Second Ave. Sagas
  • About
  • Contact Me
  • 2nd Ave. Subway History
  • Search
  • About
  • Contact Me
  • 2nd Ave. Subway History
  • Search
Second Ave. Sagas

News and Views on New York City Transportation

Fulton Street

MTA promises to build something at Fulton St.

by Benjamin Kabak January 27, 2009
written by Benjamin Kabak on January 27, 2009

In an alternate universe, this transit complex exists already.

As MTA projects go, the Fulton St. dome ranks high on the futility scale. Originally set to open in 2007, the project is years behind schedule and millions of dollars over budget. Most notable has been the utter lack of movement on the design for the hub entrance.

It’s been almost a year to the day since the MTA announced plans to scrap the dome at the Fulton St. Transit Center. Since then, a solid blue wall has ringed the future construction site as the economy has tanked and the MTA has delayed any announcement on the future of the project. Today, we hear news.

According to a report by NY1 transit reporter Bobby Cuza, the Fulton St. hub will resemble the originally proposed complex only with sky lights replacing the troubled dome. He reports:

When it’s complete, the Fulton Street Transit Center in lower Manhattan may look something like it’s original plans after all. After a number of fits and starts, MTA officials say they are pushing forward with a design very much like the original. “The envelope of the building will look exactly the same way as it was seen on the various renderings that were presented before,” said Michael Horodniceanu, President, MTA Capital Construction Co.

But not everything will be the same. While the glass façade will be retained, a planned glass dome may well be eliminated, replaced with a skylight allowing the sun to filter inside. And it’s there on the inside, where the biggest design changes will take place, as the MTA reconfigures the space to add more shops and restaurants.

“The design that we are looking at is to increase the amount of retail space, leasable retail space, on both the street level as well as the first floor above that,” Horodniceanu.

Now, that’s all well and good, but as Cuza points out, the reality on the ground differs from that painted by Horodniceanu. In terms of timing, Cuza notes that the building foundation won’t be completed for another 18 months, and the MTA has no timetable for construction of the hub. This project will, in all likelihood, end up a good seven or eight years behind schedule.

Money is also an issue as well. In July, the Feds under the Bush Administration denied federal funds for the $350 million cost overruns. Somehow, the MTA will have to find well over a quarter billion dollars in its tight capital budget for this project. Furthermore, while the city would have originally covered sidewalk repair as part of their effort to rehabilitate Fulton St., due to the massive delays, the MTA will now be shouldering those burdens as well. Yikes.

Because there is no alternative other than a walled-in and idle construction site, the city needs this Fulton St. hub. It’s part of the 9/11 recovery efforts, and it’s part of a Lower Manhattan revitalization project. When it will arrive though is anyone’s guess.

January 27, 2009 4 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
MTA Economics

In Rockland County, having a cake and eating it too

by Benjamin Kabak January 26, 2009
written by Benjamin Kabak on January 26, 2009

seal-00 Rockland County, it seems, is a place where dreams come true. It’s an area of New York state where unicorns prance among leprechauns and genies ready to grant everyone three wishes abound. It also seems to be an area where fiscal reality and financial responsibility are concepts unheard of in legislative life.

To wit, take a peak at this recent article in The Journal News. It is entitled “Lawmakers vow to oppose MTA fare hikes, service cuts,” and that’s only half of it. Take a look:

Rockland’s state delegation ripped into the Metropolitan Transportation Authority’s plan to implement a wide range of service cuts and price increases to cover a $1.2 billion deficit. Everything from New York City buses and trains to bridges and tunnels to commuter trains and ferries would be affected. Locally, Metro-North Railroad riders would face a 20 percent fare increase.

Broke and broken seemed to be the dominant theme of the day.

“We are united in our fight against the MTA’s outrageous spiking of fares and business taxes that really will impact negatively on the Hudson Valley, and particularly Orange and Rockland counties,” state Sen. Thomas Morahan, R-New City, said.

