Feb
17

On the economic lifeblood of New York City

By

Every few months, when the MTA institutes seemingly endless weekend service changes that rob some neighborhoods of their train service, local news outlets feature stories on the economic impact of the subway service reductions. Every few months, I’m reminded of how New Yorkers take the subway system for granted and how truly important it is for the city’s economy.

This month, we have two stories from two different neighborhoods. DNA Info highlights how the L train service changes impact Brooklyn businesses. Foot traffic is always done when the L train doesn’t run, and even though merchants know the service cuts are for technological upgrades, it doesn’t help ease the pain.

Daniel Squadron, the State Senator who represents the area, has asked the MTA to make sure the diversions are only when necessary. “Good coordination, communication and planning can help make the effects less damaging for businesses and communities,” he said to DNA Info. “This is the first step, organizing businesses together to identify solutions for mitigating the effects.”

Meanwhile, business owners in Long Island City are living through a lengthy 7 line outage, and they’re suffering as well. Right now, we’re amidst a stretch without the 7 serving the area until April, and Transit says it will happen again for six weekends after baseball season ends. “It happens every year,” one restaurant manager said. “So we’ve been dealing with it for the last nine years.”

New businesses too are noticing the impact. A new comedy club in Long Island City says that advanced sales are down when the subway is out. People who would otherwise make the trip from Manhattan do not care to add a longer walk or a shuttle bus ride to their journey. His compromise is to refund those who do come $2.25, the price of their ride. “If the MTA is going to give us a middle finger, we might as well fight back with ours,” Steve Hofstetter, the club owner, said.

Now, none of this should come as a surprise. After all, a city of 8 million with its central business district an island wouldn’t be able to function without the subway system. The city wouldn’t be as vast and as powerful if millions didn’t have relatively quick and efficient ways to get around. The subway is the lifeblood of the city’s economy.

Yet, oftentimes, complaints and not appreciation are the norm. We want better service, cleaner stations, fewer problems. We want cheaper fares and faster construction. We want the system to be better so we don’t have to worry as much about our travel options. None of these desires are wrong, and if anything, they show how New Yorkers want more out of their transit system. More though requires political and economic support. Without a voice fighting for the subways and without the proper mix of subsidies that spur on growth, we’re left with a system that will sag under its age.

Whether New Yorkers care to recognize it or not, the city is what it is because of the subways. Perhaps it was dumb luck that got us here, and we’ve sort of stalled as the subway system hasn’t expanded in decades. But we need look no further than businesses that suffer when the subway isn’t running to appreciate the impact public transit has on our city. It may not always be pretty, but we’d be lost without it.



12 Responses to “On the economic lifeblood of New York City”

  1. Andrew says:

    With CBTC installation having just started, those 7 line businesses are going to have to get used to the outages.

    According to the article, there’s a push to have the shuttle buses stay on Jackson rather than divert under the el. I’ve never understood why it doesn’t run on Jackson.

    I don’t understand Xhelili’s commute: “To get to LIC from her home in Midwood, she normally takes the Q through Manhattan, then transfers to the 7 at Times Square. Now, she explained, she has to switch from the Q to the N, which she takes to Queens Plaza, and then transfer to a shuttle bus to Vernon Boulevard, a commute which has taken as long as two hours.” Normally during 7 shutdowns, the Q is extended to Queens, so she doesn’t need to transfer to the N. And when the Q isn’t running north of Prospect Park, the 7 outage is the least of her worries. Could she take a bus or the F to the G instead?

    • Alon Levy says:

      Wouldn’t it be nice if the G connected Atlantic/Pacific to QBP?

      More seriously, the G isn’t too useful (terrible headways), and it’s entirely possible Xhelili lives too far from the F. It’s also possible that the shuttle bus really is that slow. I doubt the Q/N transfer is the real problem – it adds just a few minutes when the Q is not extended, and could be just a worst-case scenario.

      • Andrew says:

        There’s no Q/N transfer. When the Q is running in Manhattan, it’s extended to Astoria when the 7 is out. The catch now is that, due to work on the upper Brighton line, the Q isn’t running north of Prospect Park. That’s the outage that’s really hurting her, and that’s why I suggested that she avoid the Brighton line, if possible.

  2. BrooklynBus says:

    You didn’t link this articlehttp://www.brooklynpaper.com/stories/35/8/dtg_ltrainerror_2012_02_24_bk.html where the MTA admitted they sent too few shuttle buses to serve L train riders. Looking to cut costs in a way that screws the customers is not the way to go. That type of poor planning is inexcusable. The MTA keeps forgeting that the riders’ needs should come before the budget.

  3. Mistral says:

    No offense, but you could really do to work on the proofreading a little…

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. […] on the Network today: Second Avenue Sagas explores just how important the subway system is to New York City’s economy. Orphan Road […]

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>