Home New Jersey Transit How quiet the Quiet Cars?

How quiet the Quiet Cars?

by Benjamin Kabak

In an age of cell phones, New Jersey Transit is trying to strike a balance between convenience and serenity. Not everyone wants to hear people yammer away on their cell phones during schleppy rides home after long days in the office, and thus, in September, the Quiet Car pilot program was born.

As I explained in September, the idea wasn’t to impose silence but to impose a certain subdued environment upon the first and last cars. I wrote:

In this pilot, it is truly social norms of train ridership that are under assault and for the better. The Quite Commute cars, says New Jersey Transit, are intended to provide a “subdued environment for customers who wish to refrain from using cell phones and are willing to disable the sound feature on pagers, games, computers and other electronic devices.” Riders are urged to talk in “subdued” voices and, thankfully enough, are told to use headphones at a volume that “cannot be heard by other passengers.” To rid trains of the blight of loud and leaky headphones would be a true accomplishment indeed.

Recently, NJ Transit expanded the pilot program to include more trains and more routes. The first and last cars on all Northeast Corridor, North Jersey Coast Line, Raritan Valley Line and Midtown Direct trains traveling in the peak direction during weekday peak periods are a part of the Quiet Commute program now. Riders, though, are duking it out over the meaning of quiet. Vincent M. Mazzolli of The Times repeats a common anecdote:

Last Monday morning, Robert Arbeeny and two friends boarded a train bound for Manhattan and began chatting about the holidays. Robert Arbeeny, left, and Steven Heite last week riding in a New Jersey Transit train car designated as quiet. The rules include refraining from cellphone use and talking with “subdued voices.” “Excuse me,” said the woman sitting across from them, raising her reading glasses, and then her voice. “This is the quiet car.”

Mr. Arbeeny apologized and began whispering, which caused further agitation. The woman put down her book and summoned a conductor. “They are not supposed to be talking,” she said, wagging her index finger at the group. The conductor tried stepping quietly between both parties. “They do have a right to talk,” he said in a soft voice, “they just have to speak in a very quiet manner.”

As other passengers began looking on, the woman shot back: “What kind of sense does that make! Why would you allow them to have a sustained conversation in a quiet car, and why are you taking their side over mine!”

Conductors have been caught in the middle of this battle of interpretation, but while some prickly riders want library-like silence, others understand the intricacies of the program. “Cellphones are one thing, but people are getting the wrong impression about these cars,” Annemarie Whitney, a daily commuter, said. “They are quiet cars, not silent cars. Subdued and silent are two different words, and as long as there are misconceptions out here, there are going to be disputes.”

The problem here is one of expectations vs. reality. It doesn’t make sense to expect people to be deadly silent on a train. That’s just not the way we’re used to commuting, and that’s not why the Quiet Commute was launched. (That is, however, why Bose markets noise-canceling headphones.) Rather, it’s about creating an atmosphere free from noise pollution, free from one-sided cell phone conversations and free from bleeding iPod headphones. That is a balance easy to maintain.

You may also like

11 comments

Christopher Stephens January 12, 2011 - 3:19 pm

Anything that makes commuting by mass transit more appealing should be encouraged, especially a program like this, which costs virtually nothing. If a commuter is making the decision between driving to work or taking the train, one factor (yes, among many) is weighing the comfort of controlling your own environment in your personal car versus the risk of having to listen to some jackass on his cellphone for an hour. Ever wonder why there hasn’t been a great demand for cellphone reception on subways?

Reply
Billy G January 12, 2011 - 4:18 pm

You’ve never been on a morning diesel on the Harlem Line of Metro-North then.

The *shh*-nazis will get on your case if you are generating >+5dB and not in a vestibule.

No need for admonishing signs.

Reply
Duke87 January 12, 2011 - 6:06 pm

I can’t speak for NJ Transit, but yeah, Metro-North seems to just be naturally quiet, at least during rush hour. No quiet car policy is necessary, it’s already the accepted social norm.

Unless the train gets delayed. Then everyone starts chattering.

(Friday evenings can also sometimes get noisy)

Reply
Andrew January 12, 2011 - 11:01 pm

It seems to me that the norm, everywhere on transit, should be talking with subdued voices and not using headphones that can be heard by other than the wearer. (On the latter point, NYCT’s rules of conduct only allow the use of a “sound production device” on board a train or bus if “listened to solely by headphones or earphones and inaudible to others” – so this isn’t merely a matter of courtesy.)

Quiet cars, where they are made available, should be for people who want even more quiet than that.

And maybe, if there is sufficient demand, there should also be noisy cars, for people who don’t want to comply with the norms in my first paragraph.

Reply
Al D January 13, 2011 - 9:10 am

Funny you mentioned the subway as a potential quiet zone. Because underground and disconnected promotes a certain degree of quietness. Then again, the roving musical performers, and occasional band loud school kids or out of place riders can stir up a rush hour, not to mention to the crazies promoting religion to a captive audience. Since MTA is a government, what ever happened to separation of church and state? 😉

Reply
Alon Levy January 13, 2011 - 5:52 pm

Separation of church and state doesn’t prohibit private citizens from practicing religion on public property; this is the US we’re talking about, not France or Turkey. What it does is prohibit the government from favoring or banning a religion specifically. The MTA is allowed to make a no-religion rule, in which case no religious or secularist ad or preaching is permitted, or it’s allowed to allow all religious speech as it does today. It’s also allowed to make rules with secular intent, for example banning loud busking, but then it would have to apply them to preachers and everyone else equally.

Doug January 24, 2011 - 12:01 pm

Also, I believe they need to only accommodate your ability to preach, etc., not cater to it. Therefore, 9 cars on a train is just as good as 10 cars for the purpose of being preaching.

Al D January 13, 2011 - 9:06 am

Sounds as if some people want “Silent Cars”

Reply
petey January 13, 2011 - 5:28 pm

i certainly do.
and if you want to talk, you can go to another car!

Reply
KPL January 13, 2011 - 2:57 pm

I think it’s time for a game of Silent Library.

Reply
Are the subways too quiet? :: Second Ave. Sagas January 15, 2011 - 1:44 pm

[…] up the thread from the brouhaha over the New Jersey Transit quiet cars, Marshall says an element of old New York is lost as people turn away from each other and toward […]

Reply

Leave a Comment