The three Republicans and two Democrats said they would oppose a proposal that would levy a new MTA payroll tax and would raise fares and tolls by 8 percent. The tax would cost Rockland employers more than $18 million a year, the Rockland County Business Association and the Rockland Economic Development Corp. have estimated.

So let me get this straight: In the space of about 140 words, Rockland County’s bipartisan group of representatives noted that they oppose MTA service cuts and fare hikes and they also opposed a new payroll tax that would potentially alleviate much of these proposed fare hikes and the vast majority of the service cuts. That is mindbogglingly terrible political pandering.

I’d love to ask the Rockland representatives what their master plans are for funding the MTA. After all, these services aren’t free, and the money has to come from somewhere. They don’t want service cuts and fare hikes, the MTA’s only internal way of cost control, and they oppose dedicated funding via payroll taxes, a powerful external way of keeping service cuts and fare hikes at bay.

Logic and reality, it seems, has no place in Rockland County.

January 26, 2009 6 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
AsidesMTA Absurdity

Setting a new speed record

by Benjamin Kabak January 26, 2009
written by Benjamin Kabak on January 26, 2009

When Chris Solarz and Matt Ferrisi set out to break the record for fastest time through the subway, they knew they would succeed as long as the MTA’s system cooperated with them. It turns out that with few major service disruptions and generally reliable schedules, the duo was able to shatter the previous record. When all was said and done, they clocked in at 22 hours and 51 minutes, a good two hours and three minutes faster than the prior record.

As the two explained to the New York Press last week, they used extensive computer modeling to program the optimal route. But potential copy-cats are going to have to do the leg work the hard way. “The route is like our secret sauce,” Solzarz said to The Daily News. “We’re keeping it to ourselves.”

January 26, 2009 7 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Second Avenue Subway

Foreshadowing a Second Ave. demise

by Benjamin Kabak January 26, 2009
written by Benjamin Kabak on January 26, 2009

There’s just something about the Second Ave. subway that begs an recession. Months after the city originally proposed the oft-delayed line, the Great Depression hit. When construction resumed again in the mid-1970s, all was moving along slowly until the city teetered on the brink of financial collapse in 1975, and the MTA ran out of money for the project.

Here we are in 2009, again in the midst of a deep recession and again the city and its transit authority is attempting to build the Second Ave. subway. For a few years in the early ’00s, things seemed to be sailing along. The Federal Government was guaranteeing the vast majority of the funding for the project, and an rosy economy seemed to ensure that at least some of the project — Phase I from 57th St. and 7th Ave. to 96th St. and 2nd Ave. — would see the proverbial light of deal. But with the opening date already postponed from 2012 to 2015, economic storm clouds are once again gathering.

In an article in Crain’s that explores how business along Second Ave. is suffering due to the ongoing construction, Kira Bindrim hints at some fiscal troubles ahead for the seemingly cursed subway line. She writes:

The city is preparing to break ground on the stretch from East 68th to East 73rd streets. Construction is currently moving in three-month intervals on alternate sides of the avenue, and Phase I is slated to be finished in 2015. But three months has become six months in some locations, and work between East 83rd and East 86th streets could be stalled by lawsuits over displaced residents. The MTA has funding for contracts through year-end, but additional money must come from its next capital plan. Prospects for that budget are grim.

Indeed, economic crises have derailed the line’s building twice, in 1929 and in the 1970s. The completion date for the $3.8 billion Phase I has been postponed two years. “I’m afraid they’re going to run out of cash,” Mr. Pecora says. “We might be faced with just a hole in the road.”

In reality, based on what we’ve learned in the past, this dire report isn’t quite true. With the Feds kicking in so much money for this project, Phase I will, at some point, become a reality. Considering that a tunnel running north of 96th St. already exists, there’s a good chance that Phase II — the extension north to 125th St. — will see the light of the day sometime over the next fifteen years.

