Home Second Avenue Subway The Yorkshire Towers Edition of Great Moments in MTA Statements

The Yorkshire Towers Edition of Great Moments in MTA Statements

by Benjamin Kabak

The staircases at Entrance 2 have been designed to minimize passenger flow in front Yorkshire Towers by siphoning riders away from the active driveway.

Despite losing one law suit over the 86th St. station entrance locations and getting threatened with legal sanctions over a second, the Yorkshire Towers Tenants Association is at it again. This time, the Tenants Association has proposed a sidewalk bump-out and entrance at the corner of 2nd Ave. and 86th St. rather than a mid-block entrance that will better serve the entire neighborhood. “This will be the 86th Street lemon,” Doron Gopstein, head of the association, said.

The MTA, which recently announced the winning bid for the final contract for the 86th St. station, is fed up with these machinations, and in a statement to DNA Info, a spokesman expressed the agency’s frustration. “Enough,” the MTA said in a statement. “There is a reason why their first lawsuit was dismissed and why a judge threatened sanctions against their attorney for filing a similar, frivolous lawsuit. The MTA has no interest in delaying a project that will benefit hundreds of thousands of New Yorkers in order to appease the parochial self-interests of a select few.”

Remember: Some residents of Yorkshire Towers are protesting station entrances that direct passengers away from the building’s curb-cut driveway that fronts East 86th St. They’re protesting a subway station that will finally serve thousands of Upper East Side residents. They’re bringing up legal costs and engaging in maneuvers that could further delay construction. Parochial self-interests indeed.

You may also like

21 comments

Phillip Roncoroni June 18, 2013 - 6:24 pm

Robert Moses would’ve demolished the entire building if they tried this nonsense.

Reply
BBnet3000 June 18, 2013 - 6:27 pm

Doubt it. He was quite often willing to bend to the interests of a few rich or influential people (but never hundreds or thousands of poor or even middle class).

Reply
tacony palmyra June 19, 2013 - 9:30 am

The tenants who live in this building aren’t, on average, all that rich. It’s a pretty solidly middle to upper-middle class area. Remember that the rich and influential live in townhouses between 5th and Lex. They don’t slum it in big garish rental buildings on 2nd Ave. (And before the Yorkshire Towers were built the site was probably occupied by a bunch of run-down tenements where mostly elderly working class German-Americans held on as their neighborhood dispersed… 86th and 2nd hasn’t really ever been the land of the genteel.)

Reply
BruceNY June 19, 2013 - 12:57 pm

Ah, you must be referring to the rich & influential residents residing on 69th Street & Lexington Avenue who are trying to thwart plans to open a second entrance at the 68th St. stop on the 6 train.

Reply
Rob June 19, 2013 - 2:24 pm

Great comment; thanks!

Reply
Spendmore Wastemore June 18, 2013 - 6:53 pm

Hm. Doesn’t the city need a homeless shelter/drug rehab crash pad right around 86th & 2nd? If not, perhaps it’s time to place a few in Yorkville Towers just in case.

Amazing what you can do with eminent domain …

Reply
Alon Levy June 19, 2013 - 2:49 pm

You know who else said that? George Lucas. Not quite as bad as Hitler, but on the other hand Triumph of the Will was better cinema than The Phantom Menace.

Reply
D.R. Graham June 18, 2013 - 6:53 pm

Wow. Surprised to see the MTA get tough in a publicly released statement.

Reply
JJJJ June 18, 2013 - 6:56 pm

Thats a nice building theyve got there. Shame if anything were to happen to it.

Reply
Miles Bader June 18, 2013 - 7:21 pm

Just force them to close the driveway (what kind of idiot wastes space on a driveway in Manhattan?!) and build a public park instead. That’ll drive them insane

Reply
Roxie June 18, 2013 - 7:54 pm

a PARK? you mean with BENCHES? but then BUMS might show up! BUMS! OH THE HORROR!!!

Reply
Terratalk June 18, 2013 - 9:16 pm

and people will walk their dogs in front of the building and leave poop all over …

(and I like Kid Twist’s comment about Citibike racks below … LOL!)

Reply
Roxie June 18, 2013 - 8:00 pm

its really nice to see the MTA putting its foot down and being assertive about this. tbh if it were me i would be countersuing for wasted time and effort

Reply
Kid Twist June 18, 2013 - 8:52 pm

How cool would it be if the building’s residents woke up one morning to find a Citibike rack stretching across their driveways?

Reply
Jerrold June 18, 2013 - 11:30 pm

This is the absolute STUPIDEST nimby action that I have ever heard of.
They will have the convenience of a subway entrance right in front of their building, and they are bitching about it. Imagine in bad weather, being able to come out of your building and walk right down the subway stairs.

Reply
Miles Bader June 19, 2013 - 12:16 am

See also “Rabinowitz, Dorothy”…

http://live.wsj.com/video/opin.....D8D4D.html

Reply
JJ June 19, 2013 - 9:20 am

Way too funny
Sounds like Obama stooges ramming legislation down their throats …” it’s for your own good ” … “oh , by the way , your taxes and costs are going up too ”

Middle Class = bend-over

Reply
Benjamin Kabak June 19, 2013 - 9:33 am

Bend over and take this subway we’ve been planning for decades? It’s not all about politics. At a certain point, it’s about telling a bunch of people who’ve lost a lawsuit and were involved in the planning stages for years to cram it.

Reply
Terratalk June 20, 2013 - 10:53 pm

How about a little delayed devine retribution … just got an email saying the west side of the Yorkshire driveway will be closed for four weeks starting June 24th to dig the west opening and when they are done digging on the west side then they will close the east side of the driveway to dig the other opening … I love it! LOL! 🙂

Reply
Ned June 19, 2013 - 9:00 pm

JJ, reading your comment has caused me to lose intelligence. Kindly, Ned

Reply
llqbtt June 19, 2013 - 4:22 pm

On fifth(?) thought, Yorkshire Towers should demand SAS go on 1 Ave between 88 St & 84 St. Now why haven’t they sued for that 1?

Reply

Leave a Comment