Second Ave. Sagas
  • About
  • Contact Me
  • 2nd Ave. Subway History
  • Search
  • About
  • Contact Me
  • 2nd Ave. Subway History
  • Search
Second Ave. Sagas

News and Views on New York City Transportation

View from Underground

When you gotta go, sometimes, you just gotta go

by Benjamin Kabak April 12, 2010
written by Benjamin Kabak on April 12, 2010

Once a bathroom; now a newsstand. (Photo by flickr user theratrace)

A few weeks ago, I was heading back to Park Slope from Manhattan and found myself on a D train. To get home, I had to switch at Atlantic/Pacific to a train that makes local stops, and I thought I’d use the time I had to duck into the bathroom. It was during the middle of the afternoon rush, and I assumed that bathrooms on the mezzanine between the Fourth Ave. stop at Pacific St. and the IRT platforms at Altantic Ave. would be open. Luckily for my olfactory sense, the bathroom was locked even though the sign said it would be closed only from midnight to 5 a.m., and I simply waited until I arrived home a few minutes later.

Around the subway system, the MTA’s bathrooms pop up like hidden gems – or trash heaps – amidst an unfriendly system. New York isn’t known for its public restrooms, and the subways are no exception. The johns at Times Square near the 8th Ave. line are useable; the ones at W. 4th St. are generally locked; and I don’t know anyone who dares enter the restrooms on the F platform at Delancey St. You never know what you’re going to find.

For a few years, I’ve toyed on and off with a subway bathroom feature. I’d take my camera and document the toilets underground. Somehow, though, I haven’t been able to stomach the idea. Do we really want to see what’s inside the subway’s myriad unloved bathrooms? Today, Heather Haddon did just that sans a camera. She explored all 129 restrooms in 77 subway stations and found what you would expect. Most are dirty; most reek of human waste; and nearly half of them were closed when they should have been open. “They’re pretty disgusting. People are always cleaning themselves in there and doing other stuff,” Kelvin Pau said at 168th St.

Haddon continues:

Of the open bathrooms, a third were frightening caverns of garbage, urine, standing water or unseemly smells. Odors from the Astoria-Ditmars Blvd. station on the N nearly caused an amNewYork reporter to feel faint during a recent visit…

Don’t expect to find toilet paper or soap, as few of the bathrooms had either. And while graffiti has largely been eliminated from subway stations, it lives on in the bathrooms, as many of the walls and stalls were covered in tags.

Keeping the bathrooms tidy and open is a challenge because they are constantly being vandalized or attract “criminal activity,” Seaton said. “They may be locked at any given time due to vandalism and ongoing repairs,” he said.

Haddon and her co-reporter Nicholas Klopsis close with a list of the best and worst bathrooms in the system. Stay away from Hunts Point where the men’s room stalls have no walls or 57th St. and Broadway with its “potpourri of not-so-pleasing smells.” And if you really have to go, just head above ground and find the nearest coffee house. It can’t be worse than the restrooms that mar the subways.

April 12, 2010 26 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Second Avenue SubwaySubway History

A Second Ave. Subway once bound for Avenue A

by Benjamin Kabak April 12, 2010
written by Benjamin Kabak on April 12, 2010

Even as Phase 1 of the Second Ave. Subway moves forward, the Holy Grail of New York City subway expansion plans is still inspiring those who dream of a better mass transit system for the city. Over at his excellent site vanshnookenraggen, Andrew Lynch recently unveiled his incredibly fascinating and thorough examination of the Second Ave. Subway future. I’m working with Andrew to bring parts of his series to Second Ave. Sagas, but in the meantime, his post has me taking a trip back through New York City subway planning history.

The date in 1969, two years after the Chrystie St. Cut opened, and New York City is eying another round of subway expansion. The Board of Estimate and the New York City Transit Authority are working, often at odds with each other, to develop plans for the Second Ave. Subway, forty years after the initial IND Second System fell victim to the Great Depression. The debate over the route would expose the demands of a Board trying to respond to constituent demands and a Transit Authority attempting to make the most out of its service offerings.

