Second Ave. Sagas
  • About
  • Contact Me
  • 2nd Ave. Subway History
  • Search
  • About
  • Contact Me
  • 2nd Ave. Subway History
  • Search
Second Ave. Sagas

News and Views on New York City Transportation

Subway Security

Replacing the station agents before they’re eliminated

by Benjamin Kabak March 10, 2010
written by Benjamin Kabak on March 10, 2010

Currently, New York City’s 422 subway stations are staffed by 3000 station agents. These folks are supposed to serve as the eyes and ears of the MTA. They sit in their booths to help passengers in need, assist those who can’t negotiate the turnstiles and, ideally, guard against crime. In a few months, their numbers will drop by 450, and although every station will still be staffed, people will be inconvenienced.

For the MTA, the elimination of station agents should allow them more flexibility. Many of the station agents provide help that can be centralized. For example, if a person in a wheelchair or with a stroller needs to use the emergency exit, that person could readily call an MTA employee at a centralized location who could, with the use of closed-circuit camera technology, verify the need for help and press a button to activate the emergency door. This employee could oversee multiple stations at once, and the agency wouldn’t need to staff the stations with as many people. The same can be down for people who need directions as well.

In fact, the MTA has already been promoting their Customer Assistance Intercoms as solutions for those straphangers who encounter an agent-less station. Bright red signs direct customers to the intercoms, and on the other end should be another station agent who can offer assistance. The problem, reports amNew York’s Heather Haddon is that these intercoms are hard to find and don’t always work.

The subway intercoms that straphangers must increasingly rely on for help have left many riders stumped about how to use them — if they can find them at all. “I’ve never noticed it,” said Queens rider Maryanne Bannon, 58. “Most New Yorkers are not trained for this.”

…In a small survey of straphangers by amNewYork, no one was familiar with the rather cryptic-looking boxes. “They have to come up with a better design. It’s not consumer friendly,” said Karl Kronebusch, 54, a Park Slope rider.

Even MTA CEO Jay Walder recently admitted that he had a hard time finding the intercom in a station he frequents, saying he was “disappointed” by the obscure system. “We’ve almost hidden them away,” Walder said last week.

The boxes also periodically break, with an entire bank of them out recently, union officials said. Furthermore, many stations where the station agents are being removed don’t have the safety devices installed yet, said MTA board member Andrew Albert. “Before we remove booth agents, we should have a method of contacting the police,” Albert said.

Albert’s quote speaks for itself. The MTA has chosen to replace people with a centralized system, but they’ve done so in an obtuse way. Transit needs to install easy-to-see intercom boxes in convenient places, and the agency must ensure that someone is always on the other end. Many college campuses have a blue light phone system, and the MTA should use that visible approach as inspiration.

As more station agents are eliminated, riders may encounter more problems with their commutes. As station agents seemingly field only a handful of requests a shift, it may seem that not many will be inconvenienced, but a few people per day will quickly add up.

March 10, 2010 3 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
MTA EconomicsMTA Politics

How the state robs from the MTA

by Benjamin Kabak March 9, 2010
written by Benjamin Kabak on March 9, 2010

Albany lawmakers used money that should have gone to the MTA to fund other state obligations. (Source: Streetsblog)

When Albany approved a series of emergency budget reappropriations in late November, they did so under the public guise of a deficit. The money wasn’t there, they said, and so they had to take away over $100 million from the MTA.

At the time, an MTA press release sort of highlighted how the state hadn’t been broke but had basically stolen the money for the MTA and reappropriated it. “This is the first time that an existing appropriation to the MTA from dedicated MTA taxes has been reduced after collection by the state,” the release said.

Today, Ben Fried and John Kaehny at Streetsblog explain how this accounting sleight of hand amounts to state-sponsored robbery. Albany took money that should have gone to the MTA and simply moved it to another account. Talk about your two sets of books.

I’ll quote at length what the two had to say, but do visit Streetsblog if you don’t already:

The overwhelming majority of the $143 million reduction in transit funding did not originate from the state budget. Instead, Albany took dedicated transit tax revenues from the MTA and redirected them to the state’s general fund. In effect, Albany stole $118 million from transit to subsidize the rest of the state budget. That’s enough money to restore all the subway and bus cuts currently on the table in the MTA’s austerity plan.

