Second Ave. Sagas
  • About
  • Contact Me
  • 2nd Ave. Subway History
  • Search
  • About
  • Contact Me
  • 2nd Ave. Subway History
  • Search
Second Ave. Sagas

News and Views on New York City Transportation

Service Cuts

Report: Under-the-table cuts target overtime

by Benjamin Kabak March 26, 2010
written by Benjamin Kabak on March 26, 2010

Some buses don’t run when driver shifts remain empty.

Officially, the MTA Board voted to approve $93 million worth of service cuts earlier this week. Those cuts will go into effect at the end of June and will include a massive restructuring of bus service and the elimination of two subway lines. Under the table, the MTA has, according to a recent report, been scaling back service to cut down the number of overtime hours it pays out as well.

In amNew York today, Heather Haddon writes of cuts through unfilled shifts. When a bus driver calls in sick, the MTA will, instead of filling that shift with a driver set to make $42 an hour as overtime pay, simply allow the buses to miss their scheduled runs. She writes:

To save money, the MTA has reduced the number of drivers used as subs for those who call in sick, resulting in the cancellation of scheduled trips, according to union officials and transit advocates. Up to 15 trips a day have been canceled in at least seven Brooklyn depots in recent weeks, forcing straphangers to wait for an extra 20 minutes at times, they said. In Manhattan, the already sluggish crosstown buses have also taken a hit, union sources said.

“If they cut it any more, it’s useless. It’s just faster to walk as it is,” said Billie Swarztrauber, 61, who recently waited 25 minutes for the crosstown M23 to show up.

A transit spokesman could not confirm the service reduction Thursday, but the cash-strapped agency has been trying to curb the nearly $500 million a year it spends on overtime. Filling the trips is expensive, with drivers earning an average of $42 an hour to work overtime.

The MTA has had a touch-and-go relationship with overtime over the last few years, and this hidden cut seems to be one way to attack what some — but not all — view as a problem. Earlier this year, New York State Comptroller Thomas DiNapoli urged the authority to cut its overtime spending. The agency had, he said, spent $577 million in 2008 with five percent of those taking home overtime pay earning 30 percent of the total payouts. Some LIRR engineers pocketed over $200,000.

At first, I was surprised by the overtime numbers. Yet, with the assist of frequent commenter Niccolo Machiavelli, I picked up a different perspective. Niccolo wrote a lengthy defense of overtime and highlighted how it can be cheaper to pay for overtime than to hire more employees. Meanwhile, as he did it, the $577 million in overtime came to approximately 4.5 hours per week of overtime per worker, a figure in line with the national average.

What the authority appears to be doing here is saving through a service cut without making it official. It doesn’t cost the MTA anything not to run buses, and in fact, they save by avoiding extra man-hours. As with every cut, the commuters are the ones who draw the short straw. People wait for a bus that won’t arrive to show up and are left irate indeed.

March 26, 2010 6 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
AsidesStraphangers Campaign

For straphangers, a legacy but no more straps

by Benjamin Kabak March 25, 2010
written by Benjamin Kabak on March 25, 2010

The word “straphanger” remains an archaic and anachronistic slang for subway riders. Coined in Chicago among the El trains in the 1890s, the phrase was a reference to those who ride trains while standing up and had to hold onto leather straps for balance. New York had cooped the slang in the early 1900s, and the name lives on most famously in conjunction with the Straphangers Campaign. In fact, 1969 was the last year subway cars featured straps in the city, and now, they live on only in the Transit Museum’s vintage cars.

Today, we can eulogy the last vestige of straps in the city. As Heather Haddon reports, the last of the leather straps have been removed from the Roosevelt Island tram. We now have stainless steel bars for balance, and true straphanging is no more. And thus another part of New York City transportation history will live on, as the IRT, BMT and IND do, as a reference to a bygone era.

March 25, 2010 9 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Buses

Sheldon Silver kills bus improvements, again

by Benjamin Kabak March 25, 2010
written by Benjamin Kabak on March 25, 2010

Sheldon Silver, the speaker of the New York Assembly and powerful leader of that body’s Democratic caucus, has a love-hate relationship with transit initiatives in New York City. He represents District 64 which encompasses Lower Manhattan, Chinatown and parts of the Lower East Side, an area very heavily dependent upon transit, and yet, his most notorious accomplishment over the last two years is the murder of congestion pricing when the MTA started warning about a looming debt crisis.