The newly-formed MTA’s plan for Second Ave. was a simply one. As the current plans propose, the new subway line would have headed straight down Second Ave. and south of Houston St., would have followed, in the words of Emanuel Perlmutter, “Chrystie Street, the Bowery, St. James Place, Pearl and Water Streets to a Broad Street terminus.” This route would have maximized connections with out lines as well because plans called for transfers between the SAS and the F at 2nd Ave. and the D at Grand St. The MTA alleged that 25,000 riders from the Bronx and 30,000 from Brooklyn would have taken advantage of these transfers, and from a planning perspective, the MTA would have achieved its goal of offering comprehensive service.

The politicians though did not like it one bit. Manhattan Borough President Percy Sutton called it a “snobway thruway.” This train, he alleged, skirted the city’s poorer neighborhoods – called slums by reporters and politicians – and it did not provide ready transit access to those who lived in Alphabet City. Instead, in the days before the MetroCard, thousands of less well-off New Yorkers would have to continue paying double fares to take the bus from the far reaches of the East Village to the subway on Second Ave.

And so throwing money to the wind, the Board of Estimate pushed what they thought to be a better solution. Will Lisner of The Times described the change as thus: “The amended route would leave Second Avenue at 17th Street and bend east to Stuyvesant Square (near Stuyvesant Town), under 15th, 14th and 13th Streets to Avenue A, south to Essex Street along East Broadway and across Chatham Square.” This Ave. A would cost an additional $57 million, and although the Board of Estimate believed it would service 20,000 additional passengers, the MTA claimed just 3000 more riders would enter at Ave. A than if the subway were to stay on Second Ave. Furthermore, the IND transfers would be lost as well.

Eventually, after much political wrangling, the Board of Estimate and the MTA agreed to a proposal so expansive it could never see the light of the day. At a cost of $55 million more, the Second Ave. Subway would have the best of both worlds: The train would head south via Second Ave. and also include a loop to Ave. C between 14th and Houston Sts. As some transit planners called the loop a “gimmick” to save “a few blocks walk,” others hailed it as a compromise that would placate both the Board and the MTA.

Yet, by the 1974, it was not to be. Spiraling costs shelved the Second Ave. Subway to at least 1986, and today, as I wrote in September, that tea-cup shaped Alphabet City loop, while the darling of subway dreamers, just isn’t meant to be.

April 12, 2010 23 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Service Advisories

Service changes for a few months and the weekend

by Benjamin Kabak April 9, 2010
written by Benjamin Kabak on April 9, 2010

It’s Friday evening once again, and you know what that means: Service advisories!

This week, I have announcement of a change that will last three months along the 6. There will, says New York City Transit, be “limited Pelham Bay Park-bound 6 service to and from Parkchester station beginning on Saturday, April 10 through early July, 2010 because of ongoing station rehabilitation.” The station, which opened in 1920, will enjoy new canopies, a refurbished mezzanine, new lighting and a public address system. The platform edges will receive the tactile strips in place throughout the system.

Due to this work, various platforms will be closed over the next few months:

  • At all times, all northbound 6 local trains will skip Parkchester, while express trains will stop at Parkchester between 3 p.m. and 9 p.m. on weekdays, but on the Manhattan-bound platform.
  • From 6:30 a.m. to 10:30 a.m., the last stop for some 6 trains is St. Lawrence Avenue; to continue northbound, transfer to a Pelham Bay Park-bound 6 train at St. Lawrence Avenue.
  • From 3 p.m. to 9 p.m. on weekdays, the last stop for all 6 local trains is St. Lawrence Avenue; to continue northbound, transfer to a Pelham Bay Park-bound ^ express train at Hunts Point Avenue.
  • From 10:30 a.m. to 3 p.m., the last stop for some Bronx-bound 6 trains is 3rd Avenue-138th Street; to continue northbound, transfer to a Pelham Bay Park-bound 6 train.

And that’s that. Meanwhile, below are the rest of this weekend’s service changes. As always, these come to me via New York City Transit and are subject to change without notice. Listen to on-board announcements and pay attention to signs in your local station. For a map of these changes, check out Subway Weekender.