How did they pull off the heist? To explain, we need to give a short intro to the MTA operating budget.

In addition to fares and tolls, MTA service is mainly funded by an array of dedicated taxes, which total about $4.5 billion every year. A smaller portion comes from “state and local subsidies,” of which Albany is supposed to contribute about $190 million. Already, we’re only talking about a small fraction of the MTA’s nearly $12 billion operating budget.

But here’s the thing — Albany’s “contribution” consists almost entirely of tax revenue that’s already dedicated to transit. This year, Albany put just $7 million from the general fund into MTA operations, according to the state Division of the Budget. The rest of its obligation to the MTA — $183 million — came from dedicated transit taxes.

So when the state made off with $143 million from the MTA budget in the December deficit reduction package, lawmakers were not reducing the state’s contribution to transit so much as raiding the MTA piggy bank and robbing transit riders of funds collected specifically to serve them. When all was said and done, Albany had taken $118 million from dedicated MTA taxes…

The dedicated revenue source in question — the Metropolitan Mass Transportation Operating Assistance Fund (MMTOA) — was established in 1981 and consists entirely of taxes collected in the 12-county MTA region… So $118 million in downstate taxes, meant to fund transit exclusively, disappeared into the Albany money pit. Nothing in New York state law prevents the same thing from happening again.

Unfortunately, we can’t do very much right now, but Fried and Kaehny urge riders and advocates to be protective of our future funding initiatives. We could ask elected officials to prevent against agency theft. We could ask them to own up to their cuts. After all, the same representatives who approved this giant cut are the ones slamming the MTA for being broke. Politicians just shouldn’t be allowed to have their cake and eat it too.

March 9, 2010 0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
AsidesSecond Avenue Subway

More stimulus funds for SAS (and ESA)

by Benjamin Kabak March 9, 2010
written by Benjamin Kabak on March 9, 2010

A coterie of New York’s elected representatives announced a new round of stimulus funding for a pair of the MTA’s big ticket capital items. According to a release from Sen. Chuck Schumer’s office, the city is receiving another $275 million in Economic Recovery Act funding for transit projects. The Second Ave. Subway will receive $78.9 million — or enough for approximately a third of a mile of subway line — while the East Side Access project gets a $195.4 million grant. “This funding is a win-win for all New York straphangers,” Schumer said. “Both East Side Access and the Second Avenue Subway will meet commuter needs that have existed for far too long here in New York. These funds will help Long Island and New York City improve transportation options and spur economic growth in the process.” Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand and Representatives Jerry Nadler and Carolyn Maloney all echoed Schumer’s statement.

March 9, 2010 13 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
View from Underground

Does anybody really know what time it is?

by Benjamin Kabak March 9, 2010
written by Benjamin Kabak on March 9, 2010

For New Yorkers, nothing is seemingly as important as time. We rush from place to place in the anonymous masses of people that fill our city to the brim. We run up stairs and down stairs. We dash to reach train doors before they close, and we tap our feet impatiently if we are left waiting too long for an elevator, a doctor’s appointment, a restaurant reservation. If only things were on time. If only we had more time.

In the vast underground world beneath the city streets, time takes on a different meaning. We might wait impatiently for a train, but our time is not our own. We are the whims of the time of the Q train, the 2 train. We wait for the searching glow of headlights to pierce the darkness of the tunnel, and only then do we know that it’s time for our train to arrive.

One of the reasons we don’t know how time operates in the subway is because the MTA’s approach to countdown clocks has been painfully slow and misguided over the years. Another reason is because the clocks are wrong. As I noticed two and a half years ago, clocks at W. 4th St. were an hour and 14 minutes slow. Today, they’re still an hour and 14 minutes slow. Late has a different meaning when the clocks are set to run in a different time zone.

This week, two stories reminded me about how time is ethereal as we travel the subways. The first came to me in the form of a press release from New York City Transit. The good folks in charge of the clocks in the subway wanted to tell us that the manual clocks — approximately 250 of them — are in the process of being sprung ahead a good four or five days ahead of the rest of the country. These clocks are found in nooks and crannies throughout the system and date to another age when cigarette ads used to share space. Today, the MTA says the advertising revenue from these clocks draw in $500,000 annually.

