Second Ave. Sagas
  • About
  • Contact Me
  • 2nd Ave. Subway History
  • Search
  • About
  • Contact Me
  • 2nd Ave. Subway History
  • Search
Second Ave. Sagas

News and Views on New York City Transportation

Rider Report Cards

The long, slow trek from Coney Island to Jamaica brings home a C-minus

by Benjamin Kabak December 5, 2007
written by Benjamin Kabak on December 5, 2007

Ah, the F train. You know, loyal readers, that I’ve been waiting for this Rider Report Card to show up for a while. The F, you see, the latest recipient of a C-minus grade, is a frequent topic around here.

One of the longest – and slowest – routes in the system, the F starts out at Coney Island and runs, as we know, local, painfully, slowly local up the Culver Line and through Brooklyn. It crosses into Manhattan via the Rutgers St. tunnel before taking the local route up 6th Ave. It crosses into Queens via the 63rd St tunnel with a stop on Roosevelt Island before running express out to 179th St. in Jamaica via Queens Boulevard.

For months, the F has been the focus of Gary Reilly’s advocacy work. With unused express tracks from Jay St on south, the F rides along one of the most underused and overcrowded sections of track in New York City. We’ve tried for months to convince NYCT to run the F as an express and the V as a local out to Church Ave., but four years of construction on the Gowanus Viaduct has rendered this opporunity moot. Instead we’ll just suffer the ails of an overcrowded train.

Gary and I aren’t the only ones bemoaning the F. The 13,000 riders who gave the train a C-minus are right there along with us, and on the top of the list of complains are those same two issues an F express would alleviate: The trains are too crowded and too slow, and they don’t arrive often enough. No kidding.

This time, however, the fix will be easy enough, and NYCT knows it. When the construction is completed, riders on this line will reportedly enjoy express service through parts of Brooklyn. Hopefully, with some trains running express through rapidly-growing population centers in Carroll Garden, Park Slope and Kensington, this line, well under capacity, will see an increase in service across the board as well.

Meanwhile, as to the other top complaints – station quality and the quality of announcements – the F has a long way to go. Old cars with aging public address systems do not lend themselves to intelligible announcements, and with service changes planned for the next few years, this problem will only get worse before it gets better.

What follows are the top ten complaints for another C-minus grade joining a long line of mediocre grades. After the jump, the full grade breakdown.

  1. Reasonable wait times for trains
  2. Adequate room on board at rush hour
  3. Minimal delays during trips
  4. Station announcements that are easy to hear
  5. Train announcements that are easy to hear
  6. Cleanliness of stations
  7. Cleanliness of subway cars
  8. Sense of security in stations
  9. Station announcements that are informative
  10. Sense of security on trains
Continue Reading
December 5, 2007 7 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
7 Line Extension

As the 7 line heads west, Schumer urges a fully-funded project

by Benjamin Kabak December 4, 2007
written by Benjamin Kabak on December 4, 2007

westwardho.jpg

34th St. and 11th Ave. still seems like the middle of nowhere to me. (Source: AP)

We are now in the middle of a golden age of subway expansion. For the second time this year, the MTA celebrated a groundbreaking as city, state and agency officials gathered in the Times Square station to launch the 7 line westward to its eventual new terminus at 34th St. and 11th Ave.

The project, set to be completed in 2014, will cost the city — and not the MTA — an estimated $2.1 billion. Supposedly, this money will come from the tax revenues from the as-yet-realized Hudson Yards development. (For more on that development, check out Curbed’s top-notch coverage.) Officials were, of course, patting each other on the back yesterday.

“My administration is committed to ensuring the vitality of our state’s critical infrastructure as it contributes to fostering continued economic development,” New York’s Governor Eliot Spitzer said. “The transit system is the lifeblood of New York City, and the 7 line extension will bring an underutilized part of the city to life as a vibrant residential and commercial center.”

The Mayor, one of the driving forces behind this extension, spoke well of the project too. “Nothing better exemplifies our commitment to transit oriented development than the fact that we’re providing over $2 billion for the extension of the 7 and working with the MTA and the State to realize this vital component of our development plans,” Mayor Michael Bloomberg said. “The development of the Far West Side simply couldn’t happen without this extension, and because of it we will see this area give rise to a vibrant and exciting neighborhood with needed housing, office space, commercial and cultural venues, and parks and open spaces.”

But what just a minute. As I’ve detailed in the past (here, here, here and here), the 7 line extension we’re getting is not the one we want or need. When the city and the MTA originally agreed to the project, the plans called for a stop at 41st and 10th Ave. and one at 34th St. and 11th. But rising costs quickly scuttled those plans.

