Second Ave. Sagas
  • About
  • Contact Me
  • 2nd Ave. Subway History
  • Search
  • About
  • Contact Me
  • 2nd Ave. Subway History
  • Search
Second Ave. Sagas

News and Views on New York City Transportation

Transit Labor

Did a union protest slow down Friday bus service?

by Benjamin Kabak March 30, 2010
written by Benjamin Kabak on March 30, 2010

When the MTA Board voted to cut hundreds of unionized station agents, TWU President John Samuelsen vowed to fight the cuts. On Friday, according to one report, he and other TWU members may have begun that fight with a procedural move that slowed down bus service in Queens during the morning commute.

According to Pete Donohue of The Daily News, a series of spot inspections at the College Point bus depot led to 16 route cancellations and 64 delays of over an hour as Queens commuters waiting for the bus. Some union leaders claimed this move was simply for the security and safety of drivers and passengers while others said it was a strike at the MTA. Writes Donohue:

Before dawn at the College Point bus depot, union officers conducted spot inspections on buses heading to the only exit. Citing equipment defects, union officers and staff delayed 64 buses by more than an hour, the Metropolitan Transportation Authority confirmed. The scheduled runs of an additional 16 buses were canceled by managers because of the logjam, the MTA said. All told, about one-third of the depot’s available fleet was affected by what sources said was the biggest action of its kind in years….

[Samuelsen] maintained the equipment inspections were not connected to MTA plans to let go up to 500 token booth clerks and bus drivers later this year. “The union has an obligation to provide a safe workplace for our members and a safe bus for the riders, and by doing these inspections, we’re living up to our obligation,” Samuelsen said.

The union inspections Friday did reveal numerous defects in turn signals, wheelchair lifts and headlights, Samuelsen claimed. But a source familiar with the inspections acknowledged, “This is the union’s way of flexing its muscles.” Since January, the union has conducted several bus checks at other depots, according to the union. While it’s illegal for a union to intentionally slow service as a show of force, it can be difficult to prove.

These allegations remind me of my bus experiences on Saturday night. I rode the B71 — a route soon to be eliminated — from Park Slope to Carroll Gardens, and as my girlfriend and I prepared to exit the bus, we started chatting with the driver about the impending extinction of his bus. He started bemoaning the high salaries earned by those at the top of the MTA management chain and said that those people should take paycuts first. I didn’t want to start a debate by telling him that those managers are taking cuts and losing jobs while any remaining TWU employees will get to enjoy their raises this year. We had to get off the bus, and it wasn’t worth the fight.

Still, as the union may or may not be hitting back at the MTA, the truth remains that, until Albany finds a way to fund public transportation in New York City, everyone will feel the pain. Management will be reduced; union members will lose their jobs; passengers will see bus and subway service cut. Sometimes, we fall into a “union-vs.-management” framework, but as long as the MTA remains on the edge of financial ruin, everyone loses.

March 30, 2010 6 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
AsidesSubway Security

Could a station agent have prevented the 2 train stabbings?

by Benjamin Kabak March 30, 2010
written by Benjamin Kabak on March 30, 2010

Unfortunately for the MTA, this Sunday’s 2 train stabbings led to a renewed focus on the authority’s plan to eliminate station agents. Although the actual murder took place aboard the 2 train in between 14th and Christopher Sts., some of the perps escaped via the southbound platform at Christopher St. while the others left at Houston, and both of those platforms are currently without station agents. Today, in the Daily News, Pete Donohue and Barry Paddock ask if station agents could have helped the solve the crime.

The answer to that question is both yes and no. As with the cameras I explored this morning, a station agent who happened to see the allegedly killers exit the station would have been able to provide a description to the police. Yet, we shouldn’t think that the station agent would have stopped this crime. The stabbings occurred on a train well out of sight from any MTA employee, and this seemingly heat-of-passion killing seems to have been nearly unavoidable. When we consider as well that station agents are not allowed to leave their booths, the best we could hope for is a more accurate description of the still-at-large killers. How to balance those surveillance needs with the MTA’s budgetary woes is a problem facing the authority right now.

March 30, 2010 3 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Subway Security

The benefits and limitations of subway security cameras

by Benjamin Kabak March 30, 2010
written by Benjamin Kabak on March 30, 2010

Over the last few months, we’ve heard a lot about the MTA’s efforts at securing its system. A ongoing lawsuit against Lockheed Martin has left the current state of subway security in disarray, and approximately half of the system’s 4300 cameras do not work properly. Had everything gone according to plan, by now, the entire subway system would have been outfitted with closed-circuit security cameras.