Beginning yesterday, Transit contractors had to start the manual switch in order to finish by 2 a.m. on Saturday night when the city springs ahead. For now, some clocks will say it’s actually an hour later than it really is, and Transit in a statement said that they “apologize in advance for any confusion this process may cause.” Unless the clock just says “late,” “early” or “on time,” the purported time doesn’t matter. Those clocks are accurate for only so long.

And another piece focuses on more modern clocks. Michael Grynbaum of The Times profiled the new countdown clocks Transit is installing in various subway and bus routes across the city. As regular readers of Second Ave. Sagas know, those countdown clocks range from the high-tech along the IRT lines to the budget version on trial in Washington Heights to countdown clocks for buses along 34th St. No longer will riders peer into dark tunnels awaiting the train to arrive on its own time. Now, we have the time blessed by signals.

While Transit hopes to remove the mystery and angst from our commutes, New Yorkers are stubborn in their ways. “This is New York City, nothing runs on time,” Leonora Berisaj said to Grynbaum. “It’s not about the clock. It’s about the bus.” We operate on transit’s time, no matter how many minutes away the next train supposedly will be.

Photo of the old ad clocks via New York City Transit.

March 9, 2010 9 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
AsidesSecond Avenue Subway

On the ten most expensive transit projects of the decade

by Benjamin Kabak March 8, 2010
written by Benjamin Kabak on March 8, 2010

Over at the Infrastructurist today, Yonah Freemark took a slideshow look at the ten most expensive North American transit projects from the past decade. Number one was the $2.63-billion, 10.7-mile Tren Urbano, and the list includes New Jersey’s HudsonBergen Light Rail, Los Angeles’ $1.9 billion red line extension and the New Jersey River Line. Missing from the list is the Second Ave. Subway, and it’s staggering, really, to think about Phase I of the SAS in this context. The MTA’s subway spur north from 57th St. is going to cover approximately two miles and will cost somewhere close to $5 billion while these other projects cost half as much and cover miles of ground. Is the Second Ave. Subway truly worth it?

March 8, 2010 21 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
MTA EconomicsMTA Politics

Walder agrees to meet with students over free transit

by Benjamin Kabak March 8, 2010
written by Benjamin Kabak on March 8, 2010

As angry New Yorkers have rained scorn upon the heads of the MTA Board, new CEO and Chairman Jay Walder has been acutely affected by the people. “It’s tearing my heart out right now,” he said last week. “Last night at 1 o’clock in the morning I’m turning over in bed trying to figure out how to make the choices” about service cuts. Since Walder himself cannot order more taxes or higher state subsidies, he is left with but two choices: cut services or raise fares.

Despite this dilemma, Walder is willing to listen. The Daily News reported today that Walder has agreed to a hearing with students who are concerned about the impending elimination of the free Student MetroCard program. The MTA head will meet with students next Wednesday as they make the case for the student transit program, and he makes the case for an MTA very short on funds.

So what then can Walder do without money for the program and little political support from City Hall or Albany? When he meets with students, he must explain to them how the city and state should be funding the program and how those two governing bodies have abdicated their responsibilities to the MTA and, more importantly, to New York’s students. He should show him the chart above from Streetsblog and the one below while urging them to turn their rage toward our elected officials. After all, if the politicians won’t listen to students, who will they listen to?

March 8, 2010 8 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Staten Island

Planning to charge for the Staten Island Railway

by Benjamin Kabak March 8, 2010
written by Benjamin Kabak on March 8, 2010

While Transit may one day add more service on Staten Island, for now, the authority is looking to charge more for the one commuter rail line currently servicing the borough. Earlier this year, the MTA started charging fares at Tompkinsville, and now, we learn that the entire line will be a fare-generating one in the near future.

As Maura Yates from the Staten Island Advance reports, the MTA will soon do away with free rides on the Staten Island Railway and will begin, within a few years, to require paid fares at every station. She writes:

The MTA plans to restore fare collection along the entire 14-mile rail line from St. George to Tottenville within the next few years, as part of a master plan to raise more revenue, cut down on crime and close what has been a free-ride perk that is unique in the city’s public transit system.

Turnstiles recently installed at the Tompkinsville station are the first part of the plan, which eventually will incorporate “Smart Card” technology to collect fares along the rest of the line. Riders now swipe their cards only at Tompkinsville and St. George, while the train is free for trips beginning and ending at any other stations along the line. Make the 37-minute trip between Stapleton and Tottenville, for instance, and pay not a cent.