Beyond that, though, it’s anyone’s guess. The economy will rebound, and President Obama should promote a stimulus plan now that includes significant investments in mass transit and public transportation. That, as Streetsblog noted last week, hasn’t been so quick in the making. Maybe one day, New York will finally enjoy a Second Ave. subway running the length of Manhattan, but for now, with history as our guide, everyone is holding their collective breaths.

* * *

Postscript: The Crain’s article linked above covers some familiar ground. For nearly 18 months now, business owners have complained about the disruptions along Second Ave. That is simply the cost of progress, and while the government and the MTA should do what they can to mitigate the disruptions, if New York is to progress as a city, we need to build subway lines. As The Overhead Wire noted last week, in the London area, land values around planned future Tube stops has risen significantly, and when all is said and done, the SAS will have a material benefit on the East Side housing market. The disruptions today are the cost of a better future tomorrow.

January 26, 2009 16 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Service Advisories

Weekend service advisories

by Benjamin Kabak January 23, 2009
written by Benjamin Kabak on January 23, 2009


From 12:01 a.m. Saturday, January 24 to 5 a.m. Monday, January 26, 1 trains skip 28th, 23rd and 18th Streets in both directions due to signal testing near South Ferry.


From 11:30 p.m. Friday, January 23 to 5 a.m. Monday, January 26, there are no 1 trains between 14th Street and South Ferry due to signal testing near South Ferry. Free shuttle buses and 2 trains provide alternate service.


From 11:30 p.m. Friday, January 23 to 5 a.m. Monday, January 26, free shuttle buses replace the 2 between 96th Street and 149th Street-Grand Concourse due to installation of emergency lighting.


From 12:01 a.m. Saturday, January 24 to 5 a.m. Monday, January 26, downtown 2 trains run local from 96th Street to Chambers Street and uptown 2 trains run local from Chambers Street to 72nd Street due to signal testing near South Ferry and conduit and cable installation.


From 12:01 a.m. Saturday, January 24 to 5 a.m. Monday, January 26, the 5 train replaces the 2 train between 149th Street-Grand Concourse and Wakefield-241st Street due to installation of emergency lighting.


From 11:30 p.m. Friday, January 23 to 5 a.m. Monday, January 26, there is no 3 train service due to installation of emergency lighting. The 24 and free shuttle buses provide alternate service.


From 11:30 p.m. Friday, January 23 to 5 a.m. Monday, January 26, 4 trains are extended to New Lots Avenue due to installation of emergency lighting.


From 9 a.m. to 3 p.m. Sunday, January 25, Manhattan-bound 4 trains skip Mosholu Parkway due to maintenance, testing and inspection of equipment.


From 12:01 a.m. to 5 a.m. every night from January 20 –February 5, there are no 4 trains available at Nostrand and Kingston Avenues due to switch renewal at Nostrand Avenue. Free shuttle buses provide alternate service.


From 12:01 a.m. to 5 a.m. every night from January 20 –February 5, 4 trains skip Bergen Street, Grand Army Plaza, and Eastern Parkway due to switch renewal at Nostrand Avenue. Customers may take the 2 instead.


From 12:01 a.m. Saturday, January 24 to 5 a.m. Monday, January 26, uptown 4 trains run express from Brooklyn Bridge to 14th Street, then local to 125th Street due to a concrete pour north of Spring Street.


From 12:01 a.m. Saturday, January 24 to 5 a.m. Monday, January 26, downtown 4 trains run local from 125th Street to Brooklyn Bridge due to a concrete pour north of Spring Street.


From 12:01 a.m. Saturday, January 24 to 5 a.m. Monday, January 26, 5 trains run in two sections (due to installation of emergency lighting.):

  • Between Dyre Avenue and East 180th Street and
  • Between East 180th Street and Grand Central-42nd Street


From 12:01 a.m. Saturday, January 24 to 5 a.m. Monday, January 26, there are no 5 trains between Grand Central and Bowling Green due to a concrete pour north of Spring Street. Customers should take the 4 instead.


