Second Ave. Sagas
  • About
  • Contact Me
  • 2nd Ave. Subway History
  • Search
  • About
  • Contact Me
  • 2nd Ave. Subway History
  • Search
Second Ave. Sagas

News and Views on New York City Transportation

Fare Hikes

The fare hike debate is so over

by Benjamin Kabak December 11, 2007
written by Benjamin Kabak on December 11, 2007

For weeks, the MTA had promoted their planned Webinar. Join us on Monday, December 10, they said, for an interactive presentation about the fare hike proposals. MTA officials would discuss the new fare hike structure and field questions for thousands of riders sitting at their computers.

But of course, disaster struck, and no one — literally no one that I know — was able to access the Webinar. For their part, the MTA blamed their third-party software provider both in an e-mail to those of us who had registered and in a statement released to the media. MTA CEO and Executive Director Lee Sander spoke for the agency in an e-mail:

Unfortunately, we experienced some technological difficulties which created difficulty for some participants to view the slide presentations being given. For that we sincerely apologize. Even though the technology didn’t work perfectly for us this first time, the webinar format and the extremely successful Public Engagement Workshop we held on November 17th, were noble experiments to expand our public outreach efforts. We learned a lot today and look forward to better employing the electronic element in the future.

Now, I take some exception to Sander’s statement. I along with Chris from East Village Idiot and the good folks at Gothamist tried to access this webinar with no success. But despite this 100 percent lack of participation from the group of people I know, MTA Spokesman Jeremy Soffin said, “There were obviously technical difficulties, although we received hundreds of questions and know that the audio worked as well.”

If someone who heard and saw this presentation with no problems could come forward, I’d love to hear from you. Was it any good? Did they adequately address the issues and concerns raised in this PDF presentation? I’ve seen that slideshow before so it’s not a surprise to me, but was it to you?

Meanwhile, the bigger news of the day — and here I am, burying the lede — is that the failure of the fare hike Webinar and the whole sense of debate no longer matters. New York’s big guns have spoken, and it would be a huge surprise if the MTA’s board failed to pass the fare hike next week.

Exhibit A comes to us from Mayor Michael Bloomberg. For weeks, Bloomberg — and by extension, the four MTA board votes he controls — had been silent. Today, with word of the hike getting out, Bloomberg, speaking to us from China, lifted that veil. Elizabeth Benjamin has the mayor’s statement:

Based on the information that my staff and I have received and reviewed over the past few weeks, I am now satisfied that the MTA budget is a responsible plan that includes important cost reductions. I agree with Governor Spitzer that this fare increase is necessary to maintain an adequate level of service and balance the needs and obligations of all who use this critical part of the region’s infrastructure. Although it is always hard to ask riders to pay more, I will now urge the City’s representatives to support the proposed fare plan that calls for preserving the $2.00 fare and holding the overall fare increase to less than 4%. This was something we couldn’t support until we’d done everything possible to lower operating expenses and to ensure efficiencies.

And Gov. Spitzer, the embattled governor who is screwing us and getting screwed, sounded a similar bell today:

I commend MTA Chair Dale Hemmerdinger and MTA Executive Director and CEO Lee Sander on the hard work that they and their staff have put into developing a fiscally responsible 2008 budget…I urge the MTA Board to adopt the proposed budget at their meeting next week.

We must now turn our efforts to the long-term funding of the state’s transportation infrastructure, including the needs of the MTA. We need to invest, not only to maintain the system we have, but to make the necessary improvements to grow the system through the 2nd Avenue Subway, East Side Access, Access to Regions Core, and a new Moynihan Station – projects that will ensure the system serves the 21st Century economy.

On the other side of the debate, a few members of the citycouncil and Christine Quinn looking to position herself for a run at the mayorship spoke out against the fare hike. The best statement came from Simcha Felder who slammed Spitzer’s tourist-friendly plan:

I’m not surprised that the MTA has found a new way to rip us off by holding the base fare favored by tourists at $2, while raising every other fare, including the fares of the weekly and monthly unlimited passes. Hard working New Yorkers, who have to deal with crowded trains, delayed and intermittent service, and dirty subway stations every day should be the ones shielded most from fare hikes.

But it doesn’t matter. The big guns have spoken. The fare hike will pass, and the MTA’s efforts at soliciting public opinion came to an inglorious end today.