The city balked at spending a few hundred more million dollars beyond than the $2.1 billion they had originally planned in spite of an estimated tax windfall of $60 billion from the Hudson Yards development. The MTA proposed a shell station at 41st and 10th that could eventually be turned into a full station when funds were available. When the city tried to force the MTA to cover the cost overruns of such a shell station, the MTA balked, and those plans were simply scuttled. Thus, the city is screwing over a neighborhood and the MTA. Once that work is complete, it will forever be significantly more expensive to build that station.

But as long as the drilling and detailing work is still east of 41st and 10th Ave., there’s hope yet. Enter Senator Chuck Schumer. Over the weekend, Schumer sent a strongly-worded letter to New York leaders urging them to include the second station at 10th and 41st even if that meant cutting down on some of the more useless parts of the planned Hudson Yard development. William Neuman at The Times reports:

Mr. Schumer asked the city to postpone plans for a costly tree-lined pedestrian boulevard west of 10th Avenue and to direct money toward the station project, which was canceled because of escalating costs…[City spokesman John Gallagher] said about $560 million would be spent on land for the first phase of the boulevard and portions of the subway line, including a new station at 34th Street and 11th Avenue…

But in an interview, Senator Schumer said the city still had time to change course. “It seems so obvious that a second rail station is more important than a boulevard for economic development,” he said. “It’s not that the boulevard is a bad thing. It’s just if you’re faced with a choice, when there’s limited funds, you first do the infrastructure.”

I don’t have much to add to what Schumer had to say. The man is completely, 100 percent right. The city, if they’re really expected $60 billion in tax revenue, should be able to fund another subway station on an extension they wanted built in the first place.

While city and MTA officials claim they may yet try to work something out, their responses to questions about potential overruns and future plans were vague at best. Meanwhile, Mayor Bloomberg outright dismissed Schumer. “Senator Schumer is never critical about anything. You must have confused him with someone else,” he said in response to Schumer’s letter. That’s not really the response I would expect from someone who could personally fund this entire 7 line extension.

Meanwhile, as construction goes, so goes politics. I’m sure this groundbreaking isn’t the last time we’ll hear about that stop at 41st St. and 10th. Hopefully, someone will come to their senses about it and just fund the whole thing. The city sure could use it.

December 4, 2007 13 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
AsidesSubway History

Views from a nostalgic weekend

by Benjamin Kabak December 3, 2007
written by Benjamin Kabak on December 3, 2007

Railfans were out in full force this Sunday, trying to capture the first rides of the 2007 holiday Nostalgia Train. For some railfan pictures, check out this gallery. I’ll have my own up after next weekend or the weekend after. [Railfanwindow.com]

December 3, 2007 0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
7 Line ExtensionAsides

7 extension groundbreaking set for 11 a.m.

by Benjamin Kabak December 3, 2007
written by Benjamin Kabak on December 3, 2007

Officials from the MTA and New York City will gather in the Times Square station to break ground on the 7 line extension this Monday. The planned extension, set to be completed by 2014, will see the 7 line terminate at 34th St. and 11th Ave. While plans call for a shell of a station at 41st. and 10th Ave. as well, the future of that station is very much uncertain. [amNew York via The Tracker Blog]

December 3, 2007 0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
MTA EconomicsMTA Politics

Politicians, MTA square off over emergency workers

by Benjamin Kabak December 3, 2007
written by Benjamin Kabak on December 3, 2007

After the London Underground bombings in 2005, the MTA ramped up its emergency preparedness. One of their measures included putting around 100 workers in high-volume stations who were in charge solely of emergency procedures should a calamity befall the subway system.

Two years later, these workers have yet to be put to use, and with other emergency preparedness in place, the MTA wants to eliminate these 100 positions as part of their internal belt-tightening efforts. New York’s politicians, of course, will have nothing of it. We can’t cut emergency workers in a post-9/11 world, now can we? Well, I think we can.

Before we get into that, though, Pete Donohue from The Daily News has more on this story.

The posts at 20 key hubs are no longer needed because NYC Transit – the MTA’s bus and subway division – has improved subway station exits throughout the system, managers claim. “Panic bars” have been installed on locked swinging-door gates that lead to sidewalk stairwells.

Riders can unlock the gates themselves and no longer need token booth clerks to open them up, NYC Transit spokesman Charles Seaton said. The upgrades “add a significant amount of exiting capacity to the system,” he added.