From 4 a.m. Saturday, January 24 to 10 p.m. Sunday, January 25, Manhattan-bound 6 trains run express from Pelham Bay Park to Parkchester due to track panel installation from Castle Hill Avenue to Parkchester. The last stop for some Bronx-bound 6 trains is 3rd Avenue-138th Street.


From 12:01 a.m. Saturday, January 24 to 5 a.m. Monday, January 26, uptown 6 trains run express from Brooklyn Bridge to 14th Street due to a concrete pour north of Spring Street.


From 11:30 p.m. Friday, January 23 to 5 a.m. Monday, January 26, (and weekends through Feb 28-Mar 2) there are no 7 trains between Times Square-42nd Street and Queensboro Plaza due to track panel installation on the Davis Street curve and security conduit and cable installation in the under river tube. The N and free shuttle buses provide alternate service.


From 10:30 p.m. Friday, January 23 to 5 a.m. Monday, January 26, free shuttle buses replace A trains between Beach 90th Street and Far Rockaway due to track panel work.


From 12:01 a.m. Saturday, January 24 to 5 a.m. Monday, January 26, A trains run local between 168th Street and Canal Street due to station rehabilitation and construction of the underground connector at Jay Street.


From 11:30 p.m. Friday, January 23 to 5 a.m. Monday, January 26, free shuttle buses replace A trains between 168th Street and 207th Street due to tunnel and lighting work. Customers may transfer between the Broadway or Ft. Washington Avenue shuttle buses and the A train at 168th Street.


From 12:01 a.m. Saturday, January 24 to 5 a.m. Monday, January 26, there are no C trains running due to station rehabilitation and construction of the underground connector at Jay Street.

  1. A trains replace the C between 168th Street and Hoyt-Schermerhorn Sts.
  2. F trains replace the C between Hoyt-Schermerhorn Sts. and Euclid Avenue


From 12:01 a.m. Saturday, January 24 to 5 a.m. Monday, January 26, Coney Island-bound D trains run on the N line from 36th Street to Coney Island-Stillwell Avenue due to canopy replacement work.


From 11:30 p.m. Friday, January 23 to 5 a.m. Monday, January 26, free shuttle buses replace E trains between Jamaica Center and Union Turnpike due to fan work.


From 12:01 a.m. Saturday, January 24 to Monday, January 26, G trains replace the F between Hoyt-Schermerhorn Sts. and Coney Island-Stillwell Avenue due to station rehabilitation and construction of the underground connector at Jay Street.


From 12:01 a.m. Saturday, January 24 to Monday, January 26, F trains run between 179th Street and Euclid Avenue C station due to station rehabilitation and construction of the underground connector at Jay Street.


From 8:30 p.m. Friday, January 23 to 5 a.m. Monday, January 26, there are no G trains between Forest Hills-71st Avenue and Court Square. Customers take the E or R instead.


From 11:30 p.m. Friday, January 23 to 5 a.m. Monday, January 26 (and weekends through February 2), there are no L trains between 8th Avenue and Union Square due to switch renewal near 8th Avenue. Customers may use the M14 bus instead.


From 11:30 p.m. Friday, January 23 to 5 a.m. Monday, January 26 (and weekends through February 2), L trains run in two sections (due to switch renewal near 8th Avenue):

  • Between Union Square and Bedford Avenue every 16 minutes*, skipping 3rd Avenue and
  • Between Bedford Avenue and Rockaway Parkway every 8 minutes*

Customers must transfer at Bedford Avenue to continue their trip.
*10 p.m. Sunday, January 25 to 5 a.m. Monday, trains run every 20 minutes.


From 12:01 a.m. Saturday, January 24 to 5 a.m. Monday, January 26, N trains run local between Canal Street and 57th Street due to track panel installation on the Davis Street curve and security conduit and cable installation in the under river tube.


From 12:01 a.m. Saturday, January 24 to 5 a.m. Monday, January 26, the last stop for Coney Island-bound N trains is Whitehall Street due to track panel installation on the Davis Street curve and security conduit and cable installation in the under river tube.