From 11:30 p.m. Friday, April 9 to 5 a.m. Monday, April 12, there are no 1 trains between 14th Street and South Ferry. The 23 trains provide alternate service, running local between 14th Street and Chambers Street. Free shuttle buses replace 1 trains between Chambers Street and South Ferry. Please note that during the day 1 trains skip 18th, 23rd, and 28th Streets in both directions. During the overnight hours, 1 trains skip 18th, 23rd, and 28th Streets only in the uptown direction. These service changes are due to Port Authority work at the World Trade Center site and concrete pours at 50th and 79th Streets.


From 11 p.m. Friday, April 9 to 5 a.m. Monday, April 12, 2/3 trains run local between 96th Street and Chambers Street due to concrete pours at 50th Street and 79th Street. Note: Overnight, 3 trains run local between 96th Street and 34th Street.


From 1 a.m. to 1 p.m. Sunday, April 11, downtown 4 trains run local from 125th Street to Grand Central-42nd Street due to track cable work.


From 6:30 a.m. to 1 p.m., Sunday, April 11, downtown 5 trains run local from 125th Street to Grand Central-42nd Street due to track cable work.


At all times until September 2010, the Whitlock Avenue and Morrison-Sound View Avs. stations are closed for rehabilitation. Customers should use the Elder Avenue 6 station or the Simpson Street 25 station instead. The Bx4 bus provides alternate connecting service between stations.


Beginning 12:01 a.m. Saturday, April 10, through 5 a.m. Monday, July 5, the Pelham Bay Park-bound 6 platform at Parkchester is closed for rehabilitation.


From 12:01 a.m. Saturday, April 10 to 5 a.m. Monday, April 12, downtown A trains run local from 168th Street to West 4th Street, then are rerouted on the F to Jay Street; trains resume local service on the A to Euclid Avenue, then continue on the regular A route to Lefferts Blvd or the Rockaways due to a concrete pour at West 4th Street.


From 12:01 a.m. Saturday, April 10 to 5 a.m. Monday, April 12, uptown A trains run local from Euclid Avenue to 168th Street due to a concrete pour at West 4th Street.


At all times until June 2010, the Far Rockaway-bound A platforms at Beach 60th Street and Beach 36th Street are closed for rehabilitations.


From 12:01 a.m. Saturday, April 10 to 5 a.m. Monday, April 12, there are no C trains running due to a concrete pour at West 4th Street. Customers should take the A instead. Please note: A trains run local with exceptions.


From 12:01 a.m. Saturday, April 10 to 5 a.m. Monday, April 12, Bronx-bound D trains run on the N line from Coney Island-Stillwell Avenue to 36th Street (Brooklyn) due to switch renewal north of 9th Avenue. Please note: During the day, Bronx-bound trains skip 53rd Street and 45th Street R stations.


From 11:30 p.m. Friday, April 9 to 5 a.m. Monday, April 12, free shuttle buses replace E trains between Jamaica Center and Union Turnpike due to switch renewal and asbestos abatement north of Sutphin Blvd. Please note: E trains are rerouted on the F line between Forest Hills-71st Avenue and 179th Street.


From 12:01 a.m. Saturday, April 10 to 12 noon Sunday, April 11, Manhattan-bound E trains run express from Forest Hills-71st Avenue to Roosevelt Avenue due to track cable work.


From 12:01 a.m. Saturday, April 10 to 5 a.m. Monday, April 12, Queens-bound F trains run on the A line from Jay Street to West 4th Street due to the Broadway-Lafayette to Bleecker Street Transfer construction.


From 12:01 a.m. to 12 noon Sunday, April 11, after leaving Roosevelt Avenue, Queens-bound F trains are rerouted to the E from Queens Plaza to 5th Avenue-53rd Street; trains resume service on the F at 47th-50th Sts. due to cable work at Roosevelt Island station.


From 8:30 a.m. Friday, April 9 to 5 a.m. Monday, April 12, there is no G train service between Forest Hills-71st Avenue and Court Square due to fan plant work near Queens Plaza. Customers should take the E or R instead. Note: Brooklyn-bound R trains run express from Forest Hills-71st Avenue to Roosevelt Avenue.


