Second Ave. Sagas
  • About
  • Contact Me
  • 2nd Ave. Subway History
  • Search
  • About
  • Contact Me
  • 2nd Ave. Subway History
  • Search
Second Ave. Sagas

News and Views on New York City Transportation

Congestion Fee

Left for dead, congestion fee lives

by Benjamin Kabak July 19, 2007
written by Benjamin Kabak on July 19, 2007

Live from a Blackberry at LAX, it’s the return of the congestion fee.

When last we saw the congestion fee plan, it was dead in the water, and New York had just lost out on $500 million from the feds. Well, the funeral may have bee premature. As Streetsblog summarizes, the congestion fee plans are alive and kicking. The dtate legislature and executives have agreed to establish a commission to address the congestion problem

I’ll have more later when I can get to a computer. For now, check out Streetsblog.

July 19, 2007 0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Service Advisories

Lexington Ave. steam explosion to mess with the Thursday commute

by Benjamin Kabak July 19, 2007
written by Benjamin Kabak on July 19, 2007

This destruction on Lexington Ave. is going to wreck havoc with the morning commute. (Photo by Peter Foley of the European Pressphoto Agency)

Mid-Day Update: The MTA announced shortly after the end of rush hour this morning that all trains are now stopping at Grand Central Terminal. Shuttle service has been restored as well. However, as many streets remain closed around the giant hole at Lexington and 41st, bus service on the M42, M98, M101, M102, M103 and M104 is slower than normal with some route detours. These changes could last a while.

=====

The notices came to me on my Blackberry this evening while I stared at animals in the San Diego Zoo. Three thousand miles from home, I could do nothing but check the mobile Internet to find out more about the steam pipe explosion that has left a gaping hole on Lexington Ave. just a block from Grand Central Terminal and a few feet above the subway tunnels underneath Manhattan.

While CityRoom and Gothamist each did fantastic jobs with their up-to-the-minute updates (CityRoom here and Gothamist here), I had to piece together the story as reports reached me during a Padres game. Such are the travails of vacation.

But the three-hour time difference always me to blog now, on the edge of the morning commute in New York City, with some bad news for travelers heading to Grand Central Terminal. Things, according to this MTA service alert for New York City Transit, do not look good.

As of 5:30 a.m., the East Side is a mess. While the tunnels escaped unharmed, the air around midtown could be filled with asbestos from the exploding pipe. As such, many streets are closed and access to Grand Central Terminal is limited to the 47th St. entrance. As for the subways, travel on the East Side is restricted.

First, the good news: Trains are running through the East Side IRT tunnels (and, yes, some of us still know what the IRT is) but are not stopping at Grand Central. The closest stops are as follows: On the 6, walk from 51st or 33rd Sts. On the 4 and 5, the trains will stop at 14th St./Union Square and 59th St.

The 7 coming inbound from Queens is skipping Grand Central Terminal. The nearest stop in this case is the 5th Ave. stop along 42nd St.

The Times Square shuttle is suspended for now, and the M104 and M42 buses are terminating at Times Square instead of on the East Side.

From Westchester, the morning commute should be okay. As the MTA reports, Metro-North is running into Grand Central, but only one entrance at the station is open. Plan accordingly.

It’s going to be a rough few days for East Side travel. Many streets are closed as WCBS 880 AM reports here, and Lexington Ave. will probably be closed for a while as the city tests the steam pipes, the air quality and the structural integrity of the pavement before moving onto the repair phase.

Keep an eye on the MTA’s service alerts, and I’ll do my best to keep everyone updated. It’s going to be a tough few days around midtown.

July 19, 2007 1 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Subway Security

If you see something on TV, say something

by Benjamin Kabak July 18, 2007
written by Benjamin Kabak on July 18, 2007

security-bus-side-copy.jpg

Everyone loves the MTA’s security campaigns. They’re great for everything from funny pictures of dogs and ad campaign knock-offs to cheesy MTA-related blog headlines to graffiti (such as the doctored poster I saw once that said “Bush is still president, say something”).

Now, the MTA is expanded the “see something, say something” ad campaign out of the subways and buses and on to your TV screens. With 1944 tips last year, the MTA is hoping to expand the program, and beginning this month, 10-second TV spots will hit the airwaves over 4000 times until November. The ads (which you can view here) urge citizens to keep up the good work reporting abandoned backpacks and suspicious packages.