From 11:30 p.m. Friday, January 23 to 5 a.m. Monday, January 26, the 42nd Street Shuttle S operates overnight to replace 7 service between Times Square-42nd Street and Grand Central-42nd Street. due to track panel installation on the Davis Street curve and security conduit and cable installation in the under river tube.

January 23, 2009 0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
7 Line ExtensionHudson Yards

Whither Hudson Yards, again?

by Benjamin Kabak January 23, 2009
written by Benjamin Kabak on January 23, 2009

The Hudson Yards area, it seems, is doomed, and the MTA may suffer a financial hit because of this curse.

Last May, after months of public and private wrangling, the MTA saw its first $1-billion bidder pull out of the Hudson Yards project. Shortly after that Tishman Speyer deal for the rail yards died a painful death, Related Companies swooped in and signed a similar deal. The Related deal, it seems, may join the Tishman plan in the great Hudson Yards in the sky.

Erik Engquist of Crain’s first reported on this development earlier this week. He writes:

If the Metropolitan Transportation Authority and the Related Cos. cannot reach a deal on Hudson Yards in 10 days, the $15 billion project could end up being postponed indefinitely or never being built.

The authority and the developer have until Jan. 31 to sign a contract, which would trigger a schedule of payments that could ultimately bring close to $1 billion into MTA coffers. But the sinking economy and a paucity of financing are pressuring both sides.

Given the uncertain market, Related would like to avoid commitments of scope and schedule that threaten the profitability of the project. At the same time, the developer wants to move forward and not forsake the $11 million deposit it put down last May.

Both sides in the Crain’s article are saying the right things. “Hudson Yards continues to move forward,” Joanna Rose, a Related vice president, said to Engquist. “We remain focused on the various governmental and required reviews that continue to progress and are working closely with the MTA, the Department of City Planning and the community.”

But with MTA CEO and Executive Director Elliot Sander calling the negotiations “very sensitive,” it’s easy to see a collapse in the near future. With this deal on the rocks — and the Atlantic Yards deal treading water for another year — the MTA’s capital budget may suffer. These mega-projects were to bring in over $1 billion, and if they both fall through, the MTA will have to scramble to replace the funds.

Meanwhile, as the Related deal teeters on the brink, the city’s commitment to the 7 line extension remains in place. No matter what happens, the city will fund the construction of the 7 line from its current Times Square terminus to 34th and 11th Ave. While there may be no development on the Hudson Yards area for a decade, at least the subway will serve the area. With more pressing projects on tap, that hardly seems like a good use of funds to me. This could turn into quite the boondoggle.

January 23, 2009 17 comments
1 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Ravitch Commission

State Senate Dems to support Ravitch recs

by Benjamin Kabak January 23, 2009
written by Benjamin Kabak on January 23, 2009

With the MTA’s financial future on the line, the Ravtich Recommendations are an important set of measures various state agencies can implement. While the city will eventually have to decide on the East River bridge toll centerpiece, the state senate seems to be doing its part to bail out the MTA.

As the Daily News reports today, State Senate Democrats are ready to support a new payroll tax as per the Ravitch Recommendations. The money from this one percent tax will help fill the MTA’s depleted coffers. Glenn Blain has more:

Senate Democrats are ready to support a new payroll tax to help rescue the MTA. Majority Leader Malcolm Smith, who previously opposed imposing new taxes, said Democrats would support the proposed tax if the business community agrees to it.

“It’s really the last thing we want to take a look at, however, this is a classic example, I think, of shared sacrifice,” Smith said Thursday.

The tax of one-third of 1% is a key component of the financial bailout plan crafted by former MTA Chairman Richard Ravitch. It would affect payrolls in New York City and the other counties the MTA serves. Smith noted that most business groups, including the Partnership for New York City, have expressed support for the tax. Ravitch’s plan, which has the support of Gov. Paterson, is intended to plug the MTA’s $1.2 billion budget gap and head off draconian fare hikes and service cuts.