When the new system goes online, which, owing to the MTA’s budget crisis, is still at least a few years away, passengers will no longer use MetroCards but rather pay with a “Smart Card,” likely a “tap and go” system, where a card is held up to a reader without the need to slow down to swipe. The system would include a way for inspectors to check for proof that the fare was paid, and scofflaws likely would face a steep fine if caught. If you didn’t pay and there were a spot check, “you’d have a problem,” said MTA board member Allen Cappelli.

While City Council members and MTA Board members are happy to discuss the impact fare collection and fare inspection will have on the safety and security of the State Island Railway, I’m more interested to hear about the costs. Yates reports that the new $6.9 million station at Tompkinsville will generate approximately $702,000 in fares this year. It will take, more or less, ten years to pay off that investment, more so if we consider depreciation and maintenance costs.

New York City Transit didn’t provide a revenue projection for the service or any potential information on the installation costs simply because it’s too remote a plan right now. While ridership dipped in 2009, recently, approximately 15,000 per day have been using the SIR, but because many of those enter and exit at the Ferry Terminal, their fares are captured. Although further investment in fare technologies on Staten Island could earn the MTA more revenue down the line and avert maintenance costs by discouraging vandalism, the overall net gains from this added revenue probably will not be realized much quicker than the investment at Tompkinsville will be.

March 8, 2010 47 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Service Advisories

A busy weekend of work at Fulton St.

by Benjamin Kabak March 5, 2010
written by Benjamin Kabak on March 5, 2010

Updates coming later. In the meantime, you know the drill. As a note, I’m working on a glossary of track work terms to provide some context on this service changes. If anyone has technical knowledge of the terms Transit uses each work, please contact me.


Please note: From 12:01 a.m. Saturday, March 6 to 5 a.m. Monday, March 8, there are no transfers between A, 2/3 and 4/5 trains at Fulton Street-Broadway-Nassau. In Manhattan, free transfers are available between 4/5 trains at Fulton Street and A/E/2/3 trains at the World Trade Center/Chambers Street/Park Place station. Customer must exit and re-enter the system when making this connection. In Brooklyn, customers may transfer at Nevins Street between 2/3 and 4 trains. Manhattan-bound A trains are running on the F line from Jay Street to West 4th Street.


From 11 p.m. Friday, March 5 to 5 a.m. Monday, March 8, Manhattan-bound 4 trains run express from Burnside Avenue to 125th Street due to a track chip-out at 149th Street-Grand Concourse.


From 12:01 a.m. Saturday, March 6 to 5 a.m. Monday, March 8, downtown 4/6 trains run express from 14th Street-Union Square to Brooklyn Bridge due to gap filler replacement at 14th Street-Union Square and the Broadway-Lafayette Street to Bleecker Street construction.


From 1 a.m. to 1 p.m. Sunday, March 7, downtown 4 trains run local from 125th Street to Grand Central-42nd Street due to a track cable pull.


From 6:30 a.m. to 1 p.m. Sunday, March 7, downtown 5 trains run local from 125th Street to Grand Central-42nd Street due to a track cable pull.


From 12:01 a.m. Saturday, March 6 to 5 a.m. Monday, March 8, Pelham Bay Park-bound 6 trains run express from 3rd Avenue-138th Street to Hunts Point Avenue due to track chip out at Longwood Avenue.


At all times until September 2010, the Whitlock Avenue and Morrison-Sound View Avs. stations are closed for rehabilitation. Customers should use the Elder Avenue 6 station or the Simpson Street 25 station instead. The Bx4 bus provides alternate connecting service between stations.


From 11:30 p.m. Friday, March 5 to 5 a.m. Monday, March 8, there are no 7 trains between Times Square-42nd Street and Queensboro Plaza due to track panel installation on the Davis Street curve, installation of a new switch at Hunters Point Avenue, track chip-out at Vernon Blvd.-Jackson Avenue and construction of the Long Island City-Court Square to 45th Road-Court House Square transfer.
The N and Q and free shuttle buses provide alternate service. Note: The 42nd Street S shuttle runs overnight and Q train service is extended to/from Ditmars Blvd.