In response, Peter Villone, chairman of the city council’s Public Safety Committee, claimed that the MTA is “jeopardizing the lives of their riders” because, hey, people might be slowed down by those HEET turnstiles which, Mr. Villone, were designed to facilitate rapid egress from subway stations. Common sense has a field day with the city council sometimes.

Now I know many people are wary about eliminating emergency response positions, and this cut would only save the MTA a few million dollars whereas better accountability with regards to the Student MetroCard program could save the MTA $71.5 million. But I think it’s a fine program to cut.

Do we really need 100 extra workers whose only responsibility is to be prepared for an emergency? No. Rather, the MTA should make sure that all of its employees are well versed in emergency response protocols.

It’s not hard to figure out which of the 20 key hubs are staffed. I’m sure Times Square, Penn Station and all of the other insanely crowded stops are on the list. These stations all have plenty of other MTA personnel working there, and these workers should be well trained in case of an emergency. Despite Villone’s calls, we the riders would be just fine in case of an emergency if we were taking instruction from MTA personnel already on the payroll rather than 100 unnecessary workers.

December 3, 2007 1 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Service Advisories

Tightening budgets, MTA proposes permanent bus service changes

by Benjamin Kabak November 30, 2007
written by Benjamin Kabak on November 30, 2007

As part of its effort to shore up their fiscal future, the MTA has released documents that show how some service changes may become permanent. This is but one of the prices we’ll have to pay if promised financial contributions from the state do not become a reality, and a fare hike is avoided.

For now, the MTA is cutting service only on buses during holidays, but in the future, these cuts could spread to affect subway service. That would be a dark day indeed. William Neuman at The Times has more on this story:

Budget documents released this week show that the authority is planning to reduce the number of buses operating on Christmas Eve, Christmas Day, New Year’s Eve, New Year’s Day, Martin Luther King’s Birthday, Thanksgiving Day and the day after Thanksgiving, one of the biggest shopping days of the year…

The service change will save an average of $250,000 per day, amounting to $1.8 million a year. It is part of a series of budget cuts that includes removing all elevator operators from five subway stations in Upper Manhattan. The number of operators staffing the elevators has been a contentious issue in the past amid worries about crime and safety. Because the stations are deep underground, all passengers must use the elevators.

On behalf of the Straphangers, Gene Russianoff expressed his dismay. “I guess we’re getting the coal in our stocking,” the campaign’s staff lawyer for the Straphangers Campaign said.

But Gene, I say, you can’t have it both ways. Either the MTA is fiscally responsible and trims service to free up money for needed expansion and maintenance plans or the MTA is fiscally irresponsible and slides further into debt. While the Authority tends to play fast and loose with numbers sometimes, the reality is pretty clear. They need money to pay off their debts, and if these type of service cuts are the way to go, that’s how it will be until a fare hike or state contributions head the MTA’s way.

So with this sobering news mind, take a look at this weekend’s service changes and think about what could be. We wouldn’t want to see terrible weekend service all the time.

Service alerts are here i press release form and after the jump with the little subway line bullets.

Continue Reading
November 30, 2007 1 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Asides

Complain, and ye shall receive

by Benjamin Kabak November 30, 2007
written by Benjamin Kabak on November 30, 2007

Yesterday, out of frustration, I complained about a long wait during my morning commute. Today, in what I can only assume is a sheer coincidence because I didn’t mention the stop (7th Ave. on the Brighton Line), two NYCT timers were in the station clocking the trains, and what they discovered should not be encouraging. I just missed a B at 9:12 and had to wait until 9:24 for the next one to show up. According to the PDF schedule, these trains should arrive every 8 minutes during the morning rush. Unlike yesterday, a Q showed up in between as it should. Baby steps.

November 30, 2007 2 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Queens

MTA to continue express service after Mets games

by Benjamin Kabak November 30, 2007
written by Benjamin Kabak on November 30, 2007

In its oversight role yesterday, the City Council’s Transportation Committee posed an important question often on the minds of New York’s sports fans: What does the MTA do to accommodate increased ridership during ball games and other special events?

Now, as you might guess, I have some very strong feelings on this matter. For example, the MTA sure doesn’t run extra 2 trains at Grand Concourse-149th St. after Yankee games even though many Yankee fans use that station to get home to the West Side. Up until last year, Mets fans suffered from the same problem. As I wrote in May, the lack of 7 express service from Shea to Manhattan after Mets games was one of the more infuriating aspects of trekking out to Flushing.

