Home View from Underground Lead, follow and get out of the way

Lead, follow and get out of the way

by Benjamin Kabak

I found myself on Monday afternoon at around 1:15 p.m. confronted with a daunting task. I had to walk from 50th St. between 6th and 7th Aves. to the corner of 44th St. and Broadway. I could skirt pedestrian traffic until 48th St. by using some of the midtown mid-block cut-throughs, but that still left me with three blocks on Broadway before the glorious pedestrian plaza began.

And so I readied myself for a mash of gawking tourists, slow-moving folks ambling through Times Square and workers on their lunch breaks scurrying to and fro. It was a mostly beautiful, disorganized, urban mess of pedestrians, and all was going well until those slow-moving folk became too much. At a certain point, I could have either shoved some people out of the way or come to a dead spot until the congestion cleared. It was then that the sidewalk rage set in.

The concept is a simple one, as Shirley Wang of the Wall Street Journal explored earlier this week. Behavioral scientists have discovered that pedestrians can suffer from the walking version of road rage. She writes:

Researchers say the concept of “sidewalk rage” is real. One scientist has even developed a Pedestrian Aggressiveness Syndrome Scale to map out how people express their fury. At its most extreme, sidewalk rage can signal a psychiatric condition known as “intermittent explosive disorder,” researchers say. On Facebook, there’s a group called “I Secretly Want to Punch Slow Walking People in the Back of the Head” that boasts nearly 15,000 members.

Some researchers are even studying the dynamics that trigger such rage and why some people remain calm in hopes of improving anger-management treatments and gaining insights into how emotions influence decision making, attention and self control…

Signs of a sidewalk rager include muttering or bumping into others; uncaringly hogging a walking lane; and acting in a hostile manner by staring, giving a “mean face” or approaching others too closely, says Leon James, a psychology professor at the University of Hawaii who studies pedestrian and driver aggression.

For the cool-headed, sidewalk rage may seem incomprehensible. After all, it seems simple enough to just go around the slow individual. Why then are some people, even those who greet other obstacles with equanimity, so infuriated by unhurried fellow pedestrians?

The article delves into the psychology of sidewalk strollers. The people who want to go faster get unnecessarily annoyed at those walking too slow, and while Wang and the scientists she spoke with seem to want to graft anger management issues on to everyone annoyed with someone moving slowly, I’ve always thought it’s a matter of human nature and selfishness.

We want to get where we’re going at our pace, and we expect walking to be orderly. Fast people on the left; slow people on the right. Don’t walk four across; don’t stop suddenly. It’s common decency. Yet, we don’t see aboveground, and we don’t see it underground.

Although Wang’s story focuses on the city’s streets, the findings in her piece are equally applicable underground. While walking from the lower level platforms at West 4th to the exit every day, I see disorder on the staircases. People who can barely mount the 16 steps hover on the left while other slow walkers climb up the right. Those wishing to leave with haste can fend for themselves in the middle or huff in the back. The drama plays out at every staircase and even on the climb to street level. Slower walkers do not adhere to the rule of the right.

It would be easy to generalize this behavior. Perhaps the selfishness of speed is why straphangers blast music out of leaky headphones, why they take up too many seats and why they litter throughout the subway. The researchers Wang speaks to suggest looking up and staying calm. That’s always good advice for a frustrating walk through the subway system too.

You may also like

45 comments

Jason February 17, 2011 - 7:41 am

I suffer from this rage, frequently. It is truly rage, but really tourists don’t bother me nearly as much as people who are purposely inconsiderate because they feel their lives are the center of the universe.

My list:

1.) Ghetto strollers – Those who “walk” as slow as possible simply just to strut. They are fully aware that others are held up behind them,but are too “tough” and “street” to give a damn. This has led me to almost physically throwing someone out of the way simply because they couldn’t give any less of a damn about anyone but themselves.
a.) A subset of this group are those who must, MUST block the entire entrance to anything (subway mostly) and have a conversation, whether be face to face or on a phone despite the very glaring fact that they are inconviencing and annoying everyone. The rage must be supressed here as well, but now ive taken to just calling them out on it,..i just dont care anymore.

2.)Stairways/Escalators: I live off the IND 181 station. It is quite deep and my exit is at 181 itself. Your choice is one escalator (the other is always broken) or a 3-4 story climb. I never take the escalator due to rage of seeing someone young (though not always the case, but usually the majority) just stand there and block everyone from moving up and be fully aware of it to boot. Let me add, these escalators are essentially single-file so passing someone is hard to do and it also operates extremely slowly for whatever reason.

3.) Lower down, but still annoying are the 3-4 across walkers and the stroller-nazis whose self-importance is only matched by their delusion that giving birth is somehow an act that elevates them above the rest of us.

