & Limousine Commission.

Oberman spoke with Streetsblog yesterday, and he’s saying all the right things. “Are bridge tolls popular in this district? No,” he said. “But more popular than cutting student MetroCards.” Oberman, who believes that the subways are “as important to the [residents] as police service or ambulances,” criticized Kruger for never taking the subways and vowed to fight for better transit if elected. While only those in District 27 can vote in this primary, there are other ways pro-transit forces can make their voices felt, and it’s about time these obstructionist Senators were give a run for their seats.

May 4, 2010 1 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
MTA Economics

Once more unto the overtime breach

by Benjamin Kabak May 4, 2010
written by Benjamin Kabak on May 4, 2010

The latest from The Post on the MTA’s overtime payouts sure sounds familiar. As MTA CEO and Chairman Jay Walder is exploring ways to reduce overtime, the MTA, say Tom Namako and James Fanelli, is doling out dollars left and right. It’s an outrage! Or is it?

First, the story:

As the MTA was announcing plans in 2009 to eliminate two subway lines and 33 bus routes, thousands of employees — from agency presidents to train mechanics — were pocketing millions in overtime and other perks, The Post has learned.

Hogging a stunning slice of the overtime were Long Island Rail Road employees, who benefit from arcane union work rules that allow everyday engineers and grease monkeys to rake in hundreds of thousands of dollars above their salaries while barely lifting a wrench. Railroad employees account for more than half of the top 100 overtime earners in 2009, records show.

Monica Hunter, a supervisor for the LIRR, was the highest overtime earner, pulling in a staggering $155,000 on top of her $79,000 salary last year. Track foreman Vincent Mazzola wasn’t far behind, scoring $148,000 on top of his $82,000 salary. Work rules — some more than a century old — allow employees to game the system. For example, when crew members are switched from one train to the next, they are contractually given another day’s full pay.

The MTA Inspector General, says The Post, is currently conducting a review of these pesky LIRR work rules from another era, but for The Post, that investigation and analysis seems nearly beside the point. Look at how wasteful the MTA is!

But let’s step back from the snarky exclamation points and the initial outrage to ask another question: Did these two reporters actually ask the MTA how much it would cost to fill the vacant shifts without overtime? How much more would the MTA be paying in salary and, more importantly, benefits and pension plans if the authority hired a new worker for every 40 hours of overtime per week? That would, I think, be a vital piece of information to have before slamming the MTA for doling out the overtime. It is possible for overtime to be a money-saver.

When a state comptroller report called for tighter overtime regulations, frequent SAS commenter Niccolo Machiavelli left a very detailed comment with some overtime math. Based upon the numbers, the average MTA worker puts in 4.5 hours of overtime a week, a figure well within range of the national average. While it’s easy to highlight the outliers, the MTA’s overtime isn’t nearly as problematic as it seems.

It makes sense, of course, for the authority to modernize its overtime rules. LIRR employees, for example, shouldn’t draw overtime just because they have to go work on another train to fill out their shift. But it pays to look a little deeper at the problem before proclaiming it to be one.

May 4, 2010 10 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Load More Posts

About The Author

Name: Benjamin Kabak
E-mail: Contact Me

Become a Patron!
Follow @2AvSagas

Upcoming Events
TBD

RSS? Yes, Please: SAS' RSS Feed
SAS In Your Inbox: Subscribe to SAS by E-mail

Instagram



Disclaimer: Subway Map © Metropolitan Transportation Authority. Used with permission. MTA is not associated with nor does it endorse this website or its content.

Categories

  • 14th Street Busway (1)
  • 7 Line Extension (118)
  • Abandoned Stations (31)
  • ARC Tunnel (52)
  • Arts for Transit (19)
  • Asides (1,244)
  • Bronx (13)
  • Brooklyn (126)
  • Brooklyn-Queens Connector (13)
  • Buses (291)
  • Capital Program 2010-2014 (27)
  • Capital Program 2015-2019 (56)
  • Capital Program 2020-2024 (3)
  • Congestion Fee (71)
  • East Side Access Project (37)
  • F Express Plan (22)
  • Fare Hikes (173)
  • Fulton Street (57)
  • Gateway Tunnel (29)
  • High-Speed Rail (9)
  • Hudson Yards (18)
  • Interborough Express (1)
  • International Subways (26)
  • L Train Shutdown (20)
  • LIRR (65)
  • Manhattan (73)
  • Metro-North (99)
  • MetroCard (124)
  • Moynihan Station (16)
  • MTA (98)
  • MTA Absurdity (233)
  • MTA Bridges and Tunnels (27)
  • MTA Construction (128)
  • MTA Economics (522)
    • Doomsday Budget (74)
    • Ravitch Commission (23)
  • MTA Politics (330)
  • MTA Technology (195)
  • New Jersey Transit (53)
  • New York City Transit (220)
  • OMNY (3)
  • PANYNJ (113)
  • Paratransit (10)
  • Penn Station (18)
  • Penn Station Access (10)
  • Podcast (30)
  • Public Transit Policy (164)
  • Queens (129)
  • Rider Report Cards (31)
  • Rolling Stock (40)
  • Second Avenue Subway (262)
  • Self Promotion (77)
  • Service Advisories (612)
  • Service Cuts (118)
  • Sponsored Post (1)
  • Staten Island (52)
  • Straphangers Campaign (40)
  • Subway Advertising (45)
  • Subway Cell Service (34)
  • Subway History (81)
  • Subway Maps (83)
  • Subway Movies (14)
  • Subway Romance (13)
  • Subway Security (104)
  • Superstorm Sandy (35)
  • Taxis (43)
  • Transit Labor (151)
    • ATU (4)
    • TWU (100)
    • UTU (8)
  • Triboro RX (4)
  • U.S. Transit Systems (53)
    • BART (1)
    • Capital Metro (1)
    • CTA (7)
    • MBTA (11)
    • SEPTA (5)
    • WMATA (28)
  • View from Underground (447)

Archives

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram

@2019 - All Right Reserved.


Back To Top