Two months after I wrote about that 7 service, the MTA announced a post-game express pilot program. For the duration of the 2007 baseball season, up until that fateful final game for the Mets, New York City Transit offered 7 express service following weekday night games. And it was good.

Today, at that City Council Transportation Committee hearing, Larry Gould, the senior director of operations analysis for NYCT, said that this experimental service will probably continue into 2008 and, according to a report in Newsday, expand. Gould noted that the MTA will look into providing express trains after weekend games as well.

During the hearing, John Liu, committee head, pressed Gould on providing express service after the U.S. Open, and Liu delivered the quote of the year. “I don’t think it’s rocket science here,” Liu said. “You’ve done it for the Mets games. Why not do it for the tennis games?”

Oh, John, it’s not rocket science; it’s MTA scheduling. That can be much harder to comprehend than rocket science.

But, to give NYCT credit, Gould said that the program should encompass the 2008 U.S. Open too. In particular, this is great news for folks leaving the Open at 2 a.m. after matches run long, as they did earlier this year, and great news for all as the MTA is showing a willingness to take full advantage of express service options on existing tracks.

November 30, 2007 0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Subway History

Taking a Nostalgic holiday ride back in time

by Benjamin Kabak November 29, 2007
written by Benjamin Kabak on November 29, 2007

car100.jpg

The R100 is one of a few old cars set to run this month as part of Nostalgia Train along the V line. (Photo courtesy of New York City Transit)

Remember when subway cars had wicker seats and ceiling fans? Well, if you’re under the age of 50, you probably have no idea what I’m talking about, but subway history is going to come alive for a few weeks in December.

Beginning on Sunday, New York City Transit is going to start a five-Sunday run of a Nostalgia Train along the V line between Queens Plaza and Second Ave. You can bet subway watchers and railfans will be out en masse this month snapping photos as often as they can.

According to the MTA, this special holiday Nostalgia Train will run from 10 a.m. to 5 p.m. every Sunday in December along the Sixth Avenue local line. “Holiday shoppers will have the opportunity to experience a ride on a train from another era,” NYCT President Howard Roberts said. “With a little bit of luck and good timing, riders will be able to catch a ride on this classic subway train at stations along the V line between Queens Plaza and Second Avenue.”

The train will feature many cars generally on display at the Transit Museum, and Subchat is already buzzing with anticipation. I’ll be doing some train-hunting one of these weekends.

According to the MTA, this Nostalgia Train is designed to highlight the history of the IND. Among the cars included will be Car No. 100, an R1-type car that was the first of 300 placed in service when the IND opened 75 years ago; Car No. 484, an R4 car that was outfitted with a then-experimental public address system; and Car No. 1575, an original R7 that, after a wreck, served as the prototype to the R10.

Get your cameras ready; bring a book for those long waits on the platforms; and have fun. Nostalgia Train spotting is a great way to experience the subways as they once were.

November 29, 2007 5 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Rider Report Cards

Catching up on the Rider Report Cards

by Benjamin Kabak November 29, 2007
written by Benjamin Kabak on November 29, 2007

With all of the talk recently about fare hikes, I’ve let the Rider Report Card results slide a bit. Well, let’s catch up.

At the end of last week, buried during the Thanksgiving holiday, the MTA released Rider Report Card results for the IND lines. The Eighth Avenue Express, the Eighth Avenue Local and the Rockaway Park Shuttle received their grades. The results were far from impressive.

We begin with the A train. Immortalized in song, the Eighth Avenue Express runs express down Eight Avenue from Inwood in northern Manhattan to the Rockaways via Howard Beach/JFK Airport or, sometimes, to Lefferts Boulevard. It’s quite the run, but the riders aren’t huge fans. The A pulled down a C-minus for its efforts from 6703 riders.

The C train is the A’s lesser cousin. This Eighth Avenue local starts at Washington Heights-168th St. and runs local to Euclid Ave. except between the hours of 11 p.m. and 5:30 a.m. The trains are also shorter than the A trains. The C received an unimpressive D-plus from its 3967 voters.

The Rockaway Park Shuttle reaches from Broad Channel to Rockaway Park-Beach 116 Street. It is one of only two subways in New York – the other being on Staten Island – on which I’ve never ridden, and the 132 graders who give it a a D-plus tell me I’m not missing much.

For the A and the C, the major problems were the same: wait times are unreasonable; delays plague the trips; and room on board at rush hour is scarce. I couldn’t agree more. The A as an express train south of 59th St. is a joke. It takes the same amount of time to go anywhere in a local as it does on the A, and I’ve spent many an evening at 6 p.m. waiting 10-15 minutes for any 8th Ave. IND train to show up.