As I’ve mentioned in the past, I am in support of this fare hike. Until the MTA has money in hand from the state government, they have to proceed down a fiscally responsible path. The Richard Brodsky’s and John Liu’s of the world can criticize them all they want and offer up empty promises of hundreds of millions of dollars, but that’s not good enough. The MTA controls its own fate right now, and until someone shows me otherwise, it’s the way to go.

One day, we’ll all know what to do with that odd amount of change left on our pay-per-ride MetroCards, and we’ll all learn to re-educate ourselves in the ways of MetroCard mathematics. But for now, the fare hike is a fait accompli. And that’s life in the Big Apple for ya.

December 11, 2007 10 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Brooklyn

Southern Brooklyn Q stops gearing up for renovations

by Benjamin Kabak December 10, 2007
written by Benjamin Kabak on December 10, 2007

neckroadrehab.jpg

The Neck Road stop will look much less forlorn when renovations are complete. (Courtesy of the MTA)

Brooklyn sure is in for a rough ride. A few weeks after announcing years of construction — and service changes — in central Brooklyn along the F line, the MTA unveiled plans to completely overhaul seven stations along the Brighton Line from Neck Road and Newkirk Ave.

First up are Neck Road and Avenue U, and the MTA’s plans should wreak havoc for commuters relying on the Q and B trains to ferry them to and from Homecrest or Sheepshead Bay and the rest of the city. The work on just those two stations is set to take 28 months, and there is, as yet, no timetable for work on the other five stations.

Much like the work on the F train, commuters will be facing constant service changes as these two 100-year-old stations finally receive a proper overhaul. Included in the renovation are ADA-compliancy plans. The MTA anticipates work to begin in late 2008, sometime around October, and for the first 11 months, southbound service will be rerouted. All southbound Q and B trains will skip Ave. U and Neck Road, running from Kings Highway to Sheepshead Bay. For the B, this is routine service, but the Q will see two fewer stops.

Riders wishing to get to these two stations will be able to transfer to a northbound Q train at Sheepshead Bay making all local stops or transfer to a shuttle bus at Kings Highway. This bus will run from Kings Highway down Ocean Ave. and east on Ave. U to Gerritsen Ave. near Marine Park. The shuttle is, in fact, a bit of a boon to many who faced long walks from the subway along that route or long waits for the B3. Additionally, many riders may also just choose to walk to Kings Highway or Sheepshead Bay as those stations aren’t very far from Avenue U and Neck Road respectively.

After 11 months of southbound work, in fall of 2009, phase two of the project will begin. This time, the northbound platforms get their makeover. All southbound trains make normal stops while northbound trains ride on the express tracks, bypassing Neck Road and Ave. U. To reach northbound trains, riders at Neck Road and Ave. U will have to ride south Sheepshead Bay for Manhattan-bound Q or B trains. The three people riding north from Coney Island or Brighton Beach trying to reach Neck Road or Ave. U will be able to switch to southbound local service at Kings Highway.

Got all that? Backriding is confusing stuff. For a convenient picture form of this mess, the MTA’s presentation to Brooklyn Community Board 15 is available here as a PDF.

The service changes should wrap up by mid-2010, and it is anticipated that the renovations on the other stations will fit into a similar time frame. All in all, fun times are ahead for people in southern Brooklyn relying on the B and Q lines. With the F line construction set for the same time, good options from Coney Island north are slowly dwindling.

December 10, 2007 10 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
AsidesMTA Absurdity

Webinar a stunning success

by Benjamin Kabak December 10, 2007
written by Benjamin Kabak on December 10, 2007

Wait. Wait. No, it’s not. We’re now 45 minutes into the so-called fare hike webinar, and guess what? The only message from the MTA is: “Hi, please be patient we are experiencing technical difficulties.” Anyone surprised by this? Anyone? Bueller?

Update: At about 1:45 p.m., a message popped up on my computer telling me that “The Webinar has Ended.” It ended before it even began. Computers 1, MTA 0.