The MTA’s press releases tells us that this campaign will cost approximately $3 million. The 10,000 posters in the MTA’s system will be joined with 84 ads in 11 regional newspapers and the TV spots on New York’s major English and Spanish-language TV networks.

“As recent incidents from around the world have taught us, the public can play a vital role in helping to identify a threat. Engaging the eyes and ears of the ridership continues to be essential in developing a true security partnership,” Michael Balboni, deputy secretary for public safety for New York State, said in the MTA’s statement.

So there you have it, folks. Three-million dollars spent on TV ads while the subways themselves remain insecure. I’m all for educating the public about proper anti-terrorism messages, but at one point do we say, “Enough is enough” and invest the money spent on public awareness campaigns back into protecting the system?

July 18, 2007 3 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Congestion Fee

A post mortem on the congestion fee

by Benjamin Kabak July 18, 2007
written by Benjamin Kabak on July 18, 2007

Yesterday’s post on the fall of Mayor Bloomberg’s congestion fee left many feeling raw about the way Albany mistreats New York. Today, the finger-pointing reined supreme.

But no matter how the state Assembly members tried to spin, the blame ultimately rests on their shoulders. It’s their fault that Bloomberg’s plan didn’t pass. It’s their fault New York is stuck with no solution to its congestion problem and no solution to the looming financial problems that could plague the MTA for years.

The New York Times noted that Mayor Bloomberg was not happy at all with the state legislature but may have to shoulder some of the blame. While SUBWAYblogger noted that Bloomberg knew his plan was the right one, Diane Cardwell of The Times explained how Bloomberg didn’t adequately convince the state legislature of this fact:

At a news conference in Brooklyn yesterday, Mr. Bloomberg denounced lawmakers for failing to even take up his plan, suggesting that they lacked “guts” and that their inaction would result in children being exposed to polluted air. “Albany just does not seem to get it,” he said …

[But] Rather than engaging either Gov. Eliot Spitzer or legislative leaders from the beginning, they said, Mr. Bloomberg and his aides sprang a complex proposal on the Legislature at the end of its session, seemed unprepared to answer questions or revise details, missed opportunities to sway legislators, and then used the deadline to apply for federal financing as a bludgeon to shove the plan through.

“The constant drumbeat of the deadline may have done more harm than good — people got their backs up,” said Assemblyman Richard N. Gottfried, who favored the plan. “People don’t like to have a gun to their head.”

While The Daily News came down more firmly on the side of Mayor Bloomberg, they too noted that political machinations doomed the congestion pricing plan. Republican Senate Majority Leader Joe Bruno, who couldn’t muster all of his troops behind the plan, blamed Gov. Eliot Spitzer for a failure of leadership, and The News noted that the Assembly has grown tired of caving to a powerful executive (in this case, Bloomberg).

While the state missed the July 16th deadline that would have ensured over $500 million in federal funds for the implementation of the congestion fee, not everyone is ready to declare the plan dead forever. Sewell Chan at the CityRoom blog notes that the Straphangers have urged the state to continue work on a congestion fee plan. Other are using this opportunity to push other ideas — such as bike sharing — that would hopefully get cars off the road.

The Streetsblog advocates, major proponents of the congestion fee, responded yesterday as well. In fact, they went so far as to print a letter from the man who killed the congestion fee. Richard Brodsky, an Assembly representative from Westchester whose constituents would have the most to lose from the plan, work tirelessly to fight the pricing plan. Earlier this month, Streetsblog noted that Brodsky took in more from the parking industry than any other representative. Brodsky claims he was working for the democratic process and that the parking industry money he takes in had nothing to do with his stance on the congestion fee. And I have a bridge to sell you.

No matter where everything stands today, though, we have to remember that the congestion fee isn’t dead forever. It’s just dead for now and no longer can enjoy the possibility of a $500 million federal grant. A reader of mine — an ex-pat Jerry living in Prague — says he visits London frequently and notes that the congestion fee works in reducing traffic. One day, New York will take some responsibility for its transportation and environmental future and become like London. We lost this round, but we can’t give up this fight. The congestion fee in New York will happen, and it will happen soon.

