Home Service Cuts Judge orders MTA to keep station booths open

Judge orders MTA to keep station booths open

by Benjamin Kabak

MTA will appeal ruling but begin public hearing process as well

Token Booth

The legal dispute over the MTA’s desires to close token booths will continue. (Photo by Benjamin Kabak)

A New York State Supreme Court judge in Manhattan has ordered the MTA to keep station booths open and staffed until the Authority can hold public hearings on the closures. This decision — a legal blow to the MTA — came nearly a month to the day after another judge issued a temporary restraining order that kept station booths open. The authority, which says it will both appear and follow the ruling, will now have to hold public hearings on the station booth closures before proceeding with the dismissal of 222 workers and the shuttering of over 100 booths.

The MTA first proposed closing the station booths in 2009 when a budget shortfall emerged. At the time, the authority held the hearings legally required under New York Public Authorities Law § 1205(5). When Albany approved the payroll tax package that guaranteed funding for the MTA, the authority decided to eliminate positions and close the booths through attrition rather than layoffs. Yet, when an $800 million deficit emerged in 2010, the authority announced its decision to implement layoffs but this time without a public hearing.

In its legal argument, the Transport Workers Union Local 100 challenged the decision to eschew hearings. The TWU alleged a violation of the Public Authorities Law that requires the MTA to hold a hearing when it is contemplating “any complete or partial closing of a passenger station…or any means of public access to such facility.” The judge agreed with the TWU that these closures proposed for 2010 warranted a new hearing even though they were materially identical to those put forward last year.

Taking an expansive view of the MTA’s requirements under the Public Authorities Law, Judge Saliann Scarpulla ordered the MTA to maintain the booths until hearings could be held. “As of May 2009, [the MTA] had informed the public that the earlier plan for mass subway token booth and customer assistant kiosk changes was not going to be implemented,” she wrote. “Once the respondents decided, almost a year later, to reimplement that plan, new hearings were required.”

In a sense, though, Judge Scarpulla’s order hinges almost exclusively on this technicality. Because the MTA is cutting station agents through firings after saying it would so through attrition 12 months ago, it must hold another hearing. After all, as the TWU alleged, the “concerns of the citizenry” could have shifted in time.

In a separate part of the opinion, however, Judge Scarpulla refuses to side with the TWU as it attempts to question the overall safety impact of the station agent dismissals. The TWU had wanted a judge to find that the booth closures would violate the MTA’s “statutory obligation to promote the safety and convenience of the public.” Since the MTA has traditionally been granted wide latitude in its operations, the final decision to close the booths is not, said the judge, “subject to judicial review.”

So where then does this decision leave the MTA? First, the authority does not have to rehire the 250 station agents who were fired in early May. As long as the authority maintains staffing levels necessary to keep the booths open, it can do what it pleases with its employees. Second, the MTA can go ahead with dismissals and closures after it follows the legally mandated procedures as set forth in the Public Authorities Law. In other words, after going through another public comment and hearing process, the Board can still vote to close the stations and still vote to fire the workers.

This ruling, then, is nothing more than a procedural and fiscal thorn in the MTA’s side, and it will probably cost $100,000 a day plus the expenses for the public hearings for the MTA to comply with it.

In response, the MTA expressed is displeasure over the ruling and vowed to both appeal and start the lengthy public hearing process. “The MTA is disappointed in today’s ruling that we cannot proceed with slated subway booth and kiosk closures without repeating the public hearing process. These closures were necessitated by the MTA’s dire financial situation, and the need for the savings they generate remains,” the authority said in a statement this afternoon. “While we disagree with the ruling and intend to appeal, we will be proceeding on a parallel track with the public hearing process. With that in mind, an MTA Board meeting will be scheduled for next week at which the Board will be asked to authorize the public hearing process to move this vital cost-saving initiative forward.”

I am still awaiting comment from the TWU.

After the jump, a copy of the court’s decision is embedded.


A tip of the hat goes to NBC New York for providing this decision.

You may also like


Joe June 4, 2010 - 2:45 pm

Would they rather see the MTA go broke instead of getting rid of an outdated position?

oscar June 4, 2010 - 2:47 pm

yes, yes they would.
they probably drive to work with a nice placard

Marc Shepherd June 4, 2010 - 3:38 pm

Uh, yes. Clearly.

Alon Levy June 4, 2010 - 5:40 pm

The MTA isn’t going to go broke. It can raise fares. Bankruptcy will only loom if the MTA remains in a budget hole after raising fares to revenue-maximizing levels.