From 12:01 a.m. Saturday, April 10 to 5 a.m. Monday, April 12, Queens-bound N trains are rerouted to the R line from DeKalb Avenue to Canal Street due to track maintenance.


From 11 p.m. Friday, April 9 to 7 a.m. Saturday, April 10, from 11 p.m. Saturday, April 10 to 8 a.m. Sunday, April 11 and from 11 p.m. Sunday, April 11 to 5 a.m. Monday, April 12, uptown Q trains run local from Times Square-42nd Street to 57th Street-7th Avenue due to a track dig out north of Times Square.


From 12:01 a.m. Saturday, April 10 to 5 a.m. Monday, April 12, Manhattan-bound Q trains run on the R line from DeKalb Avenue to Canal Street due to track maintenance.


From 6:30 a.m. to midnight Saturday, April 10 and from 6:30 a.m. to 12 noon Sunday, April 11, Brooklyn-bound R trains run express from Forest Hills-71st Avenue to Roosevelt Avenue due to track cable work.


From 10:30 p.m. Friday, April 9 to 5 a.m. Monday, April 12, free shuttle buses replace Rockaway Park Shuttle S trains between Rockaway Park and Beach 67th Street due to station rehabilitation at Beach 98th Street.

April 9, 2010 2 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
AsidesMTA Economics

Funding transit through selling spare parts

by Benjamin Kabak April 9, 2010
written by Benjamin Kabak on April 9, 2010

The MTA has long recognized the collectors value in its spare and old parts. A rollsign from, say, the now-reefed R40s can command a pretty penny from those who enjoy subway memorabilia, and recently, the MTA has found value in dirt. Today, Heather Haddon from amNew York delves into the economics of the MTA’s recycling and reclamation programs. In addition to those pieces of subway history that Transit sells as memorabilia and collectibles – green and red station entrance globes, anyone? – the MTA, she says, can make millions selling old bus parts and recycling unused diesel fuel.

Interesting, she also highlights the MTA’s vast reserves of dirt. Currently, the authority is digging new tunnels under 11th and 2nd Aves. and the East River for various capital projects, and the agency has found itself with spare dirt on hand. “Developers of tennis courts,” Haddon writes, “and playgrounds are eager to scoop up pure dirt, and 100,000 tons of it from the East Side Access project was used to landscape the recently opened Pier 1 at Brooklyn Bridge Park.” That long-awaited project in Brooklyn will soon enjoy another 30,000 tons of dirt from the East Side Access tunnels. Who knew?

April 9, 2010 1 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Self Promotion

Listen live to Second Ave. Sagas on NYC Tracks

by Benjamin Kabak April 9, 2010
written by Benjamin Kabak on April 9, 2010

At 5 p.m. this afternoon, I’ll be making a Blog Talk Radio appearance to talk subways. I’m a guest on NYC Tracks’ weekly podcast. Coming out of the CUNY Journalism school, NYC Tracks is a new site focusing on the goings-on beneath city streets, and today’s podcast features amNew York’s Heather Haddon alongside yours truly.

The 30-minute show can be heard here in an hour, and the player embedded at right above will carry it as well. We’ll be discussing the week in transit news. So be sure to check that out.

April 9, 2010 0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
MTA Economics

MTA to cut $40 million from back-end projects

by Benjamin Kabak April 9, 2010
written by Benjamin Kabak on April 9, 2010

In a few months, the MTA will drastically scale back train and bus service throughout the New York region in an effort to close approximately $383 million of a $790 million budget gap. As the authority struggles to find savings to cover the remaining $378 million shortfall, CEO and Chair Jay Walder announced plans yesterday to save $40 million through cuts to projects that won’t impact service.

To achieve this goal, the authority has conducted what they call a “top-to-bottom review of every project in the operating budget to see what can be eliminated or put on hold.” To do this, the authority has cut or put on hold 141 non-essential projects that either are not required by law or are not necessary to maintain passenger safety or quality of service. This total includes nearly 50 percent of all projects originally slated for 2010.