July 18, 2007 1 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Congestion Fee

As the congestion fee goes, so goes New York City

by Benjamin Kabak July 17, 2007
written by Benjamin Kabak on July 17, 2007

As I sit in a house in Los Angeles for a week away from New York, I know that New York City is unique among all of this country’s urban areas. The Big Apple does not need cars to survive. The Big Apple lives and dies on its public transportation network.

Last night was a sad one for the City as the cars ruled and the public transportation network, facing a financial crisis, received what could become its death blow. In a day that could be worse for New York City than when Robert Moses and his short-sighted, automobile-centric, neighborhood-destroying ego came to power, Mayor Bloomberg’s congestion fee plan died in Albany tonight.

It died in the arms of people who think they know what’s best for New York City and people who are beholden to special interests. It died in the arms of residents of the Outer Boroughs who live far beyond the subway in Eastern Queens. It died in the arms of suburban residents who travel into the city every day, polluting with their cars and not giving back to the city in the form of taxes or other fees. It died in the arms of those who feel a sense of entitlement because they ride around in cars that affect our environment while they go back to their whitewashed suburbs with cleaner air and more trees.

The Times gives us the bleak details:

Lawmakers on Monday shelved Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg’s plan to charge a fee to drivers entering the busiest parts of Manhattan, dealing a setback to the mayor as he tries to raise his national profile and promote his environmental initiatives.

The State Senate, which had convened in a special session, adjourned without taking up the plan after it became apparent that the votes for passage were not there.

Meanwhile, the Assembly speaker, Sheldon Silver, proposed sending the issue to a study commission that would also consider other ways to reduce traffic, and giving the Legislature until next March to act.

While Bloomberg’s plan, one that would guarantee a steady source of income for the MTA to provide for better public transportation options, has been rejected by the apparently All-Knowing Sheldon Silver, the fate of the $576 million grant that the federal government had planned to award New York City is unknown. The State Assembly is attempting to set up some bureaucratic commission to further study the long-term social, environmental, health and economics effects of the congestion fee plan an in effort to secure the money the city would have received had Bloomberg’s plan passed.

So now, we in New York City stand neglected. Those of us who live in subway-accessible areas and rely on subways and buses for our transportation could face a bleak future thanks to a bunch of suburban people too impressed with themselves to ride mass transit and residents in faraway Queens and the Bronx who don’t realize that the congestion fee would bring them more reliable and faster public transportation.

Today is a sad day for New York politics. It is a sad message sent to the City. Get a car, the pols tell us. Well, I say, New York was built by the subways. Where the subways ran, people followed. No one likes to drive in New York, and no one should drive in New York. Commuter rail, subway lines and buses could get more people all over the city with fewer environmental consequences than cars do now. This isn’t hard to understand if you live in the city. But apparently our Albany overlords, many of whom live in areas that we as New Yorkers wouldn’t even recognize as New York, think they know what’s right.

Today, I’m bitter. I’m bitter that New York won’t follow London’s lead and become a model for a more efficient approach to traffic problems in the 21st century. I’m bitter that our wonderful public transportation network could be facing an uphill battle to maintain even its current levels of service. I’m bitter that politicians couldn’t get this deal finished.

Tomorrow, we’ll move on. We’ll go back to the drawing board and attempt to get this plan back on track. Tomorrow, we’ll pick up the wacky stories and ongoing subplots of the MTA’s coping with its second hundred years. But today, we can be mad that the congestion fee did not pass and hope that we can drop a “yet” into this sentence too. Today, we can mourn a bold idea turned away and complain about people from “upstate.” Today we can think of what could have been and hope that one day it still might be.

July 17, 2007 6 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Congestion Fee

Senate, Assembly debating congestion fee into the evening

by Benjamin Kabak July 16, 2007
written by Benjamin Kabak on July 16, 2007

There is still no word yet on the future of the congestion fee in New York or on that $500 million boon from the federal government. I’ll have more tonight if news breaks. In the meantime, Sewell Chan at The New York Times has numerous updates (with more still to come) at this post on the Cityroom blog. There’s hope yet.

July 16, 2007 2 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Congestion Fee

Fate of NYC public transportation could be decided today

by Benjamin Kabak July 16, 2007
written by Benjamin Kabak on July 16, 2007

Five hundred million dollars. Roll that number around your head. This whole thing, this weekend of congestion pricing battles, it’s really all about the $500 million, and today, we will find out the future of that large sum the federal government is dangling in front of New York City.