From a practical purpose, addressing these problems could be tricky. For much of their runs in Manhattan, the A and C are sharing tracks with other trains. The A runs with the D from 145th St. to 59th St., and the C runs with the B from 145th St. to 59th St. and then with the E south of 59th St. to Canal St. Increasing capacity on these lines will require a fair amount of scheduling adjustments.

Top ten complaints are below. Full grades are after the jump.

  1. Reasonable wait times for trains
  2. Minimal delays during trips
  3. Adequate room on board at rush hour
  4. Station announcements that are easy to hear
  5. Cleanliness of stations
  6. Train announcements that are easy to hear
  7. Sense of security on trains
  8. Cleanliness of subway cars
  9. Sense of security in stations
  10. Comfortable temperature in subway cars

  1. Reasonable wait times for trains
  2. Minimal delays during trips
  3. Adequate room on board at rush hour
  4. Station announcements that are easy to hear
  5. Cleanliness of stations
  6. Train announcements that are easy to hear
  7. Sense of security in stations
  8. Cleanliness of subway cars
  9. Sense of security on trains
  10. Station announcements that are informative

  1. Reasonable wait times for trains
  2. Minimal delays during trip
  3. Cleanliness of stations
  4. Sense of security in stations
  5. Cleanliness of subway cars
  6. Sense of security on trains
  7. Lack of scratchitti in subway cars
  8. Train announcements that are easy to hea
  9. Station announcements that are easy to hear
  10. Working elevators and escalators in stations
Continue Reading
November 29, 2007 6 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Load More Posts

About The Author

Name: Benjamin Kabak
E-mail: Contact Me

Become a Patron!
Follow @2AvSagas

Upcoming Events
TBD

RSS? Yes, Please: SAS' RSS Feed
SAS In Your Inbox: Subscribe to SAS by E-mail

Instagram



Disclaimer: Subway Map © Metropolitan Transportation Authority. Used with permission. MTA is not associated with nor does it endorse this website or its content.

Categories

  • 14th Street Busway (1)
  • 7 Line Extension (118)
  • Abandoned Stations (31)
  • ARC Tunnel (52)
  • Arts for Transit (19)
  • Asides (1,244)
  • Bronx (13)
  • Brooklyn (126)
  • Brooklyn-Queens Connector (13)
  • Buses (291)
  • Capital Program 2010-2014 (27)
  • Capital Program 2015-2019 (56)
  • Capital Program 2020-2024 (3)
  • Congestion Fee (71)
  • East Side Access Project (37)
  • F Express Plan (22)
  • Fare Hikes (173)
  • Fulton Street (57)
  • Gateway Tunnel (29)
  • High-Speed Rail (9)
  • Hudson Yards (18)
  • Interborough Express (1)
  • International Subways (26)
  • L Train Shutdown (20)
  • LIRR (65)
  • Manhattan (73)
  • Metro-North (99)
  • MetroCard (124)
  • Moynihan Station (16)
  • MTA (98)
  • MTA Absurdity (233)
  • MTA Bridges and Tunnels (27)
  • MTA Construction (128)
  • MTA Economics (522)
    • Doomsday Budget (74)
    • Ravitch Commission (23)
  • MTA Politics (330)
  • MTA Technology (195)
  • New Jersey Transit (53)
  • New York City Transit (220)
  • OMNY (3)
  • PANYNJ (113)
  • Paratransit (10)
  • Penn Station (18)
  • Penn Station Access (10)
  • Podcast (30)
  • Public Transit Policy (164)
  • Queens (129)
  • Rider Report Cards (31)
  • Rolling Stock (40)
  • Second Avenue Subway (262)
  • Self Promotion (77)
  • Service Advisories (612)
  • Service Cuts (118)
  • Sponsored Post (1)
  • Staten Island (52)
  • Straphangers Campaign (40)
  • Subway Advertising (45)
  • Subway Cell Service (34)
  • Subway History (81)
  • Subway Maps (83)
  • Subway Movies (14)
  • Subway Romance (13)
  • Subway Security (104)
  • Superstorm Sandy (35)
  • Taxis (43)
  • Transit Labor (151)
    • ATU (4)
    • TWU (100)
    • UTU (8)
  • Triboro RX (4)
  • U.S. Transit Systems (53)
    • BART (1)
    • Capital Metro (1)
    • CTA (7)
    • MBTA (11)
    • SEPTA (5)
    • WMATA (28)
  • View from Underground (447)

Archives

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram

@2019 - All Right Reserved.


Back To Top