Mar
11

ARC legal fees beginning to mount

By

As Gov. Chris Christie fights with the federal government for the right to keep $271 million earmarked for the ARC Tunnel, the state’s legal bill is beginning to mount. After just one month on the job, D.C. firm Patton Boggs had billed New Jersey Transit $330,000 for the effort. “NJ Transit’s budget contains funds for legal and other such expenses and this will come out of that,” Paul Wyckoff, agency spokesman, said. “There are hundreds of millions of dollars at stake here. This is certainly, we feel, worth the best legal effort we can produce. Patton Boggs is a highly regarded, highly professional firm that is working to save state taxpayers money as efficiently as possible.”

New Jersey politicians who have fought with Christie over the ARC cancellation since Day One again lobbed grenades toward the governor. “I’m not suggesting the state shouldn’t have counsel. I hope the state wins,” John Wisniewski, chairman of the state assembly’s Transportation Committee, said. “But $333,281 — there are lots of good lawyers in New Jersey that don’t charge $485 an hour.”

If New Jersey thinks it has a valid case to make for those federal dollars, the state has every right to employ outside counsel to do so, and Wisniewski has every right to complain about the fees. Ultimately, though, if they get to keep any of the $271 million, the $330,000 a month will be but a drop in the bucket. Still, the attempts to keep the money seem to be garnering more attention than the efforts to build a new cross-Hudson rail tunnel, and that’s not helping anyone in the region.



Categories : ARC Tunnel, Asides

7 Responses to “ARC legal fees beginning to mount”

  1. Donald says:

    I wonder if Christie had any financial or personal connections to the DC law firm while he was US Attorney. I see red flags. Christie gave a lucrative contract to John Ashcroft (who hired him) so I would not be surprised to see a shady deal.

  2. Al D says:

    Ben, if I may be so bold, in a recent article, you quoted a percent acceptable amount of legal fees to risk in the instance where MTA wants to un-negotiate certain financial provisions of it’s contract with the union. Would that same standard not apply here?

  3. Christopher says:

    Last night when I was at 6 Ave station I noticed the signs for the H&M tunnels… and thought: That’s it! Ditch the name PATH, go back to calling the Hudson and Manhattan and get H&M to sign a multi-year naming rights deal!

    You’re welcome New Jersey.

  4. Donald says:

    I don’t see how a state can try to keep money the feds gave them and want back. Can’t the feds just deduct $271 million from any future aid they give to NJ?

    • SEAN says:

      Why not. Anyone who gets SSI needs to be mindful of how much is in their bank account. If you have over $2,000 & the SSA finds out, not only will payments stop you will need to pay back ALL moneys recieved before payments resume.

    • Nathanael says:

      Yes, the Feds can do exactly that.

  5. I’m glad I found you on Google. I’ll be sure to bookmark you, and thanks for the info!

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>