From 12:01 a.m. Saturday, March 6 to 5 a.m. Monday, March 8, Queens-bound A trains run local from 168th to 145th Streets and from 125th to 59th Streets, then make express stops to Jay Street, then resume local service to Euclid Avenue due to the installation of conduits for the public address system. The Queens-bound A will skip 50th Street, 23rd Street, Spring Street, and Fulton Street-Broadway Nassau.


From 12:01 a.m. Saturday, March 6 to 5 a.m. Monday, March 8, Manhattan-bound A trains run local from Euclid Avenue to Jay Street, then are rerouted to the F line to West 4th Street. Trains resume local A service to 59th Street (D trains are running local between 59th Street and 145th Street to replace C service.) This is due to the Chambers Street Signal Modernization project.


From 12:01 a.m. Saturday, March 6 to 5 a.m. Monday, March 8, there is no C train service due to the Chambers Street Signal Modernization project. Customers may take the A or D instead. Note: D trains run local between 145th Street and 59th Street. A trains run local with exceptions.


From 12:01 a.m. Saturday, March 6 to 5 a.m. Monday, March 8, there are no D trains between Pacific and 34th Streets due to the Broadway-Lafayette to Bleecker Street transfer construction. The N and free shuttle buses provide alternate service.


From 12:01 a.m. Saturday, March 6 to 5 a.m. Monday, March 8, D trains run local between 145th Street and 59th Street due to installation of conduits for public address system.


From 12:01 a.m. Saturday, March 6 to 5 a.m. Monday, March 8, E trains run local between Forest Hills-71st Avenue and Queens Plaza due to track maintenance.


From 12:01 a.m. Saturday, March 6 to 5 a.m. Monday, March 8, F trains run local between Forest Hills-71st Avenue and 21st St-Queensbridge due to track maintenance.


From 8:30 p.m. Friday, March 5 to 5 a.m. Monday, March 8, there are no G trains between Forest Hills-71st Avenue and Court Square due to track maintenance. Customers may take the E or R instead.


From 8 a.m. to 5 p.m., Saturday, March 6 and Sunday, March 7, Manhattan-bound J trains skip Flushing Avenue, Lorimer Street and Hewes Street due to track repairs.


From 12:01 a.m. to 6:30 a.m. Saturday, March 6 and Sunday, March 7, and from 12:01 a.m. to 5 a.m., Monday, March 8, N trains are rerouted over the Manhattan Bridge between DeKalb Avenue and Canal Street due to Jay Street station rehabilitation and construction of the underground connector to Lawrence Street.


From 12:01 a.m. Saturday, March 6 to 5 a.m. Monday, March 8, N trains run local between Pacific Street and 59th Street in Brooklyn due to Broadway-Lafayette to Bleecker Street transfer construction.


From 12:01 a.m. Saturday, March 6 to 5 a.m. Monday, March 8, Q train service is extended to/from Ditmars Blvd. to supplement lost 7 service in Queens.


From 12:01 a.m. Saturday, March 6 to 5 a.m. Monday, March 8, uptown Q trains run local from Canal Street to 57th Street-7th Avenue due to a concrete pour at Union Square.


From 12:01 a.m. to 6:30 a.m. Saturday, March 6 and Sunday, March 7 and from 12:01 a.m. to 5 a.m. Monday, March 8, there are no R shuttle trains between 36th Street and 59th Street in Brooklyn due to Broadway-Lafayette to Bleecker Street transfer construction. Customers may take the N instead.


From 6:30 a.m. to midnight Saturday, March 6 and Sunday, March 7, R trains are rerouted over the Manhattan Bridge between DeKalb Avenue and Canal Street due to Jay Street Station Rehabilitation and Construction of Underground Connector to Lawrence Street.


From 12:01 a.m. to 6:30 a.m. Saturday, March 6 and Sunday, March 7 and from 12:01 a.m. to 5 a.m. Monday, March 8, the 42nd Street S shuttle runs overnight to replace 7 trains in Manhattan (due to track panel installation on the Davis Street curve.)


From 10:30 p.m. Friday, March 5 to 5 a.m. Monday, March 8, free shuttle buses replace S trains between Rockaway Park and Beach 67th Street due to station rehabilitation at Beach 98th and Beach 90th Streets.