According to Blain, Ravitch journeyed up to Albany to meet with State Senate leaders this week. Over the next month, in advance of the MTA’s March 25th drop-dead date, two State Senate committees will hold joint hearings on the Ravitch recommendations. Time is clearly of the essence.

Meanwhile, for MTA watchers, this development is clearly good news. If Albany passes half of the Ravitch-inspired bailout plan, the focus — and pressure — will shift to the city. Council members will face increased pressure to approve either the East River bridge tolls or some form of monetary relief — car licensing fees, congestion pricing — for the MTA. Our transit system might just be saved yet.

January 23, 2009 5 comments
1 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
AsidesMTA Absurdity

Breaking a subway record

by Benjamin Kabak January 22, 2009
written by Benjamin Kabak on January 22, 2009

A few hours ago, two investment analysts became the time-honored attempt to break the world record for fastest time through the subway. Using a software simulation, Chris Solarz and Matt Ferrisi are attempting to reach all 468 stations in under 24 hours, 54 minutes and 3 seconds. “I think our record will probably hold up, but I don’t want to say that it’s not possible,” Bill Amarosa, the current record holder, said to The Daily News. As long as they don’t get slowed down by too many unavoidable delays, Solarz and Ferrisi might just make it.

January 22, 2009 14 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Ravitch Commission

At Crain’s breakfast, Sander calls for proper funding

by Benjamin Kabak January 22, 2009
written by Benjamin Kabak on January 22, 2009

sander

Elliot Sander poses with some of the subway system’s aging infrastructure. He hopes for the funds to start some much-needed system modernization. (Photo courtesy of Crain’s.)

The venerable business journal Crain’s hosts regular breakfasts featuring major city players. Yesterday, MTA CEO and Executive Director Elliot “Lee” Sander took the stage to give his “Save the MTA” speech. Sander explained what the MTA plans to do with federal stimulus funding but reiterated the need for Albany to fund the authority’s operating budget.

Daniel Massey from Crain’s New York Business Journal was on hand to report on the talk:

The agency plans to reduce overhead and save $30 million to $40 million by consolidating its back-office administrative offices from seven locations to one, at 370 Jay St., in Brooklyn. And it expects to rake in $1.5 billion to $3 billion from the federal government’s stimulus package. The MTA would use that money to begin the next phase in rehabilitation of the Atlantic Avenue viaduct, which carries Long Island Railroad passengers between Jamaica and downtown Brooklyn; rehabilitate subway stations; overhaul shops and yards; and bolster mega-projects like the Second Avenue Subway and East Side Access, which would connect LIRR trains to Grand Central Terminal.

But those savings and additional funds won’t mean much if the state does not adopt the Ravitch Commission’s plan, which would boost MTA coffers by putting tolls on East River bridges and adding a regional business tax that would amount to 33 cents on every $100 of payroll, Mr. Sander said. Administration represents only 7% of the MTA budget, and the federal dollars would be only about 5% to 10% of the agency’s capital needs. “While the key elements of the plan…are painful without question, the alternative of failing to adequately invest in the MTA is far worse: much higher fares and less service, both of which are unacceptable,” he said…

Mr. Sander said Gov. David Paterson will soon introduce a bill containing the commission’s recommendations, and that it needs to pass before March. He said he thought the plan was fair in its current form and rejected a proposal from some New York City elected officials that the payroll tax be increased further instead of tolling the bridges.

Sander ended the speech with a warning directed at the state legislature. He has long noted that New York has been challenged as one of the world’s leading cities by transit expansion in China and Europe. He reiterated that claim yesterday. “Other than an increase in crime, I can’t think of anything that will start the death knell for New York,” he said.