Generally, this halting attempt at installing cameras doesn’t impact the public. We’ll ride the trains no matter what and hope for the best. But this weekend, two stories highlight both the benefits and limitations of subway security cameras. The first happened right here in New York when a stabbing on Sunday morning left two riders dead and the cops on the hunt for a killer. The NYPD’s efforts have been slowed by the lack of adequate security measures underground.

As Ray Rivera and Michael Grynbaum write in The Times today, Christopher St. — the station through which the alleged perp escaped — has no cameras, and overall, the system’s video surveillance system “remains a patchwork of lifeless cameras, unequipped stations and problem-plagued wiring.”

MTA and New York City officials are aware of the system’s shortcomings. “This definitely should have been recorded on surveillance camera,” Norman Seabrook, head of the MTA’s security committee, said to The Times “Post-9/11, the terrorist bombings that just occurred in Moscow, the two murders that just occurred plus other incidents that continue to occur in the subway system, we cannot wait any longer to ensure the safety of the public.”

Yet, the Moscow bombings, despite Seabrook’s concern, highlight just how useless security cameras can be. During the Monday morning rush hour, two suicide bombers detonated explosives in the Moscow Metro. The bombers are suspected to be a part of some Northern Caucasus separatist groups, and the blasts raised fears through Russia and the rest of the world.

In New York, the NYPD rushed to “activate” a security plan, Reuters reported on Monday. Police details flooded the subway system, and squads were dispatched to major transit hubs around the city. Although there was no suspected link between America’s enemies and the Russian attackers, the city wanted to maintain a strong security footing. It was, MTA spokesman Jeremy Soffin said to amNew York, a “precaution.”

Yet, I wonder if this response is more an example of wishful thinking and the limitations we run up against in defending an open and porous subway system than it is of precaution. By dispatching police after the fact, it is as though security officials are trying to close the barn door after the horse escaped. As former NYPD commissioner Howard Safir said to Heather Haddon, “There are so many entrances, so many stations, so many people. It’s virtually impossible to guarantee that it won’t be vulnerable.”

So where then does that leave New Yorkers on a daily basis? On the one hand, a killer is still at large because he was able to slip out of an unsecured subway system after stabbing two or three men on a subway train car that is surveillance-free. On the other, we are aware of the security risks we face as we ride the trains and now that, while exceedingly rare, a terrorist attack underground can be a devastating and tragic event. As station agents vanish and security dollars languish, the MTA must do what it can to guard against both kinds of subway attacks.

March 30, 2010 7 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Subway Security

A Sunday morning stabbing on the 2 train

by Benjamin Kabak March 29, 2010
written by Benjamin Kabak on March 29, 2010

As Saturday night turned into Sunday morning, two men were fatally stabbed on a Brooklyn-bound 2 train. What happened on the train remains something of a mystery, but as more information comes to light, the tale is a particularly grisly one.

I first saw the news in The Times on Sunday morning when it was nothing more than a short report from the Associated Press. By the evening, their reporting had turned into a longer story with some details. Two groups of young men boarded the Brooklyn-bound 2 train making local stops. The first got on at 42nd St; the second got off later.

Somewhere in between 14th St. and Christopher St., Darnell Morel and Ricardo Williams were stabbed multiple times, and police stopped the train at Houston St. The assailants fled, and the two victims were both pronounced dead on arrival at St. Vincent. A third stabbing victim, says the report, remains in stable condition at the hospital.

The Daily News and The Post provided different takes on the story with the help of the victims’ friends. Apparently, ten friends were on the way back from a night out at the Cellar Bar in the Bryant Park Hotel. At 14th St., one of the group threw a bag of garbage out of the train car and hit another passenger on the platform. He and his three friends got agitated and pulled a knife. As the group tried to calm down the potential assailant, Morel and Williams were stabbed. “When we left, he stood banging on the glass with the knife in his hand,” Bryan Woods, a friend of the two victims, said to The Daily News. “[He was] laughing like he knew he got one of us.”

Cops are still looking for alleged attackers and are trying to piece together a more complete story. Both Morel and Williams, reported The Times, had arrest records. For the papers, this is a story of the city’s increased homicide rate. The subways, relatively crime-free for years, haven’t seen a spike in petty crime, but across the city, the murder rate has been climbing. Is it, as some bemoan, a return to the 1980s? “I feel like the city is losing its grip,” Liz McCarvill, a West Village resident, said to The Post. “I have to take the subway at 4:30 in the morning to get to the airport. It’ll be me and the people who kill each other.”