March 5, 2010 0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Fulton Street

At Fulton St., checking in on the Corbin Building

by Benjamin Kabak March 5, 2010
written by Benjamin Kabak on March 5, 2010

A station arises at Fulton St. (Photo by Peter from Ink Lake)

Now that the MTA has a plan, a timeline and money for the Fulton St. Transit Center, the news from Lower Manhattan has slowed to a trickle. We no longer hear monthly promises of impending plans or status updates featuring more cost overruns or a delayed timeline. As Capital Construction projects go, this one is moving along smoothly right now.

As work crews continue to build atop some of Manhattan’s oldest areas and amidst landmarked buildings, the stories coming out of the Fulton St. area have taken on a different, more in-depth tone. Take, for instance, the latest from Downtown Express’ Julie Shapiro. She highlights the work at the Corbin Building, an 1889 building that abuts the new transit center.

For years, the city has neglected this beautiful building. Just twenty feet wide, it extends 160 feet down John St. and at eight stories, was one of the tallest buildings in Lower Manhattan when it opened 111 years ago. Its ties to transit extend back to its origins as it was named for Austin Corbin, the man responsible for uniting all of the Long Island-based rail lines under the LIRR umbrella.

Before Sept. 11, the building had fallen into a state of disrepair. Time had taken a toll on Francis Kimble’s intricate designs, and after Sept. 11, the building had to undergo extensive repairs. When the MTA announced initial plans for the Fulton St. Transit Center, the Corbin Building was to be demolished. After a public outcry over that plan in 2003, the MTA decided to rethink the future of the Corbin Building and asked architects to incorporate it into updated plans for the hub.

Shapiro picks up the story:

While the M.T.A. was initially against saving the building, the project team now could not be more enthusiastic about the historical details they are uncovering. “This is once in a lifetime for us,” said Uday Durg, program executive for the M.T.A., as he and [Capital Construction president Michael] Horodniceanu gave Downtown Express a tour this week. “This is not the kind of building you see every day. For an engineer, this is the highlight for us — for our whole career.”

…The belowground levels of the building are a hive of activity, as the M.T.A. builds a new foundation of steel and concrete to ensure that the building remains safe. “The foundation left quite a lot to be desired,” Horodniceanu said. “It was great for the time it was built, but not for today.”

The building’s brick supports originally went down only 20 feet below street level, and the building started sinking as the M.T.A. worked on the adjacent Fulton Transit Center. M.T.A. crews are digging down another 35 feet to underpin the building, a painstaking process that should be complete in August.

Then the preservation work will begin: The ornate reddish-brown facade will be cleaned; the intricately decorated grand staircase will be restored; and hidden historical gems, like the original boiler, will be displayed. The building will also get a new roof, new windows and a storefront restored to look just like it did in 1917.

Eventually, these historical elements of the Corbin Building will be incorporated into straphangers’ every-day rides. An escalator will take riders from the depths up Fulton St. past original arches and building boilers. Eventually commercial retailers and maybe even a museum will return to the Corbin Building.

For too many years, New York City has been willing to pile modernism on top of history. A walk around Lower Manhattan reveals little of the 400-year legacy of the Dutch colony and early New York. In the Bronx, even the original Yankee Stadium is being deconstructed. By at the corner of John St. and Broadway, the Corbin Building will remain, incorporated into a 21st Century transit center and serving as a nod to the city’s sometimes-forgotten past.

March 5, 2010 18 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
New Jersey Transit

NJ Transit set to hike fares, slash services

by Benjamin Kabak March 5, 2010
written by Benjamin Kabak on March 5, 2010

As states struggle through a period of high deficits, rail subsidies are a taking a hit at a time when we as a country should be investing in mass transit. We know how poorly the MTA is faring right now, and today, we hear word that another key player in the New York region’s network of transportation service is in dire need of funds. To close a $300 million budget gap, New Jersey Transit will be rising its fares and cutting services across the state.

According to published reports, the commuter rail-and-bus service will make an announcement later today of hikes and cuts across the state. Fares will be increased by an average of 25-30 percent. Bus wait times will be increased by approximately five to ten minutes, and a few rush hour trains will be slashed from the schedule. The agency hopes to restore these services when the state economy improves, but right now, New Jersey is $2.2 billion in the red. Earlier this week, the agency announced plans to fire 200 workers and roll back executive compensation and employee benefits packages.