Unsurprisingly, then, Silver is at it again. This time, he has stripped a proposal to allow the MTA to implement camera enforcement of dedicated bus lanes from the state executive budget proposal. Gov. David Paterson recently proposed camera enforcement in his executive budget proposal two weeks ago, and the move was not without controversy. After all, the cameras for BRT enforcement purposes were originally shot down by David Gantt in 2008. Still, with the governor leading the charge, transit advocates had some hope this year.

The governor’s original proposal was, in the words of Streetsblog’s Noah Kazis, a “real game-changer” for bus riders. The bill would have allowed for camera enforcement on all 50 of the city’s bus lane miles and would have allowed for stationary cameras or those mounted on buses. Cars would receive summonses of up to $125 if they violated the bus lane laws.

The State Senate became the first of the state’s august legislative bodies to whittle away the camera proposals yesterday when they offered up a watered-down version of bus lane enforcement. Cameras, said the Senate, could be used only on existing bus lanes. The new SBS routes planned for the Upper East Side would not have been able to take advantage of these badly-needed cameras.

Advocates were unhappy. “Select Bus Service is the most important and promising project for bus riders in years,” Lindsey Lusher Shute of Transportation Alternatives said to Streetsblog. “The New York State Senate needs to revise their bus camera language and give SBS their full support. We expect the Assembly to do the same.”

The Assembly didn’t do the same; rather, the Assembly stripped the provision from the bill entire. Reports Ben Fried and Noah Kazis:

Chances to improve service on New York City’s dedicated bus lanes appeared to narrow yesterday, when Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver and his Democratic conference rejected bus lane enforcement cameras in the chamber’s draft budget. Camera enforcement is one of the linchpins in the city’s strategy to put the “rapid” in Bus Rapid Transit. Without it, bus riders will remain stymied by traffic, even on Select Bus Service routes…

“Right now, bus lanes are routinely violated by many vehicles, resulting in chronic delays for hundreds of thousands of bus riders,” said Gene Russianoff, staff attorney for the Straphangers Campaign. “Using enforcement cameras in city bus lanes could turn that around, making bus service more reliable and helping to reduce congestion.”

Two years ago, bus cams died in the Assembly transportation committee, chaired by Rochester representative David Gantt. This time around, they were stripped out in the Assembly’s opaque budget process. One advocate in Albany told Streetsblog that rank-and-file Assembly members were unaware that the bus cam provisions had been slashed from the budget resolution as late as yesterday afternoon, hours before the resolution was unveiled and voted on.

Gantt has no veto power in the Assembly budget process, which the Speaker himself exerts enormous influence over. The budget resolution only had to clear a vote in the Assembly Ways and Means Committee, chaired by Upper Manhattan representative Denny Farrell, before the Speaker brought it to the full floor last night. “It’s our view that Silver maintains pretty tight control over the budget process,” said Laura Seago, a research associate at the Brennan Center for Justice and co-author of the 2009 report on Albany dysfunction, “Still Broken.”

I’m holding out hope that, during reconciliation, the Senate’s version with the watered-down camera provisions will pass. Otherwise, New Yorkers will be left stranded yet again by Sheldon Silver. When I find myself sitting in traffic stuck on a bus that can’t navigate its bus lane and can’t enforce dedicated lanes, I’ll think of Sheldon Silver and again remember how he doesn’t support transit initiatives in his own home town.

March 25, 2010 12 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
AsidesSelf Promotion

Getting to know me

by Benjamin Kabak March 25, 2010
written by Benjamin Kabak on March 25, 2010

Check this out: Last week, Charlotte Eichna, editor of Our Town, the Upper East Side newspaper, sat down with me to talk transit and profile Second Ave. Sagas for her readers. The profile hit the Internet last night, and the paper is available around town today. I haven’t seen a print copy yet, but apparently, I’m on the cover. You can check out the interview here. In it, I talk about the origins of the blog, my views on the current state of transit in New York City and Albany’s tortured relationship with the MTA. [Our Town]

March 25, 2010 5 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Subway History

A groundbreaking for the subway, 110 years later

by Benjamin Kabak March 25, 2010
written by Benjamin Kabak on March 25, 2010

For many New Yorkers, the name Robert Van Wyck will conjure up images of traffic on the expressway near JFK Airport that bears his name. Perhaps some will know him as the city’s first mayor after the five boroughs were unified, and others will know tales of the way Van Wyck’s ice trust scandal cost Tammany Hall the 1901 mayoral election.