Reply
Edward February 17, 2011 - 9:18 am

Wow. Ever try saying “excuse me, please”? I find about 95% on NYers and tourists respond pretty well to a simple, polite request to move.

As far as Times Square Ben, I can remember a day in the not-too-distant past when you could throw a rock down 42nd St between 7th and 8th and not hit anyone. I like Times Square better this way.

In the end, where exactly are we all going that an extra 5 mins will kill us? If there’s anyone out there with inflated self-importance, it’s usually the one complaining about all the OTHER people in the way. If you’re walking thru Times Square, you’re part of the crowd blocking someone else from walking even faster than you!

Reply
Cap'n Transit February 17, 2011 - 9:23 am

Yes, smartypants, I’ve tried saying “excuse me, please.” There are some assholes who will ignore that. What do you do about them?

Reply
Edward February 17, 2011 - 9:30 am

How about walking around them? A little less anger goes a long way in this town. BTW, the question was for Jason. You can keep your negative language for the smartypants on the escalator who doesn’t get out of your way fast enough–though I doubt you’d ever say a peep, you’d just seethe with rage and then post about it on SAS!

Reply
Jason February 17, 2011 - 11:44 am

“How about walking around them?”

Jeez, now why didn’t i think of that?

George February 17, 2011 - 12:52 pm

It seems to me that you have some website rage! You seem quite the self-righteous douchebag who I would have to pass in the street. Get out of your bubble, man. Stop thinking you’re better than all of us! DISGUSTING!!!!!

Jason February 17, 2011 - 1:17 pm

If what I wrote above directly applies to you, please help yourself to present your side of why you think its okay to such behavoir. Insulting my viewpoint is pretty weak.

If you have nothing to prove, please DIAF

John Paul N. February 17, 2011 - 1:39 pm

I think George was replying to Edward…

Edward February 17, 2011 - 2:07 pm

I think not. My posting didn’t contain phrases like “stroller Nazi” and “ghetto strollers”. Wouldn’t call my posting asking folks to be more patient a case of “website rage.”

Edward February 17, 2011 - 2:20 pm

Then again, maybe he IS railing against me. Man, if I’m the most disgusting, negative person you’ve ever seen on the Internet, then you don’t get online much! Asking folks to take a breath and say “excuse me” if someone’s blocking their way. What a disgusting Nazi I’ve become!

If I wanted this kind of angry banter, I could have signed on to Gothamist.

Benjamin Kabak February 17, 2011 - 2:22 pm

I think everyone needs a time out. Everyone relax. No need to get so angry.

Edward February 17, 2011 - 2:36 pm

Agreed Ben. Gonna get offline for a few and talk a nice slow walk on this gorgeous day 🙂

Scott E February 17, 2011 - 9:45 am

Yank their cellphone away from their ear. Then maybe they’ll hear you.

Reply
Edward February 17, 2011 - 9:51 am

Or maybe they’ll stab you or punch you in the face. You try it first, let me know how that works for ya 🙂

Spencer K February 17, 2011 - 10:34 am

I dunno what town you live in, but there are some seriously inconsiderate and oblivious people who live and work in NYC. I’ve tried “Excuse me” when they’re literally blocking the way, and get the “don’t bother me turn of the shoulder”. The only thing to do is push through. It’s rude, but not nearly as rude as being treated like your time and existence is less important than theirs.

It’s happened more than once, and the act gets old quick.

Bolwerk February 17, 2011 - 10:40 am

It sounds trite, but people who just stop on the sidewalk really are obnoxious. I consciously try to “pull over” on the sidewalk out of courtesy for those behind me.

Edward February 17, 2011 - 10:41 am

I live in NYC and try not to think I’m so important that 8,000,000 people should move out of my way because I’m in such a rush. Nine times out of ten, the people I say “excuse me” to actually move.

Maybe it’s the tone you’re using and not the actual words. There’s a big difference between saying “excuse me” in a polite tone, and yelling “EXCUSE ME PLEEEEEEZZZEE!!!” as if the person walking in front of you is a complete a-hole who should not exist on planet Earth.

George February 17, 2011 - 12:55 pm

Why is it that everyone on this site understands this message pretty well but you seem to be the only NYer who isn’t bothered by it! Stop dictating to people how to live and go for a relaxing walk on 34th Street. You’re the most negative human being I’ve ever encountered on a website. DISGUSTING!!!!!!

Jason February 17, 2011 - 1:18 pm

WTF is a relaxing walk on 34th street?

George February 17, 2011 - 4:00 pm

Jason I was not in any way shape or form responding to you; I think you’re quite a good guy. I was replying to Mr. Self-Righteous Edward who should take a non-relaxing walk on 34th St and come back and tell us he didn’t push people out of the way. Sorry for the misunderstanding!