December 10, 2007 3 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Fare Hikes

How Eliot Spitzer saved the cars and tourists while nailing the rest of us

by Benjamin Kabak December 10, 2007
written by Benjamin Kabak on December 10, 2007

This afternoon, at 12 noon, the MTA will officially unveil its new fare plan during an online seminar. But, thanks to William Neuman and The New York Times, we already know what the new fare structure proposal will be, and as we guessed, everyday riders will bear the brunt of the increase. Thank you, Governor Spitzer.

Before getting to the proposal, let’s review: The MTA came under fire for its new fare hike plan seemingly from Day 1 in September. Comptrollers criticized the plans; MTA Board Members criticized the plan; the Straphangers criticized the plan. Then, in an effort to bolster his flagging image, New York’s Gov. Eliot Spitzer strongly urged the MTA to keep the base fare at $2 and scale the back the hikes. The MTA obliged, and now we’re all worse off. Well, all of us except the whopping 14 percent of subway riders who pay just $2 a ride.

So now, enter the new new fare hike proposal. Take it away, William Neuman:

Subway and bus riders who use monthly unlimited-ride MetroCards would be hit the hardest under a revised proposal to increase transit fares, which is to be announced today by the Metropolitan Transportation Authority.

The cost of the monthly pass would rise to $81 from $76, a 6.6 percent increase, according to a memo sent to the authority’s board members yesterday. Bonus pay-per-ride MetroCards would also face increases under the new proposal. Also, an earlier proposal to offer discounts during off-peak hours is no longer being recommended, according to the memo…

Under the new proposal, the weekly unlimited-ride MetroCard would increase to $25, from $24, a 4.2 percent increase. Also, a 14-day MetroCard would be created, with a cost of $47. As part of the changes, the bonus on pay-per-ride MetroCards would fall to 15 percent, from 20 percent. But the amount of money needed to qualify for the bonus will also drop, to $7, from $10, the memo said.

You know what this means, right? Get ready to flex your math brains. For those pay-per-ride folks, buy a $20 MetroCard, get $3 more dollars. Those $23 cards really won’t come in handy at the end of its life. And forget about adding $7 more dollars; you’ll just end up with $8.05 instead, an utterly useless amount when it comes to the subway.

Meanwhile, it’s that Unlimited Ride increase that worries me. Sure, as the Monthly MetroCard Challenge shows, we’re all getting some pretty good deals with those cards, and I do like the addition of a 14-day Unlimited card. But while Spitzer made a good show of supposedly stopping the fare hike, the large faction of us using Unlimited Ride cards will now be shouldering more of the burden than we would have if the fare had risen to $2.25.

In the original plan, the Unlimited Ride cards were up for two different increases. The Peak/Off-Peak plan that was pretty much dead on arrival had the Unlimited cards heading to $81 for a month while the more traditional increase had those cards at $79. Now, the base fare — the fare used by one-off riders who don’t really enjoy all the benefits of the subway — will stay at $2, and Unlimited Ride MetroCards will go up by a whopping 6.6 percent, an increase even greater than that of the one planned for the bridge and tunnel crossings run by the MTA.

Once again, cars and tourists get the benefit of a reduced fare plan while residents relying on mass transit on a daily basis draw the short straw. Thanks for looking out for us, Gov. Spitzer. Appreciate it.

Personally, I’ve long expressed my support for a fare hike. Until Richard Brodsky makes good on his promise, reiterated once again in Neuman’s article, of more federal funds for the MTA, the agency has to shore up its financial future. But I can’t really get behind a plan that really nails the MTA’s most loyal customers while giving cars a sweet deal. We should be doing what we can to encourage mass transit use right now, and I’d rather see no fare hike than this shortsighted plan put forth by a pandering governor.

December 10, 2007 13 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Service Advisories

The holidays are kind to weekend subway service

by Benjamin Kabak December 7, 2007
written by Benjamin Kabak on December 7, 2007

So get this: There is a grand total of three service advisories this weekend plus the ever-popular “the Cortlandt Street Station is closed until the end of days” advisory. That’s what happens when tourists are in town. The MTA can’t confuse people who just stand there gaping.

So all you Upper West Siders wishing for express service (cough cough my parents cough cough), it’s your lucky weekend. Service advisories are here in press release form and below.


From 7 a.m. to 7 p.m., Saturday, December 8 and Sunday, December 9, Bronx-bound 4 trains run express from 149th Street to Burnside Avenue due to cable work north of 149th Street station.