What many do not know about Van Wyck is that he is the man who, with one well-placed shovel, started construction on the New York City subway systems. As the MTA Board voted to cut service yesterday, we let the 110th anniversary of the day construction started on the subway slip by us announced. It was then a day of celebration for the city, and New Yorkers in 1900 thought Tunnel Day would be commemorated annually well into the future. This year, the MTA gave its nod to history by cutting off some of the city’s lifeblood.

March 24 in 1900 was a Saturday, and that afternoon at 1 p.m., Mayor Van Wyck took a silver shovel made by Tiffany and with a handle constructed from wood from the “Lawrence,” Commodore Perry’s flagship from the Battle of Lake Erie, to the front steps of City Hall. There, above a now-defunct stop, he broke ground amidst a throng of politicians and IRT officials. Today, the subway system stretches for miles and miles, and the shovel is with the Museum of the City of New York.

As we reflect on a subway system that will soon lose service and a map that will be short two lines, we look back at Van Wyck’s words on that day. He was a politician who understood the importance of mass transit in New York City. “The completion of this undertaking,” he said, “will be second only in importance to that of the Erie Canal…This made our city the commercial and financial metropolis of the world, with a population of three and a half millions of people, for whose accommodation and comfort this rapid transit underground road is necessary. The contrast exhibited between the two periods is striking and instructive. De Witt Clinton saluted in 1825 a city of one hundred and sixty thousand souls. We speak to a population of three and a half millions. Then the slow stage coach was the only means of passenger transportation, now it is superseded by steam and electricity.”

Alexander Orr, president of the city’s Rapid Transit Commission, echoed Van Wyck’s words. “The removal of the spadeful of earth by our respected Mayor, which, according to the programme, we are soon to witness,” he said, “will be the inauguration of a system of municipal transit which, if courageously carried out, will continue to stimulate our marvelous development, and knit together all the sections of this great city in fact, as they have been lately united in name.”

I wonder what Orr and Van Wyck would think of the system today. It stretches far beyond the imagination of the IRT’s Contract 1, but the stations look much the same as they did in 1904. The city, then willing to invest heavily in transit, and state have shirked their responsibilities, and the MTA has been left with no choice but to scale back service the city needs. Orr’s and Van Wyck’s prognostications came true; the subways have knit together all sections of this great city, but who will realize that today and come to a sagging system’s eventual rescue?

After the jump, an excerpt from The Times article from March 25, 1900 about the groundbreaking ceremony. The writer, a name lost to time, waxes poetically about Tunnel Day.

Continue Reading
March 25, 2010 5 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
AsidesMTA Economics

A snapshot of the real estate problem

by Benjamin Kabak March 24, 2010
written by Benjamin Kabak on March 24, 2010

As the MTA has struggled to address is budgetary shortfalls, much has been made about the authority’s reliance on the real estate transfer tax. In a good market — say, 2007 — the tax brought in $1.6 billion for the MTA, and had the real estate bubble maintained its high, the MTA would not be facing tough decisions on service cuts. Today at The New York Observer, Eliot Brown wrote a short piece highlighting how the declining tax revenues hurt the MTA. Looking at the first quarter tax revenues in each of the last four years, Brown charts how real estate taxes collected from January through March declined from $412.2 million to just $96.4 million. When the market recovers, so too will the MTA to a point, but for now, there is no end in sight.

March 24, 2010 0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Service Cuts

Transit service cuts to go into effect on June 27

by Benjamin Kabak March 24, 2010
written by Benjamin Kabak on March 24, 2010

Mark your calendar for a transit funeral: The last V and W trains will roll down the line on Friday, June 25.

After the MTA voted to approve sweeping service cuts that will save just $91 million while inconveniencing millions, the authority announced today that all bus and rail changes will go into effect on June 27, 2010. Because that is a Sunday, the V and W trains, the two weekday-only lines slated for elimination, will run their last regular service ride that Friday. The M will turn orange and head up Sixth Ave. via the Chrystie St. Cut on Monday, June 28, and the Q, express in Manhattan, will run local north of 57th St. to Ditmars Boulevard in Astoria. The Staten Island Ball Park special will be discontinued prior to the start of the Staten Island Yankees’ June 18 season opener.

For MTA officials, the decision to cut service was not made lightly. “The extent of our deficit requires that most of the cuts move ahead, but we listened to our customers and made changes where we could,” MTA Chairman and CEO Jay H. Walder said this morning. “We were able to take a number of cuts off the table but unfortunately, many of the cuts moving ahead will be painful.”