For the most part, Sander’s speech isn’t a new one. While he did offer a dire update on the Hudson Yards project — and we’ll touch on that later — he has continued to press for the Ravitch Committee recommendations even as the public piles on during the fare hike/service cuts hearings. As the head of the MTA, he’s doing all he can to stave off the cuts, and for that, he deserves support. Hopefully, Albany will heed his calls.

January 22, 2009 5 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
AsidesRider Report Cards

The grades remain the same

by Benjamin Kabak January 21, 2009
written by Benjamin Kabak on January 21, 2009

Late yesterday, New York City Transit announced that the A train had received a C-, again, on its rider report card. Today, CityRoom explores how the grades have stayed constant in the second round of report cards. Interestingly, the MTA received nearly the same number of replies in 2008 as they did in 2007 for the A, but those results are the exception and not the norm. Now, I’ll have more on the rider report cards as some point, but I still have to question the utility of doing this exercise again. I understand Howard Roberts’ rationale; he wants to keep on top of improvement. But the subways are slow to change, and this second round just strikes me as overkill.

January 21, 2009 9 comments
1 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Load More Posts

About The Author

Name: Benjamin Kabak
E-mail: Contact Me

Become a Patron!
Follow @2AvSagas

Upcoming Events
TBD

RSS? Yes, Please: SAS' RSS Feed
SAS In Your Inbox: Subscribe to SAS by E-mail

Instagram



Disclaimer: Subway Map © Metropolitan Transportation Authority. Used with permission. MTA is not associated with nor does it endorse this website or its content.

Categories

  • 14th Street Busway (1)
  • 7 Line Extension (118)
  • Abandoned Stations (31)
  • ARC Tunnel (52)
  • Arts for Transit (19)
  • Asides (1,244)
  • Bronx (13)
  • Brooklyn (126)
  • Brooklyn-Queens Connector (13)
  • Buses (291)
  • Capital Program 2010-2014 (27)
  • Capital Program 2015-2019 (56)
  • Capital Program 2020-2024 (3)
  • Congestion Fee (71)
  • East Side Access Project (37)
  • F Express Plan (22)
  • Fare Hikes (173)
  • Fulton Street (57)
  • Gateway Tunnel (29)
  • High-Speed Rail (9)
  • Hudson Yards (18)
  • Interborough Express (1)
  • International Subways (26)
  • L Train Shutdown (20)
  • LIRR (65)
  • Manhattan (73)
  • Metro-North (99)
  • MetroCard (124)
  • Moynihan Station (16)
  • MTA (98)
  • MTA Absurdity (233)
  • MTA Bridges and Tunnels (27)
  • MTA Construction (128)
  • MTA Economics (522)
    • Doomsday Budget (74)
    • Ravitch Commission (23)
  • MTA Politics (330)
  • MTA Technology (195)
  • New Jersey Transit (53)
  • New York City Transit (220)
  • OMNY (3)
  • PANYNJ (113)
  • Paratransit (10)
  • Penn Station (18)
  • Penn Station Access (10)
  • Podcast (30)
  • Public Transit Policy (164)
  • Queens (129)
  • Rider Report Cards (31)
  • Rolling Stock (40)
  • Second Avenue Subway (262)
  • Self Promotion (77)
  • Service Advisories (612)
  • Service Cuts (118)
  • Sponsored Post (1)
  • Staten Island (52)
  • Straphangers Campaign (40)
  • Subway Advertising (45)
  • Subway Cell Service (34)
  • Subway History (81)
  • Subway Maps (83)
  • Subway Movies (14)
  • Subway Romance (13)
  • Subway Security (104)
  • Superstorm Sandy (35)
  • Taxis (43)
  • Transit Labor (151)
    • ATU (4)
    • TWU (100)
    • UTU (8)
  • Triboro RX (4)
  • U.S. Transit Systems (53)
    • BART (1)
    • Capital Metro (1)
    • CTA (7)
    • MBTA (11)
    • SEPTA (5)
    • WMATA (28)
  • View from Underground (447)

Archives

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram

@2019 - All Right Reserved.


Back To Top