Jason February 17, 2011 - 11:45 am

This^^^^

Jason February 17, 2011 - 11:41 am

No, i’m not that important and neither are they. That was the whole crux of my post, that inconsiderate people who for one reason or another deem themselves more important than the other 8 million people here, cause frustration and then rage. And their lack of any self-awarenss is a crap excuse for being inconsiderate when you live in such a large city, hence my point that i’m not really annoyed by tourists but more so my fellow citizens.

Also, in the age of shrinking budgets and jobs, being late is a big deal.

Reply
DJ February 17, 2011 - 1:09 pm

I’d love to hear Jason’s definition of a “stroller nazi”. Does anyone who has a stroller qualify? One might think he sprang from a tree instead of a mom. I further wonder if he would have given his own mother a look of scorn or disapproval for daring to bring a baby on mass transit, or *gasp*, push one in a stroller down the sidewalk. Hide them away! Lock your babies up in closets until they’re old enough to walk precisely according to the standards of Jason!! What a self-centered, judgmental jackass. It must be a constant source of anxiety for him to live amongst us plebs who don’t know how to do things like *walk* as well as he does. Or maybe his jeans are just on too tight.

Reply
Jason February 17, 2011 - 1:23 pm

Pretty sure my mother wasn’t hitting other peds on the sidewalk while pushing me around the city and then giving scornful looks to those who she just injured.

Protip: Need to know what a stroller nazi is? Get out of YOUR bubble and check out park slope, chelsea, or any other overly-gentrified area in this city.

And FFS, improve your reading comprehension.

Reply
Andrew February 20, 2011 - 9:25 am

My mother never took me in a stroller on the subway – that would have been rude. If we were going to ride the subway, she carried me. Strollers were for strolling. And since she wasn’t simultaneously using her iPhone, she was aware of her surroundings.

Reply
Hank February 17, 2011 - 1:49 pm

Agreed completely. 1(a) is possibly the most annoying group of all. Some giant slowing subway loading by times because he is obstructing half the door almost begs for the elbow.

I would add a fourth category: The fatty in the middle. On side streets, these obese people position themselves perfectly in the middle of the sidewalk, making passing them in either direction ridiculously difficult.

Reply
Streetsblog New York City » Today’s Headlines February 17, 2011 - 9:14 am

[…] New Yorkers Could Really Use More Sidewalk Space (2nd Ave Sagas) […]

Reply
BrooklynBus February 17, 2011 - 10:10 am

You will find the older you get, the more patience you will have and slow people in front of you won’t be so annoying. Instead you will be asking yourself the question, what could be so important that that guy or woman is in such a hurry?

Reply
Andrew February 20, 2011 - 9:27 am

I’m glad you’re never in a rush, but not everyone is so fortunate. If you’re not in a rush, why don’t you step to the side so that the people who are can get where they’re going?

Reply
Bolwerk February 17, 2011 - 10:17 am

I’m less patient with the meanderers when I’m in a rush.

And yes, there simply isn’t enough sidewalk space. Paradoxically, it seems there often is often less in the places that need it most – perhaps because planners of yore thought these were the places that most desperately needed curbside parking.

Reply
BrooklynBus February 17, 2011 - 1:18 pm

You always have it in for parking. Before you eliminate it, first get rid of all the sidewalk vendors on congested sidewalks. They have no business being there.

Reply
VLM February 17, 2011 - 1:25 pm

Things that add to vibrant urban street life: sidewalk vendors. Things that don’t: parked cars. It’s really quite simple. If parked cars are your thing, head to the mall. People walking along commercial streets in New York City shouldn’t suffer from seeing 2000 pounds of hulking metal taking up space that should be theirs.

Reply
Hank February 17, 2011 - 1:53 pm

You and Bolwerk hit the nail on this one. The MTA should offer more pay lots outside of the City so less cars infest the streets and take up space. While more real estate will not stop the sidewalk inanity, it will certainly help.

Reply
Bolwerk February 17, 2011 - 5:05 pm

I don’t even think it’s necessary to have pay lots. Simply price the parking available at a rate that guarantees there is always a space available on a given stretch of block. The only debate then is how much space should be used for parking and how much for other (perhaps non-automotive) purposes.

BrooklynBus February 17, 2011 - 5:32 pm

Many people don’t take the train because they don’t live near one and the bus is too slow and unreliable. Also, once they get in their car, the temptation is to stay in it. The solution is park and ride lots at major subway stations that are reasonably priced. So instead of building them, DOT is trying to sell off all the municipal lots and add more commercial space with expensive private parking causing more congestion.

Look at the lot at the Sheepshead Bay Station at Voorhies Avenue. First of all, most of the spaces are short term for the merchants. Only one-third of the lot (about 20 spaces) are for more than three hours. Although the cost is about $12 for 8 hours in addition to your subway fare, all the spots are taken by 7AM. On street parking is virtually impossible and there is demand for several hundred spots.