Paulp521 June 5, 2010 - 10:04 pm

The MTA does not need the TWU’s help to go broke as evidenced by the 2nd ave subway, Javits extension 50% non-working cameras etc money-pits that the MTA does quite well on its own thank you.
It’s time to fire Walder, Mrs. McCartney & co and start over.

Alon Levy June 6, 2010 - 12:46 am

Um, Walder is the one who blew the whistle on how SAS and the 7 Extension cost “3 to 6 times as much as comparable projects in Germany, France, and Italy” (my recollection of his words, not mine).

Paulp521 June 6, 2010 - 9:56 am

did walder also blow the whistle on why the MTA brass is not taking the 10% pay cuts did said they would? Dump him and Mrs. Mac

Benjamin Kabak June 6, 2010 - 10:20 am

So dump the guy who came in six months ago, inherited everyone else’s messes and is doing a pretty good job of cleaning it up? Should we put you in charge of the MTA then?

Alon Levy June 6, 2010 - 8:55 pm

Because pay cuts are stupid. Layoffs let you get rid of the chaff; pay cuts in practice get rid of the people who are competent enough to find private-sector jobs.

Nathanael June 13, 2010 - 3:26 pm

Um, Walder was just brought in — very recently — largely to clean up the mess you describe. Give him a chance, seriously — he did a decent job in London.

J May 12, 2021 - 2:35 pm

You don’t know what the hell you’re talking about.

BrooklynBus June 4, 2010 - 7:34 pm

And how much money will the MTA now waste by appealing the judge’s decision rather than simply complying with it?

The month ahead for Fulton, the weekend ahead all around :: Second Ave. Sagas June 4, 2010 - 8:48 pm

[…] « Judge orders MTA to keep station booths open Jun […]

ShAron June 4, 2010 - 8:55 pm

A better question is how much the judge got in campaign donations from the twu ?

Paulp521 June 5, 2010 - 10:07 pm

The best question is how did the MTAs’ lawyers misread a simple public authority law and then misread a TRO issued on the basis of that law. What do they have? 1400 lawyers and not one could read the thing right? Talk about wastes of money.

Benjamin Kabak June 6, 2010 - 10:21 am

They didn’t “misread” the law. Under their interpretation of the law, they believed they didn’t have to hold hearings 10 months after holding them in the first place for the same closures. How do you believe they also misread the TRO? All the TRO said was that they couldn’t close the booths. It didn’t say they couldn’t fire workers. As long as the MTA maintained staffing levels to keep the booths in question open, they could fire whomever they wanted.

Scott E June 4, 2010 - 10:22 pm

The public-hearing process doesn’t have to be a lengthy one. First, this only impacts four boroughs, unlike the previous round of fare-hike hearings which impacted all of the city plus many suburbs. Second, one meeting, with videoconferencing to established locations in all four boroughs (each with a moderator) should suffice. There’s no need to repeat the same hearing with board members who undoubtedly won’t show up to all, four times.

BrooklynBus June 11, 2010 - 9:17 am

I remember when they raised the fare once and all they had was one hearing in Long Island City for the whole NYCT.

Rhywun June 5, 2010 - 5:14 am

Uh… the MTA has already started dismantling the booths. The one on the northbound side at the R/W Rector Street is completely gone.

Chicken Underwear June 6, 2010 - 6:52 am

This would explain why the MTA was removing those booths so fast.

Nathanael June 7, 2010 - 3:51 am

You know, this gives me even less respect for TWU; they just spent their members’ money in order to make the MTA spend its money and make the courts spend state money, to no good effect. (I don’t have much respect for the ruling either.)

I wonder when the TWU will start dealing in good faith.

Streetsblog New York City » Today’s Headlines June 7, 2010 - 9:08 am

[…] Judge: Station Agent Layoffs Can't Proceed Without Hearings (NY1, SAS) […]

MTA Board to meet to address station booth closure plans :: Second Ave. Sagas June 8, 2010 - 5:07 pm

[…] a Manhattan Supreme Court judge ruled that the MTA did not follow proper procedure in moving to shutter station booths across the city, the authority knew it had to respond quickly […]

A proposal to fix the station agents :: Second Ave. Sagas June 10, 2010 - 12:02 am

[…] against the station agent dismissals last month, a Manhattan Supreme Court judge ruled that the MTA could not shutter station kiosks without holding public hearings. Even though the authority had held these hearings a little more […]


Leave a Comment