Although these cuts will come down the pike this summer, the MTA did not vote on a proposal to eliminate the Student MetroCard plan yet, and politicians and advocates are still squaring off on the issue. The Mayor slammed the state for its failure to fund student travel. “It’s the state that has cutback subsidies to the MTA and the state that has cutback the MetroCards for kids so call Albany,” Michael Bloomberg said. “If they cut back our subsidies to the MTA, they cut back the subsidies for MetroCards for the students, I think it is an outrage but it’s not the MTA’s fault, it’s the state’s fault.”

The Straphangers Campaign, though, was not willing to let the Mayor escape City Hall’s portion of the blame. “It’s true that the State triggered the current crisis over student MetroCards when Governor David Paterson cut state funding for the program,” Gene Russianoff said in a statement. “But it is also true that the City’s contribution for moving 585,000 students each weekday on the subways and the buses has remained stagnant since 1995 at $45 million. If student MetroCards are to continue, there will have to be increased funding from both the City and the State.”

With this round of cuts, the MTA has only just started what will be a year-long deficit reduction problem. The agency had a budget gap totaling nearly $800 million for 2010 and still must come up with hundreds of millions of dollars in savings. To that end, the MTA is trying to renegotiation supply contracts and defer or eliminated unnecessary projects. The agency is going to cut internal spending my consolidating its agencies and reducing overtime, and the authority said it will meet with union leaders to identify more money-saving programs as well.

Still, on June 27, at a time of historic ridership levels, the MTA will eliminate trains and cut services because Albany has failed to provide for mass transit in New York City. “The reality is that closing the first $400 million is extremely painful, and closing the additional gap will be even harder,” Walder said. “We’ve just taken a very difficult vote, but there are more difficult choices ahead to achieve necessary cost savings.”

March 24, 2010 22 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
AsidesService Cuts

MTA votes to approve service cuts

by Benjamin Kabak March 24, 2010
written by Benjamin Kabak on March 24, 2010

The MTA Board has just voted approve a sweeping package of service cuts that will save the MTA hundreds of millions of dollars while reducing bus and subway service throughout New York City. Only two board members voted against the cuts while the rest criticized Albany for neglecting transit but defended their votes on grounds of necessity. Basically, the authority’s board feels it has no choice but to cut services because the state will no longer support transit in the most transit-dependent city in the nation.

For New Yorkers, this vote means transportation pain this summer. Bus lines will be scaled back or reduced, and subway wait times and crowding will increase. The V and W trains will be eliminated, and the M will operating from Middle Village to Forest Hills via the Chrystie St. Cut and the Sixth Ave. line. The Board has delayed its vote on the Student MetroCard cuts pending the outcome of some heavy lobbying efforts by students and parents. Today is, as many Board members stated this morning, a dark day in the history of transportation in New York City, and with another $350 million deficit on the horizon, the MTA has some even tougher choices ahead.

For more information and resources about the cuts, you can check out my coverage here on Second Ave. Sagas. Earlier this week, I presented some FAQs on the board vote and what it means for New Yorkers in 2010. I also explored the latest iterations of the service cuts which included decisions to rescue some bus lines from the chopping block while saving the M train designation. For more on Student MetroCards, browse through that topic’s archives.

March 24, 2010 7 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Service Cuts

Liveblogging the MTA’s service cuts vote

by Benjamin Kabak March 24, 2010
written by Benjamin Kabak on March 24, 2010

The MTA Board is on the verge of starting their debate and subsequent vote on the service cuts. I’m going to liveblog the hearing. Follow along below.

March 24, 2010 1 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
View from Underground

How we sometimes sit and wait for the subway

by Benjamin Kabak March 24, 2010
written by Benjamin Kabak on March 24, 2010

A glimpse of some very familiar-looking wooden subway benches. (Photo by flickr user nicolasnova)

When I ride from Brooklyn to W. 4th St. to go to class in the mornings, I often encounter a very familiar subway conundrum. Do I sit on the bench to wait for my train or do I walk down the platform so that I’m closer to the exit? If I do the former, I can rest comfortably for a few minutes; if I do the latter, there are no benches for the Manhattan-bound platform has just three benches, all clustered near the staircase.

For New Yorkers, it is a familiar problem. Although our subway stations span three blocks underground, places to sit are few and far between. At those stations with the most foot traffic — Grand Central on the Lexington Ave. IRT comes to mind — only one bench, tucked out of the way, greets weary commuters. Seats are scarce and generally nowhere convenient.