That is, I think, an overstatement borne out of fear when someone is attacked and murdered on your train. I ride the 2 train regularly, and I knkow McCarvill’s concerns. Still, what happened yesterday morning is similar to the murder that took place on the D train in November. There, one rider refused to remove his bags from a seat for another rider, and that other rider killed his co-straphanger over a seat. The lessons I offered up in November served as a reminder to be wary of those around you on the train. Most New Yorkers are calm and collected; they won’t snap at an obvious mistake. But the one guy out of 100 who does can mean harm.

I want to know more about this garbage bag that was tossed from a train and the reaction of the alleged killers to that bag. The subways and streets of new york City are safe, but sometimes safety can lead to complacency. A tragedy on the 2 train yesterday didn’t need to happen.

March 29, 2010 7 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
AsidesMTA Economics

Ravitch: MTA is in ‘serious trouble’

by Benjamin Kabak March 29, 2010
written by Benjamin Kabak on March 29, 2010

For those regular readers of SAS, the latest from Richard Ravitch isn’t shocking, but it’s a warning sign nonetheless. In an interview with The Post last week, the current Lieutenant Governor and one-time MTA head expressed fears over the financial future of the MTA. “I don’t see much basis for hope. I’m very concerned,” he told Tom Namako and Carl Campanile. With real estate tax revenues for 2010 already $18 million under projection, the authority is going to have to scramble throughout the year to stay afloat, and Ravitch, the architect of last year’s funding plan, doesn’t see anyone in Albany stepping up to bat for the authority any time soon.

So what is the MTA to do? It can’t declare bankruptcy; it can’t absolve itself of old capital debts or current employment agreements. It can continue to cut services, but cutting our bus and subway options would risk incurring the wrath of commuters. It can also look to raise fares, a certainty for 2011 but an idea that hasn’t gained much traction this year. No matter the path, though, 2010 will be a struggle for the MTA at a time when New York City most needs its transit options.

March 29, 2010 12 comments
1 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
AsidesHudson Yards

Hudson Yards closing delayed again

by Benjamin Kabak March 29, 2010
written by Benjamin Kabak on March 29, 2010

Another Hudson Yards deadline is fast approaching that the MTA and Related will miss. After postponing the planned 2009 closing to Jan. 31, 2010 and then pushing it back again to March 31, the two sides have again agreed to delay the signing of the contract, The Observer reports. According to Eliot Brown, the two sides are now targeting an April 30 date as “the process of readying the legal documents has dragged on.”

While officials know it will take decades for Related to develop the area, for the MTA, the concerns here are in the dollars. Initially, Related was to start making installments of the $1 billion it will owe the MTA over the next century last year, but as Brown reports, “now the firm will not have to close on the deal until the economy hits certain specific benchmarks, showing improvements in such areas as vacancy rates.” At some point soon, Related will pay the MTA $43.5 million as an initial payment, and the real estate company has invested heavily in the site already. But the longer these negotiations drag on, the more the value of missed payments to MTA just grows and grows.

March 29, 2010 0 comment
1 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Second Avenue Subway

A launch box and art for a subway in progress

by Benjamin Kabak March 29, 2010
written by Benjamin Kabak on March 29, 2010

A glimpse inside the Second Ave. subway tunnel-boring machine launch box. (All photos by Patrick J. Cashin/MTA)

Over the last few years, as MTA construction crews have slowly turned Second Ave. into a battle zone, many New Yorkers have looked upon the decades-long Second Ave. Subway as a fantasy. It is the city’s Moby Dick, and even as Captain Ahab approaches his target, nothing, many argue, is going on. Buildings rumbling from the blasting, but progress, at least above-ground, can sometimes appear nearly non-existent.

This Friday, the MTA unveiled a series of photos from underground. In a few weeks, the Second Ave. subway tunnel-boring machine will be lowered into its launch box, and drilling from 92nd St. south to 63rd St. will begin. The city will be one step closer to a badly-needed subway line when that TBM begins its own trek downtown.

The photos are all available on the MTA’s facebook page, and they’re fairly stunning. Besides the one above of the starter tunnel, the authority has posted numerous glimpses inside the construction shaft, approximately 60 feet below ground. Take a peek:

Here, we can see why work above ground has been slow. The MTA had to shore up support walls in the launch box and relocate numerous unmapped utility lines that have connected the Upper East Side to the city’s water, sewer, gas and electricity systems. This is delicate and important work. Eventually, these utility tunnels will be enclosed after the MTA fills in the launch box area.