From 11 p.m. Friday, December 7 to 5 a.m. Monday, December 10, free shuttle buses replace A trains between Beach 90th Street and Far Rockaway due to track panel work between Beach 90th Street and Mott Avenue-Far Rockaway stations.


From 12:01 a.m., Saturday, December 8 to 5 a.m. Monday, December 10, Manhattan-bound D trains run express from Bay parkway to 9th Avenue due to switch renewal north of 9th Avenue.


The Cortlandt Street Station is closed until further notice while the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey continues to build on the WTC site.

December 7, 2007 1 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
New York City Transit

Sander, Roberts staking much on NYCT reorganization

by Benjamin Kabak December 7, 2007
written by Benjamin Kabak on December 7, 2007

Do we trust Lee Sander and Howard Roberts? That’s really the question behind this line manager plan New York City Transit will begin to implement on Monday.

If we trust the MTA CEO with impeccable academic credentials and the NYCT President who helped streamline the New York City buses twenty years ago, then this seemingly bureaucratic addition of line managers will help improve subway service, somehow. If we don’t trust them, it’s just one more layer of bureaucracy in an organization already plagued with too many employees and layers of red tape.

First, the details: In response to the mediocre grades the MTA has received from the unscientific Rider Report Cards and the seemingly glacial pace of change the pre-Sander MTA, New York City Transit has decided to assign line managers to each line. While most government agencies would shy away from adding another 20 middle managers, Howard Roberts, NYCT president, and Sander, the MTA’s head honcho, think that turning each line into its own railroad with its own funds and crew will help streamline common problems.

William Neuman in The Times wrote more about this restructuring:

The changes are designed to give individual subway lines a greater degree of autonomy by putting each one under the direction of a manager who will be responsible for almost everything that happens on the tracks, in the trains and in the stations.

The goal, Mr. Roberts said, is to have 24 subway lines operating in many ways as 24 self-contained railroads. (The number may vary, depending on how the lines are counted.) They will compete against one another and be rated on service, cleanliness, on-time performance and other measures…

The new managers will be backed up with money and manpower. Additional cleaners will be assigned to stations and trains. And managers will also be able to send out special crews to “blitz” their stations — swarming in and spiffing up everything: peeling paint, rusted fixtures and damaged signs.

The pilot program — because the MTA always needs a pilot program — starts on Monday on the L and 7 lines, those isolated bastions of crowded, underperforming subways. And with the quote of the day comes Roberts. “Bureaucracy is where it takes a year to get something done,” he said. “Creating small organizations that can react quickly and solve problems overnight is the antithesis of that.”

I have long dreamed of the day the MTA solves something overnight.

Sarcasm aside, it’s really easy to see how this plan can fail. Individual subway lines are not autonomous. While the L and 7 are the only trains on their respective tracks, take the B train. At no point from Brighton Beach to Bedford Park Boulevard are the B trains the only trains on the route. The B must share tracks, switches and signals with, at times, the Q, the D and the C trains while the F, V and A also stop at similar stations but use adjacent tracks. Who is supposed to manage that mess?

And what about this whole competition thing? Most people don’t enjoy the luxury of competition in choosing their subways. The vast majority of New Yorkers take the same trains each day because that train is close to home and gets them to work. No one’s going to walk a significant distant to find a train that won’t save them too much time. So while one commenter at CityRoom suggests naming subway cars and other superficial improvements, the Subchat contributors suggest a more rational pay-for-performance model. If your line’s stations are the cleanest, you get paid more. I like that.

For its part, The Times likes this plan. In today’s editorial, The Times notes that, right now, one person is in charge of 468 stations which is why nothing gets done. Is it better to add a new vice president and 22 more managers to improve this problem? Only if more fat is trimmed.

As Railman718 noted (here and here) today on Subchat, this reorganization appears to be something that Sander and Roberts have had on the agenda since before either of them were installed at the MTA. It’s why Pataki-era leaders who weren’t known for their transportation savviness have left in droves.

So basically, we’re right back where we started. If the MTA is intent on eliminating middle management, as Scott suggested here yesterday that they are, it’s probably a winning restructuring. If they can create adequate spheres of influence and figure out how overlapping lines are going to managed, this plan will work. If they can address the systematic problems with the MTA and bring the current state of subway technology in New York City into the 21st Century while doing it, it’s a win. All of this just makes for one tall order facing an agency that needs to overcome a tall order to gain back the trust of its riders.