As welcome a sight as these benches often are, there’s something about them that leave them very unappealing at times too. Mostly, the disgust stems from the fact that they are made of wood. It may be treated wood, but it’s also very abused wood. Benches are battered with coffee spills and food stains, with gum and other assorted items left behind and even, at one point, with bedbugs. Used by the homeless for sleeping, the six-seaters — some with backs, some without — are often looked upon with a wary eye.

What if the benches were more alluring and what if, I’ve always wondered, there were more of them? Stainless steel would be more expensive to procure, but it wouldn’t have the same problems as wood. Some stations in New York, such as 2nd Ave., have built-in benches. Around the world, the seats vary. The Paris Metro has molded plastic; the DC Metro sports some unforgiving concrete; the London Underground has something metallic. Or try this one on for size:

Recently, Ikea took underground comfort to a new level when they started outfitting some Paris Metro stations with actual Ikea furniture as part of a system-wide ad campaign. In the City of Lights, you can wait for the train in comfort. Just don’t think too hard about who else sat there before you.

As the MTA Board gears up to approve a series of service cuts later this morning, seats will become both rarer and more precious. Part of the cuts include fewer off-peak trains, and another part increases the load guidelines so that trains are not considered to be 100 percent unless every seat is taken and a quarter of the passengers are standing. In the past, trains were considered full with every seat taken and no one standing.

These cuts will give us more time to sit at our nearest stations, more time to admire or inspect or raise an eyebrow at the MTA’s wooden benches. Sometimes while standing at one end of the platform, I think about how the seats are there only when I don’t want them, and now I think we should enjoy those seats while we can though because once we’re on board those trains, seats will be scarce indeed.

March 24, 2010 9 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Load More Posts

About The Author

Name: Benjamin Kabak
E-mail: Contact Me

Become a Patron!
Follow @2AvSagas

Upcoming Events
TBD

RSS? Yes, Please: SAS' RSS Feed
SAS In Your Inbox: Subscribe to SAS by E-mail

Instagram



Disclaimer: Subway Map © Metropolitan Transportation Authority. Used with permission. MTA is not associated with nor does it endorse this website or its content.

Categories

  • 14th Street Busway (1)
  • 7 Line Extension (118)
  • Abandoned Stations (31)
  • ARC Tunnel (52)
  • Arts for Transit (19)
  • Asides (1,244)
  • Bronx (13)
  • Brooklyn (126)
  • Brooklyn-Queens Connector (13)
  • Buses (291)
  • Capital Program 2010-2014 (27)
  • Capital Program 2015-2019 (56)
  • Capital Program 2020-2024 (3)
  • Congestion Fee (71)
  • East Side Access Project (37)
  • F Express Plan (22)
  • Fare Hikes (173)
  • Fulton Street (57)
  • Gateway Tunnel (29)
  • High-Speed Rail (9)
  • Hudson Yards (18)
  • Interborough Express (1)
  • International Subways (26)
  • L Train Shutdown (20)
  • LIRR (65)
  • Manhattan (73)
  • Metro-North (99)
  • MetroCard (124)
  • Moynihan Station (16)
  • MTA (98)
  • MTA Absurdity (233)
  • MTA Bridges and Tunnels (27)
  • MTA Construction (128)
  • MTA Economics (522)
    • Doomsday Budget (74)
    • Ravitch Commission (23)
  • MTA Politics (330)
  • MTA Technology (195)
  • New Jersey Transit (53)
  • New York City Transit (220)
  • OMNY (3)
  • PANYNJ (113)
  • Paratransit (10)
  • Penn Station (18)
  • Penn Station Access (10)
  • Podcast (30)
  • Public Transit Policy (164)
  • Queens (129)
  • Rider Report Cards (31)
  • Rolling Stock (40)
  • Second Avenue Subway (262)
  • Self Promotion (77)
  • Service Advisories (612)
  • Service Cuts (118)
  • Sponsored Post (1)
  • Staten Island (52)
  • Straphangers Campaign (40)
  • Subway Advertising (45)
  • Subway Cell Service (34)
  • Subway History (81)
  • Subway Maps (83)
  • Subway Movies (14)
  • Subway Romance (13)
  • Subway Security (104)
  • Superstorm Sandy (35)
  • Taxis (43)
  • Transit Labor (151)
    • ATU (4)
    • TWU (100)
    • UTU (8)
  • Triboro RX (4)
  • U.S. Transit Systems (53)
    • BART (1)
    • Capital Metro (1)
    • CTA (7)
    • MBTA (11)
    • SEPTA (5)
    • WMATA (28)
  • View from Underground (447)

Archives

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram

@2019 - All Right Reserved.


Back To Top