In this photo, as Ben from The Launch Box noted, the norther end of the launch box at 95th St. is visible in the distance. One day, this will be a part of the 96th St. station along the Second Ave. Subway.

As workers underground prepare for the TBM, other MTA officials are trying to prepare for a new subway system as well. Just last week, in fact, Arts for Transit put out a Call for Artists for the new areas of the 63rd St. station at Lexington Ave. that will be open to the public in 2016. The Call is available here as a PDF, and the document highlights how the MTA plans to use parts of the current station to integrate SAS service and provide a transfer to the F train.

This station originally opened in 1989, and while two platforms are accessible today to the public, two more are hiding behind temporary walls. Says Arts for Transit, “The new work related to the Second Avenue Project will involve removing the existing platform dividing walls and opening up both upper and lower platforms to create a four-track-station. To serve this enlarged station, the existing upper mezzanine on the east end (which has been left unfinished since construction) will be opened with new finishes. New station entrances will be constructed at the intersection of Third Ave and 63rd Street in Manhattan.”

As the new stations come online, Arts for Transit will leave its mark. The agency says that they will have 3000 feet of wall space in the new mezzanines, and artists may turn in their portfolios this week. Arts for Transit will select some artists later this year, and construction will start 12-18 months later.

One day, it seems, a part of the Second Ave. Subway will open, and New Yorkers will realize a dream deferred for over eight decades. Who knows if Phase II will see the light of day? Who can say if the T will eventually travel from Chatham Square to 125th St. and back? For now, though, progress continues whether we see it or not.

March 29, 2010 18 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Service Advisories

Weekend service changes

by Benjamin Kabak March 26, 2010
written by Benjamin Kabak on March 26, 2010

Light weekend this week. As always, these come to me from the MTA and are subject to change without notice. Check signs at your local station and listen to on-board announcements.


From 11:30 p.m. Friday, March 26 to 5 a.m. Monday, March 29, there are no 1 trains between 14th Street and South Ferry. The 23 trains run local between 14th Street and Chambers Street. Free shuttle buses replace 1 trains between Chambers Street and South Ferry. Please note that during the day 1 trains skip 18th, 23rd, and 28th Streets in both directions. During the overnight hours, 1 trains skip 18th, 23rd, and 28th Streets only in the uptown directions. These service changes are due to Port Authority work at the World Trade Center site and concrete pours at 50th Street and 79th Streets.


From 5 a.m. to 12 noon, Sunday, March 28, downtown 2 trains skip Jackson Avenue due to track engineering near Jackson Avenue.


From 11 p.m. Friday, March 26 to 5 a.m. Monday, March 29, 2 and 3 trains run local from 96th Street to Chambers Street due to concrete pours at 50th Street and 79th Street.


From 9 a.m. to 4 p.m. Saturday, March 27 and Sunday, March 28, uptown 4 trains run express from 167th Street to Mosholu Parkway (with stops at Burnside Avenue) due to switch repairs at Burnside Avenue.


From 6:30 a.m. to 12 noon, Sunday, March 28, there are no 5 trains between 149th Street-Grand Concourse and East 180th Street due to track engineering near Jackson Avenue. Customers should take the 2 instead.


From 12:01 a.m. Saturday, March 27 to 5 a.m. Monday, March 29, uptown A trains run local from Euclid Avenue to Canal Street, then express from Canal Street to 145th Street, then local from 145th Street to 168th Street and then regular A service to Inwood-207th Street. These changes are due to the Chambers Street Signal Modernization Project. Note: From 12:01 a.m. to 5:30 a.m., Sunday, March 28, uptown A trains skip 155th and 163rd Streets due to track cleaning.


From 12:01 a.m. Saturday, March 27 to 5 a.m. Monday, March 29, downtown A trains run local from 168th Street to 145th Street, then express from 145th Street to 59th Street-Columbus Circle, then local from 59th Street to West 4th Street, then the A is rerouted to the F line between West 4th and Jay Streets. Trains resume local service on the A from Jay Street to Euclid Avenue and regular A service from Euclid Avenue to Lefferts Blvd or Far Rockaway-Mott Avenue. This is due to the Chambers Street Signal Modernization Project.