For the last week, I’ve been silent on the issue of the congestion fee, but over the last few months, I’ve been an outspoken advocate of the congestion fee plan. Any plan that reduces traffic in New York City while finding money for our cash-strapped public transportation system will get my blessing.

Now, things are coming to a head. The federal government has seemingly set a July 16th deadline for New York to pass the congestion pricing fee if the city is to be awarded a $500-million grant to implement this groundbreaking plan. Furthermore, Mayor Bloomberg’s political future is seemingly entwined with the success or failure of the plan. His Independent star will rise with a victory and fall with a defeat.

It’s been, in other words, a very active weekend on the congestion fee plan. So let’s see where this plan — one that would benefit all New Yorkers, drivers and non-drivers alike — stands as we enter the 11th Hour in Albany.

Continue Reading
July 16, 2007 9 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Arts for TransitService Advisories

Thoughts on the art-vs.-service debate

by Benjamin Kabak July 13, 2007
written by Benjamin Kabak on July 13, 2007

When the Washingotn Post published the Tom Toles cartoon above on July 3, a few loyal Second Ave. Sagas readers e-mailed it to me and noted how the idea can apply to the MTA also. The MTA, often more concerned with putting on a pretty face, spends money on luxuries instead of on more frequent service, some might contend.

I’m particularly intrigued by the notion here that station art may come at the expense of more reliable travel and service. In my opinion, station art and the MTA’s Arts for Transit programs are positives. They beautify stations that may otherwise may appear dour and depressing. The cost outlay is minimal compared to the amount the MTA spends on station upkeep, and scraping the program wouldn’t automatically provide the entire city with frequent service at all hours of the day.

Every weekend, when Friday rolls around and these weekend service advisories mount up, we complain about the the slow and hard-to-follow service. While I agree with others that service has seemed less-than-exceptional lately, I don’t think the answer to the MTA’s service woes is to scrap the Arts programs. The answer, instead, lies in securing adequate funding for the system through the congestion fee. As the odds of that worsen, we’ll just have to deal with a system strained to its economic limits.

And now your weekend service summary: New changes on the Q; still no 4 service between Brooklyn Bridge and Atlantic Ave.; and the West Side IRT express trains are running local. As always, everything else is here.

Safe travels this weekend.

July 13, 2007 2 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Buses

NYCT looking to improve bus rapid transit service

by Benjamin Kabak July 13, 2007
written by Benjamin Kabak on July 13, 2007

Parts of the bus rapid transit plan shown here in Ecuador may soon come to New York. (Photo courtesy of Transportation Alternatives)

Let’s leave the tunnels of the subway for a brief foray onto the busy, crowded streets of Manhattan. The straphangers among us used to the relatively high-speed subway service think of Manhattan’s intricate bus network with little more than disdain. The buses, maddeningly inefficient, combat gridlock, cab drivers, double parked cars and inept MetroCard users as they crawl through the City.

But if all goes according to the MTA’s new plan, bus service in New York could rapidly improve. Bobby Cuza, NY1’s transit man on the street (and apparent NYC heartthrob, if you ask some of the right people), reports on a pilot program designed to improve bus transit that the City will implement with or without congestion pricing. While bus rapid-transit service has been a major selling point with the congestion fee plan, it’s a relief to see the MTA’s willingness to move forward with BRT plans while the fate of the congestion pricing is still up in the air.

Cuza sat down with Department of Transportation Commissioner Janette Sadik-Khan to hear more about a plan already in place in many cities across the globe. He reported:

Imagine how much faster buses could move without the long, slow procession of riders waiting to dip their MetroCards. On at least one bus route by this time next year, that’ll be a thing of the past with bus stops configured to allow riders to pay before they board …

The city had originally planned to implement bus rapid transit along two routes by this fall. But they’re now going back and looking at ways to revamp the program using even more dramatic measures to increase bus speeds. One of those measures is signal prioritization, which uses technology to alter traffic lights.”When a bus hits an intersection, it gets a green light, when the rest of the traffic is given a red light. So it goes through an intersection first,” says Sadik-Khan.

Since this plan would benefit mass transit in New York City, as you could guess, I’m all in favor of it. In terms of enforcement, the MTA and the city want to install license-plate cameras on the front of buses to capture the IDs of those who would dare to block the BRT lanes. While, as you can see from the photo above, other countries have used concrete barriers to protect BRT lanes, the NYC lanes would be painted a distinct color to warn drivers of their importance.

