Home Second Avenue Subway MTA to halt late-night Second Ave. blasting

MTA to halt late-night Second Ave. blasting

by Benjamin Kabak

Over the past few years, I’ve frequently received emails from Second Ave. residents complaining of the blasting. From early in the morning to late at night, whistles, blasts and vibrations would rock the neighborhood as MTA contractors went about the slow and torturous process of constructing a subway line. As you can see from the above video, posted by Ben at The Launch Box in March, it’s a loud experience.

Recently, the complaints have seemingly come to a head as the work has continued into the night. According to a brief item in The Post, blasts were going off well the agreed-upon 7 p.m. cut-off time. Residents claim that in recent months, contractors set off 19 blasts after 9 p.m.

Now, the MTA says it will respect the 7 p.m. cutoff time. While original plans called for blasting until midnight, Michael Horodniceanu, the president of MTA Capital Construction, has said the authority will revise blasting guidelines. “People don’t want to have a romantic dinner with the sound of pavement being obliterated in the background,” he said to The Times. “After 7 p.m., we do not blast.”

The MTA has had a tense and often contentious relationship with business and residents along Second Ave., and it’s clearly tough to build a new subway line through a densely-inhabited area. With five more years left on the project, the two sides will have to continue to work together, and limiting the blasting is a long overdue move.

You may also like

17 comments

Spendmore Wastemore August 16, 2011 - 12:42 pm

9pm is late at night?

Back to Kansas, NIMBY!

Reply
petey August 16, 2011 - 4:59 pm

this native manhattanite would enjoy quiet after 9, thank you, and i don’t live on 2nd.

Reply
Bolwerk August 17, 2011 - 1:37 pm

Not that I think blasting should stop at 9pm, but it’s late if you have an infant.

Reply
Douglas John Bowen August 16, 2011 - 12:57 pm

As long as same said residents don’t complain if and when the project’s schedule slips and/or it takes longer to complete the underground task. Trade-offs are a fact of life, something all too often not acknowledged.

Reply
uesider August 16, 2011 - 2:20 pm

Midnight is a little late for blasts and the accompanying air horn signals and rumbling but don’t tell me it’s interrupting any ‘romantic dinners’ any more than taxi horns and sirens; they should be able to work on schedule with a 12-15hr blasting window

It’s a litlte hard to believe some of the complaints around this project. Thought NYers had tougher skin than what you see in the news and at meetings

Reply
Hank August 16, 2011 - 5:29 pm

NYCers are will NEVER skip a chance to complain

Reply
Bolwerk August 17, 2011 - 12:28 pm

Eh, it’s the usual NIMBYism. A pretty noisy minority does most of the complaining in any set of circumstances. They could be the screamers screaming about toll hikes on Staten Island or the anti-bike zealots suing to keep the streets from being safe. According to their theology, nobody should ever be bothered (except the people already being bothered, of course).

Our public input process encourages obstruction, plain and simple. A mass of screamers usually gets to mess things up for everybody else, and worthy projects get watered down to be barely any good at all. For whatever reason, politicians are too myopic to see that the wider public might reward them for some courage.

Reply
Jeff August 16, 2011 - 5:58 pm

Ok, So what about the schedule now ? And the costs ?

Reply
Think twice August 16, 2011 - 8:07 pm

New date of completion…2025.

They should’ve cut-and-covered the damn thing. It would have been a mess, but at least it would’ve been done already.

Reply
mike August 17, 2011 - 5:51 pm

utility relocation.

Reply
Anon August 16, 2011 - 6:27 pm

Fire in the Hole (1)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3GSx8zA9tUs

Fire in the Hole (2)

Reply
Alex August 16, 2011 - 8:29 pm

Really, I’m not surprised that they’re complaining so much. There’s a book named “Subwayland”, which is a compilation of numerous New York Times stories, and in it there is an article about the construction of the first subway in New York. If anything is obvious, it was that (in the article’s words) “our urban ancestors suffered greatly for the sake of the transportation we enjoy.” The article showed that there were plenty of complaints about subway construction that could have halted it completely (and at times did). For example, as the crew was blasting around the area of the Waldorf-Astoria at one point,
and the guests of the hotel decided that they weren’t going to take it anymore, and complained angrily to the manager. The manager in turn complained angrily to the Board of Health, who then shut down construction for a period of time. There are other stories like this that show that what those of 2nd Avenue are experiencing has happened before.

To summarize:
Do the people of Second Avenue have legitimate complaints? Yes.
Is it par for the course of subway construction? Also, yes.

Reply
Alex C August 16, 2011 - 8:49 pm

So the people of the Upper East Side are complaining that the MTA is actually trying to finish on-time a project that will benefit only them and nobody else in the city. First world problems.

Reply
pea-jay August 16, 2011 - 9:47 pm

The cynic in me wonders if this is a chance to take advantage of a reduced need for blasting in the project to score a few public relations points with the neighbors and the agency as a whole.

“Look, we’re being sensitive to resident’s concerns and won’t blast so late*”

*because we just don’t have that much left to blast anyway…

Reply
Jerrold August 17, 2011 - 10:26 am

The TUNNELS are almost finished,but
they do have the station caverns left to blast.

Reply
Ben 73@2nd August 20, 2011 - 2:36 pm

I agree: it must be that they don’t need to blast so much anymore.

Reply
bex August 17, 2011 - 1:18 pm

If you have not tried to sleep through 2nd avenue construction work, you would not understand. This is not the same as jackhammers or regular construction work, this is shake your bed silly and keep you up all night type of work.

Please note the contradiction in work hours listed in the article. Construction work is supposed to end at 7 pm. Yet the schedule calls for working until midnight? In other cities, the construction company would need to pay large penalties and receive approval in order to work past the cutoff.

Reply

Leave a Comment