From 12:01 a.m. Saturday, March 27 to 5 a.m. Monday, March 29, there is no C train service due to the Chambers Street Signal Modernization Project. Customers may take the A or D instead. Note: D trains run local between 145th Street and 59th Street. A trains run local with exceptions.


From 12:01 a.m. Saturday, March 27 to 5 a.m. Monday, March 29, D trains run local between 59th Street and 145th Street due to the Chambers Street Signal Modernization Project and the Broadway-Lafayette to Bleecker Street transfer construction.


From 12:01 a.m. to 5 a.m. Saturday, March 27, downtown D trains skip 182nd-183rd Sts. due to track cleaning.


From 12:01 a.m. to 5 a.m. Sunday, March 28, downtown D trains skip 174th -175th and 170th Streets due to track cleaning.


From 12:01 a.m. Saturday, March 27 to 5 a.m. Monday, March 29, downtown-bound F trains skip 23rd and 14th Streets due to a substation rehabilitation.


From 12:01 a.m. Saturday, March 27 to 5 a.m. Monday, March 29, uptown F trains run on the A line from Jay Street to West 4th Street due to the Broadway-Lafayette to Bleecker Street transfer construction.


From 11 p.m. Friday, March 26 to 7 a.m. Saturday, March 27, from 11 p.m. Saturday, March 27 to 8 a.m. Sunday, March 28 and from 11 p.m. Sunday, March 28 to 5 a.m. Monday, March 29, uptown Q trains run local from Times Square-42nd Street to 57th Street/7th Avenue due to a track dig-out north of 42nd Street-Times Square.

March 26, 2010 0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Service CutsSubway Security

Station agent calls: a lot or too few?

by Benjamin Kabak March 26, 2010
written by Benjamin Kabak on March 26, 2010

As part of its service cuts, the MTA is eliminating over 600 station agents throughout the system. While the authority will have at least one agent at every station at all times, the 2400 agents will be stretched thin, and numerous stops — such as those that are one way only and do not feature an in-system crossover — will be with the bare minimum of agent eyes.

Over the last few months, as these cuts have come into focus, the debate has often centered around the usefulness of the station agents, and today, the Daily News sheds some light on the issue. Station agents, reports Pete Donohue, have placed over 500,000 emergency calls over the last three years. That’s a lot, right?

Well, let’s do some math. In 2009, agents placed 150,624 calls. Some of those, notes Donohue, are follow-up calls to let dispatch know that the problem has been resolved. But we can assume that’s the base number. With 365 days in the year, that averages out to 412 calls per day. There are 422 subway stations throughout the system. So on average each station is reporting slightly less than one emergency per day.

With seven million straphangers passing through the MTA’s turnstiles each day, those 412 phone calls seem rather de minimus. Furthermore, the station agents won’t be entirely eliminated. There will still be 2400 agents staffing the system, and each station, as I said above, will be staffed at all hours. A few people might feel less safe; a few people might be more inconvenienced. I can’t help but think, however, that the concerns about safety expressed by rider advocates are more than a little overblown.

An artistic station agent drew the sign above. It was photographed by flickr user bitchcakesny.

March 26, 2010 13 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
MTA Economics

Former Bear Stears exec, MTA debt expert named CFO

by Benjamin Kabak March 26, 2010
written by Benjamin Kabak on March 26, 2010

The MTA announced this morning that former Bear Sterns executive and MTA debt expert Robert Foran has been the authority’s new Chief Financial Officer. The Harvard MBA is taking over the position at a time when the agency is rife with financial strife and facing a debt crisis of historic proportions.

“Bob’s expertise in municipal finance is unparalleled and his experience with the MTA means that he will hit the ground running,” MTA Chairman and CEO Jay H. Walder said in a statement. “His arrival will be critical in helping guide the MTA through one of the most difficult financial periods in its history.”

Foran is taking over from Gary Dellaverson who stepped down in January. Although the MTA’s own release didn’t contain much on Foran’s background, Business Week’s Martin Z. Braun profiled the new CFO in an extensive article published today. In one sense, Foran is coming in to help clean up a debt situation he helped to create. Writes Braun:

When the MTA faced a $4 billion gap in its five-year capital program in 2000 after voters rejected a transportation bond measure, Foran and Bear Stearns engineered a debt restructuring that allowed the agency to continue to finance long-term projects such as the Second Avenue subway without raising fares. “The question was, was there a way to raise that capital with the existing resources that the MTA had, because Albany was not going to give them any more money,” Foran said.

