Benjamin Kabak

Since the FBI stopped Najibullah Zazi and his co-conspirators from carrying out a potential terrorist attack on the New York City subway system, New Yorkers have had to come to grips with the reality of a porous subway system. With hundreds of miles of track stretching throughout five boroughs and access that costs one swipe of a MetroCard, New York’s subways — just like those in London, Madrid and Moscow — is open and insecure. We might rely on a catchy slogan to keep straphangers on their collective toes, but securing the subways requires a massive interagency effort that involves paying attention to chatter while keeping a close eye on the goings-on underground.

As the MTA has adjusted to life in post-9/11 New York City, its own security measures have been halting. A plan to equip every station with security cameras has been plagued with massive budget overruns. It’s beyond schedule and now the subject of a legal fight between Lockheed Martin and the MTA. Still, as the authority has promised to get some camera system online this year, the agency needs all of the support it can get from the federal government.

With that in mind, then, it’s dismaying to read that, due to the fact that the Department of Homeland Security has been forced to cut back its grants this year, New York City will be receiving fewer DHS dollars for security measures. According to numerous reports that cite a courtesy memo distributed to lawmakers this week, DHS is cutting its grants to New York City’s mass transit security fund from $153 million to $111 million. No one is happy.

“For the administration to announce these cuts two weeks after the attempted Times Square bombing shows they just don’t get it and are not doing right by New York City on anti-terrorism funding,” Chuck Schumer, New York’s senior senator, said.

Although lawmakers and New York officials have known since late last year that cuts would be forthcoming, both the timing — President Obama is due into the city later today — and the 27 percent reductions could not be worse. “We are hoping for substantial additional money from the feds to help protect our mass-transit system,” Mitchell Pally, a member of the MTA Board, said to the Wall Street Journal. “Any reduction is a concern, especially in these days when we don’t have enough money to begin with.”

Department of Homeland Security officials were quick to defend the cuts. New York City alone, they say, receives 11 percent of DHS funding, and the city took in $457 million in DHS grants last year. “DHS is actively engaged in supporting New York City’s first responders and overall preparedness for acts of terrorism and other disasters through an array of grant programs,” Matthew Chandler, a DHS spokesman who blamed congressional budget cuts for the reduction, said.

With the averted Times Square bombing fresh in the minds of city residents, New Yorkers can’t be too pleased with the news and for good reason. The New York City subways carry the bulk of the nation’s public transit riders, and although we hate to admit it, the infrastructure remains an appealing target for any potential attack. Even as New York remains vulnerable, we should learn our lessons from Europe, and DHS should ensure that transit security funding is not scaled back.

In Glasgow, a familiar anti-terrorism slogan has lost its edge. (Photo via Andrew in Amsterdam)

When two street vendors in Times Square noticed a parked car with smoke seeping out of it a few weekends ago, they did what any concerned citizen would do and called 9-1-1. The NYPD evacuated Times Square, and instead of a car with an electrical or gas fire starting, they found a vehicle packed with potentially explosive materials and alarm clocks rigged as a bomb. The bomb squad disarmed the device, the FBI caught their man and the law enforcement and anti-terrorist system worked.

As the story unfolded, the focus eventually turned to a slogan familiar to millions. Since 2003, the New York City subways have been covered signs with a simple request, now trademarked by the MTA: “If you see something, say something.” Ostensibly, this slogan is about awareness in a post-9/11 world. If citizens remain alert and see something — whatever it might be — that appears out of the ordinary, they should, as anyone with a civic duty would, say something about it. They could tell an MTA employee or, better yet, a police officer. Just don’t, urges the longer prerecorded announcements on new train cars, keep it to yourself.

Over the last few days, the widespread use of this slogan has gained some publicity. AdAge published a profile of those behind it on Monday, and The New York Times followed suit in yesterday’s paper. The phrase came to the MTA shortly after Sept. 11 from the desk of Allen Kay, an ad executive at Korey Kay & Partners, who has, according to Manny Fernandez of The Times, coined 80 slogans for his company’s clients.

“The model that I had in my head was ‘Loose Lips Sink Ships,’” Kay said. “I wasn’t born during World War II, but I sure knew the phrase and so did everybody else. In this case, I thought it was ironic because we want just the opposite. We want people to talk. I wanted to come up with something that would carry like that. That would be infectious.”

Initially, Kay wanted to launch a public campaign in the immediate aftermath of 9/11, but the MTA believed the public would grew too scared and shy away from mass transit. Instead, they wanted until 2003 when they launched the now-ubiquitous campaign of posters and PSAs, and since then, the authority has spent between $2-$3 million in Homeland Security grants on their advertising campaigns.

While some read Orwellian overtones into it — “The phrase has come to mean, ‘Go get the cops.’ It’s not an invitation to citizen engagement. It puts everybody under suspicion,” civil liberties advocate Bill Dobbs said — the phrase has achieved global recognition as well. After securing the trademark three years ago, the MTA has granted the use of the phrase to 54 organizations worldwide free of charge. The MTA, however, has requested that those agencies who do use the phrase with their permission keep the message on point. “The intent of the slogan is to focus on terrorism activity, not crime, and we felt that use in other spheres would water down its effectiveness,” Christopher Boylan, an agency spokesman, said to The Times.

Yet, despite the hoopla surrounding the phase, I can’t help but think it’s almost unnecessary. On the one hand, very few people have responded to the MTA’s directive. In 2007, for instance, the authority claimed that 1944 riders out of the 1.5 billion who used the system saw something that warranting saying, and investigation into those figures revealed that few were terrorist-related. Meanwhile, the cops disputed those numbers at the time and said that fewer than 50 had actually called to report suspicious activity.

Furthermore, as Dobbs, the advocate who fears Orwell, said, “Common sense saved the day in Times Square, not an ad campaign.” Two people who see a car with smoke coming out of it should call the cops, in other words, because it’s what people are supposed to do in a society wary of terrorism or not.

It’s hard to deny that the MTA has coined a catchy phrase. It’s six words that remind people to stay aware of what’s going on around them, and it applies in any scenario. Despite my slight skepticism, it worked a few weeks ago in Times Square, and as long it catches a potential act before anything worse happens, it should stick around for years to come.