December 7, 2007 14 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Asides

The 30-Day MetroCard Challenge Update

by Benjamin Kabak December 6, 2007
written by Benjamin Kabak on December 6, 2007

With just under half of the time left on my 30-day Unlimited MetroCard Challenge, I’ve taken 38 trips, and I’ve hit the MTA’s $2 base fare. At this rate, my $76, 30-day MetroCard will average out to approximately $1 per ride. No wonder the MTA wants to raise the fares on these things. Follow my progress in the middle column.

December 6, 2007 3 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
AsidesMTA Absurdity

Adding more bureacracy is never a good idea

by Benjamin Kabak December 6, 2007
written by Benjamin Kabak on December 6, 2007

Chalk this one up in the “Bad Idea” category. The MTA wants to divide the management of the city’s 24 subway lines to 24 different people to ensure competition among the lines. These 24 managers will be responsible for every aspect of running the subway line. NYCT President Howard Roberts thinks this plan will help the subways respond to customer complains faster. I can’t imagine the need for yet another level of bureaucracy at the MTA. The plan goes into effect on Monday on the L and 7 lines, and I’ll have more on this later. [The New York Times]

December 6, 2007 7 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Congestion FeeFare Hikes

Bloomberg, not yet willing to pony up, criticizes fare hike plans

by Benjamin Kabak December 6, 2007
written by Benjamin Kabak on December 6, 2007

It’s time for another episode of When Politicians Attack. We join Mayor Mike Bloomberg as he berates the MTA, the congestion pricing panel and everyone in between.

As the MTA rushes headlong into its key fare hike board meeting next week, the political digs are coming fast and furious, and this time, Bloomberg is getting in on the act. The fun started on Tuesday when Bloomberg started rattling his congestion pricing saber. Lobbying in support of his congestion pricing plan, Bloomberg said that the revenue from the plan could help stave off future fare hikes.

Now, Bloomberg sure does have a point: The projected revenue from the congestion fee plan could, in essence, be a part of an effort to stave off future fare hikes. But that money is more hypothetical than anything else right now. Congestion pricing is far from guaranteed, and even then, the initial revenue will go toward repaying the city for installing the congestion pricing monitoring. Optimistically, the MTA won’t see any congestion fee revenue until 2010. The agency certainly can’t wait that long to shore up its financial future.

As Tuesday turned into Wednesay, Bloomberg grew a little more belligerent. He laid the blame for the New York area’s seemingly sub-par mass transit at the feet of the MTA. “There are too many parts of this region that have not been provided with mass transit and people don’t have any choice other than to use their cars,” Bloomberg said. “And there are too many parts of our mass transit system that are not as fast, efficient and pleasurable as they should be.”

The mayor even went so far as to claim that the city is funding the 7 line extension because he “can’t wait for the MTA to act.”

Hold the phone, Mike. Let’s clear some things up. First, why is the MTA in this financial pickle without the funds necessary to ensure better mass transit access in the region? Because your predecessor helped starve the system, and you haven’t exactly picked up the financial slack. Bloomberg claims the city doesn’t have the funds available to give more to the MTA. Right.

Meanwhile, the city isn’t funding the 7 line extension because the MTA is too slow to act. The city is funding the 7 line extension because it’s hardly a top priority. In the comments on Tuesday, Scott called this project “the pointless extension to nowhere.”

To be fair, this 7 extension isn’t completely useless; there are some obvious benefits to the Hudson Yards and Far West Side. But the city is spending $2.1 billion on a one-stop extension that right now is more of a luxury than anything else. The MTA is using their $2.1 billion to build a much-needed and much-delayed subway line. I have to side with the MTA on this one.

Bloomberg, by the way, still didn’t promise more money for the beleaguered MTA today either. But a few lawmakers think he should. Both TWU Local 100 Preident Roger Toussaint and Straphangers Campaign Lawyer Gene Russianoff called on Bloomberg this week to send more money to the MTA. “You can build a world class transit system, or you can nickel and dime it to death. You can’t do both,” Toussaint said. “Mayor Bloomberg can be helpful to millions of New Yorkers who rely on mass transit and to the local economy that it powers – all he has to do is speak up.”