On a generally level, these cuts are aimed at trimming the MTA’s fat. Thirty-five facility renovation projects are being shelved, including some that replace working parts with newer ones. The MTA will not be upgrading its fleet of employee vehicles, and 82 IT upgrades are being shelved for another year for a savings of $17 million.

Specifically, one major project designed to improve the MTA’s armrests on commuter rail lines will be deferred another year. The news of armrests snagging pants first came to my attention during the early days of Second Ave. Sagas, and in 2007, the authority vowed to fix it. Now, in order to save $3 million, the pants-ripping armrests will remain, and the authority will simply eat the $15,000 a year it pays in tailoring costs. “We’re going to rely on people to get used to the way the armrests are,” Walder said.

In the end, as MTA COO Charles Monheim said, “this is nuts-and-bolts stuff.” Yet, the MTA has to find another $338 million in savings. Walder is working to renegotiate vendor contracts and will soon meet with labor heads to discuss that situation. But it is, as the MTA recognizes, extremely tough to close an $800 million gap without raising fares or relying on a congestion pricing/bridge toll plan. Still, fare hikes remain off the table until 2010, the state legislature hasn’t acted on Pedro Espada’s bridge toll proposal yet, and the fat trimming will continue.

April 9, 2010 11 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Second Avenue Subway

The shape of Tunnel Boring Machines to come

by Benjamin Kabak April 9, 2010
written by Benjamin Kabak on April 9, 2010

Early last week, the MTA took us all for a visual trip inside the Second Ave. Subway launch box. With the starter tunnels nearly complete, the Capital Construction crews will soon lower the tunnel boring machine 60 feet under the ground to start the trip from 96th St. to the existing tunnels at 63rd St.

Yesterday, via its NYCTSubwayScoop Twitter account, Transit unveiled some information about the tunnel boring machine that will soon dig the city its long-awaited Second Ave. Subway. The picture above – courtesy of MTA Capital Construction – shows the tunnel boring machine currently at work digging out the 7 line extension. The one for Second Avenue is quite similar.

Per Transit, the TBM for the East Side dates from the late 1970s. It has been reconditioned and is now “like new.” Now on the way from Newark, the TBM was tested in New Jersey and will be reassembled in front of the starter tunnels underground. A new era in the New York City subway will soon be upon us.

For this particular tunnel boring machine, a trip underground in New York City is nothing new. This is the same TBM that dug out the 63rd St. tunnel a few decades ago. Now, it will reunite with that tunnel and activate currently unused tracks that connect to the BMT Broadway line. Most recently, this machine dug out the Fall River CSO in Massachusetts.

Over the next few weeks, I’ll have more on the tunnel boring machine and its launch date approaches. For now, I’ll leave you after the jump with two final images – again via Capital Construction – of the TBM underneath 11th Ave. The first shows the TBM getting pulled through the station cavern at 34th St., and the second shows the TBM’s trailing gear. Soon, we’ll have pictures similar to these but under Second Ave. as the phantom subway inches closer to reality.

Continue Reading
April 9, 2010 11 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
AsidesATUStaten Island

On snowy days, MTA sees too many sick days

by Benjamin Kabak April 8, 2010
written by Benjamin Kabak on April 8, 2010

Staten Island bus drivers have a snow day problem, according to New York City Transit. Based upon data from a few snowy days this February, more divers are calling in sick on snowy days, the Daily News reports today. According to Transit, more drivers than usual called in sick on February 9, the day of a major storm in the New York City area, and by the time the snow had settled, 88 drivers out of Castleton – or 21 percent of that depot’s drivers – had filed for a sick day, and 15 percent of drivers from Staten Island’s Yukon depot had done the same.

To fill these service gaps, the MTA had to turn to workers who collect overtime, and the cash-strapped authority isn’t too pleased with the potential sick-day abuse. “Clearly there are cases where people are taking advantage of sick-day policies, and when and where we are able, we’re going to go after those cases in a very serious way,” Jeremy Soffin, MTA spokesman, said to Pete Donohue.

Vinnie Serapiglia, a vice president at Amalgamated Transit Workers Union Local 726, defended drivers who life outside of the city and could have faced “tough commutes” back to their suburban houses in Pennsylvania or New Jersey. “I don’t understand the thinking of the transit authority. The guys come here and put their all into the job,” he said, “and it seems like they are constantly under attack by management.”