Currently, the city plans to test these new measures along five routes, one per borough. The biggest beneficiaries would be the Manhattan routes up and down 1st and 2nd Aves. If BRT lanes were to speed up bus service along these traffic-choked streets, I think, it would work anywhere.

So be prepared for a time in the not-too-distant future when you swipe your MetroCard while you wait for the bus. Be prepared for a time when buses get the right-of-way they deserve along the City streets. Be prepared for traffic enforcement in dedicated bus lanes, enforcement sorely missing now. Seeing as how Sadik-Kahn’s DOT gets things done quickly, there’s every reason to believe we will be seeing these BRT improvements soon.

As Sadik-Kahn said to Cuza, “Every day, over two million New Yorkers are using the bus system, so we are trying to find ways to improve that service.”

July 13, 2007 8 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
MTA Absurdity

MTA signs just a little out of date

by Benjamin Kabak July 12, 2007
written by Benjamin Kabak on July 12, 2007

On my way to JFK Airport via the IND lines this morning, I spotted the sign above at Nostrand Ave. on the A platform. The JFK AirTrain has been up and running since December of 2003. Anyone wanna bet that the signs at the much more heavily-trafficked Columbus Circle stop were changed well before three and a half years of no shuttle bus service had elapsed?

July 12, 2007 5 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Load More Posts

About The Author

Name: Benjamin Kabak
E-mail: Contact Me

Become a Patron!
Follow @2AvSagas

Upcoming Events
TBD

RSS? Yes, Please: SAS' RSS Feed
SAS In Your Inbox: Subscribe to SAS by E-mail

Instagram



Disclaimer: Subway Map © Metropolitan Transportation Authority. Used with permission. MTA is not associated with nor does it endorse this website or its content.

Categories

  • 14th Street Busway (1)
  • 7 Line Extension (118)
  • Abandoned Stations (31)
  • ARC Tunnel (52)
  • Arts for Transit (19)
  • Asides (1,244)
  • Bronx (13)
  • Brooklyn (126)
  • Brooklyn-Queens Connector (13)
  • Buses (291)
  • Capital Program 2010-2014 (27)
  • Capital Program 2015-2019 (56)
  • Capital Program 2020-2024 (3)
  • Congestion Fee (71)
  • East Side Access Project (37)
  • F Express Plan (22)
  • Fare Hikes (173)
  • Fulton Street (57)
  • Gateway Tunnel (29)
  • High-Speed Rail (9)
  • Hudson Yards (18)
  • Interborough Express (1)
  • International Subways (26)
  • L Train Shutdown (20)
  • LIRR (65)
  • Manhattan (73)
  • Metro-North (99)
  • MetroCard (124)
  • Moynihan Station (16)
  • MTA (98)
  • MTA Absurdity (233)
  • MTA Bridges and Tunnels (27)
  • MTA Construction (128)
  • MTA Economics (522)
    • Doomsday Budget (74)
    • Ravitch Commission (23)
  • MTA Politics (330)
  • MTA Technology (195)
  • New Jersey Transit (53)
  • New York City Transit (220)
  • OMNY (3)
  • PANYNJ (113)
  • Paratransit (10)
  • Penn Station (18)
  • Penn Station Access (10)
  • Podcast (30)
  • Public Transit Policy (164)
  • Queens (129)
  • Rider Report Cards (31)
  • Rolling Stock (40)
  • Second Avenue Subway (262)
  • Self Promotion (77)
  • Service Advisories (612)
  • Service Cuts (118)
  • Sponsored Post (1)
  • Staten Island (52)
  • Straphangers Campaign (40)
  • Subway Advertising (45)
  • Subway Cell Service (34)
  • Subway History (81)
  • Subway Maps (83)
  • Subway Movies (14)
  • Subway Romance (13)
  • Subway Security (104)
  • Superstorm Sandy (35)
  • Taxis (43)
  • Transit Labor (151)
    • ATU (4)
    • TWU (100)
    • UTU (8)
  • Triboro RX (4)
  • U.S. Transit Systems (53)
    • BART (1)
    • Capital Metro (1)
    • CTA (7)
    • MBTA (11)
    • SEPTA (5)
    • WMATA (28)
  • View from Underground (447)

Archives

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram

@2019 - All Right Reserved.


Back To Top