Bear Stearns’s role drew criticism in a New York Times article after his bank earned tens of millions of dollars in underwriting fees for advising the MTA on the restructuring. Budget watchers such as Brecher also said the financing reduced debt service costs in the short run while pushing expenses into the future…Both Walder and Foran said the restructuring should be judged as a success because it raised the MTA’s revenue-bond credit rating to A from BBB+ and lowered borrowing costs.

While debt service costs were shifted to the future, the financing freed up enough revenue so the MTA could issue $3 billion of new debt and release $1 billion of reserve funds, Foran said. The agency’s overall debt-service burden did increase because the average life of the borrowings increased, said Foran.

“The $4 billion additional debt that we were able to sell was for assets that were going to have lives much much longer than 30 years,” he said.

Last month, the MTA had the credit rating on more than $12 billion of bonds cut by Moody’s Investors Service to A3, the fourth-lowest investment grade, from A2 with a negative outlook, after the agency said it may collect $350 million less than projected from a new payroll tax. The MTA has $28.6 billion of outstanding debt.

Despite this seemingly daunting task, Foran told Business Week that he is up for the job. “I know the MTA probably better than any other client that I worked with,” he said, “and I think the greatest value I can add is to work with the MTA right now.”

With the agency staring down a $751 million gap in its operating budget and a $10 billion funding gap in its next five-year capital plan, Foran will have to hit the ground running. The future of transportation in New York City is in his hands.

March 26, 2010 18 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Load More Posts

About The Author

Name: Benjamin Kabak
E-mail: Contact Me

Become a Patron!
Follow @2AvSagas

Upcoming Events
TBD

RSS? Yes, Please: SAS' RSS Feed
SAS In Your Inbox: Subscribe to SAS by E-mail

Instagram



Disclaimer: Subway Map © Metropolitan Transportation Authority. Used with permission. MTA is not associated with nor does it endorse this website or its content.

Categories

  • 14th Street Busway (1)
  • 7 Line Extension (118)
  • Abandoned Stations (31)
  • ARC Tunnel (52)
  • Arts for Transit (19)
  • Asides (1,244)
  • Bronx (13)
  • Brooklyn (126)
  • Brooklyn-Queens Connector (13)
  • Buses (291)
  • Capital Program 2010-2014 (27)
  • Capital Program 2015-2019 (56)
  • Capital Program 2020-2024 (3)
  • Congestion Fee (71)
  • East Side Access Project (37)
  • F Express Plan (22)
  • Fare Hikes (173)
  • Fulton Street (57)
  • Gateway Tunnel (29)
  • High-Speed Rail (9)
  • Hudson Yards (18)
  • Interborough Express (1)
  • International Subways (26)
  • L Train Shutdown (20)
  • LIRR (65)
  • Manhattan (73)
  • Metro-North (99)
  • MetroCard (124)
  • Moynihan Station (16)
  • MTA (98)
  • MTA Absurdity (233)
  • MTA Bridges and Tunnels (27)
  • MTA Construction (128)
  • MTA Economics (522)
    • Doomsday Budget (74)
    • Ravitch Commission (23)
  • MTA Politics (330)
  • MTA Technology (195)
  • New Jersey Transit (53)
  • New York City Transit (220)
  • OMNY (3)
  • PANYNJ (113)
  • Paratransit (10)
  • Penn Station (18)
  • Penn Station Access (10)
  • Podcast (30)
  • Public Transit Policy (164)
  • Queens (129)
  • Rider Report Cards (31)
  • Rolling Stock (40)
  • Second Avenue Subway (262)
  • Self Promotion (77)
  • Service Advisories (612)
  • Service Cuts (118)
  • Sponsored Post (1)
  • Staten Island (52)
  • Straphangers Campaign (40)
  • Subway Advertising (45)
  • Subway Cell Service (34)
  • Subway History (81)
  • Subway Maps (83)
  • Subway Movies (14)
  • Subway Romance (13)
  • Subway Security (104)
  • Superstorm Sandy (35)
  • Taxis (43)
  • Transit Labor (151)
    • ATU (4)
    • TWU (100)
    • UTU (8)
  • Triboro RX (4)
  • U.S. Transit Systems (53)
    • BART (1)
    • Capital Metro (1)
    • CTA (7)
    • MBTA (11)
    • SEPTA (5)
    • WMATA (28)
  • View from Underground (447)

Archives

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram

@2019 - All Right Reserved.


Back To Top