April 8, 2010 13 comments
1 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Subway Security

For cameras, looking at an in-house solution

by Benjamin Kabak April 8, 2010
written by Benjamin Kabak on April 8, 2010

Since the stabbing that left two people dead on a downtown 2 train nearly two weeks ago, much has been written about the MTA’s inadequate surveillance camera system. We know that the MTA and Lockheed Martin are in a legal battle over a system that hasn’t been implemented properly, and we’ve explored the benefits and limitations of subway security cameras. Today, amNew York has an interesting take on the situation. According to a Heather Haddon piece, the MTA’s in-house solution has worked much better than any outsourced plan.

Haddon discusses the two approaches and the economics behind it:

While hundreds of high-tech cameras that cost the MTA $20 million are broken, cheaper models installed a few years back are doing their job pretty well, amNewYork has learned. The simpler cameras, costing roughly half as much as the high-tech models that were contracted out, took about six months to install and have been used by police dozens of times to catch bank robbers and other criminals, elected officials say…

In 2006, the MTA signed a $20 million contract to install 900 high-tech cameras in 32 stations, including 14 in Manhattan. Those cameras were supposed to start rolling in 2008, but a key contractor went belly up that year, delaying the project, MTA spokesman Kevin Ortiz confirmed. “Since that time, the MTA … has continued to work to get the cameras online and all the locations will be fully operational by June of this year,” Ortiz said…

But the simpler system designed and maintained in-house has been nabbing criminals for years. In 2005, Assemb. Dov Hikind, (D-Brooklyn), allocated $1.2 million to get 120 closed-circuit cameras up in nine borough stations on the D, R and N lines. The system features $400 Panasonic closed circuit cameras on the platforms, mezzanines and stairways, capturing more angles than the other MTA devices, which point at entrances and turnstiles, union officials say. The recording device costs about $15,000 at each station.

If my math is correct, the MTA is paying $20 million to install cameras that, if developed in-house, would cost approximately $840,000 (32 stations at $15,000 a piece and 900 cameras at $400 each). I don’t have the details about the system developed with Lockheed, and I have to imagine it included some sensitive security measures that extended beyond just video surveillance. But I have to wonder too if, sometimes, the MTA is just trying too hard. If the in-house solution works and is cheaper, why throw out the baby with the bathwater?

April 8, 2010 6 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
View from Underground

Treating the trains as we would our kitchen

by Benjamin Kabak April 8, 2010
written by Benjamin Kabak on April 8, 2010

This past Sunday night, I found myself on a reasonably crowded 2 train heading from the Upper West Side to Park Slope. As the train went local and slowly snaked its way down the West Side, I had ample opportunity to surreptitiously survey the scene. What struck my fancy was something quite disgusting.

Sitting across the car from me where a family traveling together. The young parents had their daughter — maybe five or six years old — in tow, and she was trying to chow down on some fast food chicken fingers and fries. At one point, the girl spilled half of the box of food on the floor, and as her dad leaned over to inspect the damage, I was sure he would sweep it up into the plastic bag he had with him. Instead, he pushed the fries and chicken under the seat, and as the train continued onward, every few minutes, he would kick more of the food under the seat, grinding it into mush in the process. I was disgusted.

Eventually, the three exited the train, and I turned to my girlfriend, who also witnessed this display with similar disgust. “Do you think,” I asked, “they do that at home when they drop something on their kitchen floor?” I often find it easier just to kick food under the table than it is to own up and clean it up. Don’t you?

This behavior isn’t rare in the subways. People think they can just abdicate responsibility for their actions because, hey, someone else will have to clean it up. Rampant rudeness on trains is a known problem, and websites such as Train Pigs document those who eat and litter underground. Yet, it shouldn’t be like that.

New York City Transit’s trains are a shared space in the city. No matter our upbringing, our class, our socioeconomic position in the city, we ride the trains to get from Point A to Point B in a cheap, fast and environmentally friendly way. The trains, then, are only as clean as we make them. We can blame the MTA for its lack of garbage cans — a problem at stations with one entrance — and we can question the decision to skimp on station cleaners amidst an economic crisis.