But no one is proposing more park and ride lots or at least kiss and ride spots which don’t even exist in NY. The municipal lot in Flushing is being replaced more development and expensive private parking. No one is even considering an underground bus terminal at that location, sorely needed to reduce traffic congestion in Flushing. DOT’s solution is to convert Main and Union Streets to one-way to encourage double parking.

Andrew February 20, 2011 - 9:30 am

Why should the MTA be in the parking business? Let private firms fill that role.

BrooklynBus February 17, 2011 - 5:34 pm

But they don’t belong at congested intersections. It is probably not even legal for them to be there, but a few bucks to the cops goes a long way. They need to be regulated and put in areas away from congestion. You shouldn’t have to step in the street to get around them.

Reply
Bolwerk February 17, 2011 - 1:34 pm

That’s because parking is always the least productive activity in the city. Such space should be reserved for loading and trips where a car is necessary rather than optional, which can be done through pricing. Sidewalk vendors actually provide a service to people besides themselves, though I suppose they should be on the street rather than a congested sidewalk.

Reply
Andrew February 20, 2011 - 9:38 am

Also, parking probably consumes thousands of times more street space than vendors do. The elephant in the room is parking.

For starters, I recommend that the city consider, on a case-by-case basis, replacing curbside parking with sidewalk extensions on streets adjacent to subway station entrances, to better handle the flow of pedestrians to and from the subway. In many cases, those streets already have wide sidewalks, but in other cases they don’t, and the narrow sidewalks are often congested.

Reply
Phil February 17, 2011 - 10:53 am

New MTA budget solution: fine slow people who hold up pedestrian flow on stairs (and especially escalators, stand on right, walk on left) and stopping when they enter the train.

But seriously, slow-moving people pose problems for others in a similar way that a car moving 50mph on a highway is dangerous to those going 65+. Since the majority of people are moving at a relatively quick pace, their relative view is that others are keeping up with that momentum. In turn, they judge movement and subconsciously determine distance from others so that this momentum is preserved. When slower pedestrians interrupt this flow, it can result in injury, increased congestion on sidewalks, and general frustration. It seems unfair to me at least to label those who wish to travel competently at normal, rather than slow, speeds as “selfish.” If anything, the least selfish people are those who use the subway the most, follow unwritten common sense/etiquette such as letting people off before getting on and moving inwards, and keep their iPod volume low.

I know that in London this was solved (or is going to be solved soon) on Oxford Street through the use of a fast-walking lane, in essence the first separation of foot traffic depending on relative speed. The problem here is that one may argue that sidewalks should be open to all pedestrians or simply that people won’t pay attention.

Reply
Bolwerk February 17, 2011 - 1:38 pm

slow-moving people pose problems for others in a similar way that a car moving 50mph on a highway is dangerous to those going 65+.

There is no comparison. A 4-ton object hitting another 4-ton object at a net speed of 25mph [and then, in worst-case scenarios, having the potential to careen out of control into a bunch of other similar objects, causing an accident of cascade of accidents that have a net impact speed of ~65mph] is in no way similar to bumping into a slow-moving choad on the sidewalk. The slow-moving choad is simply annoying, maybe obnoxious and selfish (or maybe just disabled or something).

Okay, so, maybe it does in rare cases result in minor injury. It has a very low probability of even causing that, and virtually none of causing a violent death (unless someone happens to run into me before I’ve had my morning coffee or something).

Reply
Phil February 17, 2011 - 2:42 pm

I wasn’t trying to be literal, I was just making the point that not moving at a speed consistent with others is not only a nuisance but could have unintended consequences. If you’re going to stop or walk slowly on the sidewalk, go closest to the building and leave room for others moving at a faster pace. The same principle works on highways (keep to the right unless passing).

Reply
pea-jay February 17, 2011 - 11:46 am

Reminds me of this ImproveEverywhere piece on “Tourist Lanes”

Reply
Kevin Walsh February 18, 2011 - 10:15 am

Jeez, if there’s someone in my way on the sidewalk, I just go around them, or wait till they move. Sometimes I’M the one on the sidewalk with the camera, BTW in my activities with Forgotten NY. Never been a big deal to me.

Pedestrian rage is no better than road rage.

My rage is restricted to idiots on bicycles who nearly brain me when they ride against traffic and blow through a red signal; I just have to accept this as the way of things. I don’t accept TA and Streetsblog’s attempts to ally pedestrians and bicyclists against motorists: I consider both the enemy when on foot. On a bike, I follow the traffic regs like the sucker I am, but that’s another subject.

Reply
Andrew February 20, 2011 - 9:40 am

The problem is when it’s impossible to go around them, because they stopped in a stupid place. If you step to the side to let people by, and you avoid stopping in constrained areas, I don’t think you’ll get many complaints.

Reply

Leave a Comment