“These are extremely painful steps, but unavoidable ones. We must close our serious budget shortfall, and we at NJ Transit must do our part by making this the leanest, most efficient agency possible, without compromising safety,” Executive Director James Weinstein said. “Unfortunately, fare and service changes will have to be a part of NJ Transit’s overall response to this financial crisis.” These cuts are, he noted, the deepest one-year cuts in the 31-year history of the organization.

As with so many transit agencies around the country, New Jersey Transit’s financial success is tied in closely with government support and fare policies. The agency officials say that 42 percent of their revenue comes from fares, and when state support drops away, as it has recently, those in charge have no option other than fare hikes and service cuts.

Where New Jersey fails though is in its equation of taxes and fees that support transit at the expense of driving. As Tom Davis explored at NJ.com, the state’s gas taxes are fourth lowest in the nation and have not increased “in two decades.” Considering that New Jersey Transit’s daily weekday ridership is at an all-time high and that the various services transport nearly 900,000 people per weekday, the state’s policy decisions seem out of whack to me.

Meanwhile, New Jersey residents who commute into the city are in for a double whammy. These New Jersey Transit hikes will go into effect in May, and the MTA will be implementing its cuts (and potentially considering a fare hike) throughout the summer. We should be investing in transit right now and expanding service offerings. Instead, the transit capital of the country is slashing service and raising fares. No one will benefit.

March 5, 2010 15 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Load More Posts

About The Author

Name: Benjamin Kabak
E-mail: Contact Me

Become a Patron!
Follow @2AvSagas

Upcoming Events
TBD

RSS? Yes, Please: SAS' RSS Feed
SAS In Your Inbox: Subscribe to SAS by E-mail

Instagram



Disclaimer: Subway Map © Metropolitan Transportation Authority. Used with permission. MTA is not associated with nor does it endorse this website or its content.

Categories

  • 14th Street Busway (1)
  • 7 Line Extension (118)
  • Abandoned Stations (31)
  • ARC Tunnel (52)
  • Arts for Transit (19)
  • Asides (1,244)
  • Bronx (13)
  • Brooklyn (126)
  • Brooklyn-Queens Connector (13)
  • Buses (291)
  • Capital Program 2010-2014 (27)
  • Capital Program 2015-2019 (56)
  • Capital Program 2020-2024 (3)
  • Congestion Fee (71)
  • East Side Access Project (37)
  • F Express Plan (22)
  • Fare Hikes (173)
  • Fulton Street (57)
  • Gateway Tunnel (29)
  • High-Speed Rail (9)
  • Hudson Yards (18)
  • Interborough Express (1)
  • International Subways (26)
  • L Train Shutdown (20)
  • LIRR (65)
  • Manhattan (73)
  • Metro-North (99)
  • MetroCard (124)
  • Moynihan Station (16)
  • MTA (98)
  • MTA Absurdity (233)
  • MTA Bridges and Tunnels (27)
  • MTA Construction (128)
  • MTA Economics (522)
    • Doomsday Budget (74)
    • Ravitch Commission (23)
  • MTA Politics (330)
  • MTA Technology (195)
  • New Jersey Transit (53)
  • New York City Transit (220)
  • OMNY (3)
  • PANYNJ (113)
  • Paratransit (10)
  • Penn Station (18)
  • Penn Station Access (10)
  • Podcast (30)
  • Public Transit Policy (164)
  • Queens (129)
  • Rider Report Cards (31)
  • Rolling Stock (40)
  • Second Avenue Subway (262)
  • Self Promotion (77)
  • Service Advisories (612)
  • Service Cuts (118)
  • Sponsored Post (1)
  • Staten Island (52)
  • Straphangers Campaign (40)
  • Subway Advertising (45)
  • Subway Cell Service (34)
  • Subway History (81)
  • Subway Maps (83)
  • Subway Movies (14)
  • Subway Romance (13)
  • Subway Security (104)
  • Superstorm Sandy (35)
  • Taxis (43)
  • Transit Labor (151)
    • ATU (4)
    • TWU (100)
    • UTU (8)
  • Triboro RX (4)
  • U.S. Transit Systems (53)
    • BART (1)
    • Capital Metro (1)
    • CTA (7)
    • MBTA (11)
    • SEPTA (5)
    • WMATA (28)
  • View from Underground (447)

Archives

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram

@2019 - All Right Reserved.


Back To Top