Still, the fact remains that we the riders should be the ones who clean up after ourselves. We shouldn’t ignore food that spills, and maybe we shouldn’t let others off the hook either. I didn’t say anything to the family that spilled dinner on the floor and then tried to kick away. I let them off the train with just a glare, and others did the same. No one wanted to pick a fight, and we all faced the typical collective action problem. It was, we though, someone else’s problem.

Maybe, though, had one person said something, we could have shamed that family into doing the right thing. We could have let them know that we saw what they did and how they tried to cover it up. We could have told them that we knew they were taking a shared city resource, something upon which we all depend and something we all want to see clean, and sullying it through rude behavior. But we didn’t.

The MTA urges people to take their trash with them, and yet, many do not. Perhaps, we should urge people to treat train floors as they would their kitchen. When I spill something in the kitchen, I don’t kick it under the counter and hope no one notices. I clean it up because it’s what we are supposed to do at home and what we should also do on the trains.

April 8, 2010 34 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Load More Posts

About The Author

Name: Benjamin Kabak
E-mail: Contact Me

Become a Patron!
Follow @2AvSagas

Upcoming Events
TBD

RSS? Yes, Please: SAS' RSS Feed
SAS In Your Inbox: Subscribe to SAS by E-mail

Instagram



Disclaimer: Subway Map © Metropolitan Transportation Authority. Used with permission. MTA is not associated with nor does it endorse this website or its content.

Categories

  • 14th Street Busway (1)
  • 7 Line Extension (118)
  • Abandoned Stations (31)
  • ARC Tunnel (52)
  • Arts for Transit (19)
  • Asides (1,244)
  • Bronx (13)
  • Brooklyn (126)
  • Brooklyn-Queens Connector (13)
  • Buses (291)
  • Capital Program 2010-2014 (27)
  • Capital Program 2015-2019 (56)
  • Capital Program 2020-2024 (3)
  • Congestion Fee (71)
  • East Side Access Project (37)
  • F Express Plan (22)
  • Fare Hikes (173)
  • Fulton Street (57)
  • Gateway Tunnel (29)
  • High-Speed Rail (9)
  • Hudson Yards (18)
  • Interborough Express (1)
  • International Subways (26)
  • L Train Shutdown (20)
  • LIRR (65)
  • Manhattan (73)
  • Metro-North (99)
  • MetroCard (124)
  • Moynihan Station (16)
  • MTA (98)
  • MTA Absurdity (233)
  • MTA Bridges and Tunnels (27)
  • MTA Construction (128)
  • MTA Economics (522)
    • Doomsday Budget (74)
    • Ravitch Commission (23)
  • MTA Politics (330)
  • MTA Technology (195)
  • New Jersey Transit (53)
  • New York City Transit (220)
  • OMNY (3)
  • PANYNJ (113)
  • Paratransit (10)
  • Penn Station (18)
  • Penn Station Access (10)
  • Podcast (30)
  • Public Transit Policy (164)
  • Queens (129)
  • Rider Report Cards (31)
  • Rolling Stock (40)
  • Second Avenue Subway (262)
  • Self Promotion (77)
  • Service Advisories (612)
  • Service Cuts (118)
  • Sponsored Post (1)
  • Staten Island (52)
  • Straphangers Campaign (40)
  • Subway Advertising (45)
  • Subway Cell Service (34)
  • Subway History (81)
  • Subway Maps (83)
  • Subway Movies (14)
  • Subway Romance (13)
  • Subway Security (104)
  • Superstorm Sandy (35)
  • Taxis (43)
  • Transit Labor (151)
    • ATU (4)
    • TWU (100)
    • UTU (8)
  • Triboro RX (4)
  • U.S. Transit Systems (53)
    • BART (1)
    • Capital Metro (1)
    • CTA (7)
    • MBTA (11)
    • SEPTA (5)
    • WMATA (28)
  • View from Underground (447)

Archives

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram

@2019 - All Right Reserved.


Back To Top