“How New York City has gotten off the hook for a system that moves its residents and fuels business and tourism is pretty unbelievable,” Russianoff noted.

Yet for all of this political in-fighting, the biggest news may be the worst of the MTA: The panel currently considering congestion pricing may recommend to cut the fee from $8 to $4 and move the toll barrier south 26 blocks to 68th St. Needless to say, this would significantly reduce the $390 million the mayor claims the MTA stands to reap from congestion pricing.

It’s just another day on “As the Congestion Pricing/Fare Hike Debate Turns.” Stay tuned for more. In politics, there’s always more.

Photo of the old tokens and a Metrocard by flickr user MacRonin47.

December 6, 2007 3 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
AsidesRider Report Cards

A six-month publicity stunt

by Benjamin Kabak December 5, 2007
written by Benjamin Kabak on December 5, 2007

Anne Karni, in a piece for which I was interviewed but not quoted, takes a look at the Rider Report Cards in today’s Sun. The conclusion of everyone interviewed is that these report cards aren’t breaking new ground and that they are an attempt by the MTA to put a good public face on problems they cannot solve. As these report cards have been well covered on SAS, I’m planning a much bigger post on the points in Karni’s article once all the report cards are in. [New York Sun]

December 5, 2007 0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Load More Posts

About The Author

Name: Benjamin Kabak
E-mail: Contact Me

Become a Patron!
Follow @2AvSagas

Upcoming Events
TBD

RSS? Yes, Please: SAS' RSS Feed
SAS In Your Inbox: Subscribe to SAS by E-mail

Instagram



Disclaimer: Subway Map © Metropolitan Transportation Authority. Used with permission. MTA is not associated with nor does it endorse this website or its content.

Categories

  • 14th Street Busway (1)
  • 7 Line Extension (118)
  • Abandoned Stations (31)
  • ARC Tunnel (52)
  • Arts for Transit (19)
  • Asides (1,244)
  • Bronx (13)
  • Brooklyn (126)
  • Brooklyn-Queens Connector (13)
  • Buses (291)
  • Capital Program 2010-2014 (27)
  • Capital Program 2015-2019 (56)
  • Capital Program 2020-2024 (3)
  • Congestion Fee (71)
  • East Side Access Project (37)
  • F Express Plan (22)
  • Fare Hikes (173)
  • Fulton Street (57)
  • Gateway Tunnel (29)
  • High-Speed Rail (9)
  • Hudson Yards (18)
  • Interborough Express (1)
  • International Subways (26)
  • L Train Shutdown (20)
  • LIRR (65)
  • Manhattan (73)
  • Metro-North (99)
  • MetroCard (124)
  • Moynihan Station (16)
  • MTA (98)
  • MTA Absurdity (233)
  • MTA Bridges and Tunnels (27)
  • MTA Construction (128)
  • MTA Economics (522)
    • Doomsday Budget (74)
    • Ravitch Commission (23)
  • MTA Politics (330)
  • MTA Technology (195)
  • New Jersey Transit (53)
  • New York City Transit (220)
  • OMNY (3)
  • PANYNJ (113)
  • Paratransit (10)
  • Penn Station (18)
  • Penn Station Access (10)
  • Podcast (30)
  • Public Transit Policy (164)
  • Queens (129)
  • Rider Report Cards (31)
  • Rolling Stock (40)
  • Second Avenue Subway (262)
  • Self Promotion (77)
  • Service Advisories (612)
  • Service Cuts (118)
  • Sponsored Post (1)
  • Staten Island (52)
  • Straphangers Campaign (40)
  • Subway Advertising (45)
  • Subway Cell Service (34)
  • Subway History (81)
  • Subway Maps (83)
  • Subway Movies (14)
  • Subway Romance (13)
  • Subway Security (104)
  • Superstorm Sandy (35)
  • Taxis (43)
  • Transit Labor (151)
    • ATU (4)
    • TWU (100)
    • UTU (8)
  • Triboro RX (4)
  • U.S. Transit Systems (53)
    • BART (1)
    • Capital Metro (1)
    • CTA (7)
    • MBTA (11)
    • SEPTA (5)
    • WMATA (28)
  • View from Underground (447)

Archives

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram

@2019 - All